This multiple case study analysis investigates the culturally engaging nature of a US campus for international students using the Culturally Engaging Campus Environments (CECE) model. Semi-structured interviews and professional development workshop observations were conducted with six faculty and administrative leaders who work closely with international students with the aim of answering the overarching question: how do university faculty and student/academic affairs professionals working with international students perceive the institutional support systems for international students through the lens of the Culturally Engaging Campus Environments conceptual model? Salient findings indicated that change is most needed in the areas of opportunities for meaningful cross-cultural engagement, culturally validating environments, proactive philosophies, and availability of holistic support in within the study's campus context. Practical and theoretical implications are discussed in light of the CECE model.
American Council on Education. (n. d.). Student Affairs Professionals Make Key Contributions to Campus Internationalization.
2.
AmmiganR.JonesE. (2018). Improving the student experience: Learning from a comparative study of international student satisfaction. Journal of Studies in International Education, 22(4), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315318773137
3.
AmmiganR.SchreiberB. (2020). Student mobility in higher education: A mass movement requiring significant involvement from student affairs and services. In LudemanR.SchreiberB. (Eds.), Student affairs and services in higher education: Global foundations, issues, and best practices (pp. 175–181). IASAS-DSW.
4.
ChoJ.YuH. (2015). Roles of university support for international students in the United States: Analysis of a systematic model of university identification, university support, and psychological well-being. Journal of Studies in International Education, 19(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315314533606
5.
DeardorffD. K.JonesE. (2012). Intercultural competence. In The SAGE handbook of international higher education (Vol. 283, pp. 13–15).
6.
de KleineC.LawtonR. (2015). Meeting the needs of linguistically diverse students at the college level. College Reading & Learning Association.
7.
DenzinN.LincolnY. (2011). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. United Kingdom.
8.
GlassC. R.GodwinK. A.HelmsR. M. (2021). Toward Greater Inclusion and Success. American Council on Education.
9.
GlassC. R.HengT. T.HouM. (2022). Intersections of identity and status in international students’ perceptions of culturally engaging campus environments. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 89, 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2022.05.003
10.
GlassC. R.WestmontC. M. (2014). Comparative effects of belongingness on the academic success and cross-cultural interactions of domestic and international students. International Journal Of Intercultural Relations, 38, 106–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.04.004
JonesE.de WitH. (2020). In conversation: Moving Internationalisation beyond the “Success Box.”.
13.
JonesE.LeaskB.BrandenburgU.de WitH. (2021). Global social responsibility and the internationalisation of higher education for society. Journal of Studies in International Education, 25(4), 330–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/10283153211031679
14.
KatsumotoS.BowmanN. A. (2021). Changes in psychological well-being among international students in the US: The role of interactions with peers, faculty, and staff. Journal of College Student Development, 62(3), 345–350. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2021.0029
15.
KooK. K.YaoC. W.GongH. J. (2021). “It is not my fault”: Exploring experiences and perceptions of racism among international students of color during COVID-19. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 16(3), 284–296. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/dhe0000343
LauferM.GorupM. (2019). The invisible others: Stories of international doctoral student dropout. Higher Education, 78(1), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0337-z
18.
LeaskB. (2015). A conceptual framework for internationalization of the curriculum. In Internationalizing the curriculum (pp. 26–40). Routledge.
19.
LeaskB.de GayardonA. (2021). Reimagining internationalization for society. Journal of Studies in International Education, 25(4), 323–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/10283153211033667
20.
LeaskB.GreenW. (2020). Curriculum integration. In OgdenA. C.StreitwieserB.Van MolC. (Eds.), Education abroad: Bridging scholarship and practice. Routledge.
21.
LudemanR.KuhG.de WitH.BlairN.FuschD.TegtmeierC. (2020). The future of student affairs and services in higher education: Trends, directions and predictions. In R. Ludeman & B. Schreiber (Eds.), Student affairs and services in higher education: Global foundations, issues, and best practices (pp. 225–239). IASAS-DSW.
22.
