Configurations of Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Sustainable Development: A Review

Abstract

This review examines the configurations of corporate governance mechanisms and their influence on sustainable development outcomes. Drawing on critical theoretical frameworks, including agency theory, stakeholder theory and resource dependence theory, the review explores how board composition, executive compensation and ownership structures impact environmental, social and governance performance. By addressing cultural, regulatory and industry-specific contexts, this article highlights how these factors shape the effectiveness of governance mechanisms in promoting sustainability. Methodological choices are discussed, with attention to the limitations of excluding non-empirical and non-firm-level studies. The review also underscores the need for greater inclusion of participatory governance and community engagement practices to drive meaningful sustainability outcomes. Case studies and examples illustrate practical applications of these governance mechanisms in diverse settings. The review concludes by identifying critical research gaps. It offers recommendations for future studies, emphasising the need for longitudinal and mixed-method approaches to deepen understanding of governance’s role in sustainable development. These findings provide actionable insights for scholars, practitioners and policymakers seeking to enhance corporate governance to support global sustainability goals.

Keywords

Corporate governance environmental governance metrics social sustainable development

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abdelkader

M. G.

, Gao

, & Elamer

A. A.

(2024). Board gender diversity and ESG performance: The mediating role of temporal orientation in South Africa context. Journal of Cleaner Production , 440, 140728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140728

Ahmad

, Youjin

, Žiković

, & Belyaeva

(2023). The effects of technological innovation on sustainable development and environmental degradation: Evidence from China. Technology in Society , 72, 102184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102184

Al-Faryan

M. A. S.

(2024). Agency theory, corporate governance and corruption: An integrative literature review approach. Cogent Social Sciences , 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2337893

Al-Giffari

H. A.

, & Mayukh

(2024). Critical review of content analysis studies on corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Sustainability in Research , 2(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.59890/ijsr.v2i1.1130

Alim

, & Sulley

(2024). Beyond healing: Embracing the triple bottom line approach in post-pandemic healthcare. Cureus , 16(2), e54019. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.54019

Al-Jaifi

H. A.

, Al-Qadasi

A. A.

, & Al-Rassas

A. H.

(2023). Board diversity effects on environmental performance and the moderating effect of board independence: Evidence from the Asia-Pacific region. Cogent Business & Management , 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2210349

Almaqtari

F. A.

, Elsheikh

, Al-Hattami

H. M.

, & Mishra

(2023). The impact of board characteristics on environmentally friendly production: A cross country study in Asia and Europe. Journal of Cleaner Production , 392, 136257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136257

Al-Najjar

(2010). Corporate governance and institutional ownership: Evidence from Jordan. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society , 10(2), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701011035693

Al-Shaer

, Albitar

, & Liu

(2023). CEO power and CSR-linked compensation for corporate environmental responsibility: UK evidence. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting , 60(3), 1025–1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-022-01118-z

10.

Al-Shaer

, Zaman

, & Albitar

(2024). CEO gender, critical mass of board gender diversity and ESG performance: UK evidence. Journal of Accounting Literature . https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-10-2023-0181

11.

Aluchna

, Roszkowska-Menkes

, Kamiński

, & Bosek-Rak

(2022). Do institutional investors encourage firm to social disclosure? The stakeholder salience perspective. Journal of Business Research , 142, 674–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.064

12.

Anthonia

U. N.

(2023). Corporate governance and leadership: A framework for accountability and ethical behavior. Global Scientific Journals , 11(11), 881–902. www.globalscientificjournal.com

13.

Anthony

(2024). The role of community engagement in urban innovation towards the co-creation of smart sustainable cities. Journal of the Knowledge Economy , 15(1), 1592–1624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01176-1

14.

Antwi-Adjei

, Kong

, Kwame

, & Antwi-Adjei

N. A.

(2020). A review: Corporate governance and sustainability. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology , 7(6), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.32628/ijsrst20769

15.

Appel-Meulenbroek

, & Danivska

(2023). Steps and theories towards more effective business case processes within existing organisations: An inter-disciplinary systematic literature review. Business Process Management Journal , 29(8), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-10-2022-0532

16.

Aras-Beger

, & Taşkın

F. D.

(2021). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in multinational companies (MNCs), small-to-medium enterprises (SMEs), and small businesses. In The Palgrave handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 791–815). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42465-7_69

17.

Arif

H. M. R.

(2019). Corporate governance and firm performance: A pragmatic investigation from insurance industry of Pakistan. Net Journal of Business Management , 6(July), 8–16.

18.

Arora

, & Soni

T. K.

(2023). An optimal proportion for independent directors in the boardroom: An empirical study. Business Perspectives and Research . https://doi.org/10.1177/22785337231170491

19.

