The study investigates acquisition of verb inflections by four monolingual Hebrew-acquiring children from middle-class backgrounds, audio-recorded in longitudinal, weekly samples at a mean age-range of between 18 and 26 months. Productive use of inflectional morphology is shown to manifest increasing structural specification, as a function of children’s developing knowledge of morphology–syntax interfaces illustrated by Subject–Verb agreement. The verbs used by all four children evolve from non-specified stem-like forms via sporadic structural alternations to initial productivity in the use of largely under-specified inflected forms. This process of increasing structural specification is interpreted as reflecting paradigmatic/syntagmatic interfacings in developing grammatical productivity, such that eventually a full range of inflectional contrasts is manifested in all and only appropriate syntactic environments.
AdamG.Bat-ElO. (2008). Morphological knowledge without morphological structure. In Armon-LotemS.DanonG.RothsteinS. (Eds.) Current Issues in Generative Hebrew Linguistics (pp. 197–222). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2.
AllenS. E. M. (2000). A discourse-pragmatic explanation for argument representation in child Inuktitut. Linguistics, 38, 483–521.
3.
AndersenE. S. (1992). Complexity and language acquisition: Influences on the development of morphological systems in children. In HawkinsJ. A.Gell-MannM. (Eds.), The evolution of human languages (pp. 241–271). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4.
Armon-LotemS. (2006). Subject use and the acquisition of verbal agreement in Hebrew. In GagarinaN.GülzowI. (Eds.), The acquisition of verbs and their grammar: The effect of particular languages (pp. 45–70). Dordrecht: Springer.
5.
Armon-LotemS.BermanR. A. (2003). The emergence of grammar: Early verbs and beyond. Journal of Child Language, 30, 845–878.
6.
BassanoD. (2000). Early development of nouns and verbs in French: Exploring the interface between lexicon and grammar. Journal of Child Language, 27, 521–559.
7.
BassanoD.EmeP. E.ChampaudC. (2005). A naturalistic study of early lexical development: General processes and inter-individual variations in French children. First Language, 25, 67–101.
8.
BassanoD.LaahaS.MaillochonI.DresslerW. U. (2004). Early acquisition of verb grammar and lexical development: Evidence from periphrastic constructions in French and Austrian German. First Language, 24, 33–70.
9.
BatesE.MacWhinneyB. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. In MacWhinneyB.BatesE. (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 3–73). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BerkoJ. (1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150–177.
11.
BermanR. A. (1978). Modern Hebrew structure. Tel Aviv, Israel: University Publishing Projects.
12.
BermanR. A. (1985). Acquisition of Hebrew. In SlobinD. I. (Ed.), Crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (Vol. 1, pp. 255–371). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13.
BermanR. A. (1986). A step-by-step model of language learning. In LevinI. (Ed.), Stage and structure: Re-opening the debate (pp. 191–219). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
14.
BermanR. A. (1990). Acquiring an (S)VO language: Subjectless sentences in children’s Hebrew. Linguistics, 28, 1135–1166.
15.
BermanR. A. (1993). Developmental perspectives on transitivity: A confluence of cues. In LevyY. (Ed.), Other children, other languages: Issues in the theory of acquisition (pp. 189–241). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16.
BermanR. A. (1994). Formal, lexical, and semantic factors in the acquisition of Hebrew resultative participles. In GahlS.DolbeyA.JohnsonC. (Eds.), Berkeley linguistic society (Vol. 20, pp. 82–92).
17.
BermanR. A. (2004). Between emergence and mastery: The long developmental route of language acquisition. In BermanR. A. (Ed.), Language development across childhood and adolescence (Trends in Language Acquisition Research, Vol. 3, pp. 9–34). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
18.
BermanR. A.Armon-LotemS. (1997). How grammatical are early verbs? In MartinotC. (Ed.), Actes duColloque International sur l’Acquisition de la syntaxe en Langue Maternelle et en Langue Étrangère, 24–25 November, 1995 (pp. 17–59). Université de France-Comté, Besançon. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
19.
BermanR. A.DromiE. (1984). On marking time without aspect in child language. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 23, 21–32.
20.
BermanR. A.SlobinD. I. (1994). Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21.
BloomL. (1991). Language development from two to three. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
22.
BowermanM. (1985). What shapes children’s grammar? In SlobinD. I. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (pp. 1255–1318). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23.
BowermanM. (1990). Mapping thematic roles onto syntactic functions: Are children helped by innate linking rules?Linguistics, 28, 1253–1289.
24.
BrownP. (2008). Verb specificity and argument realization in Tzeltal child language. In BowermanM.BrownP. (Eds.), Crosslinguistic perspectives on argument structure: Implications for learnability (pp. 167–189). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25.
BrownR. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
BybeeJ. L. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 425–455.
27.
ClarkE. V. (2003). First language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
CoffinE. A.BolozkyS. (2005). A reference grammar of modern Hebrew. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
29.
CroftW. (2003). Typology and universals. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30.
