In the current volatile corporate landscape, characterized by pandemics, technology innovations and market fluctuations, efficient supply chain management practices (SCMPs) are essential for improving organizational performance. Despite their significance, there is a paucity of research examining the distinct influence of SCMPs on firm operational and financial performance (FOFP) within Pakistan’s fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) sector, especially with competitive advantage (CA) serving as a mediator. This study investigates four SCMPs: strategic supplier partnerships (SSPs), information sharing (INF), customer relationship management (CRM), and postponement (PPT) and their impact on FOFP, mediated by CA. Data from 386 FMCG employees in Pakistan were gathered through a questionnaire and analyzed utilizing structural equation modelling with SMART PLS software (version 4.0). Findings demonstrate that SSP, INF and CRM substantially improve FOFP, reducing cost, enhancing delivery times, and increasing market share and profitability. Nonetheless, PPT demonstrates no substantial direct or mediated influence on FOFP, indicating its restricted relevance in FMCG settings absent strategic planning. CA positively influences the link among SSP, INF, CRM and FOFP, strengthening cost leadership and differentiation. These findings direct managers to emphasize SSPs, INF and CRM over conventional methods, perhaps using CRM-driven loyalty programmes to enhance market share.
AburummanO. J., OmarK., Al ShbailM., & AldoghanM. (2023). How to deal with the results of PLS-SEM? In AlareeniB. & HamdanA. (Eds), Explore business, technology opportunities and challenges after the Covid-19 pandemic (pp. 1196–1206). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08954-1_101
2.
AdaryaniR. L., KalantariK., AsadiA., AlambeigiA., GholamiH., & SeifollahiN. (2023). Information sharing antecedents in the supply chain: A dynamic network perspective. Operations Management Research, 16(2), 887–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-022-00337-w
3.
AhmedS. K. (2024). How to choose a sampling technique and determine sample size for research: A simplified guide for researchers. Oral Oncology Reports, 12, 100662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oor.2024.100662
4.
Al-ShboulM. A. R., BarberK. D., Garza-ReyesJ. A., KumarV., & AbdiM. R. (2017). The effect of supply chain management practices on supply chain and manufacturing firms’ performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 28(5), 577–609. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-11-2016-0154
5.
AmedofuM., AsamoahD., & Agyei-OwusuB. (2019). Effect of supply chain management practices on customer development and start-up performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 26(7), 2267–2285. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-08-2018-0230
6.
AminF. U., JiQ., MartínezM. D. C. V., DongQ.-L., KanwalS., & ZulfiqarI. (2023). The moderating effect of customer relationship on supply chain risk management and organization performance in logistics sector of Pakistan. SAGE Open, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231164123
7.
Amoako-GyampahK., BoakyeK. G., FamiyehS., & AdakuE. (2020). Supplier integration, operational capability and firm performance: An investigation in an emerging economy environment. Production Planning & Control, 31(13), 1128–1148. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1700570
8.
AnwarS. T. (2020). Global strategy gone astray: Maersk’s big box boats and the world shipping industry. Thunderbird International Business Review, 62(2), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22115
9.
Anwer AL-ShboulM. (2022). An investigation of transportation logistics strategy on manufacturing supply chain responsiveness in developing countries: The mediating role of delivery reliability and delivery speed. Heliyon, 8(11), e11283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11283
10.
AslamM. A., & LiZ. (2025). A sustainable approach to boost resilience in fast-moving consumer goods: The critical role of suppliers and transportation capacity explored through PLS-SEM and NCA. Sustainability, 17(6), 2625. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062625
11.
AslamM. A., LiZ., NazirH., AhmedN., & MirS. (2024). Enhancing goods forwarding: A strategic approach to transportation planning for enhanced logistics operational performance with a mediating role of postponement—中国知网. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=2Z_8GvOTliXsl0h8opurydApSQO0JUgi32-CucmsIBqhbU9Wd9e61A9Dyk0gI83EC8ACMe7dGFJTPZ1BNlmNkdsl_qHeP_6j6WmnrAgyPv814EGlC-PuvyhaVX7jhZAR8QLiKeJQtNboFJiCMvrcWVVh6Bqx6X2Kz115pEc1Cgfv0rT9XqHiH6XH0DYpeMQ-&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS
12.
