Through this article, we have tried to identify the factors that lead to organizational identification of postgraduate students with the institutes in which they are studying. The idea was to find out what contributes to strong identification with the institute and how this identification with the organization leads to mutual benefit. For the current study, a sample of 275 postgraduate students studying in various management colleges in the National Capital Region (NCR) was administered a questionnaire. The analysis of the data indicates that identification with the institute is heavily influenced by clarity regarding recruiters expectations; this was followed by information sharing, participation in decision making and lastly by performance feedback. The findings of this study are useful for academic administrators in policy making and institution building. They can get a better insight into the minds of students and assess what factors are perceived as most important for them, while identifying with the institute in which they are studying.
AlbertS., AshforthB.E., & DuttonJ.R. (2000). Organizational identity and identification: charting new waters & building new bridges. Academy of management review25(1), 13–17.
2.
AlbertS. & WhettenD.A. (1985). Organizational identity. Research in organizational behavior. 7, 263–295.
3.
AllenM.W. (1992). Communication and organizational commitment: Perceived organizational support as a mediating factor. Communication Quarterly, 40(4), 357–367.
4.
AntebyM., & MolnarV. (2012). Collective memory meets organizational identity: Remembering to forget in a firm’s rhetorical history. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 515–540.
5.
AshforthB.E., & MealF. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.
6.
AshforthB.E., & MealF. (1996). Organizational identity & strategy as a context for the individual. Issues in Strategic Management, 13, 19–64.
7.
AshforthB.E, HarrisonS.H., & CorleyK.G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), 325–373.
8.
BaigM.A.I., RehmanC.A., & KhanM.K. (2012). A study of the relationship of organizational commitment with participation in decision making, procedural justice and organizational citizenship behaviour in teachers of ‘not for-profit schools’ of Lahore, Pakistan. Journal of Quality and Technology Management, VIII(II), 25–49.
9.
BassJ.R., GordonB.S., & KimY.K. (2013). University identification: A conceptual framework. Journal of Contemporary Athletics, 7(1), 13–26.
10.
BoyettJ., & BoyettJ. (1998). The guru guide: The best ideas of the top management thinkers. New York, NY: Wiley.
GujaratiD.N., & SangeethaS. (2007). Basic econometrics (4th ed., p. 359). New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill.
14.
HaslamS.A. (2001). Psychology in organizations: the social identity approach. London. Sage.
15.
HeH., & BrownA.D. (2013). Organizational identity and identification: A review of the literature and suggestions for future research. Group & Organization Management, 38(1), 3–35.
16.
JonesC., & VolpeE.H. (2010). Organizational identification: Extending our understanding of social identities through social networks. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 32(3), 371–519.
17.
KelmanH.C. (1961). Processes of opinion change. Public opinion quarterly25, 57–78.
18.
KolekofskiK.E., Jr, & HemingerA.R. (2003). Beliefs and attitudes affecting intentions to share information in an organizational setting. Information and Management, 40(6), 521–532.
19.
MealF., & AshforthB.E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 13(2), 103–123.
20.
MohapatraM., & SharmaB.R. (2008). Drivers of organizational commitment among managers of industrial organizations: A case study. Global Business Review, 9(1), 51–63.
21.
MonksJ. (2003). Patterns of giving to one’s alma mater among young graduates from selective institutions. Economics of Education Review, 22(2), 121–130.
22.
NeilsonG.L., MartinK.L., & PowersE. (2008). The secrets of successful strategy execution. Harvard Business Review, 61–70.
23.
RainaR. (2010). Timely, continuous & credible communication & perceived organizational effectiveness. The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 46(2), 345–359.
24.
TajfelH. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology33(1), 1–39.
Ul HassanF.S., ShahB., ZamanT., IkramullahM., & ShahI.A. (2011). Effect of leaders’ styles of decision making on perceived organizational effectiveness: An example from Pakistan. International Journal of Business & Social Science, 2(22), 297–307.
27.
Van KnippenbergD., & SleebosE. (2006). Organizational identification versus organizational commitment: Self-definition, social exchange, and job attitudes. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 27(5), 571–584.
28.
WelchH. (1981). Inter-relationships between organizational commitment and job characteristics, job satisfaction, professional behavior, and organizational climate. Human Relations, 34(12), 1079–1089.
