The aim of this study was to understand the distribution of various somatotype components and determine the age- and sex-related variations of the somatotype among Sunni Muslim population of Uttar Pradesh, India. The study population consisted of 214 individuals (100 males and 114 females), belonging to the age group of 18–73 years. All somatometric measurements were taken according to the protocol of the International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK). Anthropometric somatotyping was done using Heath and Carter method. Somatotype dispersion distances (SDD), mean somatotype dispersion (SDM), and standard deviation of somatotype dispersion distance (DSD) were calculated. Somatochart was also plotted for the body physique of the studied population. The results showed that mean somatotype of males is balanced endomorph (4.2–3.2–3.1), while that of females is mesomorphic endomorph (6.6–3.7–1.2). Endomorphy and mesomorphy increased with age up to 55 years and then decreased thereafter; however, ectomorphy showed the opposite trend in both the sexes. The findings of the study indicate that males and females of Sunni Muslim population are predominantly endomorphic.
AndreenkoE.MladenovaS. (2015). Changes in somatotype characteristics in the middle-aged Bulgarian men. Nutricion Hospitalaria, 32(6).
2.
ArceP. L.FloresA. A.LelievreC. S.MarincovicD. I.Gutie´rrezO. B.Berralde la RosaF. (2012). Changes of somatotype in high school students, V region, Chile: 1985–2010. Nutricion Hospitalaria, 27(1), 270–275.
3.
ArkingR. (1998). Biology of aging. Sinauer Associates, Inc.
4.
BaileyD. A.CarterJ. E. L.MirwaldR. L. (1982). Somatotypes of Canadian men and women. Human Biology, 813–828.
5.
BaltadjievA. G. (2013). Somatotype characteristics of female patients with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus[Характеристика Соматотипа Жен Щин, Больных Сахарным Диабетом Типа 2.]Folia Medica, 55(1), 64–69.
6.
BhasinM. K.JainS. (2007). Biology of the tribal groups of Rajasthan, India: 4. Age changes in somatotype. The Anthropologist, 9(4), 257–265.
7.
BolonchukW. W.SidersW. A.LykkenG. I.LukaskiH. C. (2000). Association of dominant somatotype of men with body structure, function during exercise, and nutritional assessment. American Journal of Human Biology: The Official Journal of the Human Biology Association, 12(2), 167–180.
8.
BuffaR.FlorisG.PutzuF. P.CarboniL.MariniE. (2007). Somatotype in elderly type 2 diabetes patients. Collegium Antropologicum, 31(3), 733–737.
9.
BuffaR.SuccaV.GarauD.MariniE.FlorisG. (2005). Variations of somatotype in elderly Sardinians. American Journal of Human Biology: The Official Journal of the Human Biology Association, 17(4), 403–411.
10.
CarterJ. E. L. (1980). The heath-carter somatotype method, 3rd ed. San Diego State University Syllabus Service.
11.
CarterJ. E. L. (2002). Part 1: The heath-carter anthropometric somatotype-instruction manual (pp. 3–4). htth/cmvwsomatotypeorg/Heath—CarterManual.pdf
12.
ChakrabartyS.PalM.BharatiS.BharatiP. (2008). Body form and nutritional status among adult males of different social groups in Orissa and Bihar States in India. HOMO-Journal of Comparative Human Biology, 59(3), 235–251.
13.
ChandelS.MalikS. L. (2012). Anthropometric somatotype of Kshatriya and Kurmi of Uttar Pradesh: Population and gender differences. Human Biology Review, 1(1), 1–15.
14.
ChandelS.RhetsoA.MalikS. L.KulshreshthaM. (2018). The association between body physique and physical fitness: A cross-sectional study among a tribal community of Dadra and Nagar Haveli, India. International Journal of Applied Exercise Physiology, 7(1), 11–20.
15.
