Saudi student enrollment in U.S. colleges and universities has nearly tripled since 2009-2010, in large part due to the King Abdullah Scholarship Program. The representation of Saudi females is also increasing due to the loosening of Saudi Arabia’s long-standing restrictions on women’s travel and acceptable fields of study and careers. This constructivist study highlights some of the academic experiences of female Saudi graduate students at a Comprehensive Doctoral University in the western United States. Challenges related to students’ insufficient English language skills, differences in their comfort levels interacting with American and Saudi men, positive relationships with both male and female faculty members, and generally positive feelings about their experiences at their university of choice emerged as themes within the data. The participants’ varied prior experiences with mixed-gendered educational environments led to differing levels of comfort with developing relationships with men.
AlhazmiA.NylandB. (2010). Saudi international students in Australia and intercultural engagement: A study of transitioning from a gender separated to a mixed gender environment. In FallonF. (Ed.), The 21st ISANA international education conference (pp. 1-11). Melbourne, Australia: ISANA International Education Association.
4.
Al-MouhandisZ. B. (1986). Higher education for women in Saudi Arabia. San Francisco, CA: ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
5.
AlMunajjedM. (1997). Women in Saudi Arabia today. London, England: Macmillan.
Al-SheikhlyN. A. (2012, March12). Saudi Arabian women pursuing higher education at Oregon State University (ScholarsArchive@OSU Electronic Theses and Dissertations). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1957/28228
8.
BakiR. (2004). Gender-segregated education in Saudi Arabia: Its impact on social norms and the Saudi labor market. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(28), 1-15.
9.
ChaseS. E. (2005). Narrative inquiry: Multiple lenses, approaches, voices. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (pp. 651-679). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
ChowP.BhandariR. (2011). Open doors report on international education exchange. Washington, DC: Institute of International Education.
11.
ClarkK. (2007). A modernization paradox: Saudi Arabia’s divided society. Harvard International Review, 29(3), 30-33.
12.
ConnellyF. M.ClandininD. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(2), 2-14.
13.
CreswellJ. W. (2006). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
CrottyM. (1998). The foundations of social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
DavidsonC. (2009). Transcription: Imperatives for qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(2), 36-52.
16.
FinnemoreM.SikkinkK. (2001). Taking stock: The constructivist research program in international relations and comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 391-416.
17.
FosnotC. T. (2005). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In FosnotC. T. (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 8-33). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
GuionL. A.DiehlD. C.McDonaldD. (2011). Triangulation: Establishing the validity of qualitative studies. Gainesville: Department of Family, Youth and Community Sciences, Florida Cooperative Extension Service
21.
HamdanA. (2005). Women and education in Saudi Arabia: Challenges and achievements. International Education Journal, 6(1), 42-64.
MeijerR. (2010). Reform in Saudi Arabia: The gender-segregation debate. Middle East Policy, 17(4), 80-100.
26.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
27.
MertovaP. (2011, June3). Internationalisation and quality in higher education: Perspectives of English, Australian and Czech senior academics through a critical event narrative inquiry [PowerPoint presentation]. Oxford, UK: Retrieved from http://jisctechdis.ac.uk/assets/documents/internationalisation/TIS_Mertova.ppt
28.
Ministry of Higher Education, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. (2010a, August4). The interest of universities to serve national needs, a sign of the maturity of the higher education system in Saudi Arabia. Retrieved from http://www.mohe.gov.sa/en/news/Pages/an211.aspx
MitchellM.EgudoM. (2003). A review of narrative methodology. Canberra: Australian Government, Department of Defence, Defence Science and Technology Organisation.
ProkopM. (2006). The war of ideas: Education in Saudi Arabia. In AartsandP.NonnemanG. (Eds.), Saudi Arabia in the balance: Political economy, society, foreign affairs (pp. 57-81). London, England: Hurst.
33.
RiessmanC. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
University of Northern Colorado Institutional Reporting and Analysis Services. (2013, January7). 2012 fall final enrollment profile and tuition forecast. Greeley: University of Northern Colorado.
38.
YilmazK. (2008, Spring). Constructivism: Its theoretical underpinnings, variations, and implications for classroom instruction. Educational Horizons, 86(3), 161-172.
