Crowdfunding (CF), an innovative entrepreneurial phenomenon, has gained considerable attention in social science outlets. Yet, the overall intellectual structure of this growing field of enquiry remains under wraps. This study addresses this knowledge gap by critically analysing 534 published articles using co-citation analysis of influential CF publications and tracing the intellectual history of the four variants of CF, namely rewards, donation, debt and equity. The co-citation analysis of highly cited publications uncovers the DNA (dynamics, nuances and anchors) of CF research revealing the field’s underlying disciplines and its theoretical anchors. Overall, the authors take cognisance of the intellectual scaffolding of CF research, map the advancement of CF variants and recognise its potential to act as a force of social and economic disruption. The critical analysis reported here reveals gaps in the extant literature which can provide novel avenues for productive enquiry by future CF scholars.
AgrawalA., CataliniC., & GoldfarbA. (2014). Some simple economics of crowdfunding. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 14(1), 63–97.
2.
AgrawalA., CataliniC., & GoldfarbA. (2015). Crowdfunding: Geography, social networks, and the timing of investment decisions. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 24(2), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12093
3.
AgrawalA., CataliniC., & GoldfarbA. (2016). Are syndicates the killer app of equity crowdfunding?California Management Review, 58(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.2.111
4.
AgrawalA. K., CataliniC., & GoldfarbA. (2011). The geography of crowdfunding [Working Paper No. 16820]. National Bureau of Economic Research.
5.
AhlersG. K., CummingD., GüntherC., & SchweizerD. (2015). Signaling in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(4), 955–980. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12157
6.
AkerlofG. A. (1978). The market for ‘lemons’: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. In DiamondP. & RothschildM. (Eds.), Uncertainty in economics: Readings and exercises (pp. 235–251). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-214850-7.50022-X
7.
AllisonT. H., DavisB. C., ShortJ. C., & WebbJ. W. (2015). Crowdfunding in a prosocial microlending environment: Examining the role of intrinsic versus extrinsic cues. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12108
8.
AllisonT. H., DavisB. C., WebbJ. W., & ShortJ. C. (2017). Persuasion in crowdfunding: An elaboration likelihood model of crowdfunding performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(6), 707–725. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.09.002
9.
AllisonT. H., McKennyA. F., & ShortJ. C. (2013). The effect of entrepreneurial rhetoric on microlending investment: An examination of the warm-glow effect. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(6), 690–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.01.003
10.
AndersonK., & SaxtonG. D. (2016). Smiles, babies, and status symbols: The persuasive effects of images in small-entrepreneur crowdfunding requests. International Journal of Communication, 10, 1764–1785.
11.
AndreoniJ. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. The Economic Journal, 100(401), 464–477. https://doi.org/10.2307/2234133
12.
BanerjeeA. V. (1992). A simple model of herd behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), 797–817. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118364
13.
BapnaS., & GancoM. (2021). Gender gaps in equity crowdfunding: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Management Science, 67(5), 2679–2710.
BelleflammeP., LambertT., & SchwienbacherA. (2014). Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(5), 585–609.
16.
BelleflammeP., OmraniN., & PeitzM. (2015). The economics of crowdfunding platforms. Information Economics and Policy, 33, 11–28.
17.
BernsJ. P., Figueroa-ArmijosM., da Motta VeigaS. P., & DunneT. C. (2020). Dynamics of lending-based prosocial crowdfunding: Using a social responsibility lens. Journal of Business Ethics, 161, 169–185.
18.
BikhchandaniS., HirshleiferD., & WelchI. (1998). Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascades. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(3), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.12.3.151
19.
BlockJ. H., ColomboM. G., CummingD. J., & VismaraS. (2018). New players in entrepreneurial Finance and why they are there. Small Business Economics, 50(2), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9826-6
20.
BrutonG., KhavulS., SiegelD., & WrightM. (2015). New financial alternatives in seeding entrepreneurship: Microfinance, crowdfunding, and peer-to-peer innovations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12143
21.
BurtchG., GhoseA., & WattalS. (2014). Cultural differences and geography as determinants of online prosocial lending. MIS Quarterly, 38(3), 773–794. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26634995
22.
ButticèV., ColomboM. G., & WrightM. (2017). Serial crowdfunding, social capital, and project success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(2): 183–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12271
23.
CalicG., & MosakowskiE. (2016). Kicking off social entrepreneurship: How a sustainability orientation influences crowdfunding success. Journal of Management Studies, 53(5), 738–767. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12201
24.
