Developments in linguistic theory over the last 20 years have led to a view of the different components of language as a whole that consists in a computational system whose syntactically structured output is interpreted by (mind internal) external systems. This paper suggests that music and language share the computational system and differ in the nature of external systems and the basic units of the lexicon of each system. Furthermore it is suggested that so-called formal meaning in music should be considered (along with syntactically created meaning in language) as nonconceptual representational content.
BermúdezJ. & CahenA. (2009). nonconceptual mental content. In ZaltaE. N., editor, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Fall 2009 edition.
2.
BernsteinL. (1976). The Unanswered Question.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
BrownS., MartinezM. J., & ParsonsL. M. (2006). Music and language side by side in the brain: a pet study of the generation of melodies and sentences.European Journal of Neuroscience, 23(10): 2791–803.
4.
BrownS., MerkerB., & WallinN. L. (2000). An introduction to evolutionary musicology. In WallinN. L., MerkerB., & BrownS. (eds), The Origins of Music. pp. 3–24. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
CapekC. M., BavelierD., CorinaD., newmanA. J., JezzardP., & nevilleH. J. (2004). The cortical organization of audio-visual sentence comprehension: an FMRI study at 4 tesla.Cognitive Brain Research, 20(2): 111–9.
6.
CarteretteE. C. & kendallR. A. (1999). Comparative Music Perception and Cognition. In DeutschD., (ed), The Psychology of Music, pp. 725–92. New York: Academic Press, Second edition.
7.
ChomskyN. (1994). Language and Thought.Island and London: Moyer Bell, Wakefield, Rhode.
8.
ChomskyN. (1995). Language and nature.Mind, 104(413): 1–61.
9.
ChomskyN. (2000). New horizons in the study of language and mind.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
ChomskyN. (2002). On Nature and Language.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
ChomskyN. (2004). Biolinguistics and the human capacity. Available at http://wwwchomskyinfo/talks/20040517.htm, accessed on August 5, 2009. Transcript of a lecture delivered at the hungarian Academy of Sciences.
12.
ChomskyN. (2005). Three factors in language design.Linguistic Inquiry, 36: 1–22.
13.
DaviesS. (1980). the expression of emotion in music. In Themes in the Philosophy of Music pp. 134–51. Oxford University Press. (Davies, S., 2003)
14.
DaviesS. (1983). Is music a language of the emotions?Themes in the Philosophy of Music, pp. 121–33. Oxford University Press. (Davies, S., 2003)
15.
DaviesS. (1994). Musical Meaning and expression.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
16.
DaviesS. (2003). Themes in the Philosophy of Music.Oxford University Press.
17.
DeBellisM. (1995). Music and conceptualization.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
EvansG. (1982). Varieties of Reference.Oxford University Press.
19.
EvansN. & LevinsonS. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science.Behavioral and Brain Sciences.(in press).
20.
FitchW. T. (2006). The biology and evolution of music: A comparative perspective.Cognition, 100(1):173–215. The nature of Music.
21.
FitchW. T, hauserM. D., and ChomskyN. (2005). The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications.Cognition, 97(2): 179–210.
22.
GreenbergJ. H. (1986). On being a linguistic anthropologist.Annual Review of Anthropology, 15: 1–24.
23.
HaleK. & keyserS. J. (1993). On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In haleK., & keyserS. J., (eds), The View from Building 20: essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, pp. 53–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24.
HarleyH. & noyerR. (2000). Formal versus encyclopedic properties of vocabulary: Evidence from nominalisations. In PeetersB., (ed), The Lexicon-Encyclopedia Interface.Elsevier.
25.
HauserM. D., ChomskyN., & FitchW. T. (2002). The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who has It, and how Did It Evolve?Science, 298(5598): 1569–79.
26.
HeckR. G. (2000). nonconceptual content and the space of reasons.Philosophical Review, 109: 483–523.
27.
HinzenW. (2006). Mind Design and Minimal Syntax.Oxford University Press.
28.
HinzenW. (2007). An Essay on Names and Truth.Oxford University Press.
29.
JackendoffR. (2009). Parallels and nonparallels between language and music.Music Perception, 26(3): 195–204.
30.
JackendoffR. & LerdahlF. (2006). The capacity for music: What is it, and what's special about it?Cognition, 100(1): 33–72. The nature of Music.
31.
JackendoffR. & PinkerS. (2005). The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (reply to Fitch, hauser, & Chomsky).Cognition, 97(2): 211–25.
32.
JacobF. (1982). The possible and the actual.New York: Pantheon.
33.
JenkinsL. (2000). Biolinguistics: Exploring the Biology of Language.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
JenkinsL., (ed) (2004). Variation and Universals in Biolinguistics. number 62 in north Holland Linguistic Series: Linguistic variations. Elsevier.
35.
KivyP. (2007). Music, Language, and Cognition.Oxford, Clarendon Press.
36.
KoopmanC. & DaviesS. (2001). Musical meaning in a broader perspective.Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 59.
37.
LerdahlF. & JackendoffR. (1983). A Generative Theory of Tonal Music.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38.
LuntleyM. (2003). nonconceptual content and the sound of music.Mind & Language, 18(4): 402–26.
39.
MaessB., KoelschS., GunterT. C., & FriedericiA. D. (2004). Musical syntax is processed in Broca's area: an MEG study.Nature Neuroscience, 4:540–45.
40.
McDowellJ. (1994). Mind and World.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
McQueen-TokitaA. & hughesD. W. (2008). Context and change in Japanese music. In McQueen-TokitaA., & hughesD. W., (eds), The Ashgate Research Companion to Japanese Music, pp. 1–34. Ashgate Publishing.
42.
NettlB. (2000). An ethnomusicologist contemplates universals in musical sound and musical culture. In WallinN. L., MerkerB., & BrownS., (eds). The Origins of Music. pp. 463–72. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43.
PatelA. D. (2008). Music, Language and the Brain.Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
44.
PeacockeC. (1992). Concepts.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45.
PeretzI. (2006). The nature of music from a biological perspective.Cognition, 100(1): 1–32. The nature of Music.
46.
PeretzI. & ColtheartM. (2003). Modularity of music processing.Nat Neurosci, 6(7): 688–91.
47.
PeretzI., GosselinN., BelinP., ZattoreR., PlaillyJ., & TillmannB. (2009). Music lexical networks: The cortical organization of music recognition. Submitted to Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
48.
Piatelli-PalmariniM., (ed) (1980). Language and Learning: The Debate Between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
PinkerS. & JackendoffR. (2005). The faculty of language: what's special about it?Cognition, 95(2): 201–36.
SchroederD. P. (1990). Haydn and the Enlightenment: The late symphonies and their audience.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
52.
SharpeR. A. (2004). Philosophy of Music: An Introduction. Acumen. Stalnaker, R. (1998). What might nonconceptual content be? In VillanuevaE., (ed), Concepts. Philosophical Issues 9.Atascadero: Ridgeview.
53.
WallinN. L. (1991). Biomusicology: Neurophysiological, Neuropsychological, and Evolutionary Perspectives on the Origin and Purposes of Music.Stuyvesant, NY: Pendragon Press.
54.
WallinN. L., MerkerB., & BrownS. (eds) (2000). The Origins of Music.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