DrywienM.FrackiewiczJ.GórnickaM.WielgoszJ.SobolewskaA.KulikS. (2016). Influence of the somatotype on intake of energy and nutrients in women. Anthropological Notebooks, 22(3).
16.
DrywieńM. E.FrąckiewiczJ.GórnickaM.WażnaB.ZielińskaP.WójcikK.KulikS. (2017). Somatotype, diet and nutritional status of women. Anthropological Review, 80(4), 393–404.
17.
GakharI.MalikS. L. (2002). Age changes and sex differences in somatotypes among Jats of Delhi. The Anthropologist, 4(2), 115–125.
18.
GaurR.SinghR. P. (1997). Age differences in somatotypes of Garhwali males 17–60 years of age. American Journal of Human Biology: The Official Journal of the Human Biology Association, 9(3), 285–290.
19.
GhoshS.MalikS. L. (2010). Variations of body physique in Santhals: An Indian tribe. Collegium Antropologicum, 34(2), 467–472.
20.
GhoshS.DosaevT.PrakashJ.LivshitsG. (2017). Quantitative genetic analysis of the body composition and blood pressure association in two ethnically diverse populations. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 162(4), 701–714.
21.
HeathB. H.CarterJ. L. (1967). A modified somatotype method. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 27(1), 57–74.
22.
HerreraH.RebatoE.HernandezR.Hernández-ValeraY.Alfonso-SanchezM. A. (2004). Relationship between somatotype and blood pressure in a group of institutionalized Venezuelan elders. Gerontology, 50(4), 223–229.
23.
ISAK. (2011). International standards for anthropometric assessment, ISAK manual. international society for the advancement of kinanthropometry(ISAK). Lower Hutt.
24.
KalichmanL.KobylianskyE. (2006). Sex-and age-related variations of the somatotype in a Chuvasha population. HOMO-Journal of Comparative Human Biology, 57(2), 151–162.
25.
KaurH.MalikS. L. (2016). Magnitude of sex difference in body physique of Sainis of punjab. Human Biology Review, 5(1), 72–85.
26.
KolevaM.NachevaA.BoevM. (2002). Somatotype and disease prevalence in adults. Reviews on Environmental Health, 17(1), 65–84.
27.
LiivH.WyonM.JürimäeT.PurgeP.SaarM.MäestuJ.JürimäeJ. (2014). Anthropometry and somatotypes of competitive DanceSport participants: A comparison of three different styles. HOMO-Journal of Comparative Human Biology, 65(2), 155–160.
28.
MalinaR. M.CummingS. P.KontosA. P.EisenmannJ. C.RibeiroB.ArosoJ. (2005). Maturity-associated variation in sport-specific skills of youth soccer players aged 13–15 years. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23(5), 515–522.
29.
PandeyA. K.MalikS. L. (1990). Anthropometric somatotype of Bod girls: A comparison of high and low altitude populations. American Journal of Human Biology, 2(5), 467–473.
30.
PavlovskyO.KobylianskyE. (1997). Population biology of human aging Angelo Pontecorboli Editore. Firenze, Italy.
31.
RoncoA. L.MendozaB.VarasX.JaumandreuS.De StéfaniE.FeblesG.BarbozaR.GateñoM. (2008). Somatotype and risk of breast cancer: A case-control study in Uruguay. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, 11(2), 215–227.
32.
RossW. D.WilsonB. D. (1973). A somatotype dispersion index. Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation, 44(3), 372–374.
33.
SubramanianS. K.Vivek KumarS.VinayathanA.KrishnakumarR.RajendranR. (2016). Somatotyping in adolescents: Stratified by sex and physical activity. International Journal of Anatomy and Applied Physiology, 2(3), 32–38.
34.
YangL. T.WangN.LiZ. X.LiuC.HeX.ZhangJ. F.HanH.WenY. F.QianY. H.XiH. J. (2016). Study on the adult physique with the Heath-Carter anthropometric somatotype in the Han of Xi’an, China. Anatomical Science International, 91(2), 180–187.
