Neither takers nor makers: The Big-4 auditing firms as regulatory intermediaries

Abstract

What are regulatory intermediaries? What roles do regulatory intermediaries play? What is the basis of their regulatory capacity and authority? This article examines these questions by focusing on the Big-4 international audit firms in the context of harmonizing international financial reporting standards. I argue that regulatory intermediaries perform a variety of regulatory market failure correcting functions for both regulatory makers and takers. Intermediation is far from being secondary to the regulatory process, and intermediaries, particularly those of transnational nature, have a pivotal role. Furthermore, regulatory intermediaries, as exemplified in the case of the Big-4, continuously challenge the primacy of the state, and the division of labor and balance of power between regulatory actors. Regulatory entrepreneurship and activism, coupled with unique organizational model based on global networks of partnerships, have led to the ascension of the Big-4 to unprecedented regulatory and market powers.

Keywords

Big-4 IFRS regulatory intermediaries standard-setting

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbott

Snidal

(2000) Hard and soft law in international governance. International Organization 54(3): 421–456.

Abbott

Genschel

Snidal

Zangl

(2015) International Organizations as Orchestrators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) (1964) Professional Accounting in 25 Countries. Washington, DC: AICPA.

Albrecht

(2008) Bob Jensen–IFRS critic. Available at: http://profalbrecht.wordpress.com/2008/11/10/dave-albrecht-ifrs-critic/ (accessed 7 February 2019).

Allen

Ramanna

Roychowdhury

(2013) The auditing oligopoly and lobbying on accounting standards. Working paper 13-054. Boston, MA: Accounting & Management Unit, Harvard Business School.

Baskerville

Hay

(2010) The impact of globalization on professional accounting firms: Evidence from New Zealand. Accounting History 15(3): 285–308.

Baudot

Demek

Huang

(2018) The accounting profession’s engagement with accounting standards: Conceptualizing accounting complexity through Big 4 comment letters. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 37(2): 175–196.

Bengtsson

(2011) Repoliticalization of accounting standard setting – The IASB, the EU and the global financial crisis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 22(6): 567–580.

Beresford

(2001) Congress looks at accounting for business combinations. Accounting Horizons 15(1): 73–86.

10.

Big-4 (2013) The 2012 big four firms performance analysis. Available at: http://ww1.prweb.com/prfiles/2013/01/09/10318670/The%202012%20Big%20Four%20Firms%20Performance%20Analysis.pdf (accessed 19 August 2019).

11.

Botzem

(2012) The Politics of Accounting Regulation: Organizing Transnational Standard Setting in Financial Reporting. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

12.

Botzem

Quack

(2006) Contested rules and shifting boundaries: International standard-setting in accounting. In: Djelic

M-L

Sahlin-Andersson

(eds) Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 266–286.

13.

Botzem

Quack

(2009) (No) limits to Anglo-American accounting? Reconstructing the history of the International Accounting Standards Committee: A review article. Accounting, Organizations and Society 34(8): 988–998.

14.

Boys

(2005) What’s in a name: Firms’ simplified family trees on the web. Available at: http://www.icaew.com/index.cfm/route/155661/icaew_ga/en/Home/About_us/History_of_accounting/What_s_in_a_name_Firms_simplified_family_trees_on_the_web (accessed 1 October 2017).

15.

Bratton

(2007) Private standards, public governance: A new look at the Financial Accounting Standards Board. Boston College Law Review 48(5): 5–53.

16.

Camfferman

Zeff

(2007) Financial Reporting and Global Capital Markets: A History of the International Accounting Standards Committee, 1973–2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

17.

Centre for Responsive Politics (2016) OpenSecrets.org. Available at: https://www.opensecrets.org/ (accessed 21 April 2016).

18.

Chandar

Collier

Miranti

(2014) Organizational evolution at Lybrand, Ross Bros. and Montgomery in the twentieth century. Accounting History 19(1–2): 53–76.

19.

Chiapello

Medjad

(2009) An unprecedented privatisation of mandatory standard-setting: The case of European accounting policy. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 20(4): 448–468.

20.

Church

Jenkins

Stanley

(2018) Auditor independence in the United States: Cornerstone of the profession or thorn in our side? Accounting Horizons 32(3): 145–168.

21.

Colasse

(2010) The international standardization of accounting: The resistable rise of the IASC/IASB. Gérer Et Comprendre 100: 15–24.

22.

