This study investigated the relationship between environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure and investment in R&D and the firm’s financial performance. The firm’s financial performance is measured through indicators such as financial (return on equity (ROE)), operational (return on assets (ROA)) and market performance (Tobin’s Q). The study covers sample selection in 7 years, ranging from FY 2016–2017 to FY 2022–2023, of Indian-listed firms on the Bombay Stock Exchange. This study used panel data models: multiple regression, fixed effects model and system generalised method of moments. The empirical results confirmed that the overall ESG disclosure positively correlates with ROE, ROA and Tobin’s Q. However, the results of ESG interrelated elements are measured separately by ESG disclosures. ENV, CSR and GOV disclosure reported a positive relationship across all corporate performance indicators of ROE, ROA and Tobin’s Q. The disclosure of governance and the firm’s investment in research and development (R&D) are significantly and positively correlated with corporate performance. Also, this study examines the effects of investment in R&D’s mediating role in improving ESG score and enhancing corporate performance. The study finds that ordering inferences by R&D has a more significant impact on improving ESG scores and financial performance. The study’s outcomes can be helpful to the company’s augmentation of the ESG matter disclosure and better quality in reporting and achieving ESG standards and financial performance. Further, these results benefit investors, managers and policymakers mostly.
AboudA., & DiabA. (2018). The impact of social, environmental and corporate governance disclosures on firm value: Evidence from Egypt. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 8(4), 442–458.
2.
AgarwalB., GautamR. S., JainP., RastogiS., BhimavarapuV. M., & SinghS. (2023). Impact of environmental, social, and governance activities on the financial performance of Indian health care sector firms: Using competition as a moderator. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(2), 109.
3.
AkroutM. M., & Ben OthmanH. (2016). Environmental disclosure and stock market liquidity: Evidence from Arab MENA emerging markets. Applied Economics, 48(20), 1840–1851.
4.
AlareeniB. A., & HamdanA. (2020). ESG impact on performance of US S&P 500-listed firms. Corporate Governance, 20(7), 1409–1428. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2020-0258
5.
AlbitarK., HussaineyK., KoladeN., & GergedA. M. (2020). ESG disclosure and firm performance before and after IR: The moderating role of governance mechanisms. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 28(3), 429–444.
6.
Al-TuwaijriS. A., ChristensenT. E., & HughesK. (2004). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: A simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(5/6), 447–471.
7.
AmaeshiK, AdegbiteE., & RajwaniT. (2016). Corporate social responsibility in challenging and nonenabling institutional contexts: Do institutional voids matter?Journal of Business Ethics, 134(1), 135–153.
8.
AmbecS., & LanoieP. (2008). Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(4), 45–62.
9.
Aragon-CorreaJ. A., & SharmaS. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 71–88.
10.
ArdaO. A., BayraktarE., & TatogluE. (2019). How do integrated quality and environmental management practices affect firm performance? Mediating roles of quality performance and environmental proactivity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2190
11.
AsbaughH., CollinsD., & LaFondR. (2004). Corporate governance and the cost of equity capital(Working Paper). University of Iowa and University of Wisconsin.
12.
AttigN., El GhoulS., GuedhamiO., & SuhJ. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and credit ratings. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(4), 679–694.
13.
AuerB. R., & SchuhmacherF. (2016). Do socially (Ir) responsible investments pay? New evidence from international ESG data. The Quarterly Review of Economics & Finance, 59, 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2015.07.002
14.
BarneaA., & RubinA. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0496-z
15.
BarnettM. L., & SalomonR. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11), 1304–1320.
16.
BarneyJ. (1991). Special theory forum the resource-based model of the firm: Origins, implications, and prospects. Journal of Management, 17(1), 97–98.
17.
BauerR., EichholtzP., & KokN. (2010). Corporate governance and performance: The REIT effect, real estate economics. Real Estate Economics, 38(1), 1–29.
18.
BebchukL., CohenA., & FerrellA. (2009). What matters in corporate governance?Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 783–827.
19.
BehlA., Raghu KumariP. S., MakhijaH., & SharmaD. (2022). Exploring the relationship of ESG score and firm value using cross‑lagged panel analyses: Case of the Indian energy sector. Annals of Operations Research, 313(1), 231–256.
20.
BelyaevaZ., ShamsS. R., SantoroG., & GrandhiB. (2020). Unpacking stakeholder relationship management in the public and private sectors: The comparative insights. EuroMed Journal of Business, 15(3), 269–281.
21.
