The 1970s and early 1980s saw significant structural change in the insurance
market at Lloyd’s of London and it became increasingly difficult for
providers of the collateral against which insurance was written to monitor the
activities of those responsible for writing the insurance risks and determining
the distribution of returns. Agency theory analyses the incentives for
principals and agents to develop more formal and rigorous arrangements for
accounting and audit when agents become more remote from principals. However,
when we examine the historical evidence, we find little sign of such development
at Lloyd’s during this period. We explore a number of institutional
characteristics of the Lloyd’s market which acted to constrain
adaptation until external regulatory pressure was brought to bear. Conclusions
are drawn on the limited role of agency theory in guiding policymakers and
regulators in financial markets.
Aczel, M.
,
Broyles, J.
and
Masojada, B.
, (1990),
“Participation in the Lloyd’s Insurance Market as a
Portfolio Investment”
, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting,
Vol.17, No.5, pp.
609-633
.
2.
Antle, R.
, (1982),
“The Auditor as an Economic Agent”
, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol.20,
Autumn, pp.
503-527
.
3.
Baiman, S.
,
Evans III, J.H.
and
Noel, J.
, (1987),
“Optimal Contracts With a Utility Maximising Auditor”
, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol.25,
Autumn, pp.
217-244
.
4.
Balachandran, B.V.
and
Ramakrishnan, R.T.S.
, (1980),
“Internal Control and External Auditing for Incentive
Compensation Schedules”
, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol.18, Supplement
1980, pp.
140-171
.
5.
Beaver, W.H.
, (1998), Financial Reporting: An Accounting Revolution,
(third edition),
Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice Hall
.
6.
Buijink, W.
, (1992), “Some Evidence on the Demand for
External Auditing in an Unregulated Environment: the Case of the
Netherlands”, in W. Buijink, Empirical Financial Accounting
Research: Compliance with Regulation, Distributional Properties of Financial
Ratios and Demand for External Auditing,
Maastricht Datawyse/Universitaire Pers Maastricht
, pp.89-114.
7.
Carmichael, K.S.
and
Wolstenholme, P.H.
, (1988), Taxation of Lloyd’s Underwriters,
(third edition),
London: Butterworths/ICAEW
.
8.
Chow C.W.
, (1982),
“The Demand for External Auditing: Size, Debt and Ownership Influences”
, Accounting Review, Vol.57, April, pp.
272-291
.
9.
Cockerell, H.
, (1984), Lloyd’s of London: A Portrait,
Cambridge: Woodhead-Faulkner
.
10.
Cromer
, Rt Hon The Earl of, (1969), Report of Working Party to Study
the Future of Lloyd’s,
London: Lloyd’s 1969
(published 1986).
11.
Davison, I.H.
, (1987), Lloyd’s: A View of the Room,
London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson
.
12.
DeAngelo, L.
, (1981), The Auditor-Client Contractual Relationship,
Ann Arbor, Michigan: UMI Research Press
.
13.
DTI
(1990a), Alexander Howden Holdings plc (formerly Alexander Howden
Group plc), Investigation under Section 165(1)(b) of the Companies Act 1948:
Interim and Final Reports by Sir Robert Alexander Gatehouse and Ian Glendinning
Watt FCA,
London: HMSO
.
14.
DTI
(1990b), Minet Holdings plc, W.M.D. Underwriting Agencies Limited,
Investigation under Section 165(1)(b) of the Companies Act 1948: Final
Report by Stewart Craufurd Boyd QC and Peter William Grostete DuBuisson
FCA,
London: HMSO
.
15.
Evans III, J.H.
, (1980),
“Optimal Contracts With Costly Conditional Auditing”
, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol.18, Supplement
1980, pp.
108-128
.
16.
Financial Services Authority (FSA)
(1998), The Future Regulation of Lloyd’s,
Consultation Paper 16, November,
London: FSA
.
17.
Financial Services Authority (FSA)
, (1999), Response Paper on Consultation Paper 16: The Future
Regulation of Lloyd’s, June,
London: FSA
.
18.
Fisher Working Party, (1980), Self-regulation at
Lloyd’s,
London: Lloyd’s
.
19.
Gwilliam, D.R.
, (1988),
“Auditor Independence and Auditor Judgements: An Historical Perspective”
in
Craswell, A.T.
