This article examines the role of reputation building in family business contexts through relationships between the appointment of female on board (FOB) and the establishment of risk management (RMCOM) and corporate social responsibility committees (CSRCOM). Family firms perceive FOB as decreasing their firm control. The study also analyses the moderating effect of FOB on the aforementioned nexus. This article shows that family firms with FOB and through the signalling effect can be perceived by stakeholders as more authentic and managing their reputation and image; moreover, FOB negates the benefit of a CSRCOM, but better controls asymmetric information through creating an RMCOM.
AbbasA., & FrihatniA. A. (2023). Gender diversity and firm performances suffering from financial distress: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Capital Markets Studies, 7(1), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCMS-12-2022-0045
2.
AdamsR. B., & FerreiraD. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007.
3.
AdewoleO. (2024). Translating brand reputation into equity from the stakeholder’s theory: An approach to value creation based on consumer’s perception and interactions. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 9(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-023-00085-5
4.
AgustinI. D., & UtamaC. A. (2024). The influence of risk management committee and family ownership with company performance in Indonesia: Busy directors as moderating variable. Ekombis Review Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 12(1), 871–886. https://doi.org/10.37676/ekombis.v12i1
5.
AhernK. R., & DittmarA. K. (2012). The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(1), 137–197. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr049
6.
Al-DubaiS., IsmailK. N. I. K., & AmranN. A. (2014). Family business definition: A matter of concern or a matter of convenience?Corporate Ownership and Control, 11(2), 274–280. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv11i2c2p4
7.
AlduneibatK. A. (2023). The effect of risk management committee characteristics on a company’s performance in an emerging country. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 12(1), 376–386. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv12i1siart16
8.
AminA., AliR., RehmanR. U., & NtimC. G. (2023). CEO personal characteristics and firms’ risk-taking behaviour: The moderating role of family ownership. Gender in Management, 39(2), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-02-2022-0034
9.
AndersonR. C., MansiS. A., & ReebD. M. (2003). Founding family ownership and the agency cost of debt. Journal of Financial Economics, 68(2), 263–285, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00067-9
10.
AndersonR. C., & ReebD. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58, 1301–1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00567
11.
ArayssiM., JiziM., & TabajaH. H. (2020). The impact of board composition on the level of ESG disclosures in GCC countries. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(1), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-05-2018-0136
12.
Baraibar-DiezE., & OdriozolaM. D. (2019). CSR committees and their effect on ESG performance in UK, France, Germany, and Spain. Sustainability, 11(18), 5077. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11185077
13.
BargoniA., AlonI., & FerrarisA. (2023). A systematic review of family business and consumer behaviour. Journal of Business Research, 158, 113698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113698
14.
BarontiniR., & CaprioL. (2006). The effect of family control on firm value and performance: Evidence from continental Europe. European Financial Management, 12(5), 689–723, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2006.00273.x
15.
BartholomeuszS., & TanewskiG. A. (2006). The relationship between family firms and corporate governance. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2006.00166.x
16.
BatesE. W., & LeclercR. J. (2009). Boards of directors and risk committees. The Corporate Governance Advisor, 17(6), 16–18.
17.
BearS. E., RahmanN., & PostC. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207–221, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2
18.
BettinelliC. (2011). Boards of directors in family firms: An exploratory study of structure and group process. Family Business Review, 24(2), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511402196
19.
BettinelliC., Del BoscoB., & GiachinoC. (2018). Women on boards in family firms: What we know and what we need to know. In The Palgrave handbook of heterogeneity among family firms (pp. 201–228). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77676-7_9
20.
BifulcoG. M., SavioR., PaoloneF., & TisciniR. (2023). The CSR committee as moderator for the ESG score and market value. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(6), 3231–3241. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2549
21.
BiswasP. K., RobertsH., & WhitingR. H. (2022). Female directors and CSR disclosure in Bangladesh: The role of family affiliation. Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(1), 163–192. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-10-2019-0587
22.
BrammerS., BrooksC., & PavelinS. (2006). Corporate social performance and stock returns: UK evidence from disaggregate measures. Financial Management, 35(3), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2006.tb00149.x
23.
BuchananJ. M. (1975). The Samaritan’s dilemma. In PhelpsE. S. (Ed.), Altruism, morality and economic theory (pp.71–86). Russell Sage Foundation.
24.
BurkeJ. J., HoitashR., & HoitashU. (2019). The heterogeneity of board-level sustainability committees and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(4), 1161–1186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3453-2
25.
CarterD. A., D’SouzaF., SimkinsB. J., & SimpsonW. G. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 396–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12286
26.
ChenC. X., LuH., & SougiannisT. (2011). The agency problem, corporate governance, and the asymmetrical behavior of selling, general, and administrative costs. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29, 252–282., https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01094.x
27.
