This review examines the challenges related to maternity protection experienced by women in the workplace and highlights the need for broader social science research in Asia to better inform workplace practices and policy development. A comprehensive search of eight major databases was conducted using the search terms maternity protection and maternal health. All English articles within the social sciences published between January 2009 and February 2019 were included. Removal of duplicates and screening the full-text articles using eligibility criteria were used to finalise the number of articles. A total of 12 studies were included. Six key themes identified as maternity protection issues and challenges experienced by women in the workplace were: managing maternity (n = 1); maternity infrastructure (n = 2); understanding issues of inequality in maternity protection (n = 2); returning to work after confinement (n = 2); best practices of maternity protection (n = 1); and challenges and support of maternity protection (n = 3). Even though virtually all Asian countries have adopted legislative provisions on maternity protection at work, the findings show that working mothers in Asia continue to have limited access to maternity entitlements and are discriminated against during pregnancy. Given the small number of studies, future research should further explore the local cultural variations on maternity issues to address the needs of working mothers and improve maternity protection policies.
AbeykoonP. L., Rannan-EliyaR. P., WickremasingheR., ThowfeekR., AnurangaC., & SiriwardenaI. (2014). Study on the establishment of maternity protection insurance in Sri Lanka. MB report. Institute of Health Policy. https://www.ihp.lk/publications/docs/MB%20Report.pdf
2.
AddatiL. (2015). Extending maternity protection to all women: Trends, challenges and opportunities. International Social Security Review, 68(1), 69–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.12060
3.
AECID (Spanish Agency for International Development Cooperation). (2015). Maternity protection for female workers: Laws and practices in ASEAN. https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/images/2015/August/ASEAN-Labour-Ministerial-Meeting-document/maternity%2012_3_2014.pdf
4.
AikawaT., AdministratorH., PavadhgulP., ChongsuwatR., SawasdivornS., & BoonshuyarC. (2015). Maternal return to paid work and breastfeeding practices in Bangkok, Thailand. Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health, 27(2), 1253–1262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539511419647
5.
AminahA. (2007). Work–family conflict, life-cycle stage, social support, and coping strategies among women employees. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 3, 70–79.
6.
AminahA., MaznahB., & SitiH. (2009). Work–family conflict and its antecedents among single mother employees. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 4, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.18848/1833-1882/CGP/v04i08/52970
7.
Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2015). Women in the workforce: An unmet potential in Asia and the Pacific. http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/365976
8.
AtabayE., MorenoG., NandiA., KranzG., VincentI., AssiT. M., WinfreyE. M., EarleA., RaubA., & HeymannS. J. (2015). Facilitating working mothers’ ability to breastfeed: Global trends in guaranteeing breastfeeding breaks at work, 1995–2014. Journal of Human Lactation, 31(1), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/089033441455480
9.
BanikB. K. (2017). Improving maternal health: A comparison among Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka. Journal of Health Management, 19(4), 523–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972063417727614
10.
BensonJ., & YukongdiV. (2011). Asian women managers: Participation, barriers and future prospects. Asia Pacific Business Review, 11(2), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360238042000291135
11.
BruckC., AllenT., & SpectorP. (2002). The relation between work–family conflict and job satisfaction: A finer-grained analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60, 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1836
12.
ChuangC. H., ChangP. J., ChenY. C., HsiehW. S., HurngB. S., LinS. J., & ChenP. C. (2010). Maternal return to work and breastfeeding: A population-based cohort study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47(4), 461–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.09.003
13.
CostantiniA., DickertS., SartoriR., & CeschiA. (2021). Return to work after maternity leave: The role of support policies on work attitudes of women in management positions. Gender in Management, 36(1), 108–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-06-2019-0085
14.
DasS., AlcockG., AzadK., KuddusA., ManandharD. S., ShresthaB. P., NairN., RathS., MoreN. S., SavilleN., HouwelingT. A., & OsrinD. (2016). Institutional delivery in public and private sectors in South Asia: A comparative analysis of prospective data from four demographic surveillance sites. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16, 273. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1069-7
15.
DevkotaH. R., MurrayE., KettM., & GroceN. (2018). Are maternal healthcare services accessible to vulnerable group? A study among women with disabilities in rural Nepal. PLoS One, 13(7), e0200370. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200370
16.
EmpowerMalaysia Report. (2019). Report: Vulnerabilities of women workers in Malaysia. https://www.empowermalaysia.org/s/Report-outline-women-workers-research-Completed.pdf
17.
GIFA Website. (2022). International maternity protection. https://www.gifa.org/en/international-2/international-maternity-protection/
18.
GaltryJ. (2015). Strengthening the human rights framework to protect breastfeeding: A focus on CEDAW. International Breastfeeding Journal, 10, 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-015-0054-5
19.
GeethaS., OvertonJ., & ManiamB. (2015). Flexible working arrangements, work–life balance and women in Malaysia. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 5, 34–38. http://www.ijssh.org/papers/417-H00021.pdf
20.
