Although classical agency theorists claim that pay-for-performance is not relevant in the context of private family firms, the authors provide empirical evidence of the opposite, using a sample of 529 privately held U.S. family firms. The results suggest that objective performance-based measures play a significant role in CEO compensation. Additionally, the authors find that in private family firms CEO compensation is more responsive to firm performance in firms with low ownership dispersion and in the controlling-owner stage. Furthermore, the positive pay-for-performance relation is slightly stronger for nonfamily CEOs than for family CEOs.
AchleitnerA. K.RappM. S.SchallerP.WolffM. (2010). Ausgewählte Aspekte der Vorstandsvergütung in Börsennotierten Unternehmen: Familien-vs. Nicht-Familienunternehmen [Selected aspects of executive remuneration in listed firms: Family vs. non-family firms]. Zeitschrift für Corporate Governance, 10(3), 1-12.
2.
AndersonM. C.BankerR. D.RavindranS. (2000). Executive compensation in the information technology industry. Management Science, 46, 530-547.
3.
AndersonR. C.MansiS. A.ReebD. M. (2003). Founding family ownership and the agency cost of debt. Journal of Financial Economics, 68, 263-285.
4.
AndrewsD. W. K.MoreiraM. J.StockJ. H. (2007). Performance of conditional Wald tests in IV regression with weak instruments. Journal of Econometrics, 139, 116-132.
5.
AngJ. S.ColeR. A.LinJ. W. (2000). Agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Finance, 55, 81-106.
6.
AntiaM.PantzalisC.ParkJ. C. (2010). CEO decision horizon and firm performance: An empirical investigation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 16, 288-301.
7.
AronoffC.WardJ. (1993). Family business compensation. Marietta, GA: Business Owner Resources.
8.
AstrachanJ. H.KleinS. B.SmyrniosK. X. (2002). The F-PEC Scale of Family Influence: A proposal for solving the family business definition problem. Family Business Review, 15, 31-58.
9.
BakerG. P.JensenM. C.MurphyK. J. (1988). Compensation and incentives—Practice vs theory. Journal of Finance, 43, 593-616.
10.
BalkinD. B.Gomez-MejiaL. R. (1990). Matching compensation and organizational strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 153-169.
11.
BanghøjJ.GabrielsenG.PetersenC.PlenborgT. (2010). Determinants of executive compensation in privately held firms. Accounting & Finance, 50, 481-510.
12.
BarkemaH. G.Gomez-MejiaL. R. (1998). Managerial compensation and firm performance: A general research framework. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 135-145.
13.
BarkemaH. G.PenningsJ. M. (1998). Top management pay: Impact of overt and covert power. Organization Studies, 19, 975-1003.
14.
BarnettT.KellermannsF. W. (2006). Are we family and are we treated as family? Nonfamily employees’ perceptions of justice in the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 837-854.
15.
BascleG. (2008). Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management research. Strategic Organization, 6, 285-328.
16.
BasuS.HwangL. S.MitsudomeT.WeintropJ. (2007). Corporate governance, top executive compensation and firm performance in Japan. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 15(1), 56-79.
17.
BebchukL. A.FriedJ. A. (2003). Executive compensation as an agency problem. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(3), 71-92.
18.
BerleA. A.MeansG. C. (1991). The modern corporation and private property. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
19.
BitlerM. P.MoskowitzT. J.Vissing-JorgensenA. (2005). Testing agency theory with entrepreneur effort and wealth. Journal of Finance, 60, 539-576.
20.
BlockJ. H. (2011). How to pay nonfamily managers in large family firms: A principal–agent model. Family Business Review, 24, 9-27.
BrunelloG.GrazianoC.ParigiB. (2001). Executive compensation and firm performance in Italy. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19, 133-161.
23.
BurkartM.PanunziF.ShleiferA. (2003). Family firms. Journal of Finance, 58, 2167-2201.
24.
CampelloM. (2006). Debt financing: Does it boost or hurt firm performance in product markets?Journal of Financial Economics, 82, 135-172.
25.
CapezioA.ShieldsJ.O’DonnellM. (2011). Too good to be true: Board structural independence as a moderator of CEO pay for firm performance. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 487-513.
26.
CavalluzzoK.SankaraguruswamyS. (2000). Pay-to-accounting performance and ownership structure in privately-held small corporations. Unpublished working paper.
27.
ChengS.FirthM. (2006). Family ownership, corporate governance, and top executive compensation. Managerial and Decision Economics, 27, 549-561.
28.
ChenhallR. H.MoersF. (2007). The issue of endogeneity within theory-based, quantitative management accounting research. European Accounting Review, 16, 173-196.
29.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.KellermannsF. W.ChangE. P. C. (2007). Are family managers agents or stewards? An exploratory study in privately held family firms. Journal of Business Research, 60, 1030-1038.
30.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.LitzR. A. (2004). Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 28, 335-354.
