The herbal sector, as it is currently structured, is unable to improve the living standards of the underprivileged communities, who are the gatherers of the medicinal plants, The role of grass-roots organisations and rural networks to reduce transaction costs and enhance market coordination, has been object of study in different sectors but there is a gap in the literature in the herbal sector.
The article portraits the supply relations in the medicinal plant market and suggests to promote medicinal plant enterprises such as Gram Mooligai Company Limited (GMCL), the first community based enterprise active in the herbal sector. Lessons to promote a more equitable sharing of benefits in the sector, to reform the supply chain and to promote new forms of partnership between ayurvedic firms and communities are discussed.
AlamG.BeltJ. (2004). Searching synergy: Stakeholder views on developing a sustainable medicinal plant chain in Uttaranchal, India. Amsterdam: KIT Publishers (KIT Bulletin no. 359).
2.
BeltJ.LengkeekA.J. (2003). Cultivating a healthy enterprise: Developing a sustainable medicinal plant chain in Uttaranchal-India. Amsterdam: KIT Publishers, Amsterdam (KIT Bulletin no. 350).
3.
BerdeguéJ. (2001). Cooperating to compete—associative peasant business firms in Chile. Ph.D thesis, Wageningen University.
4.
BingenJ.SerranoA.HowardJ. (2003). Linking farmers to markets: Different approaches to human capital development. Food Policy, 2(8): 405–419.
5.
ChakrabartiL.VarshneyV. (2001). Trading in Contraband. Down to Earth, 31: 27–41.
6.
ChowdhuryS.NegessaA.ToreroM. (2005). Market institutions: Enhancing the value of rural–urban links. FCND Discussion Paper 195/MTID Discussion Paper 89. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
7.
CoulterJ.MillnsJ.TallontireA.StringfellowR. (1999). Marrying farmer co-operation and contract farming for agricultural service provision in liberalizing economies in Sub-Saharan Africa. ODI Natural Resources Perspectives, No. 48. London: Overseas Development Institute.
8.
DorwardA.KyddJ. (2004). The Malawi 2002 food crisis: The rural development challenge. Journal of Modern African Studies, 4(3), 343–361.
9.
DorwardA.KyddJ.MorrisonJ.PoultonC. (2005). Institutions, markets and economic development: Linking development policy to theory and praxis. Development and Change, 3(1), 1–25.
10.
FafchampsM. (2004). Market Institutions in sub-Saharan Africa. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
FAO (Food Agriculture Organization), (2004).The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2004, Economic and Social Department, Rome: FAO.
12.
Gabre-MadhinE.Z. (2001). Market institutions, transaction costs, and social cap-ital in the Ethiopian grain market. IFPRI Research Report 124. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
13.
GhimireS.KMcKeyD.Aumeeruddy-ThomasY. (2005). Heterogeneity in ethnoecological knowledge and management of medicinal plants in the Himalayas of Nepal: Implication for conservation, Ecology and Society, 9(6), 32–43.
14.
HodgsonG.M.SamuelsW.J.ToolM.R. (1993). The Elgar companion to institutional and evolutionary economics, Aldershot: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
15.
HulmeD.ShepherdA. (2003). Conceptualizing chronic poverty. World Development, 31(3), 403–423.
16.
HussiP.MurphyJ.LindbergO.BreneemanL. (1993). The development of cooperatives and other rural organizations. Technical Paper No 199. Washington, DC: World Bank.
17.
ISMH (Indian Systems of Medicine and Homoeopathy) (2002). Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi: Government of India.
18.
JoshiK.ChavanP.WarudeD.PatwardhanB. (2004). Molecular markers in herbal drug technology, Current Science, 87(4), 159–165.
19.
KalaC.P. (2003). Commercial exploitation and conservation status of high value medicinal plants across the borderline of India and Nepal in Pithoragarh. The Indian Forester, 12(9), 80–84.
20.
KalaC.PFarooqueeN.A.DharU. (2004). Prioritization of medicinal plants on the basis of available knowledge, existing practices and use value status in Uttaranchal, India. Biodiversity and Conservation, 13(7), 453–469.
21.