Awa

H. O.

, Etim

, & Ogbonda

(2024). Stakeholders, stakeholder theory and corporate social responsibility (CSR). International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility , 9(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-024-00094-y

20.

Ayunitha

, Sulastri

H. W.

, Fauzi

M. I.

, Prabowo

M. A. S.

, & Nugraha

N. M.

(2020). Does the good corporate governance approach affect agency cost? Solid State Technology , 63(4), 3760–3770. www.solidstatetechnology.us

21.

Bager

S. L.

, & Lambin

E. F.

(2022). How do companies implement their zero-deforestation commitments. Journal of Cleaner Production , 375, 134056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134056

22.

Banik

, Das Gupta

, & Bhaumik

P. K.

(Eds). (2015). Corporate governance, responsibility and sustainability . Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137361851

23.

Baraibar-Diez

, Odriozola

M. D.

, & Fernández Sánchez

J. L.

(2019). Sustainable compensation policies and its effect on environmental, social, and governance scores. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , 26(6), 1457–1472. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1760

24.

Behlau

, Wobst

, & Lueg

(2024). Measuring board diversity: A systematic literature review of data sources, constructs, pitfalls, and suggestions for future research. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , 31(2), 977–992. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2620

25.

Bigelli

, Mengoli

, & Sandri

(2023). ESG score, board structure and the impact of the non-financial reporting directive on European firms. Journal of Economics and Business , 127, 106133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2023.106133

26.

Birindelli

, Dell’Atti

, Iannuzzi

A. P.

, & Savioli

(2018). Composition and activity of the board of directors: Impact on ESG performance in the banking system. Sustainability , 10(12), 4699. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124699

27.

Birkmose

, & Popovici

(2011). Global innovation—Lessons learned from the Novo Nordisk case. European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies , 3(1), 21–30. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Global-Innovation-Lessons-Learned-from-the-Novo-Birkmose-Popovici/796e88b9a93789b16b8a1bc4d6866b79ae9c97e5

28.

Bitencourt

C. C.

, de Oliveira Santini

, Zanandrea

, Froehlich

, & Ladeira

W. J.

(2020). Empirical generalizations in eco-innovation: A meta-analytic approach. Journal of Cleaner Production , 245, 118721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118721

29.

Bogan

V. L.

, Potemkina

, & Yonker

S. E.

(2021). What drives racial diversity on U.S. corporate boards? SSRN Electronic Journal . https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3952897

30.

Bueno

, & Kaufmann

(2022). Guiding principles on business and human rights. In Elgar encyclopedia of human rights (pp. 375–383). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789903621.guiding.principles.business

31.

Bui

, & Krajcsák

(2024). The impacts of corporate governance on firms’ performance: From theories and approaches to empirical findings. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance , 32(1), 18–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRC-01-2023-0012

32.

Burbano

V. C.

, Delmas

M. A.

, & Cobo

M. J.

(2023). The past and future of corporate sustainability research. Organization & Environment , 37(2), 133–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266231213105

33.

Calderón

, Piñero

, & Redín

D. M.

(2020). Understanding independence: Board of directors and CSR. Frontiers in Psychology , 11, 552152. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.552152

34.

Caldwell

, Hayes

L. A.

, & Long

D. T.

(2017). Leadership, trustworthiness, and ethical stewardship. Journal of Business Ethics , 96(4), 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/sl0551-010-0489-y

35.

Cao

, Li

, Zeng

, & Zhou

(2021). Diversity and inclusion: Evidence from corporate inventors. Journal of Empirical Finance , 64, 295–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2021.10.004

36.

Carter

D. A.

, D’Souza

, Simkins

B. J.

, & Simpson

W. G.

(2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review , 18(5), 396–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00809.x

37.

Chang

(2023). The role of independent directors in ensuring good corporate governance. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management , 12(1), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v12i1.13618

38.

Chang

, Osei Agyemang

, Faruk Saeed

, & Adam

(2024). Assessing the impact of financing decisions and ownership structure on green accounting disclosure: Evidence from developing economies. Heliyon , 10(5), e26672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26672

39.

Chang

, Wu

K.-T.

, Lin

S.-H.

, & Lin

C.-J.

(2024). Board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility , 9(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-024-00095-x

40.

Chen

, Song

, & Gao

(2023). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and financial outcomes: Analyzing the impact of ESG on financial performance. Journal of Environmental Management , 345, 118829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118829

41.

Chen

, & Xie

(2022). ESG disclosure and financial performance: Moderating role of ESG investors. International Review of Financial Analysis , 83, 102291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102291

42.

Chen

, Wang

, Albitar

, & Huang

(2021). Does ownership concentration affect corporate environmental responsibility engagement? The mediating role of corporate leverage. Borsa Istanbul Review , 21, S13–S24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.02.001

43.