AttiaA. (2023). Effect of sustainable supply chain management and customer relationship management on organizational performance in the context of the Egyptian textile industry. Sustainability, 15(5), 4072. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054072
13.
BaahC., & JinZ. (2019). Sustainable supply chain management and organizational performance: The intermediary role of competitive advantage. Journal of Management and Sustainability, 9(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.5539/jms.v9n1p119
14.
BaahC., AcquahI. S. K., & OforiD. (2021). Exploring the influence of supply chain collaboration on supply chain visibility, stakeholder trust, environmental and financial performances: A partial least square approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 29(1), 172–193. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2020-0519
15.
BalciG., & AliS. I. (2024). The relationship between information processing capabilities, Net-Zero capability and supply chain performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 29(2), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-06-2023-0320
16.
BandalyD. C., & HassanH. F. (2020). Postponement implementation in integrated production and inventory plan under deterioration effects: A case study of a juice producer with limited storage capacity. Production Planning & Control, 31(4), 322–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1636354
17.
BanerjeeM., & MishraM. (2017). Retail supply chain management practices in India: A business intelligence perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 34, 248–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.09.009
18.
BarneyJ. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
19.
BetenskyR. A. (2019). The p-value requires context, not a threshold. The American Statistician, 73(sup1), 115–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1529624
20.
BimhaH., HoqueM., & MunapoE. (2020). The impact of supply chain management practices on industry competitiveness: A mixed-methods study on the Zimbabwean petroleum industry. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 12(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2019.1613785
21.
BlosM. F., QuaddusM., WeeH. M., & WatanabeK. (2009). Supply chain risk management (SCRM): A case study on the automotive and electronic industries in Brazil. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(4), 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540910970072
22.
BurgessP. R., SunmolaF. T., & Wertheim-HeckS. (2023). A review of supply chain quality management practices in sustainable food networks. Heliyon, 9(11), e21179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21179
23.
ButtA. S. (2021). Understanding the implications of pandemic outbreaks on supply chains: An exploratory study of the effects caused by the COVID-19 across four South Asian countries and steps taken by firms to address the disruptions. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 52(4), 370–392. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-08-2020-0281
24.
CahyonoY., PurwokoD., KohoI., SetianiA., Supendi, SetyokoP., SosiadyM., & WijoyoH. (2022). The role of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and performance of halal agroindustry SMEs. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 11, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2022.10.012
25.
CaiS., JunM., & YangZ. (2010). Implementing supply chain information integration in China: The role of institutional forces and trust. Journal of Operations Management, 28(3), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.11.005
26.
CarbonaraN., & PellegrinoR. (2018). Real options approach to evaluate postponement as supply chain disruptions mitigation strategy. International Journal of Production Research, 56(15), 5249–5271. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1403663
27.
ChangW.-J. (2020). Experiential marketing, brand image and brand loyalty: A case study of Starbucks. British Food Journal, 123(1), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-01-2020-0014
28.
DasS., & HassanH. M. K. (2021). Impact of sustainable supply chain management and customer relationship management on organizational performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(6), 2140–2160. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-08-2020-0441
29.
FernandoY., HaliliM., TsengM.-L., TsengJ. W., & LimM. K. (2022). Sustainable social supply chain practices and firm social performance: Framework and empirical evidence. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 32, 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.04.020
30.
FornellC., & LarckerD. F. (1981). Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313
31.
FuY., HuaP., ChenQ., & ZhouS. (2022). Information sharing and fund performance: Evidence from the US mutual fund family. Investment Analysts Journal, 51(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10293523.2022.2115603
32.
García-CáceresR. G., Torres-ValdiviesoS., & del Razo-HernandezA. (2024). Governance forms of the pharmaceutical supply chain of Bogota, Colombia. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 92, 101814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2024.101814
33.
GölgeciI., & KuivalainenO. (2020). Does social capital matter for supply chain resilience? The role of absorptive capacity and marketing-supply chain management alignment. Industrial Marketing Management, 84, 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.05.006
34.
GremyrI., Birch-JensenA., KumarM., & LöfbergN. (2022). Quality functions’ use of customer feedback as activation triggers for absorptive capacity and value co-creation. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 42(13), 218–242. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-11-2021-0692
35.
