In this work, we have examined the volatility and disproportionate influence in foreign exchange markets of India and China, using daily data for the period 10 January 2006 to 23 October 2015. Generalised autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (GARCH) models are used to examine the volatility spillover between two markets. Exponential GARCH (EGARCH) model was utilised to catch the effect of good and bad news. Study revealed the bidirectional volatility and disproportionate influence among these markets during the period under observation. This examination would be useful to speculators and policymakers of the money-related markets to support hazard in current situation.
AhmedE.M.A., & SulimanZ.S. (2011). Modeling Stock Market Volatility Using GARCH Models Evidence From Sudan. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(23), 114–128.
2.
AkgirayV. (1989). Conditional Heteroscedasticity in Time Series of Stock Returns: Evidence and Forecasts. Journal of Business, 62(1), 55–80.
3.
BalabanE., BayarA. and FaffR. (2002). Forecasting Stock Market Volatility: Evidence From Fourteen Countries, University of Edinburgh Center For Financial Markets Research Working Paper, 2002.04. Edinburgh, Scotland: University of Edinburgh.
4.
BharR., & NikolovaN. (2009). Return, volatility spillovers and dynamic co relation in the BRIC equity markets: An analysis using a bivariate EGARCH framework. Global Finance Journal, 19(3), 203–218.
BongaL., & HoveniJ. (2013). Volatility spillovers between the equity market and foreign exchange market in South Africa in the 1995–2010 period. South African Journal of Economics, 81(2), 260–274.
7.
BrooksC. (2001). A double-threshold GARCH model for the French Franc/Deutschmark exchange rate. Journal of Forecasting, 20(2), 135–143.
8.
ChakrabartiG. & SenC. (2011). Volatility Regimes and Calendar Anomaly in Foreign Exchange Market. International Journal of Applied Economics and Finance, 5(2), 97–113.
9.
DickeyD.A. & FullerW.A. (1979). Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427–443.
10.
EngleR.F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of U.K. ınflation. Econometrica, 50(4), 987–1008.
11.
HerwartzH., & ReimersH.E. (2002). Empirical modelling of the DEM/USD and DEM/JPY foreign exchange rate: Structural shifts in GARCH-models and their implications. Allied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 18(1), 3–22.
12.
KamalY., Hammmad-Ul-Haq, GhaniU., & KhanM.M. (2012). Modeling the exchange rate volatility, using generalized autoregressive conditionally heteroscedastic (GARCH) type models: Evidence from Pakistan. African Journal of Business Management, 6(8), 2830–2838.
13.
KimS.J., & SheenJ. (2006). Interventions in the yen-dollar spot market: A story of price. Journal of Banking and Finance, 30(11), 3191–3214.
14.
McMillanD.G., & ThupayagaleP. (2010). Evaluating stock ındex return value-at-risk estimates in South Africa: Comaparative evidence for symmetric, asymmetric and long memory GARCH models. Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 9(3), 325–345.
15.
MukherjeeK.N., & MishraR.K. (2008). Stock market integration and volatility spillovers: India and its major Asian counterparts. MPRA Working Paper No. 12788. Retrieved 4April2012, from http://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/12788/1/MPRA_paper_12788.pdf
16.
NarayanP.K., & NarayanS. (2007). Are real exchange rates nonlinear with a unit root? Evidence on PPP for Italy. Applied Economics, 39(19), 2483–2488.
17.
NelsonD.B. (1991). Conditional heteroscedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica, 59(2), 347–370.
18.
OloweR.A. (2009). Modelling naira/dollar exchange rate volatility: Application of GARCH and asymmetric models. International Review of Businesss Research Papers, 5(3), 377–398.
19.
OmraneW.B., & ChristianH. (2010). Macroeconomic news surprises and volatility spillover in the foreign exchange markets. Financial Management Association Annual Meeting, New York, pp. 1–36.
20.
PoonS.H., & GrangerC. (2003). Forecasting volatility in financial markets: A review. Journal of Economic Literature, 41(2), 478–539.
21.
SahooS. (2012). Volatility transmission in the exchange rate of the Indian rupee. RBI Working Paper Series P S (DEPR) No. 08/2012. Mumbai, India: Department of Economıc and Policy Research, RBI.
22.
SarnoL., TaylorM., & ChowdhuryI. (2004). Nonlinear dynamics in deviations from the law of one price: a broad-based empirical study. Journal of International Money and Finance, 23(1), 1–25.
23.
TaylorS.J. (1986) Modeling Financial Time Series. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons
24.
TaylorM.P. (2006). Real exchange rates and Purchasing Power Parity: mean-reversion in economic thought. Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, 16(1–2), 1–17.
25.
TaylorM. & SarnoL. (2004). International real interest rate differentials, purchasing power parity and the behaviour of real exchange rates: the resolution of a conundrum. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 9(1), 15–23.
26.
TsuiA.K., & HoK.Y. (2004). Conditional heteroscedasicity of exchange rates: Further results based on the fractionally integrated approach. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 19(5), 337–642.
