This exploratory study investigates dairy farming from a sociological perspective by applying Bourdieu’s social theory of practice. The article uses qualitative methods; interviewing farming families to investigate their perceptions of the practice of dairy farming in the United Kingdom (UK). The results indicate that the choice to exit, or enter, the field is not an easy one, and once in the field, farmers cannot necessarily play the game, as envisaged with constraining factors preventing them from furthering their position in the field. The practice of dairy farming is also bound in farming families’ social and cultural heritage, which is being challenged by powerful players in the field.
AlstonM.2004. ‘Who is Down on the Farm? Social Aspects of Australian Agriculture in the 21st Century’. Agriculture and Human Values21 (1): 37–46.
2.
BatemanD.RayC.1994. ‘Farm Pluriactivity and Rural Policy: Some Evidence from Wales’. Journal of Rural Studies10 (1): 1–13.
3.
BowlerI.ClarkG.CrockettA.IlberyB.ShawA.1996. ‘The Development of Alternative Farm Enterprise: A Study of Family Labour Farms in the Northern Pennines of England’. Journal of Rural Studies12 (3): 285–95.
4.
BourdieuP.1983. ‘The Field of Cultural Production, or The Economic World Reversed’. Poetics12 (4): 311–56.
5.
BourdieuP.1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Translated by NiceRichard. London: Routledge, Kegan Paul.
6.
BourdieuP.1986. ‘The Forms of Capital’. In RichardsonJ. (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, (pp. 241–58). Greenwood, NY: Greenwood Publishing Group.
7.
BourdieuP.1990. The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8.
BourdieuP.1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Edited and Introduction by ThompsonJohn B. Translated by RaymondGinoAdamsonMatthew. Cambridge: Polity Press.
9.
BourdieuP.1998. Practical Reason on the Theory of Action. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10.
BourdieuP.WacquantL.L.J.1992. A Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
11.
BrubakerR.1985. ‘Rethinking Classical Theory: The Sociological Vision of Pierre Bourdieu’. Theory and Society14 (4): 745–75.
12.
BurtonR.J.F.2004. ‘Reconceptualising the “Behavioural Approach” in Agricultural Studies: A Socio-psychological Perspective’. Journal of Rural Studies20 (3): 359–71.
13.
BurtonR.J.F.WilsonG.A.2006. ‘Injecting Social Psychology Theory into Conceptualisations of Agricultural Agency: Towards a Post-productivist Farmer Self-identity’. Journal of Rural Studies22 (2): 95–115.
14.
CassellC.SymonG., eds. 1994. Qualitative Methods in Organisational Research: A Practical Guide. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
15.
CarterS.1999. ‘Multiple Business Ownership in the Farm Sector: Assessing the Enterprise and Employment Contributions of Farmers in Cambridgeshire’. Journal of Rural Studies15 (4): 417–29.
16.
ConnerD.S.2004. ‘Expressing Values in Agricultural Markets: An Economic Policy Perspective’. Agriculture and Human Values21 (1): 27–35.
17.
CurranJ.BlackburnR.A.2001. Researching the Small Enterprise. London: Sage Publications.
18.
CurryD., (ed.) BrowningH.DavisP.Sir.FergusonI.HuttonD.JuliusD.ReynoldsF.TinsleyM.VarneyD.WynneG.2002. Farming and Food a Sustainable Future, Report for the Policy Commission on the Future of Food and Farming, London. Retrieved from http://www.cabinet-office.gov.uk/farming (accessed on 30 October 2010).
DEFRA. 2004. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs website, agriculture section, http://www.defra.gov.uk (accessed in October 2004).
21.
DiMaggioP.J.PowellW.W.1983. ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’. American Sociological Review48(2): 147–60.
22.
FitzgeraldD.2003. Every Farm a Factory: The Industrial Ideal of American Agriculture. Yale Agrarian Series. Yale University: USA.
23.
FligsteinN.2001. The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of Twenty-first-Century Capitalist Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
FrancisD.G.1994. Family Agriculture Tradition and Transformation. London: Earthscan Publications.
25.
FullerA.M.1990. ‘From Part-time Farming to Pluriactivity: A Decade of Change in Rural Europe’. Journal of Rural Studies6 (4): 361–73.
26.
GassonR.ErringtonA.1993. The Family Farm Business. Oxon, UK: CAB International.
27.
GilmoreD.1986. ‘Behavioural Studies in Agriculture: Goals, Values and Enterprise Choice’. Irish Journal of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology11 (1): 19–33.
