Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A number of prominent writers on the social history and policy of sports doping in the former East Germany have compared that system with the atrocities of Nazi medical experimentation. This article draws from a range of primary and secondary sources to discuss and challenge the Nazi comparison argument. We argue that while there were many cases of secretive abuse and experimentation that led to severe side-effects, there are also examples of athletes who knew what they were taking. Moreover, the doping administrators did not have complete control over how doctors and coaches implemented the system – it was not a closed, totalitarian system that denied individual agency. We further argue that when set in the wider context of crimes within the former GDR, sports does not register as the most serious. The comparison with Nazi Germany is an over-statement constructed by writers whose emphasis on traditional sporting ethics had led them to exaggerate their argument. As such, the discussion of individual experiences opens up dilemmas, contradictions, and the space for agency, that simplistic top-down sociological and political models have so far denied.

Keywords

doping East Germany politics sport

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BBC (2000) Sports doctor doped swimmers, 12 January, available at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/599971.stm, accessed 17 August 2010.

Beraktschjan

(1997) Witness deposition, Berlin, 2 April, file number: e_su_0026, Steven Ungerleider Collection at the University of Texas’s Dolph Briscoe Center for American History.

Boese

(1996) Witness deposition, Berlin, 21 November, file number: e_su_0028 and 0029, Steven Ungerleider Collection at the University of Texas’s Dolph Briscoe Center for American History.

Booth

(2006) Sites of truth or metaphors of power? Refiguring the archive. Sport in History 26: 91–109.

Dennis

(2000) The Rise and Fall or the German Democratic Republic, 1945–1990. Harlow: Longman.

Dimeo

(2006) Good versus evil? Sport, drugs and the Cold War. In: Wagg

Andrews

(eds) East Plays West: Essays on Sport and the Cold War. Abingdon: Routledge, 149–162.

Dimeo

(2007) A History of Drug Use in Sport, 1876–1976: Beyond Good and Evil. London and New York: Routledge.

Fata

(2010) Steroid debate inspires UT journalists. The Daily Texan, 19 October.

Franke

Berendonk

(1997) Hormonal doping and androgenization of athletes: A secret program of the German Democratic Republic. Clinical Chemistry 43: 1262–1279.

10.

Frieberg

(1998) Defendant’s deposition, transcribed from telephone conversation, 9 February, file number: e_su_0032, Steven Ungerleider Collection at the University of Texas’s Dolph Briscoe Center for American History.

11.

Geipel

(1997) Witness deposition, Berlin, 21 May, file number: e_su_0034, Steven Ungerleider Collection at the University of Texas’s Dolph Briscoe Center for American History.

12.

Hoberman

(2005) Testosterone Dreams: Rejuvenation, Aphrodisia, Doping. Berkeley: University of California Press.

13.

Höppner

(1997) Defendant deposition, Berlin, 29 October, file number: e_su_0045, Steven Ungerleider Collection at the University of Texas’s Dolph Briscoe Center for American History.

14.

Johnes

(2007) Archives, truth and the historian at work: A reply to Douglas Booth’s ‘Refiguring the Archive’. Sport in History 27: 127–135.

15.

Krause

(1997) Witness deposition, Magdeburg, 24 September, file number: e_su_0053, Steven Ungerleider Collection at the University of Texas’s Dolph Briscoe Center for American History.

16.

Madler

(1999) Witness deposition, Berlin, 16 March, file number: e_su_0013, Steven Ungerleider Collection at the University of Texas’s Dolph Briscoe Center for American History.

17.

Matuschevski

(1999) Witness deposition, Berlin, 15 April, file numbers: e_su_0001 and 0002, Steven Ungerleider Collection at the University of Texas’s Dolph Briscoe Center for American History.

18.

Matz

(1996) Witness deposition, Berlin, 24 May, file number: e_su_0055, Steven Ungerleider Collection at the University of Texas’s Dolph Briscoe Center for American History.

19.

McAdams

(2001) Judging the Past in Unified Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

20.

Meineke

(1997) Witness deposition, Berlin, 19 February, file numbers: e_su_0039, Steven Ungerleider Collection at the University of Texas’s Dolph Briscoe Center for American History.

21.

Møller

(2010) The Ethics of Doping and Anti-Doping. London and New York: Routledge.

22.

Otto

(1997) Witness deposition, Berlin, 25 November, file numbers: e_su_0056 and 0057, Steven Ungerleider Collection at the University of Texas’s Dolph Briscoe Center for American History.

23.

Pound

(2004) Inside the Olympics: A Behind-the scenes Look at the Politics, the Scandals, and the Glory of the Games. Toronto: Wiley.

24.

Schmidt

(2007) The Nuremberg doctors’ trial and the Nuremberg code. In: Schmidt

Frewer

(eds) History and Theory of Human Experimentation: The Declaration of Helsinki and Modern Medical Ethics. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 71–116.

25.

Schramm

(1996) Witness deposition, Berlin, 11 September, file number: e_su_0018, Steven Ungerleider Collection at the University of Texas’s Dolph Briscoe Center for American History.

26.

Spitzer

(2006) Ranking number 3 in the world: How the addiction to doping changed sport in the GDR (East Germany). In: Spitzer

(ed.) Doping and Doping Control in Europe. Oxford: Meyer and Meyer, 57–77.

27.

Strobach

(1998) Witness deposition, Kaltenkirchen, 17 March, file number: e_su_0065, Steven Ungerleider Collection at the University of Texas’s Dolph Briscoe Center for American History.

28.

Ungerleider

(2001) Faust’s Gold: Inside the East German Doping Machine. New York: St Martin’s Press.

29.

Yoder

(1999) Truth without reconciliation: An appraisal of the enquete commission on the SED dictatorship in Germany. German Politics 8: 59–80.

The doping of athletes in the former East Germany: A critical assessment of comparisons with Nazi medical experiments

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References