BhuiyanM. B. U., & NguyenT. H. N. (2020). Impact of CSR on cost of debt and cost of capital: Australian evidence. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(3), 419–430. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-08-2018-0208
22.
BlacconiereW. G., & PattenD. (1994). Environmental disclosures, regulatory costs and changes in share value. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 18(2), 357–377.
23.
BocquetR., Le BasC., MotheC., & PoussingN. (2013). Are firms with different CSR profiles equally innovative? Empirical analysis with survey data. European Management Journal, 31(6), 642–654.
24.
BrammerS. J., & PavelinS. (2006). Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 435–455.
25.
BrancoM. C., & RodriguesL. L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 111–132.
26.
BrancoM. C., & RodriguesL. L. (2008). Factors influencing social responsibility disclosure by Portuguese companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), 685–701.
27.
BroadstockD. C., MatousekR., MeyerM., & TzeremesN. G. (2020). Does corporate social responsibility impact firms’ innovation capacity? The indirect link between environmental & social governance implementation and innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 119, 99–110.
28.
BuallayA. (2019). Is sustainability reporting (ESG) associated with performance? Evidence from the European banking sector. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30(1), 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2017-0149
29.
BuallayA., Al HawajA. A., & HamdanA. (2020). Integrated reporting and performance: A cross-country comparison of GCC Islamic and conventional banks. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 12(8), 1619–1636. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-08-2017-0084
30.
BuallayA., KukrejaG., AldhaenE., Al MubarakM., & HamdanA. M. (2020). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and firms’ performance in Mediterranean countries: A stakeholders’ perspective. EuroMed Journal of Business, 15(3), 361–375.
31.
CairncrossF. (1994). The challenge of going green. Harvard Business Review, 72(4), 40–41.
32.
CarrollA. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Bus Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.
33.
CavacoS., & CrifoP. (2010). Complementarity between CSR practices and corporate performance: An empirical study. In Corporate social responsibility: From compliance to opportunity.
34.
ChevrollierN., ZhangJ., van LeeuwenT., & NijhofA. (2019). The predictive value of strategic orientation for ESG performance over time. Corporate Governance, 20(1), 123–142.
35.
ChiongP. T. N. (2010). Examination of corporate sustainability disclosure level and its impact on financial performance. University of Multimedia.
36.
ChristmannP. (2000). Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 663–680.
37.
ClarksonP. M., FangX., LiY., & RichardsonG. D. (2013). The relevance of environmental disclosures: Are such disclosures incrementally informative?Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(4), 410–431.
38.
CuiJ., JoH., & NaH. (2018). Does corporate social responsibility affect information asymmetry?Journal of Business Ethics, 148(3), 549–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-3003-8
39.
DengX., KangJ. K., & LowB. S. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder value maximization: Evidence from mergers. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(1), 87–109.
40.
DhaliwalD. S., LiO. Z., TsangA., & YangY. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000005
41.
DillaW., JanvrinD., PerkinsJ., & RaschkeR. (2019). Do environmental responsibility views influence investors’ use of environmental performance and assurance information. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 10(3), 476–497. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-12-2018-0357
42.
DonaldsonT., & PrestonL. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.
43.
DowellG., HartS., & YeungB. (2000). Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value?Management Science, 46(8), 1059–1074.
44.
DumitrescuA., El HefnawyM., & ZakriyaM. (2020). Golden geese or black sheep: Are stakeholders the saviors or saboteurs of financial distress?Finance Research Letters, 37, 101371.
45.
DurnevA., & KimE. H. (2005). To steal or not to steal: Firm attributes, legal environment, and valuation. The Journal of Finance, 60(3), 1461–1493.
46.
ElsayedK., & PatonD. (2005). The impact of environmental performance on firm performance: Static and dynamic panel data evidence. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 16(3), 395–412.
47.
FamaE. F., & JensenM. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.
48.
FatemiA., GlaumM., & KaiserS. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45–64.
FischerT. M., & SawczynA. A. (2013). The relationship between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance and the role of innovation. Evidence from German listed firms. Journal of Management Control, 24(2), 27–52.
51.
FlammerC. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management Science, 61(11), 2549–2568.
52.
ForsmanH. (2011). Innovation capacity and innovation development in small enterprises. A comparison between the manufacturing and service sectors. Research Policy, 40(5), 739–750.
53.
FriedmanM. (1970). A Friedman doctrine: The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 13, 32–33.
54.