Chen

Y. C.

, & Wang

(2020). The effect of mandatory CSR disclosure on firm profitability and social externalities: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics , 65 (1), 169–190.

44.

Cheng

, Ahmad

S. F.

, Irshad

, Alsanie

, Khan

, Ahmad (Ayassrah)

A. Y. A. B.

, & Aleemi

A. R.

(2023). Impact of green process innovation and productivity on sustainability: The moderating role of environmental awareness. Sustainability , 15(17), 12945. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712945

45.

Chila

, & Devarakonda

(2024). The effects of firm-specific incentives (stock options) on mobility and employee entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing , 39(3), 106382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2024.106382

46.

Cohen

, Kadach

, Ormazabal

, & Reichelstein

(2023). Executive compensation tied to ESG performance: International evidence. Journal of Accounting Research , 61(3), 805–853. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12481

47.

Collins

C. S.

, & Stockton

C. M.

(2018). The central role of theory in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods , 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918797475

48.

Cornett

M. M.

, Marcus

A. J.

, Saunders

, & Tehranian

(2007). The impact of institutional ownership on corporate operating performance. Journal of Banking & Finance , 31(6), 1771–1794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.08.006

49.

Correa-Mejía

D. A.

, García-Benau

M. A.

, & Correa-García

J. A.

(2024). The critical role of corporate governance in sustainable development goals prioritisation: A 5 Ps-based analysis for emerging economies. Heliyon , 10(3), e25480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25480

50.

Croitoru

, Florea

N. V.

, Ionescu

C. A.

, Robescu

V. O.

, Paschia

, Uzlau

M. C.

& Manea

M. D.

(2022). Diversity in the workplace for sustainable company development. Sustainability , 14(11), 6728. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116728

51.

Davis

J. H.

, Schoorman

F. D.

, & Donaldson

(1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review , 22(1), 20–47.

52.

de Oliveira

U. R.

, Menezes

R. P.

, & Fernandes

V. A.

(2023). A systematic literature review on corporate sustainability: contributions, barriers, innovations and future possibilities. Environment, Development and Sustainability , 26, 3045–3079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02933-7

53.

de Souza Barbosa

, da Silva

M. C. B. C.

, da Silva

L. B.

, Morioka

S. N.

, & de Souza

V. F.

(2023). Integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria: Their impacts on corporate sustainability performance. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications , 10(1), 410. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01919-0

54.

de Villiers

, & Dimes

(2022). Critical analysis of the contribution of integrated reporting (IR) to sustainability. In Handbook of accounting and sustainability (pp. 210–223). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800373518.00020

55.

Deferne

, Bertschi-Michel

, & de Groote

(2023). The role of trust in family business stakeholder relationships: A systematic literature review. Journal of Family Business Strategy , 14(1), 100501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2022.100501

56.

DeZoort

F. T.

, & Salterio

S. E.

(2001). The effects of corporate governance experience and financial-reporting and audit knowledge on audit committee members’ judgments. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory , 20(2), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2001.20.2.31

57.

Dicuonzo

, Donofrio

, Iannuzzi

A. P.

, & Dell’Atti

(2022). The integration of sustainability in corporate governance systems: An innovative framework applied to the European systematically important banks. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance , 19(3), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-021-00140-2

58.

Duchek

, Raetze

, & Scheuch

(2020). The role of diversity in organizational resilience: A theoretical framework. Business Research , 13(2), 387–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-0084-8

59.

Eccles

R. G.

, Ioannou

, & Serafeim

(2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science , 60(11), 2835–2857.

60.

El-Chaarani

, Abraham

, & Skaf

(2022). The impact of corporate governance on the financial performance of the banking sector in the MENA (Middle Eastern and North African) region: An immunity test of banks for COVID-19. Journal of Risk and Financial Management , 15(2), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15020082

61.

Elidrisy

(2024). Comparative review of ESG reporting standards: ESRS European Sustainability Reporting Standards versus ISSB International Sustainability Standards Board (Comparative Analysis of ESG Reporting Standards). International Multilingual Journal of Science and Technology (IMJST) , 9(3), 2528–9810. www.imjst.org

62.

Emmanuel

, & Priscilla

O.-A.

(2022). A review of corporate social responsibility and its relationship with customer satisfaction and corporate image. Open Journal of Business and Management , 10(02), 715–728. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2022.102040

63.

Endrikat

, de Villiers

, Guenther

T. W.

, & Guenther

E. M.

(2021). Board characteristics and corporate social responsibility: A meta-analytic investigation. Business & Society , 60(8), 2099–2135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650320930638

64.

Escandon-Barbosa

, Salas-Paramo

, & Duque

J. L.

(2023). Cultural influence on corporate sustainability: A board of directors perspective. International Journal of Financial Studies , 11(4), 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs11040132

65.

