This study examines government communication practices targeting marginalised communities in Jharkhand, India, through a hybrid research design that combines a structured literature review with qualitative inquiry. Using the theory, context, characteristics and methodology (TCCM) framework, the study systematically maps the existing literature, identifying conceptual and contextual gaps that guide the subsequent qualitative investigation. The findings show that while previous research has mainly focused on top-down messaging strategies, the lived experiences of marginalised groups reveal significant shortcomings in cultural resonance, linguistic accessibility and participatory feedback mechanisms. By emphasising intersectional and context-specific factors, this research advances public and strategic communication theories while reinforcing their core principles. Ultimately, the study offers a pathway for future research to engage with overlooked contexts and populations, advocating for grounded, participatory models of government communication that address the diverse needs of marginalised publics.
AkhibM., & MarsenS. (2022). Scott Morrison’s political discourse during crisis: A narrative-semiotic analysis. Media International Australia. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878x221129922
2.
AkhmadJ., BasrowiB., JokoS., WibowoA., SusalitS. W., AliA., EdiP., & EfaY. (2024). The role of public administration and social media educational socialisation in influencing public satisfaction with population services: The mediating role of population literacy awareness. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 8(1), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.9.019
3.
AlnizarF., & ManshurF. M. (2022). The political language of disaster: Indonesian government communication for handling the COVID-19 pandemic. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 25(3), 240. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.66443
4.
Alon-BarkatS. (2019). Can government public communications elicit undue trust? Exploring the interaction between symbols and substantive information in communications. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muz013
5.
BausH. M., & LesleyP. (2002). Preparations for communicating. In LesleyP. (Ed.), Handbook of public relations and communications (pp. 319–323). Jaico Publishing House.
6.
BhattacharjeeT. (2015). New media as a tool of public relations in the Indian public sector: An evaluative case study of two Delhi-based government organizations [Doctoral dissertation, Assam University].
7.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications.
8.
CouldryN. (2010). Why voice matters: Culture and politics after neoliberalism. Sage Publications.
9.
CouldryN., & DreherT. (2007). Globalisation and the public sphere. Global Media and Communication, 3(1), 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766507074360
10.
CwalinaW., & FalkowskiA. (2018). Crisis management: Government strategy in framing reform proposals and communications. Journal of Political Marketing, 17(2), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2018.1447754
11.
DePaulaN., DincelliE., & HarrisonT. M. (2018). Toward a typology of government social media communication: Democratic goals, symbolic acts and self-presentation. Government Information Quarterly, 35(1), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.10.003
12.
DongC., ZhengQ., & MorehouseJ. (2023). What do we know about government public relations (GPR)? A systematic review of GPR in public relations literature. Public Relations Review, 49(1), 102284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102284
13.
DuttaM. J. (2011). Communicating social change. Taylor & Francis.
14.
EdwardsL. (2015). The role of public relations in deliberative systems. Journal of Communication, 66(1), 60–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12199
15.
FairbanksJ., PlowmanK. D., & RawlinsB. L. (2007). Transparency in government communication. Journal of Public Affairs, 7(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.245
16.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin Books.
17.
GascóM., BayerlP. S., DenefS., & AkhgarB. (2017). What do citizens communicate about during crises? Analyzing Twitter use during the 2011 UK riots. Government Information Quarterly, 34(4), 635–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.11.005
18.
GeldersD., & IhlenØ. (2010). Government communication about potential policies: Public relations, propaganda or both?Public Relations Review, 36(1), 59–62.
19.
GhoshM. (2024). Exploring gender discourses in entrepreneurship: A bibliometric analysis. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2299140
20.
GlaserB. G., & StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Nursing Research, 17(4), 364. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014
21.
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.
22.
GonçalvesG., & SantosJ. M. (2017). What ethics for governmental communication? Ethical issues on government public relations. Revista Internacional de Relaciones Publicas, 14, 165–182.
23.
GrahamM. W. (2014). Government communication in the digital age: Social media’s effect on local government public relations. Public Relations Inquiry, 3(3), 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147x14545371
24.
GrimmelikhuijsenS. (2012). Linking transparency, knowledge and citizen trust in government: An experiment. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 50–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311429667
25.
GrimmelikhuijsenS. G., & WelchE. W. (2012). Developing and testing a theoretical framework for computer-mediated transparency of local governments. Public Administration Review, 72(4), 562–571. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02532.x
26.
GrunigJ. E., & HuntT. (1984). Managing public relations. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
27.
GuestG., BunceA., & JohnsonL. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
28.
HabermasJ. (1974). The public sphere: An encyclopedia article (1964). New German Critique, 3(3), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/487737
29.
HanssonS., & KrögerS. (2020). How a lack of truthfulness can undermine democratic representation: The case of post-referendum Brexit discourses. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 23(4), 136914812097400. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148120974009
30.
HaryantiS., & RusfianE. Z. (2018). Government public relations and social media: Bridging the digital divide on people with social welfare problems. Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik, 22(2), 128–145.
31.
HoA. T.-K., & ChoW. (2016). Government communication effectiveness and satisfaction with police performance: A large-scale survey study. Public Administration Review, 77(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12563
32.
HongH. (2013). Government websites and social media’s influence on government-public relationships. Public Relations Review, 39(4), 346–356.
33.
HongP., AhnN. Y., & JungE. (2023). Linkage role of ICT and Big Data in COVID-19: A case of Korea’s digital and social communication practices. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/jices-02-2022-0020
34.
