Within the field of the geography of knowledge and technological innovation, specific attention has been paid to the phenomenon of the spatial concentration of high-tech activities and to the factors that influence the growth of new industrial areas. Within this research stream, the present work is focused on areas characterized by high levels of specialization in high-tech, and more specifically on the concept of technological districts. Technological districts (TDs) are considered to be territorial systems specialized in high-tech activities and characterized by the presence of innovative resources, such as qualified human capital, advanced research activities, the capacity to generate innovation and new technologies, and an entrepreneurial culture. Beyond discussing theoretical concepts, a methodology is proposed for the analysis and identification of TDs through the definition of a taxonomy of local systems with different levels of concentration of high-tech activities and innovative resources. The methodology has been applied to Italy and allows the identification of the most advanced technological areas, which present the basic characteristics of TDs. This methodology is also important because it can be used to compare different geographical contexts and to discuss and evaluate different possibilities in the field of innovation development policies.
Asheim, B. ( 1996) ‘Industrial Districts as "Learning Regions": a Condition for Prosperity’, European Planning Studies4 (4): 379-400.
2.
Asheim, B. ( 2000) ‘Industrial Districts: the Contribution of Marshall and Beyond’, in G.L. Clark , M.P. Feldman and M.S. Gertler (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, pp. 413-31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
Asheim, B. ( 2002) ‘Temporary Organisations and Spatial Embeddedness of Learning and Knowledge Creation’, Geografiska Annaller84: 111-24.
4.
Barrutia, J.M. and Echebarria, C. ( 2010) ‘Social Capital, Research and Development, and Innovation: an Empirical Analysis of Spanish and Italian Regions’ , European Urban and Regional Studies17.
5.
Bathelt, H. ( 2009) ‘Re-Bundling and the Development of Hollow Clusters in the East German Chemical Industry’, European Urban and Regional Studies16: 363-81.
6.
Becattini, G. ( 1987) Mercato e forza locali: Il distretto industriale . Bologna: Il Mulino.
7.
Biagiotti, A. and Burroni, L. ( 2004) ‘Between Cities and Districts: Local Software Systems in Italy’, in L. Crouch, P. Le Galés,C. Trigilia and H. Voelzkow (eds) Changing Governance in European Countries. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
8.
Bonavero, P. ( 1995) ‘I contesti locali di eccellenza tecnologica: Concetti e strumenti per l’analisi dei sistemi innovativi’, Geotema2: 68-85.
9.
Boschma, R. ( 2005) ‘Proximity and Innovation: a Critical Assessment’ , Regional Studies1: 61-74.
10.
Boschma, R. and Ter Val, A.L.J. (2007) ‘Knowledge Networks and Innovative Performance in an Industrial District: the Case of a Footwear District in the South of Italy’, Industry and Innovation14: 177-99.
11.
Bottazzi, L. and Petri, G. ( 2003) ‘Innovation and Spillovers Regions: Evidence from European Patent Data’, European Economic Review47: 687-710.
12.
Brenner, T. ( 2006) ‘Identification of Local Industrial Clusters in Germany’, Regional Studies40 (9): 991-1004.
13.
Breno, E., Fava, G.A., Guardabasso, V. and Stefanelli, M. ( 2002) Scientific Research in Italian Universities: an Initial Analysis of the Citations in the ISI Data Bank. Rome: CRUI.
14.
Breschi, S. and Lissoni, F. ( 2001) ‘Knowledge Spillovers and Local Innovation System: a Critical Survey’, Industrial and Corporate Change4: 975-1005.
15.
Bresnahan, T. and Gambardella, A. (eds) (2004) Building High-tech Clusters: Silicon Valley and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Bresnahan, T., Gambardella, A. and Saxenian, A. ( 2001) ‘‘‘Old Economy" Inputs for "New Economy" Outcomes: Cluster Formation in the New Silicon Valleys’, Industrial and Corporate Change4: 835-60.
17.
Butchart, R.L. ( 1987) ‘A New Definition of the High Technology Industries’ , Economic Review400: 82-8.
18.
Camagni, R. ( 1995) ‘The Concept of Innovative Milieu and Its Relevance for Public Policies in European Lagging Regions’, Papers in Regional Science4: 317-40.
19.
Capello, R. ( 2001) ‘Urban Innovation and Collective Learning: Theory and Evidence for Five Metropolitan Cities in Europe’, in M.M. Fischer and J. Froehlich (eds) Knowledge, Complexity, Innovation Systems , pp. 181-208. Berlin: Springer.
20.
Chadwick, A., Glasson, J., Lawton Smith, H., Clark, G. and Simmie, J. ( 2003) Enterprising Oxford. The Anatomy of the Oxfordshire High-tech Economy. Oxford: Oxford Brookes University.
