This article examines the trend toward risk-based, preemptive social control as it has developed in anti-doping regulation in professional cycling. Specifically, this research considers how the regulatory technologies of anti-doping surveillance have become a core component of the everyday routines of professional cyclists. Drawing from interviews with professional cyclists and analysis of mediated representations of anti-doping, we find that surveillance and disclosure have become not simply routine, but a central orienting practice in the everyday lives of professional cyclists. Blended into the everyday routines, surveillance technologies extend the gaze of those who watch and increase pressures to disclose. As athletes internalize surveillance and disclosure as consistent with their professional norms, the power relationships that surround sport performance become increasingly difficult to discern.
DunnM.ThomasJ. O.SwiftW.BurnsL.MattickR. P. (2010). Drug testing in sport: The attitudes and experiences of elite athletes. International Journal of Drug Policy, 21, 330-332.
7.
ElbeA. M.OverbyeM. (2014). Urine doping controls: The athletes’ perspective. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 6, 227-240.
8.
EricsonR. V.DoyleA. (2003). Risk and morality. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
9.
FontanaA.FreyJ. (1994). The art of science. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (pp. 361-376). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
FoucaultM. (1971). The archeology of knowledge. New York, NY: Vantage Books.
11.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and punish. The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Random House.
GarlandD. (1997). Governmentality and the problem of crime: Foucault, criminology, sociology. Theoretical Criminology, 1, 173-214.
14.
GiddensA. (1986). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15.
GoffmanE. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16.
GoldB.LoaderI.ThumalaA. (2013). The banality of security: The curious case of surveillance cameras. British Journal of Criminology, 53, 977-996.
17.
HaggertyK. D. (2006). Tear down the walls: On demolishing the panopticon. In LyonD. (Ed.), Theorizing surveillance: The panopticon and beyond (pp. 23-45). New York, NY: Routledge.
18.
HaggertyK. D.EricsonR. V. (2000). The surveillant assemblage. The British Journal of Sociology, 51, 605-622.
19.
HaggertyK. D.EricsonR. V. (Eds.). (2006). The new politics of surveillance and visibility. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
20.
HaggertyK. D.SamatasM. (2010). Surveillance and democracy. London, England: Routledge.
21.
HaltJ. (2009). Where is the privacy in WADA’s Whereabouts rule?Marquette Sports Law Review, 20, 267-289.
22.
HanstadD. V.LolandS. (2009). Elite athletes’ duty to provide information on their whereabouts: Justifiable anti-doping work or an indefensible surveillance regime?European Journal of Sport Science, 9, 3-10.
23.
HardieM. (2011). It’s not about the blood! Operacion Puerto and the end of modernity. In McNameeM.MøllerV. (Eds.), Doping and anti-doping policy in sport: Ethical and legal perspectives (pp. 1-23). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
24.
HardieM. (2014). Making visible the invisible act of doping. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 27, 85-119.
25.
HenneK. (2010). WADA, the promises of law and the landscapes of anti-doping regulation. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 33, 306-325.
26.
HenneK. (2014). The emergence of moral technopreneurialism in sport: Techniques in anti-doping regulation, 1966-1976. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 31, 884-901.
27.
HenneK.TroshynskiE. (2013). Suspect subjects: Affects of bodily regulation. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 2, 100-112.
28.
HughesR.CoakleyJ. (1991). Positive deviance among athletes: The implications of over-conforming to the sport ethic. Sociology of Sport Journal, 13, 307-325.
29.
KayserB.BroersB. (2013). Anti-doping policies: Choosing between imperfections. In WeisstubD. (Ed.), Athletic enhancement, human nature, and ethics (pp. 271-289). Houten, the Netherlands: Springer.
30.
KayserB.MauronA.MiahA. (2007). Current anti-doping policy: A critical appraisal. BMC Medical Ethics, 8, 2-14.
Lentillon-KaestnerV. (2013). The development of doping use in high-level cycling: From team-organized doping to advances in the fight against doping. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 23, 189-197.
33.
Lentillon-KaestnerV.CarstairsC. (2010). Doping use among young elite cyclists: A qualitative psychosociological approach. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 20, 336-345.
