Nature provides a good opportunity to understand the dynamics of evolution. The country has a huge coastline, which experiences socio-cultural and natural vulnerability. The aim of the paper has been to describe the pattern of selection intensity among the east and west coastal populations of India. Differential fertility and mortality were collected from 2,099 females (mothers) of the western coasts of India, and secondary data were collected from the eastern coast of India for comparison purposes. Selection potential was computed using Crow’s index and Johnston & Kensinger’s index. The data involved a total of 7,512 pregnancies during their reproductive lifespan and the successful outcomes (live births) were 7,073. The total index (It) for eastern coast varied from 0.221 to 1.078. For the west coast, it varied from 0.262 to 0.617. Among the eastern coastal population groups, the mortality component of selection is comparatively higher than its fertility component, while it is just the reverse among the western coastal population groups.
Alfonso-SanchezM. A.CalderonR.PenaJ. A. (2004). Opportunity for natural selection in a Basque population and its secular trend: Evolutionary implications of epidemic mortality. Human Biology, 76(3), 361–381.
2.
BaruaS. (1976). Selection intensities among the consanguineous and non-consanguineous groups of Muslim population of 24 Parganas. Man in India, 56(4), 359–364.
3.
BasuA. (1969). The Pahira: A population genetical study. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 31(3), 399–416.
4.
BasuS.KshatriyaG.JindalA. (1988). Fertility and mortality differentials among the tribal population groups of Bastar District, Madhya Pradesh, India. Human Biology, 60(3), 407–416.
5.
Cavalli-SforzaL. L.BodmerW. F. (1971). The genetics of human populations. London, UK: W. H. Freeman & Co.
6.
CrowJ. F. (1958). Some possibilities for measuring selection intensities in man. Human Biology, 30(1), 1–13.
7.
FisherR. A. (1930). The genetical theory of natural selection. New York, NY: Dover Press.
8.
GautamR. K. (2006). Population characteristics of middle and high altitude Kinnaura of Kinnaur District, Himachal Pradesh, India(Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Delhi, New Delhi.
9.
GautamR. K. (2009). Opportunity for natural selection among the Indian population: Secular trend, covariates and implications. Journal of Biosocial Science, 41(6), 705–745.
10.
GhoshA. K. (1970). Selection intensity in the Kota of Nilgiri Hills, Madras. Social Biology, 17(3), 224–225.
11.
JohnstonF. E.KensingerK. M. (1971). Fertility and mortality differentials and their implications for microevolutionary change among the Cashinahua. Human Biology, 43(3), 356–364.
12.
KapoorA. K.GautamR. K.BhasinP. (2012). Natural selection among coastal populations of India: Trend and extent. Annals of Human Biology, 39(3), 247–258.
13.
KapoorA. K.KshatriyaG. K. (2000). Fertility and mortality differentials among selected tribal population groups of north-western and eastern India. Journal of Biosocial Science, 32(2), 253–264.
14.
KapoorA. K.PatraP. K. (1998). Selection intensity in a high altitude tribe of Central Himalayas. Indian Anthropologist, 28(2), 81–87.
15.
KhongsdierR. (2000). Population genetics in Northeast India: An overview. In KhongsdierR. (Ed.), Contemporary research in anthropology (pp. 64–98). New Delhi: Commonwealth Publishers.
16.
LivingstoneF. B.SphulerJ. N. (1965). Cultural determinants of natural selection. International Social Science Journal, 17, 118–120.
17.
MukherjeeD. P. (1973). Patterns of marriage and family formation in rural India and genetic implications of family planning. Journal of Indian Anthropological Society, 8, 131–145.
18.
MulderM. B. (1998). The demographic transition: Are we any closer to an evolutionary explanation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 13(7), 266–270.
19.
MurtyJ. S.RameshA. (1978). Selection intensities among the tribal populations of Adilabad district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Social Biology, 25(4), 302–305.
20.
NichollsR. J.HoozemansF. M.MarchandM. (1999). Increasing flood risk and wetland losses due to global sea-level rise: Regional and global analyses. Global Environmental Change, 9, S69–S87.
21.
RajanikumariJ.SrikumariC. R.RaoV. (1985). Variability of selection opportunities with changing socio-cultural environments. Human Heredity, 35(4), 218–222.
22.
RameshM.RaoI. S.VeerrajuP. (2005). Opportunity for natural selection in four endogamous sub populations of Andhra Pradesh. Indian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(2), 187–182.
23.
RaoG. S. (1991). Population structure of Pattapu and Palle: Marine fishing communities of South-East Coastal of Andhra Pradesh, India(Unpublished PhD thesis). Sri Venkateshwara University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh.
24.
RaoV. V.MurtyJ. S. (1984). Selection intensities and inbreeding among some caste groups of Andhra Pradesh, India. Social Biology, 31(1–2), 114–119.
25.
ReddyB. M. (1983). Opportunity for natural selection among three migrant groups of fishermen of Puri, India. Social Biology, 30(3), 335–338.
26.
ReddyB. M.ChopraV. P. (1990). Opportunity for natural selection among the Indian populations. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 83(3), 281–296.
27.
ReddyB. M.ChopraV. P.MalhotraK. C. (1987). Opportunity for natural selection with special reference to population structural measures among the Vadde. Annals of Human Biology, 14(3), 249–261.
28.
ReddyP. C.LakshmanuduM. (1979). Indices of opportunity of selection in Mala Madiga and other Indian populations. Journal of Indian Anthropology, 14(3), 245–252.
29.
SahuP. N. (1983). Demography and genetic constitution of a small population (the Mallia). Journal of the Indian Anthropological Society, 18, 55–60.
30.
TalukdarS. (1977a). On age at menarche in India. Man in India, 57, 345–350.
31.
TalukdarS. (1977b). Selection intensity among diabetics and in natural populations. Journal of the Indian Anthropological Society, 12, 247–252.
32.
TerrenatoL.UlizziL.MartiniA. S. (1979). The effects of demographic transition on the opportunity for selection: Changes during the last century in Italy. Annals of Human Genetics, 42(3), 391–399.
33.
TurnerR. K.SubakS.AdgerW. N. (1996). Pressures, trends, and impacts in coastal zones: Interactions between socioeconomic and natural systems. Environmental Management, 20(2), 159–173.
34.
UlizziL.SanA. M.TerrenatoL. (1979). Changes of selection opportunities with a changing environment: Regional heterogeneity in Italy. Annals of Human Genetics, 43(2), 137–141.
35.
VarekampJ. C. (1999). Modern rates of sea level rise exceeds average rate of the last 2000 years. Retrieved from http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/ogp/papers/varekamp.html
36.
WrightS. (1938). Size of population and breeding structure of population in relation to evolution. Science, 87, 430–431.