Estélyi

K. S.

, & Nisar

T. M.

(2016). Diverse boards: Why do firms get foreign nationals on their boards? Journal of Corporate Finance , 39, 174–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.02.006

66.

Etikan

(2024). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and its influence on organizational reputation. Journal of Public Relations , 2(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.47941/jpr.1694

67.

Fernandez-Feijoo

, Romero

, & Ruiz-Blanco

(2014). Women on boards: Do they affect sustainability reporting? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , 21(6), 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1329

68.

Fink

(2019). Conducting literature reviews: From internet to paper . Sage Publications.

69.

Fobbe

, & Hilletofth

(2021). The role of stakeholder interaction in sustainable business models. A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production , 327, 129510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129510

70.

Freeman

R. E.

, & Reed

D. L.

(1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review , 25(3), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165018

71.

Freeman

R. E.

, Dmytriyev

S. D.

, & Phillips

R. A.

(2021). Stakeholder theory and the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management , 47(7), 1757–1770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206321993576

72.

Freeman

R. E.

, Kujala

, Sachs

, & Stutz

(2017). Stakeholder engagement: Practicing the ideas of stakeholder theory . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62785-4_1

73.

Friede

, Busch

, & Bassen

(2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment , 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917

74.

Frijns

, Dodd

, & Cimerova

(2016). The impact of cultural diversity in corporate boards on firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance , 41, 521–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.07.014

75.

García Martín

C. J.

, & Herrero

(2020). Do board characteristics affect environmental performance? A study of EU firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , 27(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1775

76.

García-Sánchez

I.-M.

, & Martínez-Ferrero

(2018). How do independent directors behave with respect to sustainability disclosure? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , 25(4), 609–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1481

77.

García-Sánchez

I.-M.

, Hussain

, Khan

S. A.

, & Martínez-Ferrero

(2020). Managerial entrenchment, corporate social responsibility, and earnings management. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , 27(4), 1818–1833. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1928

78.

Genç

(2021). Lean manufacturing practices and environmental performance. In Lean manufacturing . IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96973

79.

Glass

, Cook

, & Ingersoll

A. R.

(2016). Do women leaders promote sustainability? Analyzing the effect of corporate governance composition on environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment , 25(7), 495–511. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1879

80.

Gough

, Oliver

, & Thomas

(2017). An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd ed.). Psychology Teaching Review , 23(2), 95–96. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsptr.2017.23.2.95

81.

Govindan

, Kilic

, Uyar

, & Karaman

A. S.

(2021). Drivers and value-relevance of CSR performance in the logistics sector: A cross-country firm-level investigation. International Journal of Production Economics , 231, 107835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107835

82.

Goyal

, Kakabadse

, & Kakabadse

(2019). Improving corporate governance with functional diversity on FTSE 350 boards: Directors’ perspective. Journal of Capital Markets Studies , 3(2), 113–136. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCMS-09-2019-0044

83.

Güney

(2017). Governance and sustainable development: How effective is governance? The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development , 26(3), 316–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2016.1249391

84.

Hakovirta

, Denuwara

, Bharathi

, Topping

, & Eloranta

(2020). The importance of diversity on boards of directors’ effectiveness and its impact on innovativeness in the bioeconomy. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications , 7(1), 116. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00605-9

85.

Hambrick

D. C.

(2016). Upper echelons theory. In The Palgrave encyclopedia of strategic management (pp. 1–5). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_785-1

86.

Hammer

, & Pivo

(2017). The triple bottom line and sustainable economic development theory and practice. Economic Development Quarterly , 31(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242416674808

87.

Harjoto

, Laksmana

, & Lee

(2015). Board diversity and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics , 132(4), 641–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2343-0

88.

Hartikainen

, Järvenpää

, & Rautiainen

(2021). Sustainability in executive remuneration—A missing link towards more sustainable firms? Journal of Cleaner Production , 324, 129224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129224

89.

Hermundsdottir

, & Aspelund

(2021). Sustainability innovations and firm competitiveness: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production , 280, 124715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124715

90.

Hernández-Chea

, Vimalnath

, Bocken

, Tietze

, & Eppinger

(2020). Integrating intellectual property and sustainable business models: The SBM-IP Canvas. Sustainability , 12(21), 8871. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218871

91.

Hessels

, & Terjesen

(2010). Resource dependency and institutional theory perspectives on direct and indirect export choices. Small Business Economics , 34(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9156-4

92.

Høvring

C. M.

(2017). Corporate social responsibility as shared value creation: Toward a communicative approach. Corporate Communications: An International Journal , 22(2), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-11-2016-0078

93.