Collis

Jarvis

Skerratt

(2017) The role and current status of IFRS in the completion of national accounting rules – Evidence from the UK. Accounting in Europe 14(1–2): 235–247.

23.

Cooper

Robson

(2009) Practitioners, work and firms. In: Edwards

Walker

(eds) The Routledge Companion to Accounting History. New York: Routledge, pp. 274–296.

24.

Cortese

Irvine

(2010) Investigating international accounting standard setting: The black box of IFRS 6. Research in Accounting Regulation 22(2): 87–95.

25.

Cortese

Irvine

Kaidonis

(2010) Powerful players: How constituents captured the setting of IFRS 6, a standard for the extractive industries. Accounting Forum 34(2): 76–88.

26.

Cousins

Mitchell

Sikka

(2004) Race to the Bottom: The Case of the Accountancy Firms. Basildon: Association for Accountancy & Business Affairs.

27.

Davis

(2018) How to get away with financial fraud. The Guardian, 28 June. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/jun/28/how-to-get-away-with-financial-fraud (accessed 19 August 2019).

28.

De George

Ferguson

Spear

(2012) How much does IFRS cost? IFRS adoption and audit fees. The Accounting Review 88(2): 429–462.

29.

De Villiers

Venter

(2010) The influence of the accounting profession on the academy: A cautionary case study. Meditari Accountancy Research 26(8): 1246–1278.

30.

Dewing

Russell

(2004) Accounting, auditing and corporate governance of European listed countries: EU policy developments before and after Enron. Journal of Common Market Studies 42(2): 289–319.

31.

DiPiazza

Rake

McDonnell

Samyn

Parrett

Turley

(2006) Global capital markets and the global economy: A vision from the CEOs of the international audit networks. Available at: http://www.cybsoc.org/CEO_Vision.pdf (accessed 19 August 2019).

32.

Epstein

(2008) An SEC timetable for global accounting rule. Business Week, 27 August. Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2008-08-27/an-sec-timetable-for-global-accounting-rulesbusinessweek-business-news-stock-market-and-financial-advice (accessed 19 August 2019).

33.

European Commission (1995) Communication from the commission: Accounting harmonisation: A new strategy vis-à-vis international harmonisation. Available at: http://aei.pitt.edu/4996/1/4996.pdf (accessed 19 August 2019).

34.

Ferguson

Johnston

(2010) Lobbyists find back door to power. The Sydney Morning Herald, 6 February. Available at: https://www.smh.com.au/national/lobbyists-find-back-door-to-power-20100205-niqb.html (accessed 19 August 2019).

35.

Fransen

LeBaron

(2019) Big audit firms as regulatory intermediaries in transnational labor governance. Regulation & Governance 13: 260–279.

36.

Gallhofer

Haslam

(2007) Exploring social, political and economic dimensions of accounting in the global context: The International Accounting Standards Board and accounting dissagregation. Socio-Economic Review 5(4): 633–664.

37.

Gill

(2007) IFRS: Coming to America. Journal of Accountancy 203(6): 70.

38.

Hail

Leuz

Wysocki

(2009) Global accounting convergence and the potential adoption of IFRS by the United States: An analysis of economic and policy factors. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1357331 (accessed 19 August 2019).

39.

Hale

Held

(2011) Mapping changes in transnational governance. In: Hale

Held

(eds) The Handbook of Transnational Governance: Institutions and Innovations. Cambridge: Polity, pp. 1–36.

40.

Haller

(2002) Financial accounting developments in the European Union: Past events and future prospects. European Accounting Review 11(1): 153–190.

41.

Hanlon

(1999) International professional labour markets and the narratives of accountants. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 10(2): 199–221.

42.

Hansen

(2011) Lobbying of the IASB: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Accounting Research 10(2): 57–75.

43.

Harris

(2008) Big four make big plans for IFRS. CFO: Accounting & Tax, 22 May. Available at: http://www.cfo.com/article.cfm/11434822 (accessed 19 August 2019).

44.

Hay

Knechel

Willekens

(2014). Introduction: The function of auditing. In: Hay

Knechel

Willekens

(eds) The Routledge Companion to Auditing. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 1–9.

45.

Honeck

(2002) Developing regulatory disciplines in professional services: The role of the World Trade Organisation. In: Aharoni

Nachum

(eds) Globalization of Service: Some Implications for Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, pp. 52–72.

46.

Hopwood

(2004) Some reflections on “The harmonization of accounting within the EU.” European Accounting Review 3(2): 241–253.

47.