31.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.SharmaP. (2005). Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 555-575.
32.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SharmaP. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 23, 19-39.
33.
CiscelD. H.CarrollT. M. (1980). The determinants of executive salaries: An econometric survey. Review of Economics and Statistics, 62(1), 7-13.
34.
ColeR.MehranH. (2010, February). What can we learn from privately held firms about executive compensation? (Working paper No. 29183). New York: Federal Reserve Board of New York.
35.
ColemanS.CarskyM. (1999). Sources of capital for small family-owned businesses. Family Business Review, 12, 73-95.
36.
ConyonM. J. (2006). Executive compensation and incentives. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(1), 25-44.
37.
CooleyP. L. (1979). Managerial pay and financial performance of small business. Journal of Business Research, 7, 267-276.
38.
CruzL. M.MoreiraM. J. (2005). On the validity of econometric techniques with weak instruments: Inference on returns to education using compulsory school attendance laws. Journal of Human Resources, 40, 393-410.
39.
DailyC. M.DollingerM. J. (1992). An empirical examination of ownership structure in family and professionally managed firms. Family Business Review, 5, 117-132.
40.
DenisD. K. (2001). Twenty-five years of corporate governance research . . . and counting. Review of Financial Economics, 10, 191-212.
41.
DeversC. E.CannellaA. A.ReillyG. P.YoderM. E. (2007). Executive compensation: A multidisciplinary review of recent developments. Journal of Management, 33, 1016-1072.
42.
DevriesM. F. R. K. (1993). The dynamics of family controlled firms: The good and the bad-news. Organizational Dynamics, 21(3), 59-71.
43.
FamaE. F.JensenM. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law & Economics, 26, 301-325.
44.
FiegenerM. K. (2010). Locus of ownership and family involvement in small private firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 296-321.
45.
FilatotchevI.AllcockD. (2010). Corporate governance and executive remuneration: A contingency framework. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(1), 20-33.
46.
FinkelsteinS.BoydB. K. (1998). How much does the CEO matter? The role of managerial discretion in the setting of CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 179-199.
47.
FinkelsteinS.HambrickD. C. (1989). Chief executive compensation: A study of the intersection of markets and political processes. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 121-134.
48.
FinkelsteinS.HambrickD. C.CannellaA. A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
49.
FullerW. A. (1977). Some properties of a modification of the limited information estimator. Econometrica, 45, 939-953.
50.
GersickK. E.DavisJ. H.HamptonM. M.LansbergI. (1997). Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
51.
Gomez-MejiaL.WisemanR. M. (1997). Reframing executive compensation: An assessment and outlook. Journal of Management, 23, 291-374.
52.
Gomez-MejiaL. R. (1994). Executive compensation: A reassessment and a future research agenda. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 12, 161-222.
53.
Gomez-MejiaL. R.HaynesK. T.Nunez-NickelM.JacobsonK. J. L.Moyano-FuentesJ. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 106-137.
54.
Gomez-MejiaL. R.Larraza-KintanaM.MakriM. (2003). The determinants of executive compensation in family-controlled public corporations. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 226-237.
55.
Gomez-MejiaL. R.Nunez-NickelM.GutierrezI. (2001). The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 81-95.
56.
Gomez-MejiaL. R.TosiH.HinkinT. (1987). Managerial control, performance, and executive compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 30(1), 51-70.
57.
HabbershonT. G.WilliamsM.MacMillanI. C. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 451-465.
58.
HahnJ.HausmanJ. (2003). Weak instruments: Diagnosis and cures in empirical econometrics. American Economic Review, 93, 118-125.
HarrisD.HelfatC. (1997). Specificity of CEO human capital and compensation. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 895-920.
61.
HeL. (2008). Do founders matter? A study of executive compensation, governance structure and firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 257-279.
62.
IyengarR. R. J.WilliamsH. J.ZampelliE. M. (2005). Sensitivity of executive pay to accounting performance measures in all-equity firms. Accounting & Finance, 45, 577-595.
63.
JaffeD. T.LaneS. H. (2004). Sustaining a family dynasty: Key issues facing complex multigenerational business and investment owning families. Family Business Review, 17, 81-98.
64.
JamesH. S. (1999). Owner as manager, extended horizons and the family firm. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 6(1), 41-55.
65.
JensenM. C. (1994). Self-interest, altruism, incentives, and agency theory. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 7(2), 40-45.
66.
JensenM. C.MecklingW. H. (1976). Theory of firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
67.
JensenM. C.MurphyK. J. (1990). Performance pay and top-management incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 225-264.
68.
KamC. D.FranzeseR. J. (2007). Modeling and interpreting interactive hypotheses in regression analysis. The University of Michigan Press.
69.
KarraN.TraceyP.PhillipsN. (2006). Altruism and agency in the family firm: Exploring the role of family, kinship, and ethnicity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 861-877.
70.
