This paper sets out to explore the changing political and economic landscape of the Mexican state against the backdrop of the growing disciplinary power of the globalised financial markets (e.g., capital flight and investment strikes). Specifically it asks if the general defining characteristics of a neoliberal “competition state” found in the advanced industrialised countries (AICs) can be applied to the Mexican case. The paper sustains that although the Mexican state conforms to the basic features of a neoliberal competition state, this transformation has brought about neither sustained economic growth nor less dependence on external sources of capital. A fundamental reason for this failure lies in the highly contradictory nature of the stale's neoliberal policy formulation that is marked by domestic objectives such as subduing class conflict and international exigencies such as signalling creditworthiness.
ÁlvarezA.B.GabrielM.P. (1993) “Mexico 1988–1991: A Successful Economic Adjustment Program?”Latin American Perspectives, 20(78), 32–45.
2.
de MéxicoBanco (1987) Informe Anual 1986. México: Banco de México, S.A.
3.
de MéxicoBanco (1991) Informe Anual 1990. México: Banco de México, S.A.
4.
Bank for International Settlements (1996) 66th Annual Report. Basle: BIS.
5.
Bank for International Settlements (1999) 69th Annual Report. Basle: BIS.
6.
CernyP.G. (1993) “American decline and the emergence of embedded financial orthodoxy,” in CernyPhilip G. (ed.) Finance and World Politics: Markets, Regimes and States in the Post-hegemonic Era, 155–185, Hants, UK: Edward Elgar.
7.
CernyP.G. (1999) “Reconstructing the Political in a Globalizing World: States, Institutions, Actors and Governance,” Paper presented to the Annual Conference of the Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom, University of Nottingham, 23–25 March 1999 and to Workshop No. 26 (National Models and Transnational Structures) Joint Meetings of Workshops, European Consortium for Political Research, Mannheim, Germany, March 26–31, 1999. Mimeo.
8.
CernyP.G.EvansM. (1999) “New Labour, Globalization, and the Competition State”. Mimeo.
9.
ClarkeS. (1987) Keynesianism, Monetarism and the Crisis of the State. Aldershot: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
10.
CrottyJ.EpsteinG. (1996) “In Defence of Capital Controls,” in PanitchLeo (ed.) Socialist Register, 118–149, London: Merlin Press.
11.
DavisD.E. (1993) “The Dialectic of Autonomy: State, Class, and Economic Crisis in Mexico, 1958–1982”. Latin American Perspectives, 78(3), 46–75.
12.
GowanP. (1999) The Global Gamble: Washington's Faustian Bid for World Dominance. London: Verso.
13.
GrabelI. (1999) “Mexico Redux? Making Sense of the Financial Crisis of 1997–98”. Journal of Economic Issues, XXXIII(2), 375–381.
14.
GurriaJ.A.FadlS. (1995) “Mexico's Strategy for Reducing Financial Transfers Abroad,” in GrosseRobert (ed.) Government Responses to the Latin American Debt Problem, 121–149, Miami: North-South Center Press.
15.
HaggardS.MaxfieldS. (1996) “The Political Economy of Financial Internationalization in the Developing World,” in KeohaneRobert O.MilnerHelen (eds) Internationalization and Domestic Politics, 209–239. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
16.
HamiltonA. (1986) The Financial Revolution: The Big Bang Worldwide. Hammondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Books.
17.
HartM. (1990) A North American Free Trade Agreement: The Strategic Implications for Canada. Halifax: The Institute for Research on Public Policy.
18.
HelleinerE. (1994) States and the Reemergence of Global Finance: From Bretton Woods to the 1990s. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
19.
HollowayJ. (1995) “Global Capital and the National State,” in BonefeldWernerHollowayJohn (eds) Global Capital, National State and the Politics of Money, 116–140, New York: St. Martin's Press Inc.
20.
IMF (1983) IMF Survey. January 16, 1983. Washington, DC: IMF.
21.
IMF (1993) IMF Survey. January 25, 1993. Washington, DC: IMF.
22.
IMF (1992) Mexico: The Strategy to Achieve Sustained Economic Growth. Occasional Paper No. 99, Washington DC: IMF.
23.
IMF (1995) The IMF and the Challenges of Globalization — The Fund's Evolving Approach to its Constant Mission: The Case of Mexico. Address by Michel Camdessus Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund at the Zurich Economics Society Zurich, November 14, 1995, http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/mds/1995/MDS9517.htm.