International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) (2016) International Accounting Standards Board. Available at: http://www.ifrs.org/Pages/default.aspx (accessed 21 April 2016).

48.

Katsikas

(2006) Explaining non-state regulatory authority: The case of the International Accounting Standards Board. In: Proceedings of the 1st GARNET annual conference, Amsterdam, 27–29 September.

49.

Katstikas

(2011) Non-state authority and global governance. Review of International Studies 36(Suppl. 1): 113–135.

50.

Kearl

(1983) Rules, rule intermediaries and the complexity and stability of regulation. Journal of Public Economics 22(2): 215–226.

51.

Kerwer

(2008) Reducing the cost of capital: The International Accounting Standards Board and its quest for legitimacy. In: Proceedings of the 49th annual international studies association (ISA) convention, San Francisco, CA, 26 March. Available at: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p254153_index.html (accessed 19 August 2019).

52.

King

Griffiths

Williams

(2007) Regulatory intermediation and quality assurance in higher education: The case of the auditors. Oxford Review of Education 33(2): 161–174.

53.

Königsgruber

(2009) A political economy of accounting standard setting. Journal of Management and Governance 14(4): 277–295.

54.

Larson

Brown

(2001) Lobbying of the International Accounting Standards Committee: The case of construction contracts. Advances in International Accounting 14: 47–73.

55.

Levi-Faur

(2005) The global diffusion of regulatory capitalism. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598: 12–32.

56.

Levi-Faur

(2011) Regulation and regulatory governance. In: Levi-Faur

(ed.) Handbook on the Politics of Regulation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 3–21.

57.

Levi-Faur

Starobin

(2014) Transnational politics and policy: From two-way to three-way interactions. Jerusalem papers in regulation & governance, working paper 62. Available at: http://regulation.huji.ac.il/papers/jp%2062.pdf

58.

Macdonald

(2007) Globalising justice within coffee supply chains? Fair Trade, Starbucks and the transformation of supply chain governance. Third World Quarterly 28(4): 793–812.

59.

Malsch

Tremblay

M-S

Cohen

(2018) When Do Accounting Firms Produce Public Outcomes? (Re)Positioning the Public Interest in Auditing. Manchester Business School. Available at: http://www.research.mbs.ac.uk/accounting-finance/Portals/0/Users/002/02/2/When%20do%20Accounting%20Firms%20Produce%20Public%20Outcomes%202018.pdf (accessed 19 August 2019).

60.

Mattli

Büthe

(2005a) Accountability in accounting? The politics of private rule-making in the public interest. Governance 18(3): 399–429.

61.

Mattli

Büthe

(2005b) Global private governance: Lessons from a national model of setting standards in accounting. Law and Contemporary Problems 68(3–4): 225–262.

62.

Mattli

Woods

(2009) In whose benefit? Explaining regulatory change in global politics. In: Mattli

Woods

(eds) The Politics of Global Regulation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 1–43.

63.

Meuwissen

(2014). The auditing profession. In: Hay

Knechel

Willekens

(eds) The Routledge Companion to Auditing. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 13–22.

64.

Mitchell

Sikka

(2011) The Pin-Stripe Mafia: How Accountancy Firms Destroy Societies. Basildon: Association for Accountancy & Business Affairs.

65.

Montagna

(1986) Accounting rationality and financial legitimation. Theory and Society 15(1–2): 103–138.

66.

Mügge

(2008) Keeping competitors out. In: Graz

J-C

Nölke

(eds) Transnational Private Governance and Its Limits. London: Routledge, pp. 29–43.

67.

Mügge

Stellinga

(2015) The unstable core of global finance: Contingent valuation and governance of International Accounting Standards. Regulation & Governance 9(1): 47–62.

68.

Nölke

Perry

(2007) The power of transnational private governance: Financialization and the IASB. Business and Politics 9(3): 1–25.

69.

O’Rourke

(2003) Outsourcing regulation: Analyzing nongovernmental systems of labor standards and monitoring. Policy Studies Journal 31(1): 1–29.

70.

Partnoy

(2006) How and why credit rating agencies are not like other gatekeepers. Legal studies research paper series, research paper no. 07-46. San Diego, CA: University of San Diego.

71.

Perry

Nölke

(2005) International accounting standard setting: A network approach. Business and Politics 7(3): 1136–1136.

72.

Peterson

(2017) Count Down: The Past, Present and Uncertain Future of the Big Four Accounting Firms. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.

73.