Husted

B. W.

, & Sousa-Filho

J. M. de.

(2019). Board structure and environmental, social, and governance disclosure in Latin America. Journal of Business Research , 102, 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.017

94.

Igboanugo

, Yang

, & Bigelow

(2022). Building a framework for an inclusive workplace culture: The diversio diversity and inclusion survey. The International Journal of Information, Diversity, and Inclusion , 6(3), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.33137/ijidi.v6i3.37507

95.

Igwe

M. N.

, Khatib

S. F. A.

, & Bazhair

A. H.

(2023). Sustainability reporting in Africa: A systematic review and agenda for future research. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , 30(5), 2081–2100. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2494

96.

IKEA Group Sustainability Report FY14 . (n.d.).

97.

Ismail

A. M.

, & Latiff

I. H. M.

(2019). Board diversity and corporate sustainability practices: Evidence on environmental, social and governance (ESG) reporting. International Journal of Financial Research , 10(3), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v10n3p31

98.

Jackson

, Boswell

, & Davis

(2011). Sustainability and triple bottom line reporting—What is it all about? International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology , 1(3), 55–59.

99.

Jensen

M. C.

, & Meckling

W. H.

(1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics , 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

100.

Jiang

, Luo

, Xia

, Hitt

, & Shen

(2023). Resource dependence theory in international business: Progress and prospects. Global Strategy Journal , 13(1), 3–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1467

101.

Jiraporn

, Uyar

, Kuzey

, & Kilic

(2019). What drives board committee structure? Evidence from an emerging market. Managerial Auditing Journal , 35(3), 373–397. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-11-2018-2079

102.

Juba

O. O.

(2024). Impact of workplace safety, health, and wellness programs on employee engagement and productivity. International Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing Practice , 6(4), 12–27. https://doi.org/10.47941/ijhmnp.1819

103.

Judge

(2012). The importance of considering context when developing a global theory of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review , 20(2), 123–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00901.x

104.

Kabara

A. S.

, Khatib

S. F. A.

, Bazhair

A. H.

, & Sulimany

H. G. H.

(2022). The effect of the board’s educational and gender diversity on the firms’ performance: Evidence from non-financial firms in developing country. Sustainability , 14(17), 11058. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141711058

105.

Khan

, Kamal

, Abbas

, & Hussain

(2022). Board of directors and earnings manipulation: Evidence from regulatory change. Future Business Journal , 8(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-022-00173-1

106.

Khan

, Serafeim

, & Yoon

(2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review , 91(6), 1697–1724. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51383

107.

Klewitz

, & Hansen

E. G.

(2014). Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production , 65, 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.017

108.

KPMG. (2020). The time has come: What the future holds for sustainability reporting. Kentucky Nurse , 56(3), 1–2.

109.

Kujala

, Sachs

, Leinonen

, Heikkinen

, & Laude

(2022). Stakeholder engagement: Past, present, and future. Business & Society , 61(5), 1136–1196. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503211066595

110.

Kwarteng

, Appiah

K. O.

, & Addai

(2023). Influence of board mechanisms on sustainability performance for listed firms in Sub-Saharan Africa. Future Business Journal , 9(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-023-00258-5

111.

Lagasio

, & Cucari

(2019). Corporate governance and environmental social governance disclosure: A meta-analytical review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , 26(4), 701–711. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1716

112.

Lane

P. J.

, Koka

B. R.

, & Pathak

(2006). The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of Management Review , 31(4), 833–863. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.22527456

113.

Larcker

, Tayan

, Trivedi

, & Wurzbacher

(2019). Stakeholders and shareholders—Are executives really ‘penny wise and pound foolish’ about ESG? Stanford closer look series .

114.

Lee

M. T.

, & Suh

(2022). Understanding the effects of environment, social, and governance conduct on financial performance: Arguments for a process and integrated modelling approach. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship , 1(1), 100004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stae.2022.100004

115.

Lehtinen

, Aaltonen

, & Rajala

(2019). Stakeholder management in complex product systems: Practices and rationales for engagement and disengagement. Industrial Marketing Management , 79, 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.08.011

116.

Lin

P. T.

, Jin

, Gao

, Yang

, & Lin

(2023). Institutional investors, CSR report readability and the moderating role of ESG performance. SAGE Open , 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231208514

117.

Liu

, & Cheng

(2024). Board skill diversity and corporate environmental responsibility: The moderating effects of formal and informal pressures. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal , 16(1), 165–189. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2023-0597

118.

, Awan

M. B.

, Lu

, Li

, Aziz

M. S.

, Zhou

, Du

, Sha

, & Li

(2023). An overview of emerging and sustainable technologies for increased energy efficiency and carbon emission mitigation in buildings. Buildings , 13(10), 2658. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13102658

119.

