When traditional financial institutions found it challenging to help small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) with capital allocations, crowdfunding emerged as a beacon of innovation by furnishing and supporting the operations of SMEs by financing their tasks and facilitating the risk-sharing process. Alongside its significant expansion and widespread appeal, crowdfunding encounters several critical challenges, one of the most prominent being the information asymmetry that may arise between those seeking funds and prospective supporters. Grounded in the principles of signalling theory, a theoretical framework has been constructed for a comparative analysis between the United States and the United Kingdom. The study’s objective is to investigate information manipulation in an equity crowdfunding market by adopting visual cues (images, video, share price, valuation, equity offered) to mitigate the problem of information asymmetry in making the project successful. This has been achieved by compiling secondary data from the following equity-based platforms: StartEngine (US platform) and Seedrs and Crowdcube (UK platform). We employed econometric techniques and quadratic analysis and validated the models through a robustness check. Results reveal that the visual cues substantially impact a project’s success by mitigating the problem of information asymmetry, but this varies in each country. These findings provide valuable insights for entrepreneurs, investors and policymakers regarding how different signals in distinct market environments drive crowdfunding performance. The study fills a significant lacuna in the existing literature and provides practical guidelines on optimizing crowdfunding strategies for better outcomes in both regions.
AgarwalS., & ChuaY. H. (2020). FinTech and household finance: A review of the empirical literature. China Finance Review International, 10(4), 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-03-2020-0024
2.
AhlersG. K. C., CummingD., GüntherC., & SchweizerD. (2015). Signaling in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 39(4), 955–980. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12157
3.
BartolacciF., CaputoA., & SoverchiaM. (2020). Sustainability and financial performance of small and medium sized enterprises: A bibliometric and systematic literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1297–1309. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2434
4.
BattagliaF., RegoliA., & AgneseP. (2022). Do local innovation systems promote successful equity crowdfunding campaigns? Evidence from Italy. Finance Research Letters, 48(January), 102932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102932
5.
BelleflammeP., & LambertT. (2014). Crowdfunding : Some empirical findings and microeconomic underpinnings. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2437786
6.
BelleflammeP., OmraniN., & MartinP. (2015). The economics of crowdfunding platforms. Information Economics and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2015.08.003
7.
BrownR., & MasonC. (2017). Looking inside the spiky bits: A critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9865-7
8.
BukhariF. A. S., UsmanS. M., UsmanM., & HussainK. (2019). The effects of creator credibility and backer endorsement in donation crowdfunding campaigns success. Baltic Journal of Management, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-02-2019-0077
9.
ButticèV., DiF., & FrancescaP. (2021). They do not look alike: What kind of private investors do equity crowdfunded firms attract? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(6), 1707–1736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09895-w
10.
ButticèV., & VismaraS. (2021). Inclusive digital finance: The industry of equity crowdfunding. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(4), 1224–1241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09875-0
11.
CaiZ., ZhangP., & HanX. (2020). The inverted U-shaped relationship between crowdfunding success and reward options and the moderating effect of price differentiation. China Finance Review International, 11(2), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-11-2019-0152
12.
CaputoA., SchiocchetE., & TroiseC. (2022). Sustainable business models as successful drivers in equity crowdfunding. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 3509–3522. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3102
13.
CicchielloA. F., KazemikhasraghA., & MonferràS. (2022). Gender differences in new venture financing: Evidence from equity crowdfunding in Latin America. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 17(5), 1175–1197. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-03-2020-0302
14.
CivardiC., MoroA., & WinborgJ. (2023). “All that glitters is not gold!”: The (unexplored) determinants of equity crowdfunding. Small Business Economics, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00813-y
15.
CoakleyJ., LazosA., & Liñares-ZegarraJ. (2021). Strategic entrepreneurial choice between competing crowdfunding platforms. Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(6), 1794–1824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09891-0
16.
ColomboM. G., & ShafiK. (2021). Receiving external equity following successfully crowdfunded technological projects: An informational mechanism. Small Business Economics, 56(4), 1507–1529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00259-1
17.
CooperD. R., & SchindlerP. (2014). Business research methods (twelfth). McGraw-Hill.
18.
De CrescenzoV., Ribeiro-SorianoD. E., & CovinJ. G. (2020). Exploring the viability of equity crowdfunding as a fundraising instrument: A configurational analysis of contingency factors that lead to crowdfunding success and failure. Journal of Business Research, 115(November 2019), 348–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.051
19.
DengL., YeQ., XuD., SunW., & JiangG. (2022). A literature review and integrated framework for the determinants of crowdfunding success. Financial Innovation, 8(41). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-022-00345-6
20.
