The relationships between audit failure, judicial fault-finding and the
availability of professional indemnity insurance have been debated by legal and
accounting writers in both academic and professional circles. This paper adds an
historical perspective to the current literature by presenting a review of cases
involving allegations of auditors’ negligence over a fifty year period
starting with the first significant case involving the question of
auditors’ duties. Amateur auditors who failed to carry out a proper
audit could expect little sympathy in the professional press but when large law
suits were brought against recognised accountants, the profession was forced to
consider the risks of the consequences of adverse judicial decisions. It was not
long before practitioners sought to manage those risks through professional
indemnity insurance. However, we find no evidence that the availability of
insurance increased auditors’ risk by opening the floodgates of litigation.