Global climate goals aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, slow down climate change and promote environmental sustainability. This has prompted research into a wide range of factors aimed at increasing knowledge on reducing emissions. However, one key factor that has been neglected is climate risk or climate policy uncertainty (CPU). Another issue that has received less attention is the effect of global shocks. This study investigates the direct and moderating roles of CPU and global shocks, represented by COVID-19, on the carbon footprint of South Africa. Employing a novel CPU index data set, together with macro data from the World Bank, and rigorous econometric techniques including the fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS), the study finds that CPU has a reducing effect on carbon emissions. Furthermore, CPU reinforces the positive effects of foreign direct investment (FDI) on carbon emissions but weakens the positive effect of income on carbon emissions. Similarly, COVID-19 reinforces the positive effects of income and FDI. The study recommends a prioritization of production efficiency and environmentally friendly input use to slow down emissions.
AbbasiM. A., NosheenM., & RahmanH. U. (2023). An approach to the pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses in Asian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(17), 49270–49289.
2.
AbidM., & SekrafiH. (2021). Pollution haven or halo effect? A comparative analysis of developing and developed countries. Energy Reports, 7, 4862–4871.
3.
AboagyeS. (2017). Economic expansion and environmental sustainability nexus in Ghana. African Development Review, 29(2), 155–168.
4.
AdebayoT. S., & OdugbesanJ. A. (2021). Modeling CO2 emissions in South Africa: Empirical evidence from ARDL based bounds and wavelet coherence techniques. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(8), 9377–9389.
5.
Adjei-ManteyK., & AdamsS. (2023). Renewable energy, foreign direct investment and carbon dioxide emissions: Do sectoral value additions and policy uncertainty matter?Energy Nexus, 10, 100193.
6.
Adjei-ManteyK., Adusah-PokuF., & KwakwaP. A. (2023). International tourism, exchange rate, and renewable energy: Do they boost or burden efforts towards a low carbon economy in selected African countries?Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(2), 2245258.
7.
Adjei-ManteyK., AmoahA., AmoahB., & AsiamaR. K. (2023). COVID-19 pandemic and the global economic situation: A year on. Pan African Medical Journal, 46, 56.
8.
AdomP. K., KwakwaP. A., & AmankwaaA. (2018). The long-run effects of economic, demographic, and political indices on actual and potential CO2 emissions. Journal of Environmental Management, 218, 516–526.
9.
AgarwalN., & SomainiP. J. (2022). Demand analysis under latent choice constraints[National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Number 29993].
10.
AhmadN., LiS., HdiaM., BélasJ., & HussainW. M. H. W. (2023). Assessing the COVID-19 pandemic impact on tourism arrivals: The role of innovation to reshape the future work for sustainable development. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(2), 100344.
11.
AlamM. R., & IstiakK. (2020). Impact of US policy uncertainty on Mexico: Evidence from linear and nonlinear tests. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 77, 355–366.
12.
AltigD., BakerS., Maria BarreroJ., BloomN., BunnP., ChenS., DavisJ. D., LeatherJ., MeyerJ., MihaylovE., MizenP., ParkerN., RenaultT., SmietankaP., & ThwaitesG. (2020). Economic uncertainty before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Public Economics, 191, 104274.
13.
AminA., & DoganE. (2021). The role of economic policy uncertainty in the energy-environment nexus for China: Evidence from the novel dynamic simulations method. Journal of Environmental Management, 292, 112865.
14.
Amuakwa-MensahF., & AdomP. K. (2017). Quality of institution and the FEG (forest, energy intensity, and globalization)—Environment relationships in sub-Saharan Africa. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24, 17455–17473.
15.
BakasD., & TriantafyllouA. (2020). Commodity price volatility and the economic uncertainty of pandemics. Economics Letters, 193, 109283.
16.
BakerS. R., DavisS. J., & TerryS. J. (2020). COVID-induced economic uncertainty[NBER Working Paper No. 26983].
17.
Balsalobre-LorenteD., GokmenogluK. K., TaspinarN., & Cantos-CantosJ. M. (2019). An approach to the pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses in MINT countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 23010–23026.
18.
BarnettM., BrockW., & HansenL. P. (2022). Climate change uncertainty spillover in the macroeconomy. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 36(1), 253–320.
19.
BarnettM., BuchakG., & YannelisC. (2023). Epidemic responses under uncertainty. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(2), e2208111120.
20.
BerestyckiC., CarattiniS., DechezleprêtreA., & KruseT. (2022). Measuring and assessing the effects of climate policy uncertainty[OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 1724]. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/34483d83-en
21.
BingeL. H., & BoshoffW. H. (2020). Economic uncertainty in South Africa. Economic Modelling, 88, 113–131.
