Drawing on the body of knowledge of social impact research, this article offers the rationale, methodology and results of the social impact of the junior component of the Australia-South Africa Sport Development Programme. Academics from different disciplines developed and refined a multidimensional, flexible impact assessment tool for the research that was undertaken in the Northern Province and the Eastern Cape in 1999. The Programme that was fed through the educational system in contexts of poverty was monitored and assessed in relation to individual and core sociological indicators at macro-, meso- and micro-levels. The change that was indicated by the presenters (school teachers), participants (children) and other national and regional stakeholders portrays perceptions and experiences of `social change' in terms of ideology, socialization, empowerment, equity and access to participation and decision-making against the background of material constraints and the manifestations of poverty.
Arkly, L. (1999) `Study to Look at Impact of Sport: Australia to Fund Project', Star (23 Feb.): 2.
2.
Barrow, C.J. (1997) Environmental and Social Impact Assessment: An Introduction.London: Arnold.
3.
Bloss, H. (1977) `Sport Development Assistance under Educational and Political Aspects', International Journal of Physical Education (Fall): 21-23, 27.
4.
Boshoff, G.B.E. (1997) ` “Barefoot” Sports Administrators: Laying the Foundation for Sports Development in South Africa', Journal of Sport Management11: 69-79.
5.
Branch, K. , Hooper, D.A., Thompson, J. and Greighton, J. (1984) Guide to Social Assessment: A Framework for Assessing Social Change.Social Impact Assessment Series, 11.Boulder, CO: Westview.
6.
Burnett, C. (1998) `School Violence in an Impoverished South African Community', Child Abuse and Neglect22(8): 789-795.
7.
Burnett, C. , Hollander, W.J., Uys, J.M., De Bruin, G.P. and Lombard, A.J.J. (1999) The Australia-South Africa Sport Development Programme: An Impact Study of the Junior Sport Component. Research Report. Johannesburg: Department of Sport and Movement Studies, Rand Afrikaans University.
8.
Chalip, L. and Green, B.C. (1998) `Establishing and Maintaining a Modified Youth Sport Program: Lessons from Hotelling's Location Game', Sociology of Sport Journal15: 326-342.
9.
Cock, J. (1994) `Sociology as if Survival Mattered', S.A. Sociological Review6(2): 14-31.
10.
Dietz, T. (1987) `Theory and Method in Social Impact Assessment', Sociological Inquiry54: 54-69.
11.
Finsterbusch, K. (1985) `Environment and Behaviour State of the Art in Social Impact Assessment', Environment and Behavior17(2): 193-221.
12.
Finsterbusch, K. and Partridge, W.L. (1990) `The Development Anthropological Approach', in K. Finsterbusch, J. Ingersoll and L. Llewellyn (eds) Methods for Social Analysis in Developing Countries.Oxford: Westview.
13.
Finsterbusch, K. , Ingersoll, J. and Llewellyn, L. (1990) Methods for Social Analysis in Developing Countries.Boulder, CO, and San Francisco, CA: Westview.
14.
Finsterbusch, K. , Llewellyn, L.G. and Wolf, C.P. (eds) (1983) Social Impact Assessment Methods.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15.
Forrester, V. (1999) `Sports, Recreation, Arts and Culture: Transforming Socio-Economic Conditions', Professional Management Review (April): 122-128.
Gramling, R. and Freudenburg, W.R. (1992) `Opportunity-Threat, Development, and Adaptation: Toward a Comprehensive Framework for Social Impact Assessment', Rural Sociology57(2): 216-234.
18.
Huguet, P. and Latané, B. (1996) `Social Representations as Dynamic Social Impact', Journal of Communication46(4): 57-63.
19.
Ingersoll, J. (1990) `Social Analysis in AID and the World Bank', in Kurt Finsterbusch, Jasper Ingersoll and Lynn Llewellyn (eds) Methods for Social Analysis in Developing Countries.Oxford: Westview.
20.
International Association for Impact Assessment (1997) IAIA. http://www.iaia.org/. Retrieved 10 February 2000.
21.
Kotzé, J.C. (1993) In their Shoes.Kenwyn, Johannesburg: Juta.
22.
Lane, M.B. , Ross, H. and Dale, A.P. (1997) `Social Impact Research: Integrating the Technical, Political, and Planning Paradigms', Human Organization56(3): 302-310.
23.
Nowak, A. and Szamrey, J. (1990) `From Private Attitude to Public Opinion: A Dynamic Theory of Social Impact', Psychological Review97(3): 362-376.
24.
Rossi, P.H. , Freeman, H. and Lipsey, M.W. (1999) Evaluation: A Systematic Approach.London: Sage.
25.
Shuttleworth, J. and Wan-Ka, C. (1998) `Youth Sport Education and Development in Hong Kong: A Conflict Model Social Impact Assessment', Sport, Education and Society3(1): 37-58.
26.
Sidiropoulos, E. , Jeffery, A., Forgey, H., Chipps, C., Corrigan, T., Mophuthing, T., Helman, A. and Dimant, T. (1997/8) 1997/98: South Africa Survey.Johannesburg: South African Institute of Race Relations.
27.
Steyn, A.F. and Uys, T. (1998) The Small Group: Structure and Dynamics.Pretoria: Consortium.
28.
Taylor, C.N. , Bryan, C.H. and Goodrich, C.G. (1990) Social Assessment Theory, Process and Techniques. Studies in Resource Management. 7. Lincoln, New Zealand: Lincoln University, Centre for Resource Management.
29.
Wolf, C.P. (1983) `Social Impact Assessment: A Methodological Overview', in Kurt Finsterbusch, Lynn G. Llewellyn and C.P. Wolf (eds) Social Impact Assessment Methods.London: Sage.
30.
Woodman, L. (1988) `Sport Development: Systems, Trends and Issues', Sports Coach11(4): 29-38.