ChenS., NiX., & TongJ. Y. (2016). Gender diversity in the boardroom and risk management: A case of R&D investment. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(3), 599–621. extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/resources/files/Pertanika%20PAPERS/JSSH%20Vol.%2025%20(S)%20Nov.%202017/23%20JSSH(S)-0609-2017-4thProof.pdf
28.
ChuJ., LiX., & ZouY. S. (2024). Corporate social responsibility committee: International evidence. European Corporate Governance Institute–Finance Working Paper, (984), 11–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4845058
29.
ChuaJ., ChrismanJ. J., & StelerL. P. (2003). Extending the theoretical horizons of family business research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 331–338, https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.00012
30.
CitterioA., LocatelliR., & UselliA. (2024). Mapping corporate social responsibility in family firms: A bibliometric review across countries. Sustainability, 16(2), 500. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020500
31.
ClaessensS., DjankovS., FanJ. P., & LangL. H. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. The Journal of Finance, 57(6), 2741–2771. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00511
32.
CrisóstomoV. L., de Azevedo PrudêncioP., & de Freitas BrandãoI. (2023). Corporate reputation in Brazil: The effects of the shareholding control configuration, corporate governance, and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Reputation Review, 26(4), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-022-00152-w
33.
CronqvistH., & NilssonM. (2003). Agency costs of controlling minority shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(4), 695–719. https://doi.org/10.2307/4126740
34.
CruzC., JustoR., Larraza-KintanaM., & Garces-GaldeanoL. (2019). When do women make a better table? Examining the influence of women directors on family firm’s corporate social performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(2), 282–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258718796080
35.
CybinskiP., & WindsorC. (2013). Remuneration committee independence and CEO remuneration for firm financial performance. Accounting Research Journal, 26(3), 197–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-08-2012-0068
36.
D’AmatoA. (2017). Do women perform better in family firms? Exploring the moderating role of family firm status. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 29(3), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWBR-12-2016-0039
37.
DaoudJ. I. (2017, December). Multicollinearity and regression analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 949(1), 012009. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/949/1/012009
38.
DeephouseD. L., & JaskiewiczP. (2013). Do family firms have better reputations than non‐family firms? An integration of socioemotional wealth and social identity theories. Journal of Management Studies, 50(3), 337–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12015
39.
DemsetzH., & LehnK. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93(6), 1155–1177. https://doi.org/10.1086/261354
40.
D’EsteC., & CarabeliM. (2022). Family ownership and risk: The role of family managersCorporate Governance, 22(6), 1161–1177. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-09-2021-0338
41.
DowlingG. (2006). How good corporate reputations create corporate value. Corporate Reputation Review, 9(2), 134–143https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550017
42.
FirdausL. M., & AdharianiD. (2017). Board of directors’ gender, managerial ownership and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from Indonesia. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 25(S), 281–297.
43.
Fleitas-CastilloG. D. C., Pérez-AlemánJ., & Santana-MartínD. J. (2025). Board gender diversity and cash holding: The effect of family ties. Review of Managerial Science, 19(4), 1161–1193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00788-4
44.
Garcia-MecaE., & Santana-MartínD. J. (2023). Board gender diversity and performance in family firms: Exploring the faultline of family ties. Review of Managerial Science, 17, 1559–1594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00563-3
45.
GennariF., & SalvioniD. M. (2019). CSR committees on boards: The impact of the external country level factors. Journal of Management and Governance, 23(3), 759–785, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-018-9442-8
46.
GhoshA., KarunaC., & TianF. (2015). Causes and consequences of the CEO also being the chair of the board. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 27(2), 197–223. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-51212
47.
GhoshC., GiambonaE., HardingJ. P., & SirmansC. F. (2011). How entrenchment, incentives and governance influence REIT capital structure. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 43(1), 39–72. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1800094
48.
Godos-DiezJ. L., Cabeza-GarciaL., Alonso-MartínezD., & Fernández-GagoR. (2018). Factors influencing board of directors’ decision-making process as determinants of CSR engagement. Review of Managerial Science, 12(1), 229–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0220-1
49.
Gomez-MejiaL. R., Nunez-NickelM., & GutierrezI. (2001). The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069338
50.
HabermanH., & DanesS. M. (2007). Father-daughter and father-son family business management transfer comparison: Family FIRO model application. Family Business Review, 20(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00088.x
51.
HagelinN., HolmenM., & PramborgB. (2006). Family ownership, dual-class shares, and risk management,SSRN Electronic Journal, 16(3), 283–301, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2006.01.002
52.
Hernandez-PerlinesF., CovinJ. G., & Ribeiro-SorianoD. E. (2021). Entrepreneurial orientation, concern for socioemotional wealth preservation, and family firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 126(10), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.050
53.