KeB.PetroniK.SafieddineA. (1999). Ownership concentration and sensitivity of executive pay to accounting performance measures: Evidence from publicly and privately-held insurance companies. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 28, 185-209.
71.
KrollM.SimmonsS. A.WrightP. (1990). Determinants of chief executive officer compensation following major acquisitions. Journal of Business Research, 20, 349-366.
72.
LawlerE. E. (1981). Pay and organization development. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
73.
LansbergI. (1983). Managing human resources in family firms: The problem of institutional overlap. Organizational Dynamics, 12, 39-46.
74.
LiF.SrinivasanS. (2011). Corporate governance when founders are directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 102, 454-469.
75.
LubatkinM. H.DurandR.LingY. (2007). The missing lens in family firm governance theory: A self-other typology of parental altruism. Journal of Business Research, 60, 1022-1029.
76.
LubatkinM. H.SchulzeW. S.LingY.DinoR. N. (2005). The effects of parental altruism on the governance of family-managed firms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 313-330.
77.
MauryB. (2006). Family ownership and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Western European corporations, Journal of Corporate Finance, 12, 321-341.
78.
McConaughyD. L. (2000). Family CEOs vs. nonfamily CEOs in the family controlled firm: An examination of the level and sensitivity of pay to performance. Family Business Review, 13, 121-131.
79.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. (2006). Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Family Business Review, 19, 73-87.
80.
MoreiraM. J. (2003). A conditional likelihood ratio test for structural models. Econometrica, 71, 1027-1048.
81.
MurphyK. J. (1986). Incentives, learning, and compensation: A theoretical and empirical-investigation of managerial labor contracts. Rand Journal of Economics, 17(1), 59-76.
82.
MurrayM. P. (2006). Avoiding invalid instruments and coping with weak instruments. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 111-132.
83.
Nuno PereiraI.Paulo EsperançaJ. (2008). Top executive compensation in Portuguese family firms. Corporate Ownership and Control, 5, 104-111.
84.
OzkanN. (2011). CEO compensation and firm performance: An empirical investigation of UK panel data. European Financial Management, 17, 260-285.
85.
ParkY. (2002). Executive pay practices in family controlled firms in Canada: A preliminary study. In ChrismanJ. J.HolbrookJ. A. D.ChuaJ. H. (Eds.), Innovation and entrepreneurship in western Canada: From family business to multinationals (pp. 321-332). Calgary, Alberta, Canada: University of Calgary Press.
86.
RoodmanD. (2005). IVVIF: Stata module to report variance inflation factors after IV [Computer Software]. Chestnut Hill, MA: Statistical Software Components.
87.
RosenS. (1982). Authority, control, and the distribution of earnings. Bell Journal of Economics, 13, 311-323.
88.
RossS. A. (1973). Economic theory of agency: Principals problem. American Economic Review, 63, 134-139.
89.
SchulzeW. S.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N. (2003a). Exploring the agency consequences of ownership dispersion among the directors of private family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 179-194.
90.
SchulzeW. S.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N. (2003b). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 473-490.
91.
SchulzeW. S.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N.BuchholtzA. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12, 99-116.
92.
Setia-AtmajaL.TanewskiG. A.SkullyM. (2009). The role of dividends, debt and board structure in the governance of family controlled firms. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 36, 863-898.
93.
SharmaP. (2004). An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for the future. Family Business Review, 17, 1-36.
94.
ShleiferA.VishnyR. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52, 737-783.
95.
StockJ. H.YogoM. (2002). Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
96.
ThachL.KidwellR. E. (2009). HR practices in US and Australian family wineries: Cultural contrasts and performance impact. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 5, 219-240.
97.
TosiH. L.WernerS.KatzJ. P.Gomez-MejiaL. R. (2000). How much does performance matter? A meta-analysis of CEO pay studies. Journal of Management, 26, 301-339.
98.
van EssenM.OttenJ.CarberryE. J. (2012). Assessing managerial power theory: A meta-analytic approach to understanding the determinants of CEO compensation, Journal of Management. Advance Online Publication, doi 10.1177/0149206311429378.
99.
WassermanN. (2006). Stewards, agents, and the founder discount: Executive compensation in new ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 960-976.
100.
WellesE. O. (1995). What CEO$ make. INC, 17, 12.
101.
WernerS.TosiH. L. (1995). Other people’s money: The effects of ownership on compensation strategy and managerial pay. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1672-1691.
102.
WestheadP.HoworthC. (2007). Types of private family firms: An exploratory conceptual and empirical analysis. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 19, 405-431.
103.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.
104.
YogoM. (2004). Estimating the elasticity of intertemporal substitution when instruments are weak. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 797-810.
105.
YoungC. S.TsaiL. C. (2008). The sensitivity of compensation to social capital: Family CEOs vs. nonfamily CEOs in the family business groups. Journal of Business Research, 61, 363-374.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
