This study investigates the association between eligibility for occupational welfare and employees’ skill levels. In particular, building on Visser’s classification, we explore (i) the extent to which this relationship is moderated by industrial relations regimes and (ii) whether the moderating effect of industrial relations regimes has changed over time. Analyses draw on the latest three waves (2005, 2010, 2015) of the European Working Conditions Survey, and consider a nationally representative sample (N = 64,122) of employees in 30 European countries (the then 28 EU Member States plus Norway and Turkey). Findings indicate a significant, persistent, skill-biased disparity in access to occupational welfare in any industrial relations regime, with the only exception of the organised corporatism regime (that is, the Nordic countries).
AgostiniCAscoliU (2014) Il welfare occupazionale: un’occasione per la ricalibratura del modello italiano?Politiche Sociali2/2014: 263–280.
2.
BaccaroLHowellC (2011) A common neoliberal trajectory: The transformation of industrial relations in advanced capitalism. Politics & Society39(4): 521–563.
3.
BaccaroLHowellC (2017) Trajectories of Neoliberal Transformation: European Industrial Relations since the 1970s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BechterBBrandlBMeardiG (2011) From National to Sectoral Industrial Relations: Developments in Sectoral Industrial Relations in the EU. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
BergPBoschGCharestJ (2014) Working time configurations: A framework for analyzing diversity across countries. Industrial & Labour Relations Review67(3): 805–837.
7.
BergPKossekEEBairdMBlockRN (2013) Cross-national collective bargaining and public policy pathways to work-family policy adoption: A comparative case study of Australia and the United States. European Management Journal31(5): 495–504.
8.
BernaciakMDumanandAŠcepanovicV (2011) Employee welfare and restructuring in the public sector: Evidence from Poland and Serbia. European Journal of Industrial Relations17(4): 365–380.
9.
BlankF (2018) With or without you. Occupational welfare and public social policies in Germany. In: NataliDPavoliniEVanherckeB (eds) Occupational Welfare in Europe: Risks, Opportunities and Social Partner Involvement. Brussels: ETUI, pp. 103–123.
10.
BoschG (2017) Different national skills systems. In: WarhurstCMayhewKFinegoldDBuchananJ (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Skills and Training. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 424–443.
11.
BuddJMumfordK (2004) Trade unions and family-friendly policies in Britain. ILR Review57(2): 204–222.
12.
BurroniL (2016) Capitalismi a confronto. Istituzioni e regolazione dell’economia nei paesi europei. Bologna: Il Mulino.
13.
ChungH (2018) Dualization and the access to occupational family-friendly working time arrangements across Europe. Social Policy & Administration52(2): 491–507.
14.
CrouchC (1993) Industrial Relations and European State Traditions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
CzarzastyJ (2018) Occupational welfare in Poland: A semi-peripheral feature of a semi-peripheral economy. In: NataliDPavoliniEVanherckeB (eds) Occupational Welfare in Europe: Risks, Opportunities and Social Partner Involvement. Brussels: ETUI, pp. 215–237.
16.
Den DulkLPetersPPoutsmaE (2012) Variations in adoption of workplace work-family arrangements in Europe: The influence of welfare-state regime and organisational characteristics. International Journal of Human Resource Management23(13): 2785–2808.
17.
EbbinghausBVisserJ (1997) Der Wandel der Arbeitsbeziehungen im westeuropäischen Vergleich. In: HradilSImmerfallS (eds) Die westeuropäischen Gesellschaften im Vergleich. Opladen: Leske+Budrich, pp. 233–276.
18.
EmmeneggerPHausermannSPalierBSeeleib-KaiserM (2012) (eds) The Age of Dualization: The Changing Face of Inequality in Deindustrializing Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
Esping-AndersenG (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
20.
Eurofound (2016) Mapping Key Dimensions of Industrial Relations. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
21.
