This study attempts to explore the effect of corporate governance parameters like board size and independent directors along with firm-specific characteristics such as age, size and profitability on the environmental performance disclosure of 38 National Stock Exchange (NSE) listed Indian non-financial companies for the period of 2013–2017. This study uses panel data analysis and finally documents a positive impact of board size and age of firm on the environmental performance disclosures of Indian companies. The study also finds a significant and negative effect of board independence on the environmental performance disclosure of such companies. The study based on its findings questions the role of independent directors as an internal regulatory body and suggests external regulatory specifications for better environmental performance and its disclosure to the public.
AbidinZ. Z.KamalN. M.JusoffK. (2009). Board structure and corporate performance in Malaysia. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 1(1), 150.
2.
AhmadN. N. N.MohamadN. A. (2014). Environmental disclosures by the Malaysian construction sector: Exploring extent and quality. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(4), 240–252.
3.
AhmadN.RashidA.GowJ. (2017). Board independence and corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting in Malaysia. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 11(2), 61–85. doi:10.14453/aabfj.v11i2.5.
4.
Al-MalkawiH. A. N.PillaiR.BhattiM. I. (2014). Corporate governance practices in emerging markets: The case of GCC countries. Economic Modelling, 38, 133–141.
5.
AltafN.ShahF. A. (2018). Ownership concentration and firm performance in Indian firms: Does investor protection quality matter. Journal of Indian Business Research, 10(1), 33–52.
6.
ArafatM. Y.WarokkaA.DewiS. R. (2012). Does environmental performance really matter? A lesson from the debate of environmental disclosure and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Management Studies, 2012, 1–15.
7.
BaeS.MasudM.KimJ. (2018). A cross-country investigation of corporate governance and corporate sustainability disclosure: A signaling theory perspective. Sustainability, 10(8), 2611.
8.
BreuschT. S.PaganA. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239–253.
9.
BurgwalD. V. D.VieiraR. J. O. (2014). Environmental disclosure determinants in dutch listed companies. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 25(64), 60–78.
10.
ChaitanyaV. (2007). Rapid economic growth and industrialization in India, China & Brazil: At what cost? William Davidson Institute Working Paper Number 897. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1087333
11.
ChakrabartyS.WangL. (2012). The long-term sustenance of sustainability practices in MNCs: A dynamic capabilities perspective of the role of R&D and internationalization. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(2), 205–217.
12.
ConnellyJ. T.LimpaphayomP. (2004). Board characteristics and firm performance: Evidence from the life insurance industry in Thailand. Chulalongkorn Journal of Economics, 16(2), 101–124.
13.
DienesD.SassenR.FischerJ. (2016). What are the drivers of sustainability reporting? A systematic review. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(2), 154–189. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2014–0050
14.
DobreE.StanilaG.BradL. (2015). The influence of environmental and social performance on financial performance: Evidence from Romania’s listed entities. Sustainability, 7(3), 2513–2553.
15.
FamaE. F.JensenM. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.
16.
GargA. K. (2007). Influence of board size and independence on firm performance: A study of Indian companies. Vikalpa, 32(3), 39–60.
17.
GRI. (2006). Retrieved from https://www.globalreporting.org/
18.
HamidM. A.TingI. W. K.KwehQ. L. (2016). The relationship between corporate governance and expropriation of minority shareholders’ interests. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 99–106.
19.
HaninunH.LindrianasariL.DenzianaA. (2018). The effect of environmental performance and disclosure on financial performance. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 11(1–2), 138–148.
20.
HaqueF.NtimC. G. (2018). Environmental policy, sustainable development, governance mechanisms and environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(3), 415–435.
21.
HartS. L.AhujaG. (1996). Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(1), 30–37.
22.
HausmanJ. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 46(6), 1251–1271.
23.
HtayS. N. N.RashidH. M. A.AdnanM. A.MeeraA. K. M. (2012). Impact of corporate governance on social and environmental information disclosure of Malaysian listed banks: Panel data analysis. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 4(1), 1–24. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5296/ajfa.v4i1.810
24.
HussainN. (2016). Determinants and consequences of corporate sustainability performance and disclosure. Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10579/8354
25.
IbrahimN. A.HowardD. P.AngelidisJ. P. (2003). Board members in the service industry: An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility orientation and directorial type. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(4), 393–401. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027334524775
26.
IwataH.OkadaK. (2011). How does environmental performance affect financial performance? Evidence from Japanese manufacturing firms. Ecological Economics, 70(9), 1691–1700.
27.
JangguT.DarusF.ZainM. M.SawaniY. (2014). Does good corporate governance lead to better sustainability reporting? An analysis using structural equation modeling. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 145, 138–145.
28.
KhanA.MuttakinM. B.SiddiquiJ. (2013). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(2), 207–223.
29.
KielG. C.NicholsonG. J. (2003). Board composition and corporate performance: How the Australian experience informs contrasting theories of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(3), 189–205.
30.
KleinL. R. (1962). Introduction to econometrics. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
31.
KleinA. (2002). Audit committee, board of directors characteristics, and earning management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(3), 375–400.
32.
KonarS.CohenM. A. (2001). Does the market value environmental performance. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(2), 281–289.
33.