FreedmanM., & JaggiB. (1988). An analysis of the association between pollution disclosure and economic performance, accounting. Auditing & Accountability Journal, 1(2), 43–58.
55.
FreemanR. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
56.
FreemanR. E. (1999). Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 233–236.
57.
GalbreathJ. (2013). ESG in focus: The Australian evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(3), 529–541.
58.
GiannarakisG., AndronikidisA., & SariannidisN. (2020). Determinants of environmental disclosure: investigating new and conventional corporate governance characteristics. Annals of Operations Research, 294, 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03323-x
59.
GibbonsR., & WaldmanM. (2004). Task-specific human capital. American Economic Review, 94(2), 203–207.
60.
GilalF. G., AshrafZ., GilalN. G., GilalR. G., & ChaanaN. A. (2019). Promoting environmental performance through green human resource management practices in higher education institutions: a moderated mediation model. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 120–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1835
61.
GodfreyP. C., MerrillC. B., & HansenJ. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), 425–445.
62.
GompersP., IshiiJ., & MetrickA. (2001). Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 107e156.
63.
GoncalvesO., RobinotE., & MichelH. (2016). Does it pay to be green? The case of French ski resorts. Journal of Travel Research, 55(7), 889–903.
64.
GrantR. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114–135.
65.
GreveH. R. (2003). A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 685–702.
66.
GuptaL., & JhamJ. (2021). Green investing: Impact of pro-environmental preferences on stock market valuations during turbulent periods. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 15(5), 59–81. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v15i5.5
67.
HairJ. F., BlackW. C., BabinB. J., & AndersonR. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
68.
HalkosG., & SkouloudisA. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and innovative capacity: Intersection in a macro-level perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 291–300.
69.
HallR. (1992). The strategic analysis of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 13(2), 135–144.
70.
HamidiS., ZandiatashbarA., & BonakdarA. (2018). The relationship between regional compactness and regional innovation capacity (RIC): Empirical evidence from a national study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 394–402.
71.
HanJ.-J., KimH. J., & YuJ. (2016). Empirical study on relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance in Korea. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 1(1), 1–16.
72.
HarjotoM. A., & JoH. (2015). Legal vs normative CSR: Differential impact on analyst dispersion, stock return volatility, cost of capital, and firm value. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(1), 1–20.
73.
HarrisonJ. S., BosseD. A., & PhillipsR. A. (2010). Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1), 58–74.
74.
HartS. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014.
75.
HartS. L., & MilsteinM. B. (2003). Creating sustainable value. Academy of Management Perspectives, 17(2), 56–67.
76.
HullC. E., & RothenbergS. (2008). Firm performance: The interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Strategic Management Journal, 29(7), 781–789.
77.
JhaM. K., & RangarajanK. (2020). Analysis of corporate sustainability performance and corporate financial performance causal linkage in the Indian context. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 5(1), 1–30.
78.
JitmaneerojB. (2016). Reform priorities for corporate sustainability: Environmental, social, governance, or economic performance?Management Decision, 54(6), 1497–1521.
79.
JoH., & HarjotoM. A. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 351–383.
80.
KaragozogluN., & LindellM. (2000). Environmental management: Testing the win-win model. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43(6), 817–829.
81.
KempR. (1994). Technology and the transition to a sustainable economy: continuity and change in complex technological systems. Paper presented at the Symposium International de Modeles de Developpment Soutenable, Paris, March16–18.
82.
KhannaT., & PalepuK. (2000). The future of business groups in emerging markets: Long-run evidence from Chile. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 268–285.
83.
KimJ., ChungS., ParkC., & FriedmanM. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: the impact of the MSCI ESG ratings on Korean firms. Journal of the Korea Academia- Industrial Cooperation Society, 14(11), 5586–5593.
84.
KirnerE., KinkelS., & JaegerA. (2009). Innovation paths and the innovation performance of low-technology firms—An empirical analysis of German industry. Research Policy, 38(3), 447–458.
85.
KonarS., & CohenM. A. (2001). Does the market value environmental performance?Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(2), 281–289.
86.
KrügerP. (2015). Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 115, 304–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.09.008
87.
LeeS., SeoK., & SharmaA. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance in the airline industry: The moderating role of oil prices. Tourism Management, 38, 20–30.
88.
LevB., PetrovitsC., & RadhakrishnanS. (2010). Is doing good good for you? How corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth. Strategic Management Journal, 31(2), 182–200.
89.
LiS., & GaurA. (2014). Financial giants and moral pygmies? Multinational corporations and human rights in emerging markets. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 9(1), 11–32.