Posner

(2010) Sequence as explanation: The international politics of accounting standards. Review of International Political Economy 17(4): 639–664.

74.

Quaglia

(2014) The European Union and Global Financial Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

75.

Reinecke

Manning

von Hagen

(2012) The emergence of a standards market: Multiplicity of sustainability standards in the global coffee industry. Organization Studies 33(5–6): 791–814.

76.

Shapiro

(2004–2005) Who pays the auditor calls the tune – Auditing regulation and clients’ incentives. Seton Hall Law Review 35(3): 1029–1096.

77.

Shore

Wright

(2018) How the Big 4 got big: Audit culture and the metamorphosis of international accountancy firms. Critique of Anthropology 38(3): 303–324.

78.

Solomon

(2008) Conversations with the Big 4 accounting firms’ chief executives. Current Issues in Auditing 2(1): C13–C27.

79.

Spence

Sturdy

Carter

(2018) Professionals with borders: The relationship between mobility and transnationalism in global firms. Geoforum 91: 235–244.

80.

Spence

Zhu

Endo

Matsubara

(2017) Money, honour and duty: Global professional service firms in comparative perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society 62(3): 82–97.

81.

Strange

(1996) The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

82.

Street

(2006) The G4’s role in the evolution of the international accounting standard setting process and partnership with the IASB. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 15(1): 109–126.

83.

Street

(2007) The US role in the globalisation of accounting standards. In: Godfrey

Chalmers

(eds) Globalisation of Accounting Standards. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 64–80.

84.

Sutton

(1984) Lobbying of accounting standard-setting bodies in the U.K. and the U.S.A.: A Downsian analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society 9(1): 81–95.

85.

The Economist (2003) Auditing the auditors. The Economist, 13 February. Available at: https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2003/02/13/auditing-the-auditors (accessed 19 August 2019).

86.

The Economist (2013) Shining a light on the auditors. The Economist, 7 December. Available at: https://www.economist.com/business/2013/12/07/shining-a-light-on-the-auditors (accessed 19 August 2019).

87.

Veron

(2007) The Global Accounting Experiment. Brussels: Bruegel.

88.

Vieru

Schadewitz

(2010) Impact of IFRS transition on audit and non-audit fees: Evidence from small and medium-sized listed companies in Finland. The Finnish Journal of Business Economics 59(1): 11–41.

89.

Ward

(2006) Progress on the road to quality: ethics, standards and regulation. Available at: https://www.ifac.org/news-events/2006-02/progress-road-quality-ethics-standards-and-regulation (accessed 05 July 2014).

90.

White

(2010) Markets: The credit rating agencies. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 24(2): 211–226.

91.

White

(2017) A U.S. imperative: High-quality, globally accepted accounting standards. Public Statement. Available at: https://www.sec.gov/news/statement/white-2016-01-05.html (accessed 27 October 2018).

92.

Whitehouse

(2008) Experts: Take advantage of IFRS training. Compliance Week, 26 August. Available at: https://www.complianceweek.com/experts-take-advantage-of-ifrs-training/5383.article (accessed 19 December 2016).

93.

Whitman

(2009) The Fundamentals of Global Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

94.

Wieczynska

(2016) The “Big” consequences of IFRS: How and when does the adoption of IFRS benefit global accounting firms? The Accounting Review 91(4): 1257–1283.

95.

Zeff

(2003a) How the U.S. accounting profession got where it is today: Part I. Accounting Horizons 17(3): 189–205.

96.

Zeff

(2003b) How the U.S. accounting profession got where it is today: Part II. Accounting Horizons 17(4): 267–286.

97.

Zeff

(2008) IFRS developments in the USA and EU, and some implications for Australia. In: Ken Spencer memorial lecture, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 28 May. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Financial Reporting Council.

98.

Zeff

(2012) The evolution of the IASC into the IASB, and the challenges it faces. The Accounting Review 87(3): 807–837.

99.

Zeff

(2016) Political lobbying on accounting standards-US, UK and international experience. In: Nobes

Parker

(eds) Comparative International Accounting. Harlow: Pearson, pp. 267–299.

100.

Zukin

DiMaggio

(eds) (1990) Structures of Capital: The Social Organization of the Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

101.

Zund

(1983) Endeavours towards the harmonization of standards of accounting and reporting in the OECD and UNO – Critical appraisal. In: Bromwich

Hopwood

(eds) Accounting Standards Setting: An International Perspective. London: Pitman, pp. 106–120.