Eurofound (2017) European Working Conditions Survey Integrated Data File, 1991–2015 [Data Collection]. 5th ed. UK Data Service, SN: 7363. Available at: http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-7363-5(accessed 5 May 2020).
22.
Eurofound (2018) Measuring Varieties of Industrial Relations in Europe: A Quantitative Analysis. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
23.
European Commission (2013) Industrial Relations in Europe 2012. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
24.
European Commission (2015) Employment and Social Developments in Europe 2014. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
25.
FarnsworthK (2004) Welfare through work: An audit of occupational social provision at the turn of the New Century. Social Policy & Administration38(5): 437–555.
26.
FarnsworthK (2013) Occupational welfare. In: GreveB (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Welfare. London: Routledge, pp. 30–39.
27.
FleckensteinTSeeleib-KaiserM (2011) Business, skills and the welfare state: the political economy of employment-oriented family policy in Britain and Germany. Journal of European Social Policy21(2): 136–149.
28.
FransDDoerflingerNPulignanoV (2019) Occupational welfare and segmentation: explaining across (and within) sectoral variation in Germany and Belgium. Zeitschrift für Sozialreform65(3): 215–242.
29.
GallieD (ed.) (2007) Employment Regimes and the Quality of Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
GoldenL (2008) Limited access: Disparities in flexible work schedules and work-at-home. Journal of Family and Economic Issues29(1): 86–109.
31.
GreveB (2007) Occupational Welfare: Winners and Losers. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
32.
GunniglePTurnerTMorleyM (1998) Employment flexibility and industrial relations arrangements at organisation level: A comparison of five European Countries. Employee Relations20(5): 430–442.
33.
HallPSoskiceD (eds) (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
HasselA (2014) The paradox of liberalization: Understanding dualism and the recovery of the German political economy. British Journal of Industrial Relations52(1): 57–81.
35.
JaehrlingKMéhautP (2013) Varieties of institutional avoidance: employers’ strategies in low-waged service sector occupations in France and Germany. Socio-Economic Review11(4): 687–710.
36.
JanssonOOttossonJMurhemSMagnussonL (2018) Sweden: Supplementary occupational welfare with near universal coverage. In: NataliDPavoliniEVanherckeB (eds) Occupational Welfare in Europe: Risks, Opportunities and Social Partner Involvement. Brussels: ETUI, pp. 55–77.
37.
Kaufman B (ed.) (2004) Theoretical Perspectives on Work and the Employment Relationship. Champagne, IL: Industrial Relations Research Association.
38.
KeuneMPaytonN (2018) The Netherlands: Occupational welfare within state-defined limits. In: NataliDPavoliniEVanherckeB (eds) Occupational Welfare in Europe: Risks, Opportunities and Social Partner Involvement. Brussels: ETUI, pp. 31–53.
39.
KohlHPlatzerH-W (2007) The role of the state in central and east European industrial relations: The case of minimum wages. Industrial Relations Journal38(6): 614–635.
40.
KorkutUde RuyterAMaganarisMBayleyD (2017) What next for unions in Central and Eastern Europe? Invisibility, departure and the transformation of industrial relations. European Journal of Industrial Relations23(1): 65–80.
41.
KossekEEFriedeA (2006) The business case: Managerial perspectives on work and the family. In: Pitt-CatsouphesMKossekEESweetS (eds) The Work and Family Handbook. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 611–626.
42.
MahnkopfB (1992) The ‘skill-oriented’ strategies of German trade unions: Their impact on efficiency and equality objectives. British Journal of Industrial Relations30(1): 61–81.
43.
Gumbrell-McCormickRHymanR (2018) Trade Unions in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44.
MeardiG (2018) Economic integration and state responses: Change in European industrial relations since Maastricht. British Journal of Industrial Relations56(3): 631–655.
45.