GroverV., & MalhotraM. K. (2003). Transaction cost framework in operations and supply chain management research: Theory and measurement. Journal of Operations Management, 21(4), 457–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(03)00040-8
36.
Guerola-NavarroV., Gil-GomezH., Oltra-BadenesR., & Sendra-GarcíaJ. (2021). Customer relationship management and its impact on innovation: A literature review. Journal of Business Research, 129, 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.050
37.
HairJ., HultG. T. M., RingleC., & SarstedtM. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
38.
HairJ. F., RisherJ. J., SarstedtM., & RingleC. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
39.
HamiduZ., IssauK., Boachie-MensahF. O., & Asafo-AdjeiE. (2023). On the interplay of supply chain network complexity on the nexus between supply chain resilience and performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 31(5), 1590–1610. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-09-2022-0551
40.
IslamiX. (2021). How to integrate organizational instruments? The mediation of HRM practices effect on organizational performance by SCM practices. Production & Manufacturing Research, 9(1), 206–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2021.1978007
41.
IslamiX. (2023). Lean manufacturing and firms’ financial performance: The role of strategic supplier partnership and information sharing. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 30(9), 2809–2831. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-02-2022-0084
42.
IslamiX., & Topuzovska LatkovikjM. (2022). There is time to be integrated: The relationship between SCM practices and organizational performance—The moderated role of competitive strategy. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2010305. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.2010305
43.
IvanovD., & RozhkovM. (2020). Coordination of production and ordering policies under capacity disruption and product write-off risk: An analytical study with real-data based simulations of a fast moving consumer goods company. Annals of Operations Research, 291(1), 387–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2643-8
44.
JackE. P., & PowersT. L. (2015). Managing strategic supplier relationships: Antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 30(2), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-08-2011-0101
45.
JafariH., EslamiM. H., & PaulrajA. (2022). Postponement and logistics flexibility in retailing: The moderating role of logistics integration and demand uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 243, 108319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108319
46.
Jum’aL., ZimonD., & IkramM. (2021). A relationship between supply chain practices, environmental sustainability and financial performance: Evidence from manufacturing companies in Jordan. Sustainability, 13(4), 2152. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042152
47.
KhalfallahM., & LakhalL. (2020). The impact of lean manufacturing practices on operational and financial performance: The mediating role of agile manufacturing. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 38(1), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-07-2019-0244
48.
KhanM., AjmalM. M., JabeenF., TalwarS., & DhirA. (2023). Green supply chain management in manufacturing firms: A resource-based viewpoint. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 1603–1618. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3207
49.
KhanG. F., SarstedtM., ShiauW.-L., HairJ. F., RingleC. M., & FritzeM. P. (2019). Methodological research on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An analysis based on social network approaches. Internet Research, 29(3), 407–429. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-12-2017-0509
50.
KhanS., ZhangY., GolpîraH., & DongQ. (2018). The Impact of Green Supply Chain Practices in Business Performance: Evidence from Pakistani FMCG Firms. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems, 17(2), 267–275. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219686718500166
51.
KockN., & HadayaP. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131
52.
KuE. C. S., HsuS.-F., & WuW.-C. (2020). Connecting supplier–supplier relationships to achieve supply chain performance of restaurant companies. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 3(3), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTI-10-2019-0113
53.
KuoS.-Y., LinP.-C., & LuC.-S. (2017). The effects of dynamic capabilities, service capabilities, competitive advantage, and organizational performance in container shipping. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 95, 356–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.11.015
54.
LedroC., NosellaA., & VinelliA. (2022). How to assess organizational and strategic impacts of customer relationship management: A multi-perspective performance evaluation method. Expert Systems with Applications, 199, 117024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117024
55.
LeeR. (2021). The effect of supply chain management strategy on operational and financial performance. Sustainability, 13(9), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095138
56.
LeleV., & AjmeriY. (2024). Supply chain integration and collaboration. In LeleV. & AjmeriY. (Eds), From source to shelf: Orchestrating a supply chain symphony (pp. 83–117). Apress. https://doi.org/10.1007/979-8-8688-0986-6_4
57.
LiY., HuangJ., & SongT. (2019). Examining business value of customer relationship management systems: IT usage and two-stage model perspectives. Information & Management, 56(3), 392–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.07.012
58.
