The spread between the policy rate and operating target rate of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has consequences on the transmission of monetary policy signals. Using weekly data from 2011 to 2020 (504 observations), the study employs variants of General Auto Regressive Conditional Heteroskedastic model to comprehensively analyse the factors that drive this spread. Besides the factors retrieved from the literature, this study also gauges the impact of COVID-19 on the spread and its volatility. The results indicate that the spread is significantly impacted by its lag, volume of transactions in the counterpart markets, distribution pattern of the liquidity by the central bank, foreign market intervention, liquidity adjustment facility (LAF), currency in circulation and reserve requirement while market expectations and government cash balances are found to be non-significant. Besides, announcement effect of COVID and changes in key rates are found to be significant. The results of Exponential GARCH do not find significant asymmetry in response to positive and negative shocks on the spread. Volatility in the spread is comparatively more responsive to its lags than to the market shocks.
AfonsoG., & LagosR. (2012). An empirical study of trade dynamics in the fed funds market(Staff Report, No. 550). Federal Reserve Bank of New York. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2010636
2.
BechM., & MonnetC. (2016). A search-based model of the interbank money market and monetary policy implementation. Journal of Economic Theory, 164, 32–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2015.08.007
3.
BeirneJ. (2012). The EONIA spread before and during the crisis of 2007–2009: The role of liquidity and credit risk. Journal of International Money and Finance, 31(3), 534–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2011.10.005
4.
BhattacharyyaI., RoyM., JoshiH., & PatraM. D. (2009). Money market microstructure and monetary policy: The Indian experience. Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economies, 2(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/17520840902726326
5.
BhattacharyyaI., & SensarmaR. (2005). Signalling instruments of monetary policy: The Indian experience. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 3(2), 180–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03404632
BollerslevT. (1987). A conditionally heteroskedastic time series model for speculative prices and rates of return. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(3), 542. https://doi.org/10.2307/1925546
8.
ChakravartyR. (2020). The new monetary policy framework: What it means. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 18(2), 457–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-020-00210-2
9.
ChristensenJ. H. E., & RudebuschG. D. (2014). Estimating shadow-rate term structure models with near-zero yields. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 13(2), 226–259. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbu010
10.
DuaP. (2020). Monetary policy framework in India. Indian Economic Review, 55(1), 117–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41775-020-00085-3
11.
EffiongE. L. (2014). Exchange rate dynamics and monetary fundamentals: A cointegrated SVAR approach for Nigeria. Global Business Review, 15(2), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150914523569
12.
EngleR. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica, 50(4), 987. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912773
13.
EngleR., & MezrichJ. (1996). GARCH for groups: A round-up of recent developments in GARCH techniques for estimating correlation. Risk, 9(8), 36–40. https://www.econbiz.de/Record/garch-for-groups-a-round-up-of-recent-developments-in-garch-techniques-for-estimating-correlation-engle-robert/10007078117
14.
FrancqC., HorvathL., & ZakoianJ. M. (2011). Merits and drawbacks of variance targeting in GARCH models. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 9(4), 619–656. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbr004
15.
GhoshS., & AcharyaA. (2010, August). Determinants of Overnight Index Swap (OIS) Rates: Some empirical findings from an emerging market economy, India(Reserve Bank of India Occasional Papers, Vol. 31, No. 1). Reserve Bank of India (RBI). https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/bs_viewcontent.aspx?Id=2248
16.
GhoshS., & BhattacharyyaI. (2009). Spread, volatility and monetary policy: Empirical evidence from the Indian overnight money market. Macroeconomics And Finance in Emerging Market Economies, 2(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/17520840903076622
17.
GrayS. (2011). Central bank balances and reserve requirements. (IMF Working Papers, Vol. 11, No.36, p. 1). https://doi.org/10.5089/9781455217908.001
18.
HiltonS., & HrungW. (2010). The impact of banks’ cumulative reserve position on federal funds rate behavior. International Journal of Central Banking, 6(3), 101–118. https://www.ijcb.org/journal/ijcb10q3a3.pdf
19.
IMF. (2001). Chapter 2 money markets and monetary policy operations [E-book]. In Developing government bond markets (pp. 63–92). The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.5089/9780821349557.069
20.
JoshiH. (2004). The interbank money market in India: Evidence on volatility, efficacy of regulatory initiatives and implications for interest rate targeting(Reserve Bank of India Occasional Papers, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2 and 3). Reserve Bank of India (RBI). https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/PublicationsView.aspx?id=7919
21.
KavediyaR., & PattanaikS. (2016). Operating target volatility: Its implications for monetary policy transmission(Reserve Bank of India Occasional Papers, Vol. 37, No. 1 & 2). Reserve Bank of India (RBI). https://m.rbi.org.in/Scripts/bs_viewcontent.aspx?Id=3479
22.