Madhani

P. M.

(2017). Diverse roles of corporate board: Review of various corporate governance theories. The IUP Journal of Corporate Governance , 16(2), 7–28. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2981605

120.

Magano

, Silvius

, Nogueira

, & Hamed

(2024). Consideration of sustainability in projects: A cross-sectional quantitative analysis. Sustainability , 16(3), 1269. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031269

121.

Mahalakshmi

, Nallasivam

, Kumar

S. H.

, Kalavathy

K. S.

, & Desai

(2024). Sustainability by design: IKEA’s eco-friendly marketing efforts . https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-374-0_14

122.

Maharajh

, Dhliwayo

, & Chebo

A. K.

(2024). The influence of family dynamics on business performance: Does effective leadership matter? Journal of Family Business Management , 14(3), 515–533. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-04-2023-0058

123.

Mao

, Lu

, Sun

, Zhang

, & Guo

(2024). Regional culture and corporate finance: A literature review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications , 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02551-8

124.

Mariani

M. M.

, Al-Sultan

, & De Massis

(2023). Corporate social responsibility in family firms: A systematic literature review. Journal of Small Business Management , 61(3), 1192–1246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1955122

125.

Marín

, Rubio

, & de Maya

S. R.

(2012). Competitiveness as a strategic outcome of corporate social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , 19(6), 364–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1288

126.

Marquis

, & Qian

(2014). Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: Symbol or substance? Organization Science , 25(1), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0837

127.

Mensah

(2019). Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review. Cogent Social Sciences , 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2019.1653531

128.

Minciullo

, Zaccone

M. C.

, & Pedrini

(2022). The antecedents of corporate sustainability performance: A study on generic and sustainability-related corporate governance mechanisms. Sustainability , 14(15), 9761. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159761

129.

Mohd Noor

, Rasli

, Abdul Rashid

M. A.

, Mubarak

M. F.

, & Abas

I. H.

(2022). Ranking of corporate governance dimensions: A Delphi study. Administrative Sciences , 12(4), 173. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12040173

130.

Mohsni

, Otchere

, & Shahriar

(2021). Board gender diversity, firm performance and risk-taking in developing countries: The moderating effect of culture. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money , 73, 101360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2021.101360

131.

Molina-Azorín

J. F.

, & López-Gamero

M. D.

(2016). Mixed methods studies in environmental management research: Prevalence, purposes and designs. Business Strategy and the Environment , 25(2), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1862

132.

Neubaum

D. O.

, Thomas

C. H.

, Dibrell

, & Craig

J. B.

(2017). Stewardship climate scale. Family Business Review , 30(1), 37–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486516673701

133.

Newig

, Jager

N. W.

, Challies

, & Kochskämper

(2023). Does stakeholder participation improve environmental governance? Evidence from a meta-analysis of 305 case studies. Global Environmental Change , 82, 102705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102705

134.

Nichols

P. M.

, & Dowden

P. E.

(2019). Maximizing stakeholder trust as a tool for controlling corruption. Crime, Law and Social Change , 71(2), 171–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-017-9767-2

135.

Nocca

(2017). The role of cultural heritage in sustainable development: multidimensional indicators as decision-making tool. Sustainability , 9(10), 1882. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101882

136.

Nogueira

, Gomes

, & Lopes

J. M.

(2023). Triple bottom line, sustainability, and economic development: What binds them together? A bibliometric approach. Sustainability , 15(8), 6706. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086706

137.

OHCHR. (2012). The corporate responsibility to respect human rights: An interpretive guide . 92.

138.

Oktaviani. (2012). Ethics as a risk management strategy: The Australian experience. Journal of Business Ethics , 8(1), 165–175. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/196255896.pdf

139.

Ong

T. S.

, Zhou

, Teh

B. H.

, & Di Vaio

(2023). Equity ownership concentration’s impact on corporate internal control: The moderating effects of female directors and board compensation. Environment, Development and Sustainability , 26(5), 12309–12337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03795-9

140.

Ordonez-Ponce

, Clarke

, & MacDonald

(2021). Business contributions to the sustainable development goals through community sustainability partnerships. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal , 12(6), 1239–1267. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2020-0068

141.

Ozdemir

, Carlos Fernandez de Arroyabe

, Sena

, & Gupta

(2023). Stakeholder diversity and collaborative innovation: Integrating the resource-based view with stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Research , 164, 113955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113955

142.

Palmer

C. G.

, Fry

, Libala

, Ralekhetla

, Mtati

, Weaver

, Mtintsilana

, & Scherman

P.-A.

(2022). Engaging society and building participatory governance in a rural landscape restoration context. Anthropocene , 37, 100320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2022.100320

143.

Park

S. K.

(2018). Social bonds for sustainable development: A human rights perspective on impact investing. Business and Human Rights Journal , 3(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2018.6

144.

