Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Mundle, Chakraborty, Chowdhury and Sikdar (2012) developed the first quality of governance (QoG) measures to assess the performance of India’s states. The present article builds on Mundle et al.’s (2012) framework by analyzing the relationship between their QoG measures and absolute child poverty in India. The empirical analysis also includes corruption indicators from Transparency International to test the relative importance of corruption and governance for combating child poverty. I combine macro (states) and micro data (children) with multilevel statistical models to achieve this task. A key finding is that governance has more explanatory power than corruption. Further, among Mundleetal.’s six measures, the BORDA measure performs consistently better and explains about 60 per cent of the between-states variation: one unit improvement in BORDA yields about 1 per cent decrease in absolute child poverty. The sensitivity of this inference is tested with regards to severe education, shelter and food deprivation.

Keywords

Good governance India child poverty corruption economic development

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agnafors

(2013). Quality of government: Toward a more complex definition. American Political Science Review, 107(03), 433–445. doi:10.1017/S0003055413000191.

Alkire

Sabina

Santos

María Emma

(2011). Acute multidimensional poverty: A new index for developing countries, Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Berlin, No. 3.

Arndt

(2008). The politics of governance ratings. International Public Management Journal, 11(3), 275–297. doi: 10.1080/10967490802301278.

Besley

Persson

(2011). Pillars of prosperity: The political economics of development clusters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Brambor

Clark

W.R.

Golder

(2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, 14(1), 63–82. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpi014.

Centre for Media Studies. (2008). India corruption study – 2008: With special focus on BPL households. New Delhi: Transparency International India.

Centre for Media Studies. (2005). India corruption study 2005: To improve governance. New Delhi: Transparency International India.

Charron

(2010). The correlates of corruption in India: Analysis and evidence from the states. Asian Journal of Political Science, 18(2), 177–194. doi: 10.1080/02185377.2010.492986.

DARP. (2009). State of governance: A framework of assessment. Department of Administrative Reforms, Public Grievances and Pensions, Government of India, New Delhi.

10.

Debroy

Bhandari

(2008). Economic freedom for states of India 2013. New Delhi: Excel Books.

11.

Gordon

Nandy

(2012). Measuring child poverty and deprivation. In Minuji

Nandy

(Eds), Global child poverty and well-being: Measurement, concepts, policy and action (pp. 57–101). Bristol, UK; Chicago, IL: Policy Press.

12.

Gordon

Nandy

Pantazis

Pemberton

Townsend

(2003). Child poverty in the developing world. Bristol, UK: Polity Press.

13.

Halleröd

Rothstein

Daoud

Nandy

(2013). Bad governance and poor children: A comparative analysis of government efficiency and severe child deprivation in 68 low- and middle-income countries. World Development, 48, 19–31.

14.

Harriss

(2005). Do political regimes matter? Poverty reduction and regime differences across India. In Houtzager

P.P.

Moore

(Eds), Changing paths: International development and the new politics of inclusion (pp. 232–243). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

15.

Holmberg

Rothstein

(2014). Good Government: The Relevance of Political Science. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Pub.

16.

Kaufmann

Kraay

Mastruzzi

(2010). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1682130). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.

17.

Minujin

Delamonica

Davidziuk

Gonzalez

E.D.

(2006). The definition of child poverty: A discussion of concepts and measurements. Environment and Urbanization, 18(2), 481 –500. doi: 10.1177/0956247806069627.

18.

Minujin

Nandy

(2012). Global child poverty and well-being: Measurement, concepts, policy and action. Bristol: The Policy Press.

19.

Mundle

Chakraborty

Chowdhury

Sikdar

(2012). The quality of governance. Economic and Political Weekly, 47(49), 41–52.

20.

OECD. (2008). Measuring human rights and democratic governance: Experiences and lessons from metagora. OECD Journal on Development, 9(2).

21.

Palmer-Jones

Sen

(2003). What has luck got to do with it? A regional analysis of poverty and agricultural growth in rural India. The Journal of Development Studies, 40(1), 1–31. doi: 10.1080/00220380412331293647.

22.

Rasbash

Charlton

Browne

W.J.

Healy

Cameron

(2013). MLwiN Version 2.28. Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol.

23.

Ravallion

(2010). A reply to Reddy and Pogge. In Anand

Segal

Stiglitz

J.E.

(Eds), Debates on the measurement of global poverty (pp. 86–101). New York: Oxford University Press.

24.

Rawls

(1999). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

25.

R Development Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for statistical computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/, Vienna, Austria.

26.

Reddy

S.G.

Pogge

(2010). How not to count the poor. In Anand

Segal

Stiglitz

J.E.

(Eds), Debates on the measurement of global poverty (pp. 42–85). New York: Oxford University Press.

27.

Roelen

Gassmann

(2008). Measuring child poverty and well-being: A literature review. SSRN eLibrary.

28.

Rothstein

(2011). The quality of government: Corruption, social trust, and inequality in international perspective. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.

29.

Rothstein

(2014a). What is the opposite of corruption? Third World Quarterly, 35(5), 737–752. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2014.921424.

30.

Rothstein

(2014b). The Chinese paradox of high growth and low quality of government: The cadre organization meets Max Weber. Governance. doi: 10.1111/gove.12128.

31.

UNICEF. (2004). The state of the world’s children report 2005: Childhood under threat. New York: UNICEF.

32.

United Nations. (1995). The Copenhagen declaration and programme of action: World summit for social development 6–12 March 1995. New York: United Nations.

33.

Walzer

(1984). Spheres of justice: A defense of pluralism and equality (reprint ed.). New York: Basic Books.

34.

Weiss

T.G.

(2000). Governance, good governance and global governance: Conceptual and actual challenges. Third World Quarterly, 21(5), 795–814.

35.

White

Leavy

Masters

(2003). Comparative perspectives on child poverty: A review of poverty measures. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 4(3), 379–396. doi: 10.1080/1464988032000125755.

36.

Zhang

Charlton

C.M.J.

Parker

R.M.A.

Leckie

Browne

W.J.

(2015). R2MLwiN v0.8-0. Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.10 MB

Quality of Governance,Corruption and Absolute Child Poverty in India

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material