DresslerW. U.MyerthalerW.PanaglO.WurzelW. U. (1987). Leitmotifs in natural morphology (Studies in language companion series). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
31.
DromiE. (1986). The one-word period as a stage in language developments: Quantitative and qualitative accounts. In LevinI. (Ed.), Stage and structure: Reopening the debate (pp. 220–245). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
32.
DromiE.BermanR. A. (1986). Language-general and language-specific in developing syntax. Journal of Child Language, 14, 371–387.
33.
DromiE.LeonardL. B.AdamG.Zadoneisky-EhrlichS. (1999).Verb agreement morphology in Hebrew-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 42, 1414–1431.
34.
DromiE.LeonardL.ShteimanM. (1993). The grammatical morphology of Hebrew-speaking children with specific language impairment: Some competing hypotheses. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 760–771.
35.
GathercoleV. C. M.SebastiánE.SotoP. (1999). The early acquisition of Spanish verbal morphology: Across-the-board or piecemeal knowledge?International Journal of Bilingualism, 3, 133–182.
GoldfajnT. (1998). Word order and time in Biblical Hebrew narrative. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
38.
HaegemanL. (1995). Root infinitives, tense, and truncated structure in Dutch. Language Acquisition, 4, 205–255.
39.
IngramD. (1989). First language acquisition: Method, description, and explanation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Karmiloff-SmithA. (1983). Language development as a problem-solving process. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 22, 1–22.
41.
Karmiloff-SmithA. (1986). Stage/structure versus phase/process in modeling linguistic and cognitive development. In LevinI. (Ed.), Stage and Structure: Reopening the debate (pp. 164–219). New York, NY: Ablex.
42.
Karmiloff-SmithA. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.
43.
Kilani-SchochM.DresslerW. U. (2002). The emergence of inflectional paradigms in two French corpora: An illustration of general problems of pre- and protomorphology. In VoeikovaM. D.DresslerW. U. (Eds.), Pre- and Protomorphology: Early phases of morphological development in nouns and verbs (pp. 45–59). Munich: Lincom Europa.
44.
MacWhinneyB. (1975). Rules, rote, and analogy in morphological formation by Hungarian children. Journal of Child Language, 2, 65–77.
45.
MacWhinneyB. (1978). The acquisition of morphophonology. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 43, 1–123.
46.
MacWhinneyB. (2005). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk – The format and programs (3rd ed., Vol. 1). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
47.
MaratsosM.ChalkleyM. (1980). The internal language of children’s syntax: The ontogenesis and representation of syntactic categories. In NelsonK. (Ed.), Children’s language (Vol. 2, pp. 127–214). New York, NY: Gardner Press.
48.
PinkerS. (1979). Formal models of language learning. Cognition, 7, 217–283.
49.
PizzutoE.CaselliM. C. (1994). The acquisition of Italian verb morphology in a cross-linguistic perspective. In LevyY. (Ed.), Other children, other languages: Issues in the theory of language acquisition (pp. 137–187). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
50.
RavidD. (1995). Language change in child and adult Hebrew: A psycholinguistic perspective. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
51.
RavidD.DresslerW. U.Nir-SagivB.Korecky-KröllK.SoumanA.RehfeldtK.…GillisS. (2008). Core morphology in child directed speech: Crosslinguistic corpus analyses of noun plurals. In BehrensH. (Ed.), Trends in corpus research (finding structure in data) (pp. 25–60). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
52.
RavidD.FarahR. (1999). Learning about noun plurals in early Palestinian Arabic. First Language, 19, 187–206.
53.
ReinhartT. (1995). Interface strategies. OTS working papers in linguistics. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
54.
SchipkeC. S.KauschkeC. (2011). Early word formation in German language acquisition: A study on word formation growth during the second and third years. First Language, 31, 67–82.
55.
ShiraiY. (1998). The emergence of tense-aspect morphology in Japanese: Universal predisposition?First Language, 18, 281–309.
56.
SlobinD. I. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In SlobinD. I. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (Vol. 2, Theoretical issues, pp. 1157–1256). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
57.
SlobinD. I.BowermanM. (2007). Interfaces between linguistic typology and child language research. Linguistic Typology, 11, 213–226.
58.
ThordardottirE.WeismerS.EvansJ. (2002). Continuity in lexical and morphological development in Icelandic and English speaking 2-years-olds. First Language, 22, 3–28.
59.
TomaselloM. (1992). First verbs: A case study of early lexical development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
60.
TomaselloM. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61.
Uziel-KarlS. (2001). A multidimensional perspective on the acquisition of verb-argument structure. Doctoral dissertation. Tel-Aviv University, Israel.
62.
WexlerK. (1993). Optional infinitives, head movement and the economy of derivations. In LightfootD.HornsteinN. (Eds.), Verb movement (pp. 305–382). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
63.
WittekA.TomaselloM. (2005). German-speaking children’s productivity with syntactic constructions and case morphology: Local cues act locally. First Language, 25, 103–125.