Park

, & Byun

(2022). Effect of managerial compensation and ability on the relationship between business strategy and firm value: For small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Sustainability , 14(8), 4689. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084689

145.

Pfeffer

, & Salancik

(2015). External control of organizations—Resource dependence perspective. In Organizational behavior 2 (pp. 244–270). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315702001-24

146.

Phung

, Trinh

H. H.

, Nguyen

T. H.

, & Trinh

V. Q.

(2023). Top-management compensation and environmental innovation strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment , 32(4), 1634–1649. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3209

147.

Pittaway

, Robertson

, Munir

, Denyer

, & Neely

(2004). Networking and innovation: A systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews , 5–6(3–4), 137–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00101.x

148.

Rao

, & Tilt

(2016). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: The Role of diversity, gender, strategy and decision making. Journal of Business Ethics , 138(2), 327–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2613-5

149.

, & Magnani

(2023). Stakeholder engagement mechanisms and value creation in circular entrepreneurship. In Stakeholder engagement in a sustainable circular economy (pp. 235–271). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31937-2_8

150.

Reddy

, & Jadhav

A. M.

(2019). Gender diversity in boardrooms—A literature review. Cogent Economics & Finance , 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2019.1644703

151.

Rehman

S. U.

, Bresciani

, Yahiaoui

, & Giacosa

(2022). Environmental sustainability orientation and corporate social responsibility influence on environmental performance of small and medium enterprises: The mediating effect of green capability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , 29(6), 1954–1967. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2293

152.

Rivera

, Ortiz

, Moreno

, & Páez-Gabriunas

(2023). The effect of company ownership on the environmental practices in the supply chain: An empirical approach. Sustainability , 15(16), 12450. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612450

153.

Sakawa

, & Watanabel

(2020). Institutional ownership and firm performance under stakeholder-oriented corporate governance. Sustainability , 12(3), 1021. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031021

154.

Samans

, & Nelson

(2022). Corporate governance and oversight. In Sustainable enterprise value creation (pp. 103–140). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93560-3_4

155.

Schillemans

, & Bjurstrøm

K. H.

(2020). Trust and verification: Balancing agency and stewardship theory in the governance of agencies. International Public Management Journal , 23(5), 650–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2018.1553807

156.

Schoenmaker

, & Schramade

(2023). Corporate governance . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35009-2_3

157.

Schoonjans

(2024). From diversity to sustainability: Environmental and social spillover effects of board gender quotas. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization , 222, 314–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2024.04.026

158.

Seuring

, & Müller

(2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production , 16(15), 1699–1710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020

159.

Shan

Y. G.

(2019). Managerial ownership, board independence and firm performance. Accounting Research Journal , 32(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-09-2017-0149

160.

Shao

(2019). Dynamic study of corporate governance structure and firm performance in China. Chinese Management Studies , 13(2), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-08-2017-0217

161.

Sharma

, & Henriques

(2005). Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal , 26(2), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.439

162.

Shourkaei

M. M.

, Taylor

K. M.

, & Dyck

(2024). Examining sustainable supply chain management via a social-symbolic work lens: Lessons from Patagonia. Business Strategy and the Environment , 33(2), 1477–1496. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3552

163.

Shrivastava

, & Addas

(2014). The impact of corporate governance on sustainability performance. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment , 4(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2014.887346

164.

Singh

, & Hong

(2023). CSR, risk management practices, and performance outcomes: An empirical investigation of firms in different industries. Journal of Risk and Financial Management , 16(2), 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16020069

165.

Singh

, Singhania

, & Aggrawal

(2021). Gender diversity on corporate boards: Review and future research agenda through bibliometric mapping. Corporate Governance and Sustainability Review , 5(3), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgsrv5i3p5

166.

Strand

(2024). Global sustainability frontrunners: Lessons from the Nordics. California Management Review , 66(3), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/00081256241234709

167.

Sun

, Pellegrini

M. M.

, Dabić

, Wang

, & Wang

(2024). Family ownership and control as drivers for environmental, social, and governance in family firms. Review of Managerial Science , 18(4), 1015–1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00631-2

168.

Tariq

, Badir

Y. F.

, Tariq

, & Bhutta

U. S.

(2017). Drivers and consequences of green product and process innovation: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future outlook. Technology in Society , 51, 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.06.002

169.

Tee

C. M.

, & Rassiah

(2020). Ethnic board diversity, earnings quality and institutional investors: Evidence from Malaysian corporate boards. Accounting & Finance , 60(4), 4257–4290. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12485

170.

Torfing

, & Bentzen

T. Ø.

(2020). Does stewardship theory provide a viable alternative to control-fixated performance management? Administrative Sciences , 10(4), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10040086

171.