(ed.), Collected Papers of the Fifth World Congress of Accounting
Historians, University of Sydney.
20.
Gwilliam, D.R.
, (2000), “Audit and Society: Audit in the
Lloyd’s Insurance Market”, SMBA working paper:
University of Wales, Aberystwyth
.
21.
Gwilliam, D.R.
,
Hoskin, K.W.
and
Macve, R.H.
, (1992), “Financial Control in the Financial
Services Industry: the Case of Lloyd’s of London”,
in
Ezzamel, M.
and
Heathfield, D.
(eds.), Perspectives on Financial Control,
London: Chapman & Hall
, pp.203-228.
22.
Gwilliam, D.
,
Macve, R.
, and
Meeks, G.
, (1999), “The Costs and Benefits of Increased
Accounting Regulation: a Case Study of Lloyd’s of
London”, Cambridge Discussion Papers in Accounting and Finance
No.42,
University of Cambridge
.
23.
Hardcastle, A.
, (1997), Report of Lloyd’s Regulatory Review
Group,
London: Lloyd’s
.
24.
Hodgson, G.
, (1984), Lloyd’s of London: A Reputation at
Risk,
London: Allen Lane
.
25.
Horton, J.
and
Macve, R.
, (1994),
“The Development of Life Assurance Accounting and Regulation in
the UK: Reflections on Recent Proposals for Accounting Change”
, Accounting, Business and Financial History, Vol.4,
No.2, pp.
295-320
.
26.
Jensen, M.C.
, (1983),
“Organization Theory and Methodology”
, Accounting Review, Vol.58, April, pp.
319-339
.
27.
Jensen, M.C.
and
Meckling, W.H.
, (1976),
“Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and
Ownership Structure”
, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.3,
October, pp.
305-360
.
28.
Jones, S.R.H.
, (1997),
“Transaction Costs and the Theory of the Firm: The Scope and
Limitations of the New Institutional Approach”
, Business History, Vol.39, No.4, pp.
9-25
.
Macve, R.H.
, (1986), A Survey of Lloyd’s Syndicate Accounts:
Financial Reporting at Lloyd’s in 1985,
London: Prentice-Hall/ICAEW
.
42.
Macve, R.H.
and
Gwilliam, D.R.
, (1993), A Survey of Lloyd’s Syndicate
Accounts (second edition): Issues in Financial Reporting at
Lloyd’s,
London: Prentice-Hall/ICAEW
.
43.
Merino, B.D.
,
Mayper, A.G.
and
Sriram, R.S.
, (1994),
“Voluntary Audits in New York Markets in 1927: A Case Study”
, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting,
Vol.21, July, pp.
619-642
.
44.
Neill, Sir Patrick
(1987), Regulatory Arrangements at Lloyd’s,
Report of the Committee of Inquiry, Cm59,
London: HMSO
.
45.
Ng, D.
, (1978),
“An Information Economics Analysis of Financial Reporting and
External Auditing”
, Accounting Review, Vol.53, October, pp.
910-920
.
46.
Ng, D.
and
Stoeckenius, J.
, (1979),
“Auditing: Incentives and Truthful Reporting”
, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol.17, Supplement
1979, pp.
1-24
.
47.
Posner, R.
, (1974),
“Theories of Economic Regulation”
, Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science,
Vol.5, Autumn, pp.
335-358
.
48.
Straus, R.
, (1939), Lloyd’s: A Historical Sketch,
London: The National Book
Association/Hutchinson & Co
.
49.
Tinker, T.
, (1988),
“Panglossian Accounting Theories: The Science of Apologising in Style”
, Accounting, Organizations & Society,
Vol.13, No.2, pp.
165-189
.
50.
Walker, M.
, (1989),
“Agency Theory: a Falsificationist Perspective”
, Accounting, Organizations & Society,
Vol.14, No.5/6, pp.
433-453
.
51.
Wallace, W.
, (1980), The Economic Role of the Audit in Free and Regulated
Markets,
New York: Touche Ross
.
52.
Watts, R.L.
and
Zimmerman, J.L.
, (1983),
“Agency Problems, Auditing, and the Theory of the Firm: Some Evidence”
, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol.26,
October, pp.
613-633
.
53.
Watts, R.L.
and
Zimmerman, J.L.
, (1986), Positive Accounting Theory,
Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall
.
