Researchers and retailers alike need to know how customers feel about artificial intelligence (AI)-driven technologies in the light of the increasing number of retail-tech hybrids driven by AI. The current research set out to gauge interest in and willingness to buy an AI-powered product in a retail environment. Determinants related to AI-based customer attitude and impulse purchase intention were theorised by drawing from the literature. The model was empirically tested with structured questionnaires using a representative sample of 354 customers chosen from the modern-trade retail industry in Sri Lanka. The findings suggest that perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use related to AI and attitudes towards technology significantly and positively impact the impulse purchase intention. Interestingly, consumer innovativeness strengthens the relationship between attitudes towards AI and impulse purchase intention, but does not influence the relationship between attitudes towards technology and impulse purchase intention. The study provides theoretical and practical insights for scholars and retail marketers.
AdamsD. A., NelsonR. R., & ToddP. A. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly, 227-247. https://doi.org/10.2307/249577
2.
AdapaS., Fazal-e-HasanS. M., MakamS. B., AzeemM. M., & MortimerG. (2020). Examining the antecedents and consequences of perceived shopping value through smart retail technology. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52, 101901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101901
3.
AcikgozF., & VegaR. P. (2022). The role of privacy cynicism in consumer habits with voice assistants: A Technology Acceptance Model perspective. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1138-1152. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1987677
4.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
5.
Al-EmranM., & GranićA. (2021). Is it still valid or outdated? A bibliometric analysis of the technology acceptance model and its applications from 2010 to 2020. In Recent advances in technology acceptance models and theories (pp. 1-12). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64987-6_1
6.
Al-JundiS. A., ShuhaiberA., & AugustineR. (2019). Effect of consumer innovativeness on new product purchase intentions through learning process and perceived value. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1698849. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1698849
7.
ApriliaC., & AmaliaR. (2023). Perceived Security and Technology Continuance Theory: An Analysis Of Mobile Wallet Users’ Continuance Intention. Global Business Review, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509221145831
8.
ArachchiH. A. D. M., & SamarasingheG. D. (2023). Intention to Adopt Intelligent Clothing in the Fashion Retail Industry: Extending the HISAM Model with Technology Readiness. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2254622
9.
ArachchiH. A. D. M., WeerasiriR. S., & MendisT. (2022). Impact of perceived corporate citizenship on purchase intention: across the fear of COVID-19 during the COVID-19 pandemic. South Asian Journal of Marketing, 3(1), 38-59. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJM-10-2021-0117
10.
ArachchiH. A. D. M. (2022). Does perceived corporate citizenship affect on purchasing intention during the COVID-19 pandemic? Across the mediation impact of brand trust and consumer–brand relationship. IIM Ranchi Journal of Management Studies, 1(2), 124-144. https://doi.org/10.1108/IRJMS-10-2021-0136
11.
ArachchiH. A. D. M., & SamarasingheG. D. (2023). Influence of corporate social responsibility and brand attitude on purchase intention. Spanish Journal of Marketing-ESIC. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-12-2021-0224
12.
ArachchiH. A. D. M., & SamarasingheG. D. (2022). Corporate Social Responsibility Towards Purchase Intention Across Regional Identity: A Comparison Between South Asia and Southeast Asia During COVID-19. Global Business Review, 23(6), 1424-1461.
13.
AshrafA. R., ThongpapanlN. T., & SpyropoulouS. (2016). The connection and disconnection between e-commerce businesses and their customers: Exploring the role of engagement, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease-of-use. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 20, 69-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2016.10.001
14.
BalakrishnanJ., DwivediY. K., HughesL., & BoyF. (2021). Enablers and inhibitors of AI-powered voice assistants: a dual-factor approach by integrating the status quo bias and technology acceptance model. Information Systems Frontiers, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10203-y
15.
BalakrishnanJ., & DwivediY. K. (2021). Conversational commerce: entering the next stage of AI-powered digital assistants. Annals of Operations Research, 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04049-5
16.
BaltazarA. (2019, January28). How grocers are reimagining the future with ai. Winsight Grocery Business. Retrieved May 18, 2022, fromhttps://www.winsightgrocerybusiness.com/technology/how-grocers-are-reimagining-future-ai
17.