HawkinsS. S., GriffithsL. J., DezateuxC., LawC., & Millennium Cohort Study Child Health Group. (2007). Maternal employment and breast-feeding initiation: Findings from the Millennium Cohort Study. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 21(3), 242–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00812.x
21.
HeymannJ., RaubA., & EarleA. (2013). Breastfeeding policy: A globally comparative analysis. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 91(6), 398–406. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.12.109363
22.
IellamoA., SobelH., & EngelhardtK. (2015). Working mothers of the World Health Organization Western Pacific offices: Lessons and experiences to protect, promote, and support breastfeeding. Journal of Human Lactation, 31(1), 36–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334414558847
23.
International Labour Office (ILO) Report. (2011). Global employment trends 2011. The challenge of job recovery. ILO. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@dgreports/@dcomm/@publ/documents/publication/wcms_150440.pdf
24.
ILO Report. (2018). Game changers: Women and the future of work in Asia and the Pacific. ILO. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/-asia/-ro-bangkok/-sro-bangkok/documents/publication/wcms_645601.pdf
25.
JonesG. W. (2012). Population policy in a prosperous city–state: Dilemmas for Singapore. Population and Development Review, 38(2), 311–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2012.00494.x
26.
LewisS., StumbitzB., MilesL., & RouseJ. (2014). Maternity protection in SMEs: An international review. International Labour Office (ILO).
27.
MadgaskarA. (2019). The future of women in Asia’s workforce. McKinsey Global Institute. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/asia-pacific/the-future-of-women-in-asias-workforce
28.
MahyutS. M. (2015). Parental rights in the workplace: The Malaysian law, practices and procedures. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 9(32), 21–28.
29.
MandalB., EricR. B., & FeinB. F. (2010). The differential effects of full-time and part-time work status on breastfeeding. Health Policy, 97(1), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.03.006
30.
MoherD., LiberatiA., TetzlaffJ., & AltmanD. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ, 339, b2535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535
31.
NguyenT. T., CashinJ., TranH. T., VuD. H., NandiA., PhanM. T., VanN. D., WeissmanA., PhamT. N., NguyenB. V., & MathisanR. (2022). Awareness, perceptions, gaps, and uptake of maternity protection among formally employed women in Vietnam. International Journal of Environmental Research on Public Health, 19, 4772. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084772
32.
OrtizJ., McGilliganK., & KellyP. (2004). Duration of breast milk expression among working mothers enrolled in an employer-sponsored lactation program. Pediatric Nursing, 30(2), 111–119.
33.
OECD. (2019). Society at a glance: Asia/Pacific 2019. https://doi.org/10.1787/soc_aag-2019-en
34.
PetticrewM., & RobertsH. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Wiley Online Book. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887
35.
RamaniS. S., SuppramaniamS., & DadaM. (2022). An exploratory study on challenges faced by working women and their perceived supports towards remote work in Malaysia. Electronic Journal of Business and Management, 7(1), 73–87.
36.
RatnayakeH., & RowelD. (2018). Prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding and barriers for its continuation up to 6 months in Kandy district, Sri Lanka. International Breastfeeding Journal, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-018-0180-y
37.
RollinsN. C., BhandariN., HajeebhoyN., HortonS., LutterC. K., MartinesJ. C., PiwozE. G., RichterL. M., VictoraC. G., & Lancet Breastfeeding Series Group. (2016). Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices? Lancet (London, England), 387(10017), 491–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01044-2
38.
SoomroJ. A., ShaikhZ. N., SaheerT. B., & BijaraniS. A. (2016). Employers’ perspective of workplace breastfeeding support in Karachi, Pakistan: A cross-sectional study. International Breastfeeding Journal, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-016-0084-7
39.
SulaimanZ., LiamputtongP., & AmirL. (2018). Timing of return to work and women’s breastfeeding practices in urban Malaysia: A qualitative study. Health & Social Care in the Community, 26(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12460
40.
ThomsonG., DykesF., & DowneS. (2011). Qualitative research in midwifery and childbirth phenomenological approaches. Online Wiley.
41.
ThowA. M., KarnS., DevkotaM. D., RasheedS., RoyS. K., SulemanY., HazirT., PatelA., GaidhaneA., PuriS., GodakandageS., SenarathU., & DibleyM. J. (2017). Opportunities for strengthening infant and young child feeding policies in South Asia: Insights from the SAIFRN policy analysis project. BMC Public Health, 17, 404. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4336-2
42.
ThuH. N., ErikssonB., KhanhT. T., PetzoldM., BondjersG., KimC. N., ThanhL. N., & AscherH. (2012). Breastfeeding practices in urban and rural Vietnam. BMC Public Health, 12, 964. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-964
43.
ZaveriA., PaulP., RoyR., & ChouhanP. (2022). Facilitators and barriers to the utilisation of maternal healthcare services in empowered action group states, India. Journal of Health Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/09720634221088359