LiS., Ragu-NathanB., Ragu-NathanT. S., & Subba RaoS. (2006). The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance. Omega, 34(2), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.08.002
59.
LiB., XuC., WangY., ZhaoY., ZhouQ., & XingX. (2024). Digital transformation, supply chain collaboration, and enterprise growth: Theoretical logic and Chinese practice. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 30(2), 100249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2024.100249
60.
LiuM., DanB., ZhangS., & MaS. (2021). Information sharing in an E-tailing supply chain for fresh produce with freshness-keeping effort and value-added service. European Journal of Operational Research, 290(2), 572–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.08.026
61.
LoosM. J., & RodriguezC. M. T. (2015). Aplicação prática do Postponement em uma empresa têxtil. Production, 25(4), 894–910. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.015011
62.
MalikT. M., HassanS. M., & TufailM. (2023). The impact of supplier strategic partnership in supply chain on organizational performance: An empirical study of supply chain management in an emerging economy. Logforum, 19(2), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2023.789
63.
MaskeyR., FeiJ., & NguyenH.-O. (2020). Critical factors affecting information sharing in supply chains. Production Planning & Control, 31(7), 557–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1660925
64.
MedinaE., CaniatoF., & MorettoA. (2023). Framing sustainable supply chain finance: How can supply chain sustainability practices and supply chain finance solutions be integrated?Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 29(3), 100837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2023.100837
65.
ModgilS., & SharmaS. (2017). Information systems, supply chain management and operational performance: Tri-linkage—An exploratory study on pharmaceutical industry of India. Global Business Review, 18(3), 652–677. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150917692177
66.
MunirM., JajjaM. S. S., ChathaK. A., & FarooqS. (2020). Supply chain risk management and operational performance: The enabling role of supply chain integration. International Journal of Production Economics, 227, 107667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107667
67.
MuntakaA. S., Agyei-OwusuB., MansoJ. F., & Kankam-BoaduE. (2023). Pursuing transport digitalisation to achieve transport cost optimisation. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 25(4), 522–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2023.2238667
68.
MutambikI. (2024). The role of strategic partnerships and digital transformation in enhancing supply chain agility and performance. Systems, 12(11), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12110456
69.
NazifaT. H., & RamachandranK. K. (2019). Information sharing in supply chain management: A case study between the cooperative partners in manufacturing industry. Journal of System and Management Sciences, 9(1), 19–47. https://doi.org/10.33168/JSMS.2019.0102
70.
NazirH., & FanJ. (2024). Revolutionizing retail: Examining the influence of blockchain-enabled IoT capabilities on sustainable firm performance. Sustainability, 16(9), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093534
71.
NazirS., ZhaoleiL., MehmoodS., & NazirZ. (2024). Impact of green supply chain management practices on the environmental performance of manufacturing firms considering institutional pressure as a moderator. Sustainability, 16(6), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062278
72.
NorinderU., & NorinderP. (2022). Predicting Amazon customer reviews with deep confidence using deep learning and conformal prediction. Journal of Management Analytics, 9(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/23270012.2022.2031324
73.
NorrmanA., & PratavieraL. B. (2023). Revisiting postponement: The importance of cross-functional integration to understand tax implications in global supply chains. Journal of Business Logistics, 44(4), 693–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12351
74.
Pejić BachM., KlinčarA., AleksićA., Rašić JelavićS., & ZeqiriJ. (2023). Supply chain management maturity and business performance: The balanced scorecard perspective. Applied Sciences, 13(4), 2065. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13042065
75.
PloenhadJ., LaoprawatchaiP., ThongrawdC., & JermsittiparsertK. (2019). Mediating role of competitive advantage on the relationship of supply chain management and organizational performance on the food industry of Thailand. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(4), 216–226.
76.
PratavieraL. B., PerottiS., MelaciniM., & MorettiE. (2020). Postponement strategies for global downstream supply chains: A conceptual framework. Journal of Business Logistics, 41(2), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12250
77.
RijalA., BaahC., Agyabeng-MensahY., AfumE., & AcquahI. S. K. (2024). Shirking in supply chain collaborations: Do circular economy entrepreneurship and technical capability moderate impacts for circular economy performance?Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 35(5), 1081–1102. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-08-2023-0354
78.