MainoFRizzaR (2018) Le piccole e medie imprese incontrano il welfare: nuove opportunità di tutela dei lavoratori e di crescita per l’azienda e il territorio?Stato e Mercato2/2018: 197–224.
46.
MolinaO (2014) Beyond de-centralization: The erosion of collective bargaining in Spain during the Great Recession. Stato e Mercato3/2014: 397–422.
47.
NaczykM (2018) Occupational welfare in the United Kingdom: From skill retention tool to social protection only for legitimate social risks. In: NataliDPavoliniEVanherckeB (eds) Occupational Welfare in Europe: Risks, Opportunities and Social Partner Involvement. Brussels: ETUI, pp. 79–102.
48.
NataliDPavoliniE (2014) Comparing (Voluntary) Occupational Welfare in the EU: Evidence from an International Research Study. OSE Paper Series, Research Paper, 16. Brussels: European Social Observatory.
49.
NataliDKeuneMPavoliniESeeleib-KaiserM (2018a) Sixty years after Titmuss: new findings on occupational welfare in Europe. Social Policy & Administration52(2): 435–448.
50.
NataliDPavoliniEVanherckeB (eds) (2018b) Occupational Welfare in Europe: Risks, Opportunities and Social Partner Involvement. Brussels: ETUI.
51.
Ozaki M (ed.) (1999) Negotiating Flexibility. The Role of the Social Partners and the State. Geneva: International Labour Office.
52.
PavoliniEAscoliUMirabileML (2013) Tempi moderni. Il welfare nelle aziende in Italia. Bologna: Il Mulino.
53.
PavoliniEArlottiMAscoliULeonardiSRaitanoM (2018) The challenge of occupational welfare in Italy: Between risks and opportunities. In: NataliDPavoliniEVanherckeB (eds) Occupational Welfare in Europe: Risks, Opportunities and Social Partner Involvement. Brussels: ETUI, pp. 173–192.
54.
RizzaRScaranoG (2019) Nuovi modelli di politica del lavoro. Milano: Egea.
55.
RuberyJGrimshawD (2003) The Organization of Employment: An International Perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
56.
RuberyJWardKGrimshawDBeynonH (2005) Working time, industrial relations and the employment relationship. Time and Society14(1): 89–111.
57.
SchröderM (2013) Integrating Varieties of Capitalism and Welfare State Research. A Unified Typology of Capitalisms. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
58.
Seeleib-Kaiser M and Fleckenstein T (2009) The political economy of occupational family policies: comparing workplaces in Britain and Germany. British Journal of Industrial Relations47(4): 741–764.
59.
SwanbergJEPitt-CatsouphesMDrescher-BurkeK (2005) A question of justice. Disparities in employees’ access to flexible schedule arrangements. Journal of Family Issues26(6): 866–895.
60.
ThelenK (2001) Varieties of labor politics in the developed democracies. In: HallPSoskiceD (eds) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 71–103.
61.
ThelenK (2014) Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62.
TrampuschC (2007) Industrial relations as a source of social policy: A typology of the institutional conditions for industrial agreements on social benefits. Social Policy & Administration41(3): 251–270.
63.
VisserJ (2008) The quality of industrial relations and the Lisbon Strategy. In: VisserJ (ed.) Industrial Relations in Europe. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, pp. 45–72.
64.
WilkinsonAWoodGDeegR (eds) (2014) The Oxford Handbook of Employment Relations: Comparative Employment Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65.
WilkinsonAWoodG (2012) Institutions and employment relations: The state of the art. Industrial Relations51(s1): 373–388.
66.
WilliamsR (2012) Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects. The Stata Journal12(2): 308–311.
67.
WißTGreveB (2019) A comparison of the interplay of public and occupational work–family policies in Austria, Denmark, Italy and the United Kingdom. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice22(5): 440–457.
68.
YerkesMATijdensK (2010) Social risk protection in collective agreements: Evidence from the Netherlands. European Journal of Industrial Relations16(4): 369–383.