28.
GlaserB.G.1992. Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
29.
GlaserB.G., ed. 1996. Gerund Grounded Theory: The Basic Social Process Dissertation. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
30.
GlaserB.G.StraussA.L.1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.
31.
GloverJ.L.2010. ‘Coping in Adverse Situations: Applying Bourdieu’s Theory of Capital to Family Farm Businesses’. Journal of Family and Economic Issues31 (4): 485–97.
32.
GloverJ.L.2013. ‘Capital Usage in Family Farm Businesses’. Journal of Family Business Management3 (2): 136–62.
33.
GloverJ.L.ReayT.2015. ‘Sustaining the Family Business with Minimal Financial Rewards: How Do Family Farms Continue?’ Family Business Review28 (2): 163–77.
34.
GrantW.1991. The Dairy Industry: An International Comparison. England: Dartmouth Publishing.
35.
GreenwoodR.MeyerR.E.2008. ‘Influencing Ideas: Celebration of DiMaggio and Powel (1983)’. Journal of Management Inquiry17 (2): 258–64.
36.
GrillerR.1996. ‘The Return of the Subject? The Methodology of Pierre Bourdieu’. Critical Sociology22 (1): 3–28.
37.
HallC.McVittieA.MoranD.2004. ‘What Does the Public Want from Agriculture and the Countryside? A Review of Evidence and Methods’. Journal of Rural Studies20 (3): 211–25.
38.
HonnethA.1986. ‘The Fragmented World of Symbolic Forms: Reflections on Pierre Bourdieu’s Sociology and Culture’. Theory, Culture and Society3 (2): 55–56.
39.
HowarthR.W.1990. Farming for Farmers? A Critique of Agricultural Support Policy. Second edition. London: The Institute of Economic Affairs.
40.
HubermanA.M.MilesM.B.2002. The Qualitative Researcher’s Companion. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
41.
IellatchitchA.MayrhoferW.MeyerM.2003. ‘Career Fields: A Small Step towards a Grand Theory?’ International Journal of Human Resources Management14 (5): 728–50.
42.
JenkinsR.1992. Pierre Bourdieu. London: Routledge.
43.
JohnsenS.2004. ‘The Redefinition of Family Farming: Agricultural Restructuring and Farm Adjustment in Waihemo, New Zealand’. Journal of Rural Studies20 (4): 419–32.
44.
KvaleS.1996. Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
45.
MarsdenT.SonninoR.2008. ‘Rural Development and the Regional State: Denying Multifunctional Agriculture in the UK’. Journal of Rural Studies24 (4): 442–31.
46.
MayeD.IlberyB.WattsD.2009. ‘Farm Diversification, Tenancy and CAP Reform: Results from a Survey of Tenant Farmers in England’. Journal of Rural Studies25 (4): 333–42.
47.
MorganS.L.MarsdenT.MieleM.MorleyA.2010. ‘Agricultural Multifunctionality and Farmers’ Entrepreneurial Skills: A Study of Tuscan and Welsh Farmers’. Journal of Rural Studies26 (2): 116–29.
48.
PattonM.1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. London: Sage.
49.
SayceS.2005. ‘Gender Change? Locked into Industrial Relations and Bourdieu’. Employee Relations28 (5): 468–82.
50.
ThornsenL.E.1993. ‘Bondekvinna som kulturell rekonstruksjon’. In Bydepolitikk, Report 6/93, edited by AlmasR.BrandthB.HaugenM.S., 193–204. Trondheim: Centre for Rural Research.
51.
VaughanD.2008. ‘Bourdieu and Organizations: The Empirical Challenge’. Theoretical Sociology37 (1): 65–81.
52.
VerschurenP.J.M.2003. ‘Case Study as a Research Strategy some Ambiguities and Opportunities’. International Journal of Social Methodology6 (2): 121–39.
53.
VillaM.1999. ‘Born to be Farmers? Changing Expectations in Norwegian Farmer’s Life Courses’. European Society for Rural Sociology, Sociologia Ruralis39 (3): 328–42.
54.
VorleyB.2003. Corporate Concentration from Farm to Consumer UK Food Group, International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
55.
WacquantL.D.1989. ‘Towards a Reflexive Sociology: A Workshop with Pierre Bourdieu’. Sociological Theory7 (1): 26–63.
56.
YinR.2003. Case Study Research Designs and Methods. Third edition, Applied Social Research Methods Series. Vol. 5. London: Sage Publications.