KumarN.SinghJ. P. (2013). Effect of board size and promoter ownership on firm value: Some empirical findings from India. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 13(1), 88–98.
34.
LuW. L. (2013). An exploration of the association among corporate sustainability performance, corporate governance and corporate financial performance. PhD Dissertations of University of Texas Arlington. Retrieved from https://rc.library.uta.edu/uta-ir/bitstream/handle/.../Lu_uta_2502D_12405.pdf?
35.
MannaA.SahuT. N.GuptaA. (2016). Impact of ownership structure and board composition on corporate performance in Indian companies. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 9(1), 44–66.
36.
MichelonG.ParbonettiA. (2012). The effects of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure. Journal of Management and Governance, 16(3), 477–509.
37.
MohamadW. I. A. W.SulongZ. (2010). Corporate governance mechanisms and extent of disclosure: Evidence from listed companies in Malaysia. International Business Research, 3(4), 216.
38.
OECD Report. (2006). Environmental compliance and enforcement in India: Rapid assessment. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/env/outreach/37838061.pdf
39.
PandeyK. D.SahuT. N. (2017a). An empirical analysis on capital structure, ownership structure and firm performance: Evidence from India. Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, 8(2), 63–72.
40.
PandeyK. D.SahuT. NSahuT. N. (2017b). Financial leverage, firm performance and value: With reference to Indian manufacturing firms. Asian Journal of Research in Banking and Finance, 7(7), 265–274.
41.
PandeyK. D.SahuT. NSahuT. N. (2019a). Concentrated promoters’ ownership and firm value: Re-examining the monitoring and expropriation hypothesis. Paradigm, 23(1), 70–82.
42.
PandeyK. D.SahuT. NSahuT. N. (2019b). Debt financing, agency cost and firm performance: Evidence from India. Vision, 23(3), 267–274.
43.
PatelliL.PrencipeA. (2007). The relationship between voluntary disclosure and independent directors in the presence of a dominant shareholder. European Accounting Review, 16(1), 5–33.
44.
Planning Commission Report, Government of India. (2000). Evaluation study on the functioning of state pollution control boards. Retrieved from http://planningcommission.nic.in/reports/peoreport/cmpdmpeo/volume1/180.pdf
45.
PostC.RahmanN.RubowE. (2011). Green governance: Boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business & Society, 50(1), 189–223. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650310394642
46.
Prado-LorenzoJ. M.Garcia-SanchezI. M. (2010). The role of the board of directors in disseminating relevant information on greenhouse gases. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(3), 391–424.
47.
RaoK.TiltC. A.LesterL. H. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental reporting: An Australian study. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 12(2), 143–163.
48.
RoufD. (2011). Corporate characteristics, governance attributes and the extent of voluntary disclosure in Bangladesh. African Journal of Business Management, 5(19), 7836–7845.
49.
SahayA. (2004). Environmental reporting by Indian corporations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 11(1), 12–22.
50.
SahoreN. S.VermaA. (2017). Environmental disclosures and size of selected Indian firms. European Scientific Journal, 13(12), 515–529.
51.
SahuT. N.MannaA. (2013). Impact of board composition and board meeting on firms’ performance: A study of selected Indian companies. Vilakshan: The XIMB Journal of Management, 10(2), 99–112.
52.
SarumpaetS. (2006). The relationship between environmental performance and financial performance of Indonesian companies. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 7(2), 89–98.
53.
SaxenaM.KohliA. S. (2012). Impact of corporate social responsibility on corporate sustainability: A study of the Indian banking industry. IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, 11(4), 39–54.
54.
ShankarB. S.BalasubramanyaN.ReddyM. T. (2008). Impact of industrialization on groundwater quality—A case study of peenya industrial area, Bangalore, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 142(1–3), 263–268.
55.
SharmaJ. P.KhannaS. (2014). Corporate social responsibility, corporate governance and sustainability: Synergies and inter-relationships. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 7(1), 14–38.
56.
The Environment (Protection) Rules. (1986). Retrieved from https://www.kspcb.gov.in/Acts-Rules/EP-Rules-1986.pdf
57.
The Manufacture, Storage and Import of Hazardous Chemicals Rules. (1989). Retrieved from http://nagarikmancha.org/images/ manufacture, Storage and Import of Hazardous Chemicals Rules, 1989.pdf
58.
The Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules. (2000). Retrieved from http://cpcbenvis.nic.in/noisepollution/noise_rules_2000.pdf
59.
The Public Liability Insurance Rules. (1991). Retrieved from https://indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/1960/1/A1991–06.pdf
60.
The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Cess Rules. (1978). Retrieved from http://www.rfhha.org/images/pdf/Hospital_Laws/Water_cess_rules_1978.pdf
61.
The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Rules. (1975). Retrieved from https://tspcb.tripura.gov.in/TSPCB-Websit/wate-rules%201975.pdf
62.
WhiteH. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817–838.
63.
WHO Report. (2018). WHO global ambient air quality database. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/gho/publications/en/
64.
XuX.WangY. (1999). Ownership structure, corporate governance in Chinese stock companies. China Economic Review, 10(1), 75–98.
65.
ZahraS. A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate social responsibility performance. European Management Journal, 7(2), 240–247.