90.
LiY., GongM., ZhangX. Y., & KohL. (2018). The impact of environmental, social, and governance disclosure on firm value: the role of CEO power. The British Accounting Review, 50(1), 60–75.
91.
LiouiA., & SharmaZ. (2012). Environmental corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Disentangling direct and indirect effects. Ecological Economics, 78, 100–111.
92.
LiuA. Z., LiuA. X., WangR., & XuS. X. (2020). Too much of a good thing? The boomerang effect of firms’ investment on corporate social responsibility during product recalls. Journal of Management Studies, 57(8), 1437–1472. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12525
93.
LoS. F., & SheuH. J. (2007). Is corporate sustainability a value-increasing strategy for business?Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 345–358.
94.
LoannouI., & SerafeimG. (2015). The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations: Analysts perceptions and shifting institutional logics. Strategic Management Journal, 36(7), 1053–1081. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2268
95.
LokuwadugeC. S. D. S., & HeenetigalaK. (2017). Integrating environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure for a sustainable development: An Australian study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1927
96.
LuH., OhW. Y., KleffnerA., & ChangY. K. (2021). How do investors value corporate social responsibility? Market valuation and the firm specific contexts. Journal of Business Research, 125, 14–25.
97.
LucasM. T., & NoordewierT. G. (2016). Environmental management practices and firm financial performance: The moderating effect of industry pollution-related factors. International Journal of Production Economics, 175, 24–34.
98.
MajumdarS. K., & MarcusA. A. (2001). Rules versus discretion: The productivity consequences of flexible regulation. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 170–179.
99.
MalarvizhiP., & MattaR. (2016). Link between corporate environmental disclosure and firm performance – perception or reality?The British Accounting Review, 36(1), 107–117.
100.
MargolisJ. D., & WalshJ. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.
101.
MargolisJ. D., ElfenbeinH. A., & WalshJ. P. (2009). Does it pay to be good…and does it matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–68
102.
MattinglyJ. E., & BermanS. L. (2006). Measurement of corporate social action discovering taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenburg Domini ratings data. Business & Society, 45(1), 20–46.
103.
McWilliamsA., & SiegelD. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification?Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603–609.
104.
McWilliamsA., & SiegelD. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.
105.
McWilliamsA., SiegelD. S., & WrightP. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1–18.
106.
Merza RadhiD. S., & SareaA. (2019). Evaluating financial performance of Saudi listed firms: Using statistical failure prediction models. International Journal of Business Ethics and Governance, 2(1), 1–18.
107.
MiroshnychenkoI., BarontiniR., & TestaF. (2017). Green practices and financial performance: A global outlook. Journal of Cleaner Production, 147, 340–351.
108.
MithaniM. A. (2017). Innovation and CSR—Do they go well together?Long Range Planning, 50(6), 699–711.
109.
NguyenD. T., HoanT. G., & TranH. G. (2022). Help or hurt? The impact of ESG on firm performance in S&P 500 non-financial firms. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 16(2), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v16i2.7
110.
NolletJ., FilisG., & MitrokostasE. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A non-linear and disaggregated approach. Economic Modelling, 52, 400–407.
111.
OdellJ., & AliU. (2016). ESG investing in emerging and frontier markets. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 28(2), 96–101.
112.
OderaO., ScottA. H. S., & GowJ. (2016). Factors influencing corporate social and environmental disclosures: a systematic review. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 11(2), 116–134.
113.
PadgettR. C., & GalanJ. I. (2010). The effect of R&D intensity on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(3), 407–418.
114.
PatelP. C., PearceJ. A., II, & OghaziP. (2021). Not so myopic: Investors lowering short-term growth expectations under high industry ESG-sales-related dynamism and predictability. Journal of Business Research, 128, 551–563.
115.
PolonskyM. J., & OttmanJ. (1998). Stakeholders’ contribution to the green new product development process. Journal of Marketing Management, 14(6), 533–557.
116.
PonnuC. H. (2008). Corporate governance structures and the performance of Malaysian public listed companies. International Review of Business Research Papers, 4(2), 217–230.
117.
PorterM. E., & Van der LindeC. (1995). Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120–134.
118.
PriceJ. M., & SunW. (2017). Doing good and doing bad: The impact of corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility on firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 80, 82–97.
119.
QiuY., ShaukatA., & TharyanR. (2016). Environmental and social disclosures: Link with the corporate financial performance. The British Accounting Review, 48(1), 102–116.