HinesC. S., & PeterG. F. (2015). Voluntary risk management committee formation: Determinants and short-term outcomes. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 34(3), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2015.02.001
54.
HoldernessC. G. (2009). The myth of diffuse ownership in the United States. Review of Financial Studies, 22(4), 1377–1408. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm069
55.
HoucineA., & DerouicheI. (2024). Board gender diversity and corporate social performance: The moderating effect of family firms. Journal of Management Control, 35(2), 265–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-024-00374-5
56.
JamesH. (1999). Owner as manager: Extended horizons and the family firm. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 6, 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/13571519984304
57.
JiaJ. (2019). Does risk management committee gender diversity matter? A financial distress perspective. Managerial Auditing Journal, 34(8), 1050–1072. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-05-2018-1874
58.
JongL., & HoP. L. (2020). Inside the family firms: The impact of family and institutional ownership on executive remuneration. Cogent Economics and Finance, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2018.1432095
59.
Jurado-CaraballoM. A. -C., & Quintana-GarciaC. (2024). Disability inclusion in workplaces, firm performance, and reputation. European Management Journal, 43(5), 752–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2024.08.001
KorenkiewiczD., & MaennigW. (2023). Women on a corporate board of directors and consumer satisfaction. Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET). Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14(4), 3904–3928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-01012-y
62.
KuboK., & SasakiR. (2024). The impact of a CSR committee on CSR performance. Japan and The World Economy, 71, Article 101269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japwor.2024.101269
63.
La PortaR., Lopez-de-SilanesF., ShleiferA., & VishnyR. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155. https://doi.org/10.1086/250042
64.
LiuY., WeiZ., & XieF. (2014). Do women directors improve firm performance in China?Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.016
65.
Lopez‐GonzálezE., Martínez‐FerreroJ., & García‐MecaE. (2019). Does corporate social responsibility affect tax avoidance: Evidence from family firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(4), 819–831. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1723
66.
MainB. M., & JohnstonJ. (1993). Remuneration committees and corporate governance. Accounting and Business Research, 23, 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1993.9729903
67.
MalikM., ShafieR., & Ku IsmailK. N. I. (2021). Do risk management committee characteristics influence the market value of firms?Risk Management, 23(1), 172–191. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41283-021-00073-8
68.
MalikM., ShafieR., Ku IsmailK. N. I., & BajaryA. R. (2023). Do ownership structures affect the establishment of a risk management committee? Evidence from an emerging market. Cogent Business and Management, 10(2), 2244216. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2244216
69.
MarpaungA. P., KotoM., HafizM. S., & HamdaniR. (2022). Female directors and firm performance: Evidence of family firm in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 22(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJEBA/2022/v22i130538
70.
MasulisR. W., PhamP. K., & ZeinJ. (2009). Pyramids: Empirical evidence on the costs and benefits of family business groups around the world. European Corporate Governance Institute Finance Working Paper, 240(8).
71.
MauryB. (2006). Family ownership and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Western European corporations. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12, 321–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2005.02.002
72.
McMillan-CapehartA., AaronJ. R., & ClineB. N. (2010). Investor reactions to diversity reputation signals. Corporate Reputation Review, 13(3), 184–197. https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2010.20
73.
MeqbelR., Alta’anyM., AbwenyM., & Al-ShaerH. (2025). CSR governance committee and carbon emission performance: Does committee composition matter?International Journal of Finance and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.3164
74.
Minguez-VeraA., & MartinA. (2011). Gender and management on Spanish SMEs: An empirical analysis. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(14), 2852–2873. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.599948
75.
MorckR., StangelandD., & YeungB. (2000). Inherited wealth, corporate control, and economic growth. In MorckR. K. (Ed.), Concentrated corporate ownership (pp. 319–69). University of Chicago Press.
76.
MorckR., & YeungB. (2003). Agency problems in large family business groups. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 367–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.t01-1-00015
77.
NasutionA. A. (2019). Analysis of corporate governance effect and characteristics of companies on the existence of risk management committee. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 648(1), 012001. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/648/1/012001
78.
Navarro-GarciaJ. C., Ramon-LiorensM. C., & Garcia-MecaE. (2022). Female directors and corporate reputation. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 25(4), 352–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/2340944420972717
79.
O’ConnorN. (2001). UK corporate reputation management: The role of public relations planning, research and evaluation in a new framework of company reporting. Journal of Communication Management, 6(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632540210806937
80.
OrtizM. M. (2025, May). The prevalence of private family firms in Europe (White Paper no. 5). Dauphine PSL, Family Business and Long-Term Investment Chair, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5228631
81.
PetersG. F., & RomiA. M. (2015). The association between sustainability governance characteristics and the assurance of corporate sustainability reports. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 34(1), 163–198. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2198068.
82.