22.
BlattmanC., & MiguelE. (2010). Civil war. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(1), 3–57.
23.
BloomN. (2009). The impact of uncertainty shocks. Econometrica, 77(3), 623–685.
24.
BorozanD., & PirgaipB. (2024). Climate policy uncertainty and firm-level carbon dioxide emissions: Assessing the impact in the US market. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(6), 5920–5938.
25.
BretschgerL., & SoretzS. (2018). Stranded assets: How policy uncertainty affects capital, growth, and the environment[CER-ETH—Center of Economic Research at ETH Zurich Working Paper No. 18/288]. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3157079 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3157079
26.
BrockW. A., & HansenL. P. (2018). Wrestling with uncertainty in climate economic models[University of Chicago, Becker Friedman Institute for Economics Working Paper 2019-71].
27.
BudionoS., & PurbaJ. T. (2023). Factors of foreign direct investment flows to Indonesia in the era of COVID-19 pandemic. Heliyon, 9(4), e15429.
28.
BulutU., Atay-PolatM., & BulutA. S. (2024). Environmental deterioration, renewable energy, natural resource rents, and schooling in Turkiye: Does the degree of energy transition matter for environmental quality?Journal of Environmental Management, 365, 121639.
29.
ChopraR., RehmanM. A., & BhardwajS. (2024). Revisiting the EKC framework concerning COP-28 carbon neutrality management: Evidence from top-5 carbon embittering countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 356, 120690.
30.
ContrerasG., & PlataniaF. (2019). Economic and policy uncertainty in climate change mitigation: The London Smart City case scenario. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 384–393.
31.
DasD., KannadhasanM., & BhattacharyyaM. (2019). Do the emerging stock markets react to international economic policy uncertainty, geopolitical risk and financial stress alike?The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 48, 1–19.
32.
Development Bank of Southern Africa. (2023). How can we reduce the carbon footprint in Africa?https://www.dbsa.org/article/how-can-we-reduce-carbon-footprint-africa
33.
DietzT., & RosaE. A. (1994). Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology. Human Ecology Review, 1(2), 277–300.
34.
DietzT., & RosaE. A. (1997). Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94(1), 175–179.
35.
DoğanB., Balsalobre LorenteD., & ShahzadU. (2021). The mitigating effects of economic complexity and renewable energy on carbon emissions in developed countries. Sustainable Development, 29(1), 1–12.
36.
Dual CitizenLLC. (2023). The climate paradox: Can we resolve it?https://dualcitizeninc.com/the-2023-climate-paradox-your-input-needed-for-a-2020s-green-breakthrough/
37.
EweadeB. S., & GüngörH. (2025). Climate policy uncertainty and energy impacts on trade openness and foreign direct investment in the United States: Evidence from the RALS co-integration test. In Natural resources forum (Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 2869–2890). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
38.
FarooqU., ShafiqM. N., SubhaniB. H., & GillaniS. (2024). Climate policy uncertainty and regional innovation performance: New empirical evidence from the United States. Managerial and Decision Economics, 45(3), 1497–1510.
39.
FriedS. (2018). Climate policy and innovation: A quantitative macroeconomic analysis. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 10(1), 90–118.
40.
FriedS., NovanK., & PetermanW. (2019). The macro effects of anticipating climate policy. In 2019 meeting papers (Vol. 683). Society for Economic Dynamics.
41.
FriedS., NovanK. M., & PetermanW. (2021). The macro effects of climate policy uncertainty[FEDS Working Paper No. 2021-018]. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3865414 or http://dx.doi.org/10.17016/FEDS.2021.018
42.
GaoJ., QinQ., & ZhouS. (2025). Spillover effects of US economic policy uncertainty on emerging markets: Evidence from transnational supply chains. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 100, 102136.
GolubA. (2020). Technological transition and carbon constraints under uncertainty. In Ancillary benefits of climate policy: New theoretical developments and empirical findings (pp. 69–87). Springer.
45.
GuesmiK., MakrychoritiP., & SpyrouS. (2023). The relationship between climate risk, climate policy uncertainty, and CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from the US. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 212, 610–628.
46.
GuidolinM., & La FerraraE. (2010). The economic effects of violent conflict: Evidence from asset market reactions. Journal of Peace Research, 47(6), 671–684.
47.
GuoH., ChenK., WangP., HuJ., YingQ., GaoA., & ZhangH. (2019). Simulation of summer ozone and its sensitivity to emission changes in China. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 10(5), 1543–1552.
48.
GuoJ., LongS., & LuoW. (2022). Nonlinear effects of climate policy uncertainty and financial speculation on the global prices of oil and gas. International Review of Financial Analysis, 83, 102286.