CholakovaM., & ClarysseB. (2015). Does the possibility to make equity investments in crowdfunding projects crowd out reward-based investments?Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 145–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/ etap.12139
25.
ColomboM. G., FranzoniC., & Rossi-LamastraC. (2015). Internal social capital and the attraction of early contributions in crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 75–100. https://doi.org/ 10.1111%2Fetap.12118
26.
CourtneyC., DuttaS., & LiY. (2017). Resolving information asymmetry: Signaling, endorsement, and crowdfunding success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(2), 265–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12267
27.
Crowdcube. (2024). https://www.Crowdcube.Com/. Retrieved, 27March2024, from https://www.crowdcube.com/explore/why-crowdcube
28.
CummingD., HornufL., KaramiM., & SchweizerD. (2021). Disentangling crowdfunding from fraudfunding. Journal of Business Ethics, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04942-w
CummingD., & JohanS. (2017). The problems with and promise of entrepreneurial finance. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 11(3), 357–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1265
31.
CummingD., DeloofM., ManigartS., & WrightM. (2019). New directions in entrepreneurial finance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 100, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.02.008
32.
DavisB. C., HmieleskiK. M., WebbJ. W., & CoombsJ. E. (2017). Funders’ positive affective reactions to entrepreneurs’ crowdfunding pitches: The influence of perceived product creativity and entrepreneurial passion. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jbusvent.2016.10.006
33.
de la ViñaL. Y., & BlackS. L. (2018). US equity crowdfunding: A review of current legislation and a conceptual model of the implications for equity funding. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 27(1), 83–110.
34.
EstrinS., GozmanD., & KhavulS. (2018). The evolution and adoption of equity crowdfunding: Entrepreneur and investor entry into a new market. Small Business Economics, 51, 425–439.
GefenD., & CarmelE. (2008). Is the world really flat? A look at offshoring at an online programming marketplace. MIS Quarterly, 32(2) 367–384. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148844
37.
GeigerM., & OranburgS. C. (2018). Female entrepreneurs and equity crowdfunding in the US: Receiving less when asking for more. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 10, e00099
38.
GerberE. M., & HuiJ. (2013). Crowdfunding: Motivations and deterrents for participation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 20(6), 1–32. doi.org/10.1145/2530540
39.
Gil-GomezH., Oltra-BadenesR., Guerola-NavarroV., & SaldañaP. (2021). Crowdfunding: A bibliometric analysis. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-021-00784-0
40.
GleasureR., & FellerJ. (2016). Emerging technologies and the democratisation of financial services: A metatriangulation of crowdfunding research. Information and Organization, 26(4), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2016.09.001
41.
GreenbergJ., & MollickE. (2017). Activist choice homophily and the crowdfunding of female founders. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(2), 341–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839216678847
42.
HornufL., & SchwienbacherA. (2018). Market mechanisms and funding dynamics in equity crowdfunding. Journal of Corporate Finance, 50, 556–574.
43.
HotaP. K., SubramanianB., & NarayanamurthyG. (2020). Mapping the intellectual structure of social entrepreneurship research: A citation/co-citation analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(1), 89–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04129-4
44.
JohnsonM. A., StevensonR. M., & LetwinC. R. (2018). A woman’s place is in the… startup! Crowdfunder judgments, implicit bias, and the stereotype content model. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(6), 813–831.
45.
KgoroeadiraR., BurkeA., & van StelA. (2019). Small business online loan crowdfunding: Who gets funded and what determines the rate of interest?Small Business Economics, 52, 67–87.
KuppuswamyV., & BayusB. L. (2017). Does my contribution to your crowdfunding project matter?Journal of Business Venturing, 32(1), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.004
48.
LinM., & ViswanathanS. (2016). Home bias in online investments: An empirical study of an online crowdfunding market. Management Science, 62(5), 1393–1414. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2206
49.
LinM., PrabhalaN. R., & ViswanathanS. (2013). Judging borrowers by the company they keep: Friendship networks and information asymmetry in online peer-to-peer lending. Management Science, 59(1), 17–35.
50.
McKennyA. F., AllisonT. H., KetchenD. J., ShortJ. C., & IrelandR. D. (2017). How should crowdfunding research evolve? A survey of the entrepreneurship theory and practice editorial board. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(2), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12269
51.
MeyskensM., & BirdL. (2015). Crowdfunding and value creation. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 5(2), 155–166.
52.
MochkabadiK., VolkmannC. K. (2020). Equity crowdfunding: A systematic review of the literature. Small Business Economics, 54, 75–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0081
53.