KyddJ.DorwardA. (2004). Implications of market and coordination failures for rural development in least developed countries. Journal of International Development, 1(6), 951–970.
22.
KrantonR.E. (1996). Reciprocal exchange: A self-sustaining system. American Economic Review, 8(4), 830–851.
23.
LairdS.A.PierceA.R. (2002). Promoting sustainable and ethical botanicals: Strategies to improve commercial raw material sourcing: Results from the sustainable botanicals pilot project industry surveys, case studies and standards collection. New York: Rainforest Alliance Editions.
24.
Meinzen-DickR.Di GregorioM. (2004). Collective action and property rights for sustainable development, 2020 Vision for Food, Agriculture and the Environment. Focus 11, Washington, DC: IFPRI Editions.
25.
MulbergJ. (1995). Social limits to economic theory, London: Routledge.
26.
NorthD.C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
PierceA.R.LairdS.A. (2003). In search of comprehensive standards for non-timber forest products in the botanicals trade. International Forestry Reviews, 5(2), 138–147.
28.
PingaliP.KhwajaY.MeijerM. (2005). Commercializing small farms: Reducing transaction costs, agricultural and development economics division, Rome: FAO.
29.
Planning Commission (2002). Report of the special group on targeting ten million employment opportunities per year over the tenth plan period, New Delhi: Government of India.
30.
Planning Commission (2000). Report of the task force on conservation and sustainable use of medicinal plants. Planning Commission, New Delhi: Government of India.
31.
PoultonC.KyddJ.DorwardA. (2006). Overcoming market constraints on pro-poor agricultural growth in sub-Saharan Africa. Development Policy Review, 2(4), 243–277.
32.
RamakrishnappaK., (2002). Impact of cultivation and gathering of medicinal plants in biodiversity: Case studies from India. Biodiversity and the Ecosystem Approach in Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Interdepartmental Working Group on Biological Diversity for Food and Agriculture, Rome: FAO.
33.
RawatR.B.UniyalR.C. (2004). Status of medicinal and aromatic plants sector in Uttaranchal: Initiatives taken by the Government of India. Financing Agriculture, 3(6), 7–13.
34.
RondotP.CollionM. (1999). Agricultural producer organizations: Their con-tribution to rural capacity building and poverty reduction. Rural Develop-ment Department, Washington DC: World Bank.
35.
SalafskyN.CauleyH.BalachanderA. (2001). A systematic test of an enterprise strategy for community-based biodiversity conservation, Conservation Biology, 15(6), 1585–1595.
36.
SamuelsW. (1995). The present state of institutional economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1(9), 569–590.
37.
ShiferawB.ObareG.MurichoG. (2008). Rural market imperfections and the role of institutions in collective action to improve markets for the poor, Natural Resources Forum, 32(2): 25–38.
38.
SiloriC.S.BadolaR. (2000). Medicinal plants cultivation and sustainable development: A case study in buffer zone of the Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, Western Himalaya, India. Mountain Research and Development, 20(9), 272–279.
39.
StockbridgeM.DorwardA.KyddJ. (2003). Farmer organizations for market access: A briefing paper, Wye College, University of London, London, UK.
40.
SubratN. (2002). Ayurvedic and herbal products industry: an overview. Paper at a Workshop on Wise Practices and Experiential Learning in the Conservation and Management of Himalayan Medicinal Plants, Kathmandu, Nepal, 15–20 December 2002.
41.
VirdiM. (2004). Wild plants as resource: new opportunities or last resort? Some dimensions of the collection, cultivation and trade of medicinal plants in the Gori basin. In AlamG.BeltJ. (Eds). Searching synergy: Stakeholder views on developing a sustainable medicinal plant chain in Uttaranchal, India (pp. 41–54). Amsterdam: KIT Publishers.
42.
WHO (2005). Strategy on traditional medicine, 2002-2005. Geneva: WHO.
43.
World Bank (2001). Medicinal plants: Local heritage with global importance. Washington DC: World Bank.
44.
World Bank (2002). From action to impact: The Africa region’s rural strategy. The World Bank, Rural Development Operations, the Africa Region, Washington DC: World Bank.