49.
HamdanA. (2024). Carbon dioxide emissions and the economic growth: Competitiveness and economic development view. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 34(4), 761–785.
50.
HashmiS. M., YuQ. R., & RongL. (2024). Testing the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis amidst climate policy uncertainty: Sectoral analysis using the novel Fourier ARDL approach. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(7), 16503–16522.
51.
HassanS., ShabiS., & ChoudhryT. (2018). Asymmetry, uncertainty and international trade[Swansea University, School of Management, Working Paper No. 24].
52.
HlatshwayoS., & SaxegaardM. M. (2016). The consequences of policy uncertainty: Disconnects and dilutions in the South African real effective exchange rate-export relationship. International Monetary Fund.
53.
HuH., LiR., & ZhangL. (2023). Financial development and resources curse hypothesis: China’s COVID-19 perspective of natural resources extraction. Resources Policy, 85, 103965.
54.
HuangS.-Z., SadiqM., & ChienF. (2023). The impact of natural resource rent, financial development and urbanization on carbon emission. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 42753–42765.
55.
International Energy Agency. (2021). Net zero by 2050: A roadmap for the global energy sector. Net Zero by 2050 - A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector - Summary for Policy Makers.
56.
IPCC. (2023). Summary for policymakers. In Core Writing Team, LeeH. & RomeroJ. (Eds.) Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. A report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change.
57.
IRENA. (2023). World energy transitions outlook 2023: 1.5°C Pathway. International Renewable Energy Agency.
58.
IsikC., OnganS., OzdermirD., AlvaradoR., JabeenG., SharifA., AlvaradoR., AminA., & RehmanA. (2024). Renewable energy, climate policy uncertainty, industrial production, domestic exports/re-exports, and CO2 emissions in the USA: A SVAR approach. Gondwana Research, 127, 156–164.
59.
IstiakK., & AlamM. R. (2019). Oil prices, policy uncertainty and asymmetries in inflation expectations. Journal of Economic Studies, 46(2), 324–334.
60.
KahiaM., Ben JebliM., & BelloumiM. (2019). Analysis of the impact of renewable energy consumption and economic growth on carbon dioxide emissions in 12 MENA countries. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 21, 871–885.
61.
KhanI., ZhongR., KhanH., DongY., & NuţăF. M. (2024). Examining the relationship between technological innovation, economic growth and carbon dioxide emission: Dynamic panel data evidence. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(7), 18161–18180.
62.
KotzéK. (2017). Fiscal policy uncertainty and economic activity in South Africa[School of Economics Macroeconomic Discussion Paper Series 2].
63.
KoutsoyiannisA. (1973). Theory of econometrics: An introductory exposition of econometric methods. The Macmillan Press Ltd.
64.
KwakwaP. A., Adjei-ManteyK. & Adusah-PokuF. (2023). The effect of transport services and ICTs on carbon dioxide emissions in South Africa. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 10457–10468.
65.
KwakwaP. A., & Adusah-PokuF. (2020). The carbon dioxide emission effects of domestic credit and manufacturing indicators in South Africa. Management of Environmental Quality, 31(6), 1531–1548.
66.
KwakwaP. A., AlhassanH., & AduG. (2020). Effect of natural resources extraction on energy consumption and carbon dioxide emission in Ghana. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 14(1), 20–39.
67.
LeeH. H., HayakawaK., & ParkC. Y. (2023). The effect of COVID-19 on foreign direct investment. Global Economic Review, 52(1), 1–17.
68.
LevenkoN. (2020). Rounding bias in forecast uncertainty. Research in Economics, 74(4), 277–291.
69.
LiX., LiZ., UmarM., & ShaoX. (2022). Exploring the asymmetric impact of economic policy uncertainty on China’s carbon emissions trading market price: Do different types of uncertainty matter?Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 178, 121601.
LopezJ. M. R., SakhelA., & BuschT. (2017). Corporate investments and environmental regulation: The role of regulatory uncertainty, regulation-induced uncertainty, and investment history. European Management Journal, 35(1), 91–101.
72.
MaumohI., & OnojaA. (2024). Climate change policy uncertainty and challenges in carbon emission for east and southern African regions. Transactions in Energy and Sustainability, 1(1), 24–40.
73.
MertM., & CaglarA. E. (2020). Testing pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses for Turkey: A new perspective. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 32933–32943.
74.
MohamedE. F., AbdullahA., JaaffarA. H., & OsabohienR. (2024). Reinvestigating the EKC hypothesis: Does renewable energy in power generation reduce carbon emissions and ecological footprint?Energy Strategy Reviews, 53, 101387.
75.