24.
JenkinsB. (1992) The Paradox of Continental Production: National Investment Policies in North America. Ithaca: Cornell UP.
25.
KapsteinE.B. (1994) Governing the Global Economy: International Finance and the State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
26.
Katerina (1997) “Mexico is Not Only Chiapas, Nor is the Rebellion in Chiapas Merely a Mexican Affair.”Common Sense, 5–37, Glasgow: Clydeside Press.
27.
KopinakK. (1994) “The Maquiladorization of the Mexican Economy,” in GrinspunRicardoCameronMaxwell A. (eds), The Political Economy of North American Free Trade, 141–161, New York: St. Martin's Press.
28.
LustigN. (1998) Mexico: The Remaking of an Economy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.
29.
MaxfieldS. (1990) Governing Capital: International Finance and Mexican Politics. Ithaca: Cornell UP.
30.
MaxfieldS. (1997) Gatekeepers of Growth: The International Political Economy of Central Banking in Developing Countries. Princeton: Princeton UP.
31.
McConnelJ.MacPhersonA. (1994) “The North American Free Trade Area: An overview of issues and prospects,” in GibbRichardMichalakWieslaw (eds) Continental Trading Blocs: The Growth of Regionalism in the World Economy, 163–188, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
32.
MéndezJ.S.M. (1994), Problemas Económicos de México. Mexico: McGraw-Hill.
33.
MiddlebrookK.J. (1995) The Paradox of Revolution: Labor, The State and Authoritarianism in Mexico. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins UP.
34.
PastorM.Jr. (1999) “Globalization, sovereignty, and policy choice: Lessons from the Mexican peso crisis,” in SmithDavid A.SolingerDorothy J.TopikSteven C. (eds), States and Sovereignty in the Global Economy, 210–229, London: Routledge.
35.
Poder Ejecutivo Federal (1989) Plan Nacional de Desarrollo, 1989–1994. Mexico City: Presidencia de la República, 1989.
36.
PoulantzasN. (1978) State, Power, Socialism. London: New Left Books.
37.
PRONASOL (Programa Nacional de Solidaridad) (1991) Manual único de operación: Programa Nacional de Solidaridad. Mexico: SPP.
38.
RuggieJ.G. (1982) “International regimes, transactions and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order,” in KrasnerStephen D. (ed.) International Regimes, 195–232, Ithaca: Cornell UP.
39.
ShadlenK.C. (1999) “Continuity amid Change: Democratization, Party Strategies and Economic Policy-Making in Mexico”. Government and Opposition, 34(3), 397–419.
40.
SoederbergS. (1999) “On the Political Economy of the IMF's Drive for Transperancy: Towards A Legal Obligation to Neoliberalism?” Paper presented at the British International Studies Association's International Political Economy Working Group at the University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom, February 12,2000. Mimeo.
41.
StoryD. (1986) The Mexican Ruling Party: Stability and Authority. New York: Praeger Publishers.
42.
StrangeS. (1994) States and Markets. London: Pinter.
43.
StrangeS. (1998) “The New World Order of Debt”. New Left Review, 9l–114.
44.
ThurowL. (1992) Head to Head: The Coming Economic Battle Among Japan, Europe and America. New York: William Morrow and Company.
45.
UnderhillG.R.D. (1998) “Transnational Financial Markets and National Economic Development Models: Global Structures versus Domestic Imperatives.” Mimeo. Paper presented to the Third Pan-European Conference on International Relations, September 16–19, 1998, Vienna, Austria.
46.
VeltmeyerH.PetrasJ.VieuxS. (1996) Neoliberalism and Class Conflict in Latin America: A Comparative Perspective on the Political Economy of Structural Adjustment. Houndsmill: MacMillan.
47.
WilliamsonJ. (ed.) (1990) Latin American Adjustment: How much has happened? Washington: Institute for International Economics.
48.
WilliamsonJ. (1993) “Democracyand the ‘Washington Consensus’”World Development, 21(8) (August), 1329–1336.
49.
World Bank (1998) Financial Vulnerability, Spillover Effects, and Contagion: Lessons from the Asian Crises for Latin America-World Bank Latin American and Caribbean Studies: Viewpoints. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