EisenbeissM., HartmannA. S., & HornufL. (2022). Social media marketing for equity crowdfunding: Which posts trigger investment decisions?https://ssrn.com/abstract=4076954, https://doi.org/10.26092/elib/1488
21.
FanH., GaoT., & LiuS. (2021). The nearer, the better? The impact of cultural and geographic distance on crowdfunding project attractiveness. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021, 12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5683525
22.
FangF. (2022). Crisis analysis and prevention and control of financial leverage imbalance in shareholder equity pledge based on the DANP model. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7799695
23.
FortezzaF., ChecchinatoF., & SlanziD. (2023). The relationship between brand constructs and motivational patterns in crowdfunding decisions. Evidence from university crowdfunding. Management Research Review, 46(4), 557–578. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-10-2021-0750
24.
FujiiM., HosomiC., & NoseY. (2021). Equity crowdfunding and financial literacy of individual investors in Japan. Journal of Capital Markets Studies, 5(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcms-03-2021-0007
25.
GeigerM., & MooreK. (2022). Attracting the crowd in online fundraising: A meta-analysis connecting campaign characteristics to funding outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 128(October2021), 107061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107061
26.
GiakoumelouA., RaimoN., PetruzzellaF., & VitollaF. (2023). Are vegans generous? An exploration of the success factors of vegan crowdfunding projects. British Food Journal, 125(7), 2704–2720. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-08-2022-0685
27.
GuggenbergerT., SchellingerB., & Von WachterV. (2023). Kickstarting blockchain: Designing blockchain-based tokens for equity crowdfunding. Electronic Commerce Research, 24(1), 239–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-022-09634-9
28.
HoisenB., & SjurA. (2022). Success in equity crowdfunding: A quantitative study of what drives equity crwodfunding campign success in Norway. Universit of Agder.
29.
HuoH., WangC., HanC., YangM., & ShangW. (2024). Risk disclosure and entrepreneurial resource acquisition in crowdfunding digital platforms: Evidence from digital technology ventures. Information Processing and Management, 61(3), 103655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103655
30.
JungeL. B., LaursenI. C., & NielsenK. R. (2022). Choosing crowdfunding: Why do entrepreneurs choose to engage in crowdfunding? Technovation, 111(September2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102385
31.
KiviloS., TesliuksA., & LublóyÁ. (2024). Factors influencing U.S. equity-crowdfunded companies’ ability to survive. Venture Capital, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2023.2300144
32.
KleinertS., BaferaJ., UrbigD., & VolkmannC. K. (2022). How equity crowdfunding platforms use quality signals to select new ventures. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 46(6), 1626–1657. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211011945
33.
KleinertS., VolkmannC., & GrünhagenM. (2020). Third-party signals in equity crowdfunding: The role of prior financing. Small Business Economics, 54(1), 341–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0125-2
34.
KochJ.-A., & SieringM. (2015). Crowdfunding success factors: The characteristics of successfully. Twenty third European conference on information systems (ECIS) (pp. 1–15). http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2015_cr
35.
KolbeM., MansouriS., & MomtazP. P. (2022). Why do video pitches matter in crowdfunding? Journal of Economics and Business, 122(October 2021), 106081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2022.106081
36.
KuboT., VeríssimoD., UryuS., MienoT., & MacMillanD. (2021). What determines the success and failure of environmental crowdfunding? Ambio, 50(9), 1659–1669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01522-0
37.
LagazioC., & QuerciF. (2018). Exploring the multi-sided nature of crowdfunding campaign success. Journal of Business Research, 90(May), 318–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.031
38.
LiuQ., WangL., ZhouJ., WuW., & LiY. (2022). Factors influencing donation intention to personal medical crowdfunding projects appearing on MSNS. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 34(4). https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.287572
39.
LukkarinenA., & SchwienbacherA. (2023). Secondary market listings in equity crowdfunding: The missing link ? Research Policy, 52(1), 104648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104648
40.
MamaroL. P., & SibindiA. B. (2023). The drivers of successful crowdfunding projects in Africa during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(332), 2–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16070332
41.
MazzocchiniF. J., & LucarelliC. (2023). Success or failure in equity crowdfunding? A systematic literature review and research perspectives. Management Research Review, 46(6), 790–831. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2021-0672
42.
MeoliM., & VismaraS. (2021). Information manipulation in equity crowdfunding markets. Journal of Corporate Finance, 67, 101866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101866
43.
MollickE. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005
44.