NarayanP. K., SabooriB., & SoleymaniA. (2016). Economic growth and carbon emissions. Economic Modelling, 53, 388–397.
76.
Nguyen-ThanhN., ChinK. H., & NguyenV. (2022). Does the pollution halo hypothesis exist in this “better” world? The evidence from STIRPAT model. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(58), 87082–87096.
77.
OzkanO., CobanM. N., IortileB. I., & UsmanO. (2023). Reconsidering the environmental Kuznets curve, pollution haven, and pollution halo hypotheses with carbon efficiency in China: A dynamic ARDL simulations approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(26), 68163–68176.
78.
OzturkS. S., DemirerR., & GuptaR. (2022). Climate uncertainty and carbon emissions prices: The relative roles of transition and physical climate risks. Economics Letters, 217, 110687.
79.
ParsonsR., & KrugellW. (2022). Policy uncertainty, the economy and business. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 25(1), 4422.
80.
PerronP. (1989). The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 57(6), 1361–1401.
81.
PhillipsP. C. B., & HansenB. E. (1990). Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I (1) processes. Review of Economic Studies, 57(1), 99–125.
82.
Polloni-SilvaE., SilveiraN., FerrazD., de MelloD. S., & MorallesH. F. (2021). The drivers of energy-related CO2 emissions in Brazil: A regional application of the STIRPAT model. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(37), 51745–51762.
83.
Presidential Climate Commission. (2024). The state of climate action in South Africa: Priorities for action for the Government of National Unity. https://pccommissionflo.imgix.net/uploads/images/24_REP_State-of-Climate-Action-in-South-Africa_v4.pdf
84.
RaoA., & LuceyB. M. (2023). Asymmetric spillovers from climate change and carbon emissions uncertainty to prices of key energy markets. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4326102
85.
RedlC. (2015). Macroeconomic uncertainty in South Africa[Economic Research Southern Africa (ERSA) Working Paper 509].
86.
RenX., WangZ., & YanC. (2021). Spillover and dynamic effects of energy transition and economic growth on carbon dioxide emissions for the European Union: A dynamic spatial panel model. Sustainable Development, 29(1), 228–242.
87.
RenX., ZhangC., & GozgorG. (2022). Climate policy uncertainty and firm-level total factor productivity: Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 113, 106209.
88.
RodrikD. (1991). Policy uncertainty and private investment in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 36(2), 229–242.
89.
Saint AkadiriS., AlolaA. A., & EtokakpanM. U. (2020). The role of electricity consumption, globalization and economic growth in carbon dioxide emissions and its implications for environmental sustainability targets. Science of the Total Environment, 708, 134653.
90.
SarkerP. K., BouriE., & MarcoC. K. L. (2023). Asymmetric effects of climate policy uncertainty, geopolitical risk, and crude oil prices on clean energy prices. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(6), 15797–15807.
91.
SarkodieS. A., OwusuP. A., & LeirvikT. (2020). Global effect of urban sprawl, industrialization, trade and economic development on carbon dioxide emissions. Environmental Research Letters, 15(3), 034049.
92.
ShiuA., LiR., & WooC. K. (2016). Economic growth and infrastructure investments in energy and transportation: A causality interpretation of China’s western development strategy. The Energy Journal, 37, 211–222.
93.
TudoseT. (2023). World Meteorological Day–2023: The future of weather, climate and water across generations. Aerul si Apa. Componente ale Mediului, X–XII.
94.
WangH., DongC., & LiuY. (2019). Beijing direct investment to its neighbors: A pollution haven or pollution halo effect?Journal of Cleaner Production, 239, 118062.
95.
WangC., WangH., BaiY., ShanJ., NieP., & ChenY. (2024). The impact of climate policy uncertainty on corporate pollution emissions—Evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Management, 363, 121426.
96.
WolfM. J., EmersonJ. W., EstyD. C., de SherbininA., & WendlingZ. A., . (2022). 2022 environmental performance index. Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy. https://epi.yale.edu/downloads/epi2022technicalappendixv02.pdf
97.
XuZ. (2020). Economic policy uncertainty, cost of capital, and corporate innovation. Journal of Banking & Finance, 111, 105698.
98.
ZhangD., & DuP. (2020). How China “Going green” impacts corporate performance?Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120604.
99.
ZhangS., LiuJ., & LiuX. (2023). Comparing the environmental impacts of nuclear and renewable energy in top 10 nuclear-generating countries: Evidence from STIRPAT model. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(11), 31791–31805.
100.
ZoteA. (2021). South Africa ranked the highest CO2 producer in transport. ESI Africa. https://www.esi-africa.com/news/sa-ranked-the-highest-co2-producer-in-transport/
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