Madden-DentT.WoodD.RoskinaK. (2019). An inventory of international student services at 200 US universities and colleges: Descriptive data of Pre-departure and post-arrival supports. Journal of International Students, 9(4), 993–1008. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v9i4.346
23.
MontgomeryK. A. (2019). Supporting Chinese undergraduate students in transition at US colleges and universities. Journal of International Students, 7, 963–989. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v7i4.184
24.
MuseusS. D. (2014). The culturally engaging campus environments (CECE) model: A new theory of success among racially diverse college student populations. In In higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 189–227). Springer.
25.
MuseusS. D.YiV.SaeluaN. (2018). How culturally engaging campus environments influence sense of belonging in college: An examination of differences between white students and students of color. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 11(4), 467. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000069
26.
Nguyet NguyenM.RobertsonM. J. (2022). International students enacting agency in their PhD journey. Teaching in Higher Education, 27(6), 814–830. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1747423
Porter-SzucsI. (2017). The quest for respect: ESL faculty and programs in US higher education. MITESOL Journal: An Online Publication of MITESOL, 1(1), 2.
29.
ProctorD. (2015). Key trends in international education research 2011–14: What does the data tell us? International Education Association of Australia. https://www.ieaa.org.au/ierncontentarchive/key-trends-2
30.
Rose-RedwoodC. R.Rose-RedwoodR. S. (2013). Self-segregation or global mixing?: Social interactions and the international student experience. Journal of College Student Development, 54(4), 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2013.0062
31.
SchaidleA. K. (2017, February 24). Making the case for an internationalized curriculum. University World News.
32.
SchreiberB. (2016). Brain drain, brain gain and brain circulation: National policy contexts’ influences on student mobility in internationalized higher education landscapes. In Bardill MoscaritoloL.OsfieldK. J.PerozziB.SheaR. (Eds.), Supporting students globally in higher education (pp. 237–256). NASPA.
33.
SchreiberB.LewisJ. (2020). Professionalization of student affairs and services around the world: More than a matter of degree(s). In LudemanR.SchreiberB. (Eds.), Student affairs and services in higher education: Global foundations, issues, and best practices (pp. 57–63). IASAS-DSW.
34.
ShapiroS. (2012). Citizens vs. aliens: How institutional policies construct linguistic minority students. In KannoY.HarklauL. (Eds.), Linguistic minority students go to college: Preparation, access, and persistence (pp. 238–254). Routledge.
35.
Spencer-OateyH.DauberD.WilliamsS.O'LearyC. (2014). Promoting integration on campus: principles, practice and issues for further exploration. UK Council for International Student Affairs (UKCISA).
36.
StakeR. E. (2013). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford press.
37.
TintoV. (1998). Colleges as communities: Taking research on student persistence seriously. The Review of Higher Education, 21(2), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1998.a30046
38.
TranL. T.VuT. T. P. (2018). Agency in mobility: Towards a conceptualisation of international student agency in transnational mobility. Educational Review, 70(2), 167–187.
39.
U.S. Department of Education (2017). Table 326.10. Graduation rate from first institution attended for first-time, full-time Bachelor’s Degree-Seeking students at 4-year postsecondary institutions.
40.
University Report: International Students and Faculty, 2021–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2017.1293615
41.
YakaboskiT.Perez-VelezK.AlmutairiY. (2018). Breaking the silence: Saudi graduate student experiences on a US campus. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 11(2), 221. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000059
42.
YaoC. W.BriscoeK. L.RuttJ. N. (2020). In the aftermath of a racialized incident: Exploring international students of color’s perceptions of campus racial climate. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 14(3), 386. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/dhe0000179
43.
YeoH. T.MendenhallR.HarwoodS. A.HunttM. B. (2019). Asian international student and Asian American student: Mistaken identity and racial microaggressions. Journal of International Students, 9(1), 39–65. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v9i1.278
44.
YuX.IsenseeE.KapplerB. (2016). Using data wisely to improve international student satisfaction: Insights gained from international student barometer. In BistaK.FosterC. (Eds.), Exploring the social and academic experiences of international students in higher education institutions (1st ed., pp. 212–232). IGI Global.