NaysmithC. (2023). Equity crowdfunding sees explosive 119% monthly growth as alternative financing method picks up steam. Benzinga. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/equity-crowdfunding-sees-explosive-119-151846492.html?guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAKUWo_CV_W-D4wcpqEQOQjMBbvuWVWiRvzR1O3n27Y93cN-OWaht5NGm4aSyVlB5OtpeD1gU-cH8Qu_-YbIHeVM-xbP1ZRy2ObbpJtsTaUH6UYqPnCKPJ9Lsa2r86vmbr0BkwthpkDhCr-5g9WLfO27K4Xv0Gt7FQlKq_7379jsX&guccounter=2
45.
ObaB., AtakanS., & KirezliO. (2018). Value creation in crowdfunding projects-evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Innovation Economics, 26(2), 37. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.pr1.0028
46.
PengN., FengY., SongX., NiuB., & YuJ. (2022). Configurational paths to medical crowdfunding success and failure based on a crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 122(5), 1306–1332. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-03-2021-0184
47.
RalchevaA., & RoosenboomP. (2016). On the road to success in equity crowdfunding. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2727742
48.
RalchevaA., & RoosenboomP. (2020). Forecasting success in equity crowdfunding. Small Business Economics, 55(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00144-x
49.
Research and Markets. (2025). Crowdfunding market global forecast report by type, application countries and company analysis 2025–2033. https://www.researchandmarkets.com/report/crowdfunding
50.
RonenJ., RonenT., ZhouM. (Jamie), & GansS. E. (2023). The informational role of imagery in financial decision making: A new approach. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2023.100851
51.
RossiA., VismaraS., & MeoliM. (2019). Voting rights delivery in investment-based crowdfunding: A cross-platform analysis. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 46(2), 251–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-018-0109-x
52.
RostamkalaeiA., & FreelM. (2023). Some initial observations on the geography of the supply of equity crowdfunding. Venture Capital, 25(1), 65–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2022.2132891
53.
SalviA., RaimoN., PetruzzellaF., & VitollaF. (2022). The role of communication in restaurant crowdfunding success. British Food Journal, 124(12), 4323–4338. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-07-2021-0797
54.
SewaidA., Garcia-CestonaM., & SilaghiF. (2021). Resolving information asymmetries in financing new product development: The case of reward-based crowdfunding. Research Policy, 50(10), 104345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104345
55.
ShillerR. J. (2013). Capitalism and financial innovation. Financial Analysts Journal, 69(1), 21–25. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v69.n1.4
56.
SpenceM. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-820924
TafaM. D., & WorkuS. T. (2022). Determinants of private commercial banks deposit in Ethiopia. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2098608
60.
TiwariC. K., VadgamaC., PalA., & GuptaK. (2023). Equity crowdfunding: A bibliometric analysis of the state of research. NMIMS Management Review, 31(2), 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/09711023231197821
61.
TroiseC., TaniM., & PapalucaO. (2020). Equity and reward crowdfunding: A multiple signal analysis. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 12(3), 30. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v12n3p30
62.
UsmanS. M., AliF., BukhariS., ZubairM., YouH. W., ShahzadF., & KhanM. A. (2023). Financing decisions and the role of CSR in donation-based crowdfunding evidence from Pakistan and Indonesia. Business & Information Systems Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-023-00827-6
63.
ValenzaG., BalzanoM., & CaputoA. (2022). The role of equity crowdfunding campaigns in shaping firm innovativeness: Evidence from Italy. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2022-0212
64.
VismaraS. (2019). Sustainability in equity crowdfunding. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141(July 2018), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.014
65.
WachiraV. K., & WachiraE. W. (2022). Equity based crowdfunding: Determinants of succcessful campaign: The case of crowdcube platform in the United Kingdom. Public Finance Quarterly, 1, 1–20. https://www.statista.com/statistics/797673/equity-based-crowdfunding-uk/
66.
WangD., & ProkopJ. (2023, April10). Gender-specific local bias in equity crowdfunding. SSRN’s ELibrary, 1–45. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4414216, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4414216
67.
WasiuzzamanS., & SuhiliN. F. (2021). Examination of the success drivers of equity crowdfunding campaigns in Malaysia. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 15(2), 425–446. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-04-2021-0134
68.
YasarB., Sevilay YılmazI., HatipoğluN., & SalihA. (2022). Stretching the success in reward-based crowdfunding. Journal of Business Research, 152(August), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.07.053
69.
ZhangY., ScholesL., FuK., HughesM., & TangF. (2023). Equity crowdfunding syndicates and fundraising performance: The effect of human capital and lead investor reputation. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 30, 645–666.
70.
ZhouY., CuiJ., & WangN. (2022). Do backers prefer crowdfunding or pre-order? An empirical study. Frontiers in Psychology, November, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.984775
71.
ZieglerT., ShneorR., & WenzlaffK. (2021, June). The 2nd benchmarking finance market global alternative report (pp. 1–196) Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