21.
Chiesa, V. and Piccaluga, A. ( 2000), ‘Exploitation and Diffusion of Public Research: the Case of Academic Spin-off Companies in Italy’, R&D Management4: 329-39.
22.
Cooke, P. and Huggins, R. ( 2001) ‘Il cluster dell’alta tecnologia di Cambridge’ , Sviluppo locale16: 34-60.
23.
Cooke, P.,Heidenreich, M. and Braczyk, H. (eds) ( 2004) Regional Innovation Systems. London : Routledge.
24.
Enright, M.J. and Roberts, B.H. ( 2004) ‘Industry Clusters in Australia: Recent Trends and Prospects’, European Planning Studies12: 99-121.
25.
Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhart, C. and Catisano Terra, B.R. ( 2000) ‘The Future of the University and the University of Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm’, Research Policy29: 313-30.
26.
European Commission (2005) European Innovation Scoreboard. Brussels, 19 November.
27.
European Commission (2006) Constructing Regional Advantage. Principles, Perspectives, Policies. Brussels: Directorate-General for Research.
28.
Eurostat (2002) ‘National and Regional Employment in High-tech and Knowledge Intensive Sectors in the EU - 1995-2000’, Statistics in Focus3, Brussels.
29.
Feldman, M. and Audretsh, D. ( 1999) ‘Innovation in Cities: Science Based Diversity, Specialization and Localized Competition’, European Economic Review43: 409-29.
30.
Fischer, M.M., Revilla Diez, J. and Snickars, F. ( 2001) Metropolitan Innovation Systems. Theory and Evidence from Three Metropolitan Regions in Europe. Berlin: Springer
31.
Florida, R. ( 1995) ‘Toward the Learning Region’, Futures27 (5): 527-36.
32.
Florida, R. ( 2002) The Rise of the Creative Class - And How It’ s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
33.
Gertler, M.S. ( 1995) ‘Being There: Proximity, Organization, and Culture in the Development and Adoption of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies’ , Economic Geography3: 293-313.
34.
Hecker, D. ( 1999) ‘High-technology Employment: a Broader View’ , Monthly Labour Review June: 18-28. Istat (1997 ) I sistemi locali del lavoro 1991, ed. Fabio Sforzi. Rome: Istituto poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato.
35.
Jaffe, A.B., Trajtenberg, M. and Henderson, R. ( 1993) ‘Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations’, Quarterly Journal of Economics153: 577-98.
36.
Krugman, P. ( 1991) Geography and Trade. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
37.
Landry, C. ( 2000) The Creative City. A Toolkit for Urban Innovation . London: Earthscan Publications .
38.
Lazzeroni, M. ( 2004) Geografia della conoscenza e dell’innovazione tecnologica . Milan: FrancoAngeli .
39.
Lazzeroni, M. and Piccaluga, A. ( 2003) ‘Towards the Entrepreneurial University’ , Local Economy1: 38-48.
40.
Malecki, E. and Oinas, P. (eds) (1999) Making Connections. Technological Learning and Regional Economic Change. Aldershot: Ashgate.
41.
Markusen, A. ( 1996) ‘Sticky Places in Slippery Space: a Typology of Industrial District’, Economic Geography3: 293-313.
42.
Maskell, P. ( 2001) ‘Knowledge Creation and Diffusion in Geographic Clusters’, International Journal of Innovation Management2: 213-37.
43.
Micklethwait, J. and Woolridge, A. ( 2000) For a Perfect Economy. London : Heinemann.
44.
Morgan, K. ( 1997) ‘The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal’, Regional Studies31 (5): 491-503.
45.
Oecd (1997) Revision of the High-tech Technology Sector and Product Classification. STI Working Papers. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development .
46.
Piccaluga, A., Balderi, C., Butelli, P., Conti, G. and Di Minin, A. ( 2007) ‘Towards an Italian Way of Public Research Valorisation. The Importance of Time and Commitment’, R&D Management Conference, Bremen, July.
47.
Porter, M.E. ( 1998) ‘Clusters and New Economics of Competition’ , Harvard Business Review November-December: 77-90.
48.
Pyke, F. and Sengenberger, W. (eds) (1992) Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.
49.
Romanelli, E. and Khessina, O. ( 2005) ‘Regional Industrial Identity: Cluster Configurations and Economic Development’, Organization Science16: 344-58.
50.
Rutten, R. and Boekema, F. (eds) (2007) The Learning Region. Foundations, State of Art, Future. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
51.
Saxenian, A. ( 1994) Regional Advantage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52.
Scott, A. ( 2006) ‘Creative Cities: Conceptual Issues and Policy Questions