This article examines union strategies towards the twin digital and green transitions, comparing the German and Belgian automotive industries. The drive towards net-zero and more digital economies is manifested through the move from fossil fuel-powered cars to electric cars, engendering a reorganisation of production, work and employment among car manufacturers. We identified two strategic union response patterns. While German unions are developing proactive strategies and proposals to influence and shape the ongoing transition of the automotive industry, Belgian unions are more passive, reacting primarily to management proposals and focusing narrowly on employment and working conditions without a broader strategy on how to influence the transformation of the automotive industry. We explain the observed cross-national differences by two factors: the importance of national institutions, i.e., the varying integration of labour into management decision-making, and the role of union knowledge regimes. The latter refers to internal union organisations and structures such as research departments, research institutes and foundations tasked with providing own research and funding external research on change topics from a union perspective, publishing studies and developing programmatic agendas, and disseminating the knowledge to union members through training, workshops and conferences.
AvogaraM (2017) Evolution of Trade Unions in Industry 4.0: A German and ItalianDebate, presented at the 15th International Conference in Commemoration of Professor Marco Biagi, Modena, Italy, 20–21March.
BoschGSchmitz-KießlerJ (2020) Shaping Industry 4.0 – An experimental approach developed by German trade unions. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research26(2): 189–206.
4.
BrynjolfssonEMcAfeeA (2014) The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.
CampbellJLPedersenOK (2014) Knowledge regimes and the national origins of policy ideas. In: CampbellJLPedersenOK (eds) The National Origins of Policy Ideas: Knowledge Regimes in the United States, France, Germany, and Denmark. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 1–36.
CarusoL (2018) Digital innovation and the fourth industrial revolution: Epochal social changes?AI & Society33(3): 379–392.
9.
Cedefop (2021) The Green Employment and Skills Transformation: Insights From a European Green Deal Skills Forecast Scenario. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
10.
ChildJ (1972) Organisational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology6(1): 1–22.
DoellgastV (2012) Disintegrating Democracy at Work: Labor Unions and the Future of Good Jobs in the Service Economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
13.
DoellgastVBellegoMPanniniE (2020) After the social crisis: The transformation of employment relations at France Télécom. Socio-Economic Review19(3): 1127–1147.
14.
DoellgastVLillieNPulignanoV (2018) Reconstructing Solidarity: Labour Unions, Precarious Work, and the Politics of Institutional Change in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
DoellgastVWagnerIO’BradyS (2023) Negotiating limits on algorithmic management in digitalised services: cases from Germany and Norway. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research29(1): 105–120.
16.
DoerflingerNFransDVan HerrewegheD, et al. (2017) Money talk. Comparing and discussing good criteria for disclosure of financial business information to employee representatives in Europe. Synthesis report, November. Leuven, Belgium: HIVA KU Leuven.
17.
EdwardsPRamirezP (2016) When should workers embrace or resist new technology?New Technology, Work and Employment31(2): 99–113.
18.
EisenbergA (2019) Just transitions. Southern California Law Review92(2): 273–330.
Eurofound (2021) Social partners going digital: Using digital tools and adapting social dialogue processes. Research report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
European Commission, Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion (2017) Blueprint for sectoral cooperation on skills: Automotive. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
23.
FlanaganFGoodsC (2022) Climate change and industrial relations: Reflections on an emerging field. Journal of Industrial Relations64(4): 479–498.
24.
GalgócziB (ed.) (2019) Towards a Just Transition: Coal, Cars and the World of Work. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute.
25.
GarneauMÉPérez-LauzonSChristian LévesqueC (2023) Digitalisation of work in aerospace manufacturing: expanding union frames and repertoires of action in Belgium, Canada and Denmark. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research29(1): 139–154.
26.
Gumbrell-McCormickRHymanR (2013) Trade Unions in Western Europe: Hard Times, Hard Choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
HaipeterT (2020) Digitalisation, unions and participation: The German case of ‘industry 4.0’. Industrial Relations Journal51(3): 242–260.
28.
HauptmeierM (2012) Institutions are what actors make of them – The changing construction of firm-level employment relations in Spain. British Journal of Industrial Relations50(4): 737–759.
29.
HauptmeierMMorganG (2014) Ideas and institutions? The evolution of employment relations in the Spanish and German auto industry. In: HauptmeierMVidalM (eds) Comparative Political Economy of Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 162–185.
30.
HeeryE (2005) Sources of change in trade unions. Work, Employment and Society19(1): 91–106.
31.
HelperSMartinsRSeamansR (2019) Value Migration and Industry 4.0: Theory, field evidence, and propositions. Presented at the Torino RENIR Workshop, Turin, Italy, 19–20February2019.
32.
HermannCFleckerJ (eds) (2013) Privatization of Public Services: Impacts for Employment, Working Conditions, and Service Quality in Europe. London: Routledge.
33.
HymanR (2001) Understanding European Trade Unionism: Between Market, Class and Society. London: SAGE.