MollickE. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005
54.
MollickE., & NandaR. (2016). Wisdom or madness? Comparing crowds with expert evaluation in funding the arts. Management Science, 62(6), 1533–1553. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2207
55.
MollickE., & RobbA. (2016). Democratizing innovation and capital access: The role of crowdfunding. California Management Review, 58(2), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.2.72
56.
MoritzA., & BlockJ. H. (2016). Crowdfunding: A literature review and research directions. In: BrüntjeD., & GajdaO. (Eds.), Crowdfunding in Europe state of the art in theory and practice (pp. 25–53). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18017-5_3
57.
MossT. W., NeubaumD. O., & MeyskensM. (2015). The effect of virtuous and entrepreneurial orientations on microfinance lending and repayment: A signaling theory perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 27–52.
58.
NahapietJ., & GhoshalS. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.
59.
NayerD., RosenboimM., & MalulM. (2024). The two sides of crowdfunding success: Attributes and motivations of backers and entrepreneurs—Evidence from Israel. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 33(1), 155–182.
60.
OberoiS., SrivastavaS., GuptaV. K., JoshiR., & MehtaA. (2022). Crowd reactions to entrepreneurial failure in rewards-based crowdfunding: A psychological contract theory perspective. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(7), 300.
61.
OrdaniniA., MiceliL., PizzettiM., & ParasuramanA. (2011). Crowdfunding: Transforming customers into investors through innovative service platforms. Journal of Service Management, 22(4), 443–470. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/09564231111155079
62.
ParhankangasA., & RenkoM. (2017). Linguistic style and crowdfunding success among social and commercial entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(2), 215–236.
63.
PaschenJ. (2017). Choose wisely: Crowdfunding through the stages of the startup life cycle. Business horizons, 60(2), 179–188.
64.
PaulusT. M., & RobertsK. R. (2018). Crowdfunding a ‘Real-life Superhero’: The construction of worthy bodies in medical campaign narratives. Discourse Context Media, 21, 64–72.
65.
PollackJ. M., MaulaM., AllisonT. H., RenkoM., & GüntherC. C. (2021). Making a contribution to entrepreneurship research by studying crowdfunded entrepreneurial opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(2), 247–262.
66.
RaduM. B., & McManusL. (2018). A qualitative analysis of requests for financial help via GoFundMe by victims of intimate partner violence. Sociological Spectrum, 38(5), 312–325.
67.
RitzerG., & JurgensonN. (2010). Production, consumption, prosumption: The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital ‘prosumer’. Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(1), 13–36.
68.
ShneorR., & VikA. A. (2020). Crowdfunding success: A systematic literature review 2010–2017. Baltic Journal of Management, 15(2), 149–182.
69.
ShortJ. C., Ketchen JrD. J., McKennyA. F., AllisonT. H., & IrelandR. D. (2017). Research on crowdfunding: Reviewing the (very recent) past and celebrating the present. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(2), 149–160.
70.
StankoM. A., & HenardD. H. (2017). Toward a better understanding of crowdfunding, openness and the consequences for innovation. Research Policy, 46(4), 784–798.
71.
VismaraS. (2016). Equity retention and social network theory in equity crowdfunding. Small Business Economics, 46(4), 579–590. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11187-016-9710-4
72.
VismaraS. (2018). Information cascades among investors in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(3), 467–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12261
73.
VismaraS. (2019). Sustainability in equity crowdfunding. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 98–106.
74.
VulkanN., ÅstebroT., & SierraM. F. (2016). Equity crowdfunding: A new phenomena. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 5, 37–49.
75.
WaldA., HolmeslandM., & EfratK. (2019). It is not all about money: Obtaining additional benefits through equity crowdfunding. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 28(2), 270–294.
76.
Walthoff-BormX., SchwienbacherA., & VanackerT. (2018). Equity crowdfunding: First resort or last resort?Journal of Business Venturing, 33(4), 513–533.
77.
YumH., LeeB., & ChaeM. (2012). From the wisdom of crowds to my own judgment in microfinance through online peer-to-peer lending platforms. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(5), 469–483.
78.
ZenoneM., & SnyderJ. (2019). Fraud in medical crowdfunding: A typology of publicized cases and policy recommendations. Policy & Internet, 11(2), 215–234.
ZhengH., LiD., WuJ., & XuY. (2014). The role of multidimensional social capital in crowdfunding: A comparative study in China and US. Information & Management, 51(4), 488–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.03.003
81.
ZupicI., & ČaterT. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