34.
LolandS.HoppelerH. (2012). Justifying anti-doping: The fair opportunity principle and the biology of performance enhancement. European Journal of Sport Science, 12, 347-353.
35.
LyonD. (2001). Surveillance society: Monitoring everyday life. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill International.
36.
LyonD. (2007). Surveillance studies: An overview. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
37.
MacGregorO.GriffithR.RuggiuD.McNameeM. (2013). Anti-doping, purported rights to privacy and WADA’s whereabouts requirements: A legal analysis. Fair Play, 1.2, 13-38.
38.
MarxG. T. (2005). Seeing hazily (but not darkly) through the lens: Some recent empirical studies of surveillance technologies. Law & Social Inquiry, 30, 339-399.
39.
MarxG. T. (2012). “Your papers please”: Personal and professional encounters with surveillance. In BallK.HaggertyK.LyonD. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of surveillance studies (pp. xxvi). Oxon, UK: Routledge.
40.
McCahillM.FinnR. L. (2014). Surveillance, capital and resistance: Theorizing the surveillance subject. New York, NY: Routledge.
41.
McGuireM.McGuireM. R. (2012). Technology, crime, and justice: The question concerning technomia. New York, NY: Routledge.
42.
McNameeM. J. (2012). The spirit of sport and the medicalisation of anti-doping: Empirical and normative ethics. Asian Bioethics Review, 4, 374-392.
43.
MøllerV. (2009). The ethics of doping and anti-doping: Redeeming the soul of sport?New York, NY: Routledge.
44.
NafzigerJ. A. R. (2011). The influence of cultural variables on the international regime to combat doping in sports. Southwestern Journal of International Law, 18, 295-302.
45.
OhlF.FincoeurB.Lentillon-KaestnerV.DefranceJ.BrissonneauC. (2013). The socialization of young cyclists and the culture of doping. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 7, 1-18.
46.
OverbyeM.WagnerU. (2014). Experiences, attitudes and trust: An inquiry into elite athletes’ perception of the Whereabouts reporting system. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 6, 407-428.
RoseN. (2000). Government and control. British Journal of Criminology, 40, 321-339.
49.
SefihaO.ReichmanN. (2014). (Be)coming clean: Confessions as governance in professional cycling. Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, 6, 177-195.
50.
SilkM.SlackT.AmisJ. (2000). Bread, butter and gravy: An institutional approach to televised sport production. Culture, Sport, Society, 3, 1-21.
51.
SimonJ. (1988). The ideological effects of actuarial practices. Law & Society Review, 22, 771-800.
52.
SluggettB. (2011). Sport’s doping game: Surveillance in the biotech age. Sociology of Sport Journal, 28, 387-403.
53.
SmithD. E. (1999). Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
54.
SouleB.LestrelinL. (2011). The Puerto affair: Revealing the difficulties of the fight against doping. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 35, 186-208.
55.
StaplesW. G. (2013). Everyday surveillance: Vigilance and visibility in postmodern life. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
56.
StensonK. (2001). The new politics of crime control. In StensonK.SullivanR. R. (Eds.), Crime, risk and justice: The politics of crime control in liberal democracies (pp. 15-29). Devon, UK: William Publishing.
57.
TeetzelS.WeavingC. (2014). From silence to surveillance: Examining the aftermath of a Canadian university doping scandal. Surveillance & Society, 11, 481-493.
58.
ThompsonC. S. (2008). Tour de France: A cultural history. Berkeley: University of California Press.
WarrenI.PalmerD.WhelanC. (2014). Surveillance, governance and professional sport. Surveillance & Society, 11, 439-453.
61.
WarrenI.ZurawskiN. (2014). Surveillance and sport. Surveillance & Society, 11, 354-359.
62.
World Anti-Doping Agency. (2014, October). Athlete biological passport operating guidelines & compilation of required elements (Version 5.0). World Anti-Doping Agency, p. 10.
63.
YarM. (2014). Crime, deviance and doping: Fallen sport stars, autobiography and the management of stigma. London, England: Palgrave.
64.
ZednerL. (2007). Pre-crime and post-criminology?Theoretical Criminology, 11, 261-281.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