BelancheD., CasalóL. V., & FlaviánC. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in FinTech: Understanding robo-advisors adoption among customers. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119(7). https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2018-0368
18.
BughinJ., HazanE., RamaswamyS., ChuiM., AllasT., DahlströmP., ... & TrenchM. (2022). Artificial Intelligence The Next Digital Frontier?June2017. McKinsey Global Institute.
19.
BlutM., & WangC. (2020). Technology readiness: A meta-analysis of conceptualizations of the construct and its impact on technology usage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48, 649-669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00680-8
20.
BonnM. A., KimW. G., KangS., & ChoM. (2016). Purchasing wine online: The effects of social influence, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and wine involvement. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 25(7), 841-869. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2016.1115382
21.
ByrneA., & HilbertD. (2008). Basic sensible qualities and the structure of appearance. Philosophical Issues, 18, 385-405.
22.
CaiZ., FanX., & DuJ. (2017). Gender and attitudes toward technology use: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 105, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.003
23.
ChangH. C. (2010). A new perspective on Twitter hashtag use: Diffusion of innovation theory. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504701295
24.
ChurchillG. A.Jr (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377901600110
25.
CuiY. G., van EschP., & JainS. P. (2021). Just walk out: The effect of AI-enabled checkouts. European Journal of Marketing, 56(6), 1650-1683. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2020-0122
26.
DavisF. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
27.
DavisF. D., BagozziR. P., & WarshawP. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
28.
DavenportT., GuhaA., GrewalD., & BressgottT. (2020). How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 24-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00696-0
29.
EschP. V., CuiY., & JainS. P. (2021). Stimulating or intimidating: The effect of AI-enabled in-store communication on consumer patronage likelihood. Journal of Advertising, 50(1), 63-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2020.1832939
30.
HashmiH. B. A., ShuC., & HaiderS. W. (2020). Moderating effect of hedonism on store environment-impulse buying nexus. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. 48(5), 465-483. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-09-2019-0312
31.
HengstlerM., EnkelE., & DuelliS. (2016). Applied artificial intelligence and trust—The case of autonomous vehicles and medical assistance devices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 105, 105-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.014
32.
HenselerJ., RingleC. M., & SarstedtM. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
33.
HeidenreichS., SpiethP., & PetschnigM. (2017). Ready, steady, green: Examining the effectiveness of external policies to enhance the adoption of eco-friendly innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(3), 343-359. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12364
34.
GansserO. A., & ReichC. S. (2021). A new acceptance model for artificial intelligence with extensions to UTAUT2: An empirical study in three segments of application. Technology in Society, 65, 101535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101535
35.
GeorgeT. (2022, March22). Artificial Intelligence (AI) use cases for the retail industry. Data Ideology. Retrieved June 11, 2022, fromhttps://www.dataideology.com/artificial-intelligence-use-cases-retail-industry/
36.
GoldsmithR. E., KimD., FlynnL. R., & KimW. M. (2005). Price sensitivity and innovativeness for fashion among Korean consumers. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145(5), 501-508. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.145.5.501-508
37.
GschwendT. (2005). Analyzing quota sample data and the peer-review process. French Politics, 3(1), 88-91. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fp.8200068
38.
HairJ. F.Jr, SarstedtM., HopkinsL., & KuppelwieserV. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
39.
HairJ. F., RisherJ. J., SarstedtM., & RingleC. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
40.
HairJ. F. M. H. G., RingleC. M., & SarstedtM. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Los Angeles:SAGE.
41.
HarL. L., RashidU. K., Te ChuanL., SenS. C., & XiaL. Y. (2022). Revolution of Retail Industry: From Perspective of Retail 1.0 to 4.0. Procedia Computer Science, 200, 1615-1625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.362
42.
JainS., & GandhiA. V. (2021). Impact of artificial intelligence on impulse buying behaviour of Indian shoppers in fashion retail outlets. International Journal of Innovation Science, 13(2), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijis-10-2020-0181
43.
KerschnerC., & EhlersM. H. (2016). A framework of attitudes towards technology in theory and practice. Ecological Economics, 126, 139-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.02.010
44.
KrejcieR. V., & MorganD. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
45.
