Politicisation of the accounting standard-setting process and the influence of key-players: An investigation into the withdrawal of the mandatory status of the Statement of Accounting Concepts No. 4 (SAC 4) in Australia
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2018
Politicisation of the accounting standard-setting process and the influence of key-players: An investigation into the withdrawal of the mandatory status of the Statement of Accounting Concepts No. 4 (SAC 4) in Australia
This article aims to develop our understanding of the political activity of groups and individual key-players leading to the withdrawal of the Statement of Accounting Concepts No. 4 (SAC 4). The study also examines the arguments advanced by opponents of this rule, using archival data and semi-structured interviews. The key findings of the study highlight the importance of highly motivated, influential and passionate stakeholders in lobbying against proposed accounting rules. In addition, this event raises interesting questions relating to our understanding of Capture theory. This article shows how key-players within the standard-setting environment interacted with each other and lobbied to bring about the withdrawal of the mandatory status of SAC 4. This study adds to the academic literature by allowing individual key-players to explain their motivations and activities in their own words.
CoombesRJStokesDJ (1985) Standard-setters’ responsiveness to submissions on exposure drafts: Australian evidence. Australian Journal of Management10(2): 31–45.
7.
CorteseCIrvineHKaidonisM (2009) Powerful players: How constituents captured the setting of IFRS 6, a standard for the extractive industries. Accounting Forum34(2): 76–88.
DyckmanTR (1988) Credibility and the formulation of accounting standards under the Financial Accounting Standards Board. Journal of Accounting Literature7: 1–30.
10.
FaircloughN (2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
11.
FogartyTHusseinMEAKetzJE (1994) Towards a better understanding of the political aspects of financial accounting standard setting in the US. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal7(4): 23–45.
12.
GinerBArceM (2012) Lobbying on accounting standards: Evidence from IFRS 2 on share-based payments. European Accounting Review21(4): 655–691.
HopeTBriggsJ (1982) Accounting policy making – Some lessons from the deferred taxation debate. Accounting and Business Research12(46): 83–96.
15.
HowardP (1994) Auditors in clash over standards. Financial Forum, August, pp. 1–2.
16.
HusseinMEKetzJE (1980) Ruling elites of the FASB: A study of the big eight. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance3(4): 354–367.
17.
KlumpesPJM (1994) the politics of rule development: A case study of Australian pension fund accounting rule-making. Abacus30(2): 140–159.
18.
KonigsgruberR (2010) A political economy of accounting standard setting. Journal of Management Government14(4): 277–295.
19.
KwokWCCSharpD (2005) Power and international accounting standard setting: Evidence from segment reporting and intangible assets projects. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal18(1): 74–99.
20.
LukesS (1974) Power: A Radical View. Hong Kong: Macmillan Press.
21.
LutherR (1996) The development of accounting regulation in the extractive industries. The International Journal of Accounting31(1): 67–93.
22.
MacArthurJB (1988) An analysis of the content of corporate submissions on proposed accounting standards in the UK. Accounting and Business Research18(71): 213–226.
23.
MillerMCLoftusJA (1993) SAC 4 and the challenge to the mandatory status of concepts statements. Australian Accounting Review3(5): 2–10.
24.
MitnickBM (1980) The Political Economy of Regulation: Creating, Designing and Removing Regulatory Forms. New York: Columbia University Press.
25.
MoonitzM (1961) The Basic Postulates of Accounting (Accounting Research Study No. 1). New York: AICPA.
26.
PeirsonP (1993) When becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World Politics4: 595–628.
27.
PickerRLeoKLoftusJClarkeKWiseV (2009) Australian Accounting Standards. Milton, Queensland, Australia: Wiley.
28.
PuroM (1984) Audit firm lobbying before the Financial Accounting Standards Board: An empirical study. Journal of Accounting Research22(2): 624–656.
29.
RobinsonPTehSTWatsonJ (1994) Lecture Resources on Financial Accounting 201, Australian Company Accounting Principles & Practices. Perth, WA, Australia: The University of Western Australia, pp. 1–38.
30.
SprouseRMoonitzM (1962) A Tentative Set of Broad Accounting Principles for Business Enterprises (Accounting Research Study No. 3). New York: AICPA.
31.
SuttonTG (1984) Lobbying of accounting standard-setting bodies in the UK and the USA: A Downsian analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society9(1): 81–95.
32.
TutticciIDunstanKHolmesS (1994) Respondent lobbying in the Australian accounting standard-setting process: ED49-a case study. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal7(2): 86–104.
33.
WalkerRGRobinsonSP (1993) A critical assessment of the literature on political activity and accounting regulation. Research in Accounting Regulation7: 3–40.
34.
WalkerRGRobinsonSP (1994a) Competing regulatory agencies with conflicting agendas: Setting standards for cash flow reporting in Australia. Abacus30(2): 119–139.
35.
WalkerRGRobinsonSP (1994b) Related party transactions: A case study of inter-organizational conflict over the development of ‘disclosure rules’. Abacus30(1): 18–43.
36.
WiseTSpearN (2000) Accounting for extractive industries: An Australian perspective. Petroleum Accounting and Financial Management Journal19(1): 30–55.