PindadoJ., & RequejoI. (2015). Family business performance from a governance perspective: A review of empirical research. International Journal of Management Review, 17(3), 279–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12040
83.
PurkayasthaA. (2022). How can women board members bring focus on the governance of ESG strategy?California Management Review Insights.
84.
ReddyK., & WellalageN. H. (2023). Effects of family ownership and family management on the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Research in International Business and Finance, 65, 101977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.101977
85.
RehmanS., & HamdanY. H. (2023). Founding-family firms and CSR performance in the emerging economy of India: A socio-emotional wealth perspective. Sustainability, 15(10), 8189. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108189
86.
Rodriguez‐ArizaL., Cuadrado‐BallesterosB., Martínez‐FerreroJ., & García‐SánchezI. M. (2017). The role of female directors in promoting CSR practices: An international comparison between family and non‐family businesses. Business Ethics: A European Review, 26(2), 162–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12140
87.
RovelliP., BenedettiC., ColladonA. F., & De MassisA. (2022). As long as you talk about me: The importance of family firm brands and the contingent role of family-firm identity. Journal of Business Research, 139, 692–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.075
88.
SagederM., MitterC., & Feldbauer-DurstmullerB. (2018). Image and reputation of family firms: A systematic literature review of the state of research. Review of Managerial Science, 12, 335–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0216-x.
89.
SalehiM., HoshmandM., & Rezaei RanjbarH. (2020). The effect of earnings management on the reputation of family and non-family firms. Journal of Family Business Management, 10(2), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-12-2018-0060
90.
SamaraG., JamaliD., & LapeiraM. (2019). Why and how should SHE make her way into the family business boardroom?Business Horizons, 62(1), 105–115.
91.
SamarawickramaD., BiswasP. K., & RobertsH. (2024). Mandatory CSR regulations and social disclosure: The mediating role of the CSR committee. Meditari Accountancy Research, 32(4), 1159–1197. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-03-2023-1950
92.
SarkarJ., & SelarkaE. (2021). Women on board and performance of family firms: Evidence from India. Emerging Markets Review, 46, 100770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2020.100770
93.
SchulzeW. S., LubatkinM. H., DinoR. N., & BuchholtzA. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12(2), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.2.99.10114
94.
SekerciN., & PagachD. (2020). Firm ownership and enterprise risk management implementation: Evidence from the Nordic Region. Journal of Risk Financial Management, 13(9), 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13090210
95.
ShaukatA., QiuY., & TrojanowskiG. (2016). Board attributes, corporate social responsibility strategy, and corporate environmental and social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(3), 569–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2460-9
96.
ShleiferA., & VishnyR. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of finance, 52(2), 737–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x
97.
SimpsonW. G., CarterD., & D’SouzaF. P. (2010). What do we know about women on boards?Journal of Applied Finance (Formerly Financial Practice and Education), 20(2). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2693058
98.
Tanyeri GünsürB., & AlpE. (2023). The value of shareholder rights in family firms: Global evidence from a death in the family. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 31(4), 625–646, https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12484
99.
UlrichP., & FibitzA. (2018). Corporate governance mechanisms in family firms: A socioemotional wealth perspective. Corporate Ownership and Control, 15(1), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv15i3art3
100.
UpadhyayA. D., BhargavaR., & FairclothS. D. (2014). Board structure and role of monitoring committees. Journal of Business Research, 67(7), 1486–1492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.07.017
101.
VieiraE. (2018). Board of directors characteristics and performance in family firms and under the crisis. Corporate Governance, 18(1), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-01-2017-0010
102.
VillalongaB., & AmitA. (2009). How are U.S. family firms controlled?The Review of Financial Studies, 22(8), 3047–3091. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn080
103.
WangJ. C., MarkóczyL., SunS. L., & PengM. W. (2019). She’-EO compensation gap: A role congruity view. Journal of Business Ethics, 159, 745–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3807-4
104.
WangJ. C., ZhaoY., & SunS. L. (2023). Female-friendly boards in family firms. Journal of Business Research, 157, 113552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113552
105.
WardJ. L., & HandyJ. L. (1988). A survey of board practices. Family Business Review, 1(3), 289–308, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1988.00289.x
106.
WaymerD., & VanSletteS. (2013). Corporate reputation management and issues of diversity. In CarrollC. E. (Ed.), The Handbook of communication and corporate reputation (pp. 471–483). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118335529.ch38
107.
WestheadP., & HoworthC. (2007). Types of private family firms: An exploratory conceptual and empirical analysis. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 19(5): 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620701552405
108.
ZahraS. A. (2005). Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Family business review, 18(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00028.x
109.
ZhouJ., TamO. K., & YuP. (2013). An investigation of the role of family ownership, control and management in listed Chinese family firms. Asian Business Management, 12, 197–225. https://doi.org/10.1057/abm.2012.40