KimJ., & ForsytheS. (2009). Adoption of sensory enabling technology for online apparel shopping. European Journal of Marketing, 43(9/10), 1101-1120. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560910976384
46.
KimH. Y., LeeY., ChoE., & JungY. J. (2020). Digital atmosphere of fashion retail stores. Fashion and Textiles, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-020-00217-6
47.
ImS., MasonC. H., & HoustonM. B. (2007). Does innate consumer innovativeness relate to new product/service adoption behavior? The intervening role of social learning via vicarious innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(1), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-006-0007-z
48.
InmanJ. J., & NikolovaH. (2017). Shopper-facing retail technology: A retailer adoption decision framework incorporating shopper attitudes and privacy concerns. Journal of Retailing, 93(1), 7-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2016.12.006
49.
LiL., WangZ., LiY., & LiaoA. (2021). Impacts of consumer innovativeness on the intention to purchase sustainable products. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 774-786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.002
50.
LiangY., LeeS. H., & WorkmanJ. E. (2020). Implementation of artificial intelligence in fashion: Are consumers ready?Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 38(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X19873437
51.
LinJ. S. C., & HsiehP. L. (2006). The role of technology readiness in customers’ perception and adoption of self-service technologies. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 17(5), 497-517. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230610689795
52.
LinC. Y. (2016). Perceived convenience retailer innovativeness: How does it affect consumers?Management Decision, 54(4), 946-964. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2015-0363
53.
LoureiroS. M. C., GuerreiroJ., & TussyadiahI. (2021). Artificial intelligence in business: State of the art and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 129, 911-926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.001
54.
LuH. P., ChengH. L., TzouJ. C., & ChenC. S. (2023). Technology roadmap of AI applications in the retail industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 195, 122778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122778
55.
MahmoudA. B., TehseenS., & FuxmanL. (2020). The dark side of artificial intelligence in retail innovation. In Retail Futures (pp. 165-180). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83867-663-620201019
56.
ManturS. T., & BorgaonH. (2020). Influence of visual merchandising on impulse buying behaviour of customers in sports retail outlet in Hubli city. Studies in Indian Place Names, 40(60), 3326-3336.
57.
McLeanG., & Osei-FrimpongK. (2019). Hey Alexa… examine the variables influencing the use of artificial intelligent in-home voice assistants. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 28-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.009
58.
MukerjeeH. S., DeshmukhG. K., & PrasadU. D. (2019). Technology readiness and likelihood to use self-checkout services using smartphone in retail grocery stores: Empirical evidences from hyderabad, India. Business Perspectives and Research, 7(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2278533718800118
59.
NakodR. (2019, December11). 5 ways to utilize artificial intelligence in retail for ... - einfochips. 5 Ways to Utilize Artificial Intelligence in Retail for Enhancing In-store Customer Experience. Retrieved April 18, 2022, fromhttps://www.einfochips.com/blog/5-ways-to-utilize-artificial-intelligence-in-retail-for-enhancing-in-store-customer-experience/
60.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd Ed.). New York:McGraw-Hill.
61.
NysveenH., PedersenP. E., & ThorbjørnsenH. (2005). Explaining intention to use mobile chat services: Moderating effects of gender. Journal of consumer Marketing, 22(5), 247-256. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760510611671
62.
ParkH. J., & ZhangY. (2022). Technology readiness and technology paradox of unmanned convenience store users. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 65, 102523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102523
63.
PayneE. M., PeltierJ. W., & BargerV. A. (2018). Mobile banking and AI-enabled mobile banking: The differential effects of technological and non-technological factors on digital natives’ perceptions and behavior. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 12(3), 328-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2020.10.006
64.
PillaiR., SivathanuB., & DwivediY. K. (2020). Shopping intention at AI-Powered Automated Retail Stores (AIPARS). Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 57, 102207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102207
65.
PodsakoffP. M., MacKenzieS. B., LeeJ. Y., & PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879.
66.
PookulangaraS., ParrJ., KinleyT., & JosiamB. M. (2021). Online sizing: Examining True Fit® technology using adapted TAM model. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 14(3), 348-357. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2021.1950847
67.