HongS. (2016). Government press releases and citizen perceptions of government performance: Evidence from Google trends data. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(4), 885–904. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1137776
35.
IhlenØ., JustS. N., KjeldsenJ. E., MølsterR., OfferdalT. S., RasmussenJ., & SkogerbøE. (2022). Transparency beyond information disclosure: Strategies of the Scandinavian public health authorities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Risk Research, 25, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2022.2077416
36.
JohnstonK. A., TaylorM., & RyanB. (2020). Emergency management communication: The paradox of the positive in public communication for preparedness. Public Relations Review, 46(2), 101903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101903
37.
KentM. L., & TaylorM. (1998). Building dialogic relationships through the World Wide Web. Public Relations Review, 24(3), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0363-8111(99)80143-x
38.
KharismaT., & KurniawanS. F. (2018). Public relations in the digital era: Case study of the use of social media by the government public relations in Anri. Journal InterAct, 7(1), 13–19.
39.
KimS., & KrishnaA. (2018). Unpacking public sentiment toward the government: How citizens’ perceptions of government communication strategies impact public engagement, cynicism, and communication behaviors in South Korea. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 12(3), 215–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118x.2018.1448400
40.
LaursenB., & ValentiniC. (2013). Media relations in the Council of the European Union: Insights into the Council press officers’ professional practices. Journal of Public Affairs, 13(3), 230–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1455
41.
LerougeR., LemaM. D., & ArnaboldiM. (2023). The role played by government communication on the level of public fear in social media: An investigation into the Covid-19 crisis in Italy. Government Information Quarterly, 40(2).
42.
LevenshusA. B. (2016). Building context-based knowledge of government social media communication through an ethnographic study of the US Coast Guard. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 44(2), 174–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2016.1155727
43.
LiuB. F., & HorsleyJ. S. (2007). The government communication decision wheel: Toward a public relations model for the public sector. Journal of Public Relations Research, 19(4), 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627260701402473
44.
LiuB. F., HorsleyJ. S., & LevenshusA. B. (2010). Government and corporate communication practices: Do the differences matter?Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38(2), 189–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909881003639528
45.
LiuB. F., HorsleyJ. S., & YangK. (2012). Overcoming negative media coverage: Does government communication matter?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(3), 597–621. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur078
46.
LiuW., LaiC. H., & XuW. (Wayne). (2018). Tweeting about emergency: A semantic network analysis of government organizations’ social media messaging during Hurricane Harvey. Public Relations Review, 44(5), 807–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.10.009
47.
MabillardV., ZumofenR., & PasquierM. (2022). Local governments’ communication on social media platforms: Refining and assessing patterns of adoption in Belgium. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 90(1), 002085232211332. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523221133229
48.
MehtaD. S. (2011). Handbook of public relations in India. Allied Publishers.
49.
PadeiroM., Bueno-LarrazB., & FreitasÂ. (2021). Local governments’ use of social media during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Portugal. Government Information Quarterly, 38(4), 101620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101620.
50.
PageM. J., MoherD., BossuytP. M., BoutronI., HoffmannT. C., MulrowC. D., ShamseerL., TetzlaffJ. M., AklE. A., BrennanS. E., ChouR., GlanvilleJ., GrimshawJ. M., HróbjartssonA., LaluM. M., LiT., LoderE. W., Mayo-WilsonE., McDonaldS., & McGuinnessL. A. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372(160). NCBI. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
51.
PandeyS., & GhoshM. (2023). Bibliometric review of research on misinformation: Reflective analysis on the future of communication. Journal of Creative Communications, 18(2), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/09732586231165577
52.
PranckutėR. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
53.
RawlinsB. (2008). Measuring the relationship between organizational transparency and employee trust. The Public Relations Journal, 2(2), 1–21.
54.
SongC., & LeeJ. (2015). Citizens’ use of social media in government, perceived transparency, and trust in government. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(2), 430–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1108798
55.
TylerT. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038
56.
VeilS. R., & AnthonyK. E. (2017). Exploring public relations challenges in compounding crises: The pariah effect of toxic trailers. Journal of Public Relations Research, 29(4), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726x.2017.1355805
57.
WatersR. D., & WilliamsJ. M. (2011). Squawking, tweeting, cooing, and hooting: Analyzing the communication patterns of government agencies on Twitter. Journal of Public Affairs, 11(4), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.385
58.
WilliamsB. (2024). Market research sustainability: 5 eco-friendly practices. Insight7—AI Tool for Interview Analysis & Market Research. https://insight7.io/market-research-sustainability-5-eco-friendly-practices/
59.
YangS.-U. (2018). Effects of government dialogic competency: The MERS outbreak and implications for public health crises and political legitimacy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(4), 1011–1032. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699017750360
60.
YudarwatiG. A., & GregoryA. (2022). Improving government communication and empowering rural communities: Combining public relations and development communication approaches. Public Relations Review, 48(3), 102200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102200
61.
ZhaoB., ChengS., KaylynJ. S., & KimY. (2023). Digital transparency and citizen participation: Evidence from the online crowdsourcing platform of the City of Sacramento. Government Information Quarterly, 40(4), 101868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101868
62.
ZhaoH. (2018). Constructing authority in times of crisis: A genre analysis of government crisis communication in China. Journal of Communication Management, 22(3), 346–360. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-11-2017-0137
63.
ZhengQ. (2023). Restoring trust through transparency: Examining the effects of transparency strategies on police crisis communication in Mainland China. Public Relations Review, 49(2), 102296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102296