Torres

(2024). Configurations of corporate governance mechanisms and sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , 31(4), 2900–2909. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2729

172.

Tranfield

, Denyer

, & Smart

(2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management , 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

173.

Truong

T. H. D.

(2024). Environmental, social and governance performance and firm value: Does ownership concentration matter? Management Decision , 63(2), 488–511. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2023-1993

174.

Tsang

, Wang

K. T.

, Liu

, & Yu

(2021). Integrating corporate social responsibility criteria into executive compensation and firm innovation: International evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance , 70, 102070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.102070

175.

Tumwebaze

, Bananuka

, Kaawaase

T. K.

, Bonareri

C. T.

, & Mutesasira

(2022). Audit committee effectiveness, internal audit function and sustainability reporting practices. Asian Journal of Accounting Research , 7(2), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-03-2021-0036

176.

Turi

J. A.

, Khastoori

, Sorooshian

, & Campbell

(2022). Diversity impact on organizational performance: Moderating and mediating role of diversity beliefs and leadership expertise. PLoS One , 17(7), e0270813. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270813

177.

Unilever PLC. (2021). Sustainability governance . Unilever. https://www.unilever.com/sustainability/responsible-business/our-sustainability-governance/

178.

Vigneau

, Humphreys

, & Moon

(2015). How do firms comply with international sustainability standards? Processes and consequences of adopting the global reporting initiative. Journal of Business Ethics , 131(2), 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2278-5

179.

Wang

Y.-H.

(2023). Board composition and corporate governance performance: Investigating the effects of diversity. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development , 35(5–6), 578–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2023.2191341

180.

Wang

, Ma

, Xue

, & Zhang

(2024). Board gender diversity and firm performance: Recent evidence from Japan. Journal of Risk and Financial Management , 17(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17010020

181.

Wang

, Ones

D. S.

, Yazar

, & Mete

(2023). Board gender diversity and organizational environmental performance: An international perspective. Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology , 5, 100164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2023.100164

182.

Wasiuzzaman

, & Subramaniam

(2023). Board gender diversity and environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure: Is it different for developed and developing nations? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , 30(5), 2145–2165. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2475

183.

Wei

, Wang

, & Giamporcaro

(2024). The impact of ownership structure on environmental information disclosure: Evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Management , 352, 120100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120100

184.

Wirba

A. V.

(2023). Corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of government in promoting CSR. Journal of the Knowledge Economy , 15, 7428–7454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01185-0

185.

Yan

, Tang

, & Hao

(2021). Can corporate social responsibility promote employees’ taking charge? The mediating role of thriving at work and the moderating role of task significance. Frontiers in Psychology , 11, 613676. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.613676

186.

Yang

, Zhang

, & Ye

(2024). The sustainability of corporate ESG performance: An empirical study. Sustainability , 16(6), 2377. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062377

187.

Yarram

S. R.

, & Adapa

(2021). Board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility: Is there a case for critical mass? Journal of Cleaner Production , 278, 123319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123319

188.

Yasin

, Naseem

, Anwar

M. A.

, Madni

G. R.

, Mahmood

, & Murshed

(2022). An analysis of the environmental impacts of ethnic diversity, financial development, economic growth, urbanization, and energy consumption: fresh evidence from less-developed countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research , 29(52), 79306–79319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21295-7

189.

Younas

(2022). Review of corporate governance theories. European Journal of Business and Management Research , 7(6), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2022.7.6.1668

190.

Zahari

A. I.

, Said

, Muhamad

, & Ramly

S. M.

(2024). Ethical culture and leadership for sustainability and governance in public sector organisations within the ESG framework. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity , 10(1), 100219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100219

191.

Zhang

, Zhang

, & Tu

(2024). An empirical study on corporate ESG behavior and employee satisfaction: A moderating mediation model. Behavioral Sciences , 14(4), 274. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14040274

192.

Zhao

, & Wu

(2023). Common institutional ownership and corporate green innovation: Supervision or collusion?—Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications , 376, 14–21. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA230712

193.

Zhou

, Liu

, Zhang

, Qi

, & Qin

(2024). Does institutional ownership affect corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China. Economic Analysis and Policy , 81, 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.11.017

194.

Zhu

, Liu

, Chen

, & Yue

(2024). Executive compensation and corporate sustainability: Evidence from ESG ratings. Heliyon , 10(12), e32943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32943

195.

Zhuang

, Denizel

, & Montabon

(2023). Examining firms’ sustainability frontier: Efficiency in reaching the triple bottom line. Sustainability , 15(11), 8871. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118871

196.

Zimon

, Arianpoor

, & Salehi

(2022). Sustainability reporting and corporate reputation: The moderating effect of CEO opportunistic behavior. Sustainability , 14(3), 1257. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031257