KüçükH., ÖzlüP., TalaslıS. A., ÜnalmışD., & YükselC. (2015). Interest rate corridor, liquidity management, and the overnight spread. Contemporary Economic Policy, 34(4), 746–761. https://doi.org/10.1111/coep.12165
23.
KumarS., PrakashA., & KushawahaK. M. (2017, July). What explains call money rate spread in India?(RBI WPS (DEPR): 07/2017). Reserve Bank of India (RBI). https://rbi.org.in/Scripts/PublicationsView.aspx?id=17460
24.
LinzertT., & SchmidtS. (2008, December). What explains the spread between the Euro overnight rate and the ECB’s policy rate?(Working Paper Series No. 983/December). European Central Bank. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp983.pdf
25.
MabroukS., & SaadiS. (2012). Parametric value-at-risk analysis: Evidence from stock indices. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 52(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2012.04.006
26.
MagnaniV. M., CaluzA. D. R., GatsiosR. C., & LimaF. G. (2021). The relationship of monetary and fiscal policy credibility with the stock market volatility in a developing country. Global Business Review, 097215092098251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150920982513
27.
MandelbrotB. (1963). The variation of certain speculative prices. The Journal of Business, 36(4), 394. https://doi.org/10.1086/294632
28.
MoschitzJ. (2004, September). The determinants of the overnight interest rate in the Euro area(ECB Working Paper, No. 393). European Central Bank (ECB). http://hdl.handle.net/10419/152827
29.
NathG. C. (2012). Indian money market dynamics. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2062253
30.
NathG. C., & GhoshP. (2017, January). The Indian call money market(CCIL Monthly Newsletter). CCIL. https://www.ccilindia.com/Documents/Rakshitra/2017/Jan/Article.pdf
31.
NathG. C., & NatarajanR. (2006). CBLO and its impact on other money market segments. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.873428
32.
NelsonD. B. (1991). Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica, 59(2), 347. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938260
33.
NeyerU., & WiemersJ. (2004). The influence of a heterogeneous banking sector on the interbank market rate in the euro area. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), 140(III), 395–428. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/events/pdf/conferences/mpimp/neyer_wiemers.pdf
34.
PatraM. D., KapurM., KavediyaR., & LokareS. M. (2016). Liquidity management and monetary policy: From corridor play to marksmanship. In GhateC., & KletzerK. M.(Eds.), Monetary policy in India: A modern macroeconomic perspective (pp. 257–296). Springer.
35.
RajJ., PattanaikS., BhattacharyaI., & Abhilasha (2018, August). Forex market operations and liquidity management(RBI Bulletin: August 2018, pp.13–22). Reserve Bank of India (RBI). https://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/Bulletin/PDFs/05AR_10082018A2E34F9C0A154C299E2D1A07FA343133.PDF
36.
RayP., & PrabuE. (2013, April). Financial development and monetary policy transmission across financial markets: What do daily data tell for India?(RBI Working Paper Series (DEPR): 04/2013). Reserve Bank of India (RBI). https://www.rbi.org.in/scripts/PublicationsView.aspx?id=14985
37.
RBI. (2011, March). Report of the working group on operating procedure of monetary policy. Reserve Bank of India (RBI). https://www.rbi.org.in/scripts/PublicationReportDetails.aspx?UrlPage=&ID=631
38.
SinghB. (2020, May). Liquidity shocks and overnight interest rates in emerging markets: Evidence from GARCH models for India(RBI WPS (DEPR): 06/2020). Reserve Bank of India (RBI). https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/PublicationsView.aspx?id=19444
39.
SoaresC., & RodriguesP. M. M. (2013). Determinants of the EONIA spread and the financial crisis. The Manchester School, 81, 82–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/manc.12010
40.
TaylorS. (1986). Modelling financial time series. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
41.
The World Bank. (2022). The India development update- navigating the storm. worldbank.org (No. 178314). 11 January 2023https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099143112052224154/pdf/IDU0d4ad74a108a3304f93083990163996425f3a.pdf
42.
ValimakiT. (2008, December). Why the effective price for money exceeds the policy rate in the ECB tenders?(ECB Working Paper Series No. 981). European Central Bank. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp981.pdf
43.
VandenbusscheJ., BlazsekS., & WattS. (2011). The liquidity and liquidity distribution effects in emerging markets: Evidence from Jordan. Applied Financial Economics, 22(3), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603107.2011.610740
44.
WhitesellW. (2006). Interest rate corridors and reserves. Journal of Monetary Economics, 53(6), 1177–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2005.03.013
45.
ZhuD., & GalbraithJ. W. (2011). Modeling and forecasting expected shortfall with the generalized asymmetric Student-t and asymmetric exponential power distributions. Journal of Empirical Finance, 18(4), 765–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2011.05.006