RehmanS. U., BhattiA., MohamedR., & AyoupH. (2019). The moderating role of trust and commitment between consumer purchase intention and online shopping behavior in the context of Pakistan. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40497-019-0166-2
68.
ReisJ., AmorimM., CohenY., & RodriguesM. (2020, April). Artificial intelligence in service delivery systems: A systematic literature review. In World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (pp. 222-233). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45688-7_23
69.
SantosM., & SchlesingerW. (2021). When love matters. Experience and brand love as antecedents of loyalty and willingness to pay a premium price in streaming services. Spanish Journal of Marketing-ESIC, 25(3), 374-391. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-11-2020-0201
70.
SaundersM., LewisP. and ThornhillA. (2009). Research Methods for Business Students, Financial Times Prentice Hall, Harlow.
71.
SaundersJ., WongV. and SaundersC. (2011). The Research Evaluation and Globalization of Business Research. British Journal of Management, 22(3), 401–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00755.x
72.
RenkoS., & DruzijanicM. (2014). Perceived usefulness of innovative technology in retailing: Consumers׳ and retailers׳ point of view. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(5), 836-843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.02.015
73.
RogersE. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations:5th ed.New York, Free Press.
74.
RogersE. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. New York:Free Press.
75.
RoggeveenA. L., & SethuramanR. (2020). Customer-interfacing retail technologies in 2020 & beyond: An integrative framework and research directions. Journal of Retailing, 96(3), 299-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2020.08.001
76.
SakrabaniP., TeohA. P., & AmranA. (2019). Strategic impact of retail 4.0 on retailers’ performance in Malaysia. Strategic Direction, 35(11), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1108/SD-05-2019-0099
77.
ShankarV., KalyanamK., SetiaP., GolmohammadiA., TirunillaiS., DouglassT., ... & WaddoupsR. (2021). How technology is changing retail. Journal of Retailing, 97(1), 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2020.10.006
78.
SindermannC., ShaP., ZhouM., WernickeJ., SchmittH. S., LiM., ... & MontagC. (2021). Assessing the attitude towards artificial intelligence: Introduction of a short measure in German, Chinese, and English Language. KI-KünstlicheIntelligenz, 35(1), 109-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-020-00689-0
79.
SunH., & ZhangP. (2006). The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(2), 53-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.013
80.
StoyanovaJ., BritoP. Q., GeorgievaP., & MilanovaM. (2015, September). Comparison of consumer purchase intention between interactive and augmented reality shopping platforms through statistical analyses. In 2015 International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA) (pp. 1-8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/INISTA.2015.7276727
81.
ThakurR., & SrivastavaM. (2015). A study on the impact of consumer risk perception and innovativeness on online shopping in India. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 43(2), 148-166. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-06-2013-0128
82.
TrivediJ., KasilingamD., AroraP., & SoniS. (2022). The effect of augmented reality in mobile applications on consumers’ online impulse purchase intention: The mediating role of perceived value. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2047
83.
VenkatesanS. (2021, June24). How walmart is using A.I. to make smarter substitutions in online grocery orders. Retrieved May 29, 2022, fromhttps://corporate.walmart.com/newsroom/2021/06/24/headline-how-walmart-is-using-a-i-to-make-smarter-substitutions-in-online-grocery-orders
84.
WilsonJ., & DaughertyP. R. (2019, November19). How humans and ai are working together in 1,500 companies. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved April 5, 2022, fromhttps://hbr.org/2018/07/collaborative-intelligence-humans-and-ai-are-joining-forces
85.
YenC., & ChiangM. C. (2021). Trust me, if you can: A study on the factors that influence consumers’ purchase intention triggered by chatbots based on brain image evidence and self-reported assessments. Behaviour & Information Technology, 40(11), 1177-1194. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1743362
86.
YigitcanlarT., CorchadoJ. M., MehmoodR., LiR. Y. M., MossbergerK., & DesouzaK. (2021). Responsible urban innovation with local government artificial intelligence (AI): A conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 71.
87.
ZhangX., YuP., YanJ., & SpilT. A. (2015). Using diffusion of innovation theory to understand the factors impacting patient acceptance and use of consumer e-health innovations: A case study in a primary care clinic. BMC health services research, 15(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0726-2
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