120.
RaoA., DagarV., SohagK., DagherL., & TaninT. I. (2023). Good for the planet, good for the wallet: The ESG impact on financial performance in India. Finance Research Letters, 56, 104093.
121.
RobertsP. W., & DowlingG. R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1077–1093.
122.
RussoM. V., & FoutsP. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559.
123.
SaeedA., AlnoriF., & YaqoobG. (2023). Corporate social responsibility, industry concentration, and firm performance: Evidence from emerging Asian economies. Research in International Business and Finance, 64, 101864.
124.
SaeidiS. P., SofianS., SaeidiP., SaeidiS. P., & SaaeidiS. A. (2015). How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 341–350.
125.
SahutJ.-M., & Pasquini-DescompsH. (2015). ESG impact on market performance of firms: International evidence. Management International, 19(2), 40–63.
126.
SalehM., ZulkifliN., & MuhamadR. (2011). Looking for evidence of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance in an emerging market. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 3(2), 165–190.
127.
San OngT., TehB. H., & AngY. W. (2014). The impact of environmental improvements on the financial performance of leading companies listed in Bursa Malaysia. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 5(5), 386.
128.
SantamaríaL., NietoM. J., & Barge-GilA. (2009). Beyond formal R&D: Taking advantage of other sources of innovation in low- and medium-technology industries. Research Policy, 38(3), 507–517.
129.
SantosaP. W. (2020). The effect of financial performance and innovation on leverage: Evidence from Indonesian food and beverage sector. Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, 11(22), 367–388. https://doi.org/10.15388/OMEE.2020.11.38
130.
ShahbazM., KaramanA. S., KilicM., & UyarA. (2020). Board attributes, CSR engagement, and corporate performance: What is the nexus in the energy sector?Energy Policy, 143, 111582.
131.
SharmaD., & ThukralM. S. (2015). Do social, environmental and governance concerns reward value to firms? An investigation of BSE-500 listed firms. IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance, 23–28.
132.
SharmaD., BhattacharyaS., & ThukralS. (2019). Resource-based view on corporate sustainable financial reporting and firm performance: Evidences from emerging Indian economy. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 13(4), 323–344.
133.
SiagianF., SiregarS. V., & RahadianY. (2013). Corporate governance, reporting quality, and firm value: evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 3(1), 4–20.
134.
SimnettR., VanstraelenA., & ChuaW. F. (2009). Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 937–967.
135.
SinghaniaM., & SainiN. (2022). Systems approach to environment, social and governance (ESG): Case of Reliance Industries. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 103–117.
136.
SurrocaJ., TribóJ. A., & WaddockS. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 463–490.
137.
TangZ., HullC. E., & RothenbergS. (2012). How corporate social responsibility engagement strategy moderates the CSR–financial performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7), 1274–1303.
138.
TarmujiI., MaelahR., & TarmujiN. H. (2016). The impact of environmental, social and governance practices (ESG) on economic performance: evidence from ESG score. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 7(3), 67–74.
139.
TeeceD. J. (1980). Economies of scope and the scope of the enterprise. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1(3), 223–247.
140.
TollinK., & VejJ. (2012). Sustainability in business: understanding meanings, triggers and enablers. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 20(7), 625–641.
141.
TurbanD. B., & GreeningD. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management, 40(3), 658–672.
142.
Velte P. (2017). Does ESG performance have an impact on financial performance? Evidence from Germany. Journal of Global Responsibility, 80(2), 169–178.
143.
VerrecchiaR. E. (2001). Essays on disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1/3), 97–180.
144.
WagnerM., & SchalteggerS. (2004). The effect of corporate environmental strategy choice and environmental performance on competitiveness and economic performance: An empirical study of EU manufacturing. European Management Journal, 22(5), 557–572.
145.
WahbaH., & ElsayedK. (2015). The mediating effect of financial performance on the relationship between social responsibility and ownership structure. Future Business Journal, 1(1–2), 1–12.
146.
WulfI., NiemöllerJ., & RentzschN. (2014). Development toward integrated reporting, and its impact on corporate governance: A two-dimensional approach to accounting with reference to the German two-tier system. Journal of Management Control, 25(2), 135–164.
147.
YadavP. L., HanS. H., & RhoJ. J. (2016). Impact of environmental performance on firm value for sustainable investment: evidence from large US firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(6), 402–420.
148.
YoonB., LeeJ. H., & ByunR. (2018). Does ESG performance enhance firm value? Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 10(10), 3635.