34.
IEA (International Energy Agency) (2020) Sustainable Recovery. World Energy Outlook Special Report. Paris: IEA.
35.
industriAll Europe (2021) Digitalisation in the post-COVID world: What role for industrial trade unions? Report, May. Brussels: industriAll Europe.
36.
KlugeNVitortS (2020) Codetermination for the sustainable company. Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Institut für Mitbestimmung und Unternehmensführung (IMU). Policy Brief 7. Available at: https://www.imu-boeckler.de/de/faust-detail.htm?sync_id=HBS-007667 (accessed 2 May 2022).
37.
KochanTAKatzHCMcKersieRB (1994) The Transformation of American Industrial Relations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
38.
KrzywdzinskiM (2017) Accounting for cross-country differences in employee involvement practices: Comparative case studies in Germany, Brazil and China. British Journal of Industrial Relations55(2): 321–346.
39.
KrzywdzinskiM (2021) Automation, digitalisation, and changes in occupational structures in the automobile industry in Germany, the United States, and Japan: A brief history from the early 1990s until 2018. Industrial and Corporate Change30(3): 499–535.
40.
KrzywdzinskiMPfeifferSEversM, et al. (2022) Measuring work and workers. Wearables and digital assistance systems in manufacturing and logistics. WZB Discussion Paper SP III 2022-301. Berlin: WZB.
41.
Lacueva-PérezFHannolaLNierhoffJ, et al. (2018) Comparing Approaches for Evaluating Digital Interventions on the Shop Floor. Technologies6(4): 116.
42.
LeyerMRichterASteinhüserM (2019) Power to the workers: Empowering shop floor workers with worker-centric digital designs. IJOPM39(1): 24–42.
43.
LévesqueCMurrayG (2013) Renewing union narrative resources: How union capabilities make a difference. British Journal of Industrial Relations51(4): 777–796.
44.
LloydCPayneJ (2019) Rethinking country effects: Robotics, AI and work futures in Norway and the UK. New Technology, Employment and Society34(3): 208–225.
45.
McKinsey and Company (2019) Industry 4.0: Capturing Value at Scale in Discrete Manufacturing. Frankfurt: MCP.
46.
MarginsonP (2016) Governing work and employment relations in an internationalized economy: The institutional challenge. Industrial and Labor Relations Review69(5): 1033–1955.
47.
MoorePVUpchurchMWhittakerX (2018) Humans and machines at work: Monitoring, surveillance and automation in contemporary capitalism. In: MoorePVUpchurchMWhittakerX (eds) Humans and Machines at Work. Monitoring, Surveillance and Automation in Contemporary Capitalism. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–16.
48.
MorganGHauptmeierM (2014) Varieties of institutional theory in comparative employment relations. In: WilkinsonAWoodGDeegR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Employment Relations – Comparative Employment Systems. Oxford Handbooks in Business and Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 190–221.
49.
MorganGHauptmeierM (2021) The social organisation of ideas in employment relations. ILR Review74(3): 773–797.
50.
PattonMQ (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. London: SAGE.
51.
PulignanoVDoerflingerN (2018) Labour markets, solidarity and precarious work: Comparing local unions’ responses to management flexibility strategies in the German and Belgian metalworking and chemical industries. In: DoellgastVLillieNPulignanoV (eds) Reconstructing Solidarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 83–103.
52.
PulignanoVDoerflingerNDe FranceschiF (2016) Flexibility and security within European labor markets: The role of local bargaining and the “trade-offs” within multinationals’ subsidiaries in Belgium, Britain, and Germany. ILR Review69(3): 605–630.
53.
PulignanoVSignorettiA (2016) Union strategies, national institutions and the use of temporary labour in Italian and US plants. British Journal of Industrial Relations54(3): 574–596.
54.
PulignanoVStewartP (2013) Understanding union responses to the management of change in Europe. Work, Employment and Society27(5): 842–859.
55.
PulignanoVWaddingtonJKlugeN (2007) Accommodating the challenges of and managing change: Trade union strategies in Europe. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research13(2): 181–184.
56.
RainnieADeanM (2020) Industry 4.0 and the future of quality work in the global digital economy. Labour & Industry: A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work30(1): 16–33.
57.
RefslundBWagnerI (2018) Cutting to the bone: Workers’ solidarity in the Danish-German slaughterhouse industry. In: DoellgastVLillieNPulignanoV (eds) Reconstructing Solidarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 67–82.
SusskindRESusskindD (2015) The Future of the Professions: How Technology Will Transform the Work of Human Experts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60.
TapiaMIbsenCLKochanTA (2015) Mapping the frontier of theory in industrial relations: The contested role of worker representation. Socio-Economic Review13(1): 157–184.
61.
TotterdillP (2015) Closing the gap: The fifth element and workplace innovation. European Journal of Workplace Innovation1(1): 55–74.
62.
TurnerL (1991) Democracy at Work: Changing World Market and the Future of Labor Unions. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