SaadN. A., ElgazzarS., & KacS. M. (2024). Investigating the impact of supply chain management practices on customer satisfaction through flexibility and technology adoption: Empirical evidence. Business Strategy & Development, 7(1), e326. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.326
79.
SabirI., GulA., HashmiS. D., & NazI. (2023). Impact of supply chain management practices on innovative performance: Mediating role of organization competence and collaborative capabilities as moderator in SME sector. Logforum, 19(4), 595–609. https://doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2023.890
80.
SachdevaN., ShrivastavaA. K., & ChauhanA. (2019). Modeling supplier selection in the era of Industry 4.0. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(5), 1809–1836. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-12-2018-0441
81.
SekranU., & BougieR. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (7th ed.). Wiley. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Research+Methods+For+Business%3A+A+Skill+Building+Approach%2C+7th+Edition-p-9781119266846
82.
ShibinK. T., DubeyR., GunasekaranA., HazenB., RoubaudD., GuptaS., & ForoponC. (2020). Examining sustainable supply chain management of SMEs using resource based view and institutional theory. Annals of Operations Research, 290(1), 301–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2706-x
83.
SohaibM., MlynarskiJ., & WuR. (2023). Building brand equity: The impact of brand experience, brand love, and brand engagement—A case study of customers’ perception of the apple brand in China. Sustainability, 15(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010746
84.
StreukensS., Leroi-WereldsS., & WillemsK. (2017). Dealing with nonlinearity in Importance-Performance Map Analysis (IPMA): An integrative framework in a PLS-SEM context. In LatanH. & NoonanR. (Eds), Partial least squares path modeling: Basic concepts, methodological issues and applications (pp. 367–403). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_17
85.
SulistyowatiN., & PurnomoW. D. (2020). Effects of supply chain strategy on company performance: The moderating role of competitive advantage. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.59160/ijscm.v9i4.3572
86.
TiwariM., BrydeD. J., StavropoulouF., & MalhotraG. (2024). Understanding the evolution of flexible supply chain in the business-to-business sector: A resource-based theory perspective. International Studies of Management & Organization, 54(4), 380–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2024.2324245
87.
TuladharA., RogersonM., EngelhartJ., ParryG. C., & AltrichterB. (2024). Blockchain for compliance: An information processing case study of mandatory supply chain transparency in conflict minerals sourcing. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 29(4), 755–777. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-11-2023-0585
88.
TushmanM., & NadlerD. (1986). Organizing for innovation. California Management Review, 28(3), 74–92. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165203
89.
VoigtK.-I., BuligaO., & MichlK. (2017). Customized and built to order: The case of Dell. In VoigtK.-I., BuligaO., & MichlK. (Eds), Business model pioneers: How innovators successfully implement new business models (pp. 55–66). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38845-8_6
90.
WaiyawuththanapoomP., AunyawongW., PoolsawadK., ThumawongchaiV., BoonrattanakittibhumiC., & JermsittiparsertK. (2023). The relationship between supply chain management activities and firm performance with the mediating and moderating effect. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 11, 375–382. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2022.9.005
91.
WangE., SolanskyS. T., & XieH. (2024). Do supply chain finance and trade digitization matter in mitigating financial instability in supply chains? An information processing theory view. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 19(4), 378–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509653.2024.2418041
92.
YeY., GuoQ., & NieJ. (2023). Retailer information strategies with a dual-purpose manufacturer. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 180, 103355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2023.103355
93.
ZekhniniK., CherrafiA., BouhaddouI., BenghabritY., & Garza-ReyesJ. A. (2020). Supply chain management 4.0: A literature review and research framework. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(2), 465–501. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-04-2020-0156
94.
ZengX., & YiJ. (2023). The supply chain information sharing path based on the internet of things. Internet Technology Letters, 7(4), e491. https://doi.org/10.1002/itl2.491
95.
ZhouH., & LiL. (2020). The impact of supply chain practices and quality management on firm performance: Evidence from China’s small and medium manufacturing enterprises. International Journal of Production Economics, 230, 107816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107816
96.
ZinnW. (2019). A historical review of postponement research. Journal of Business Logistics, 40(1), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12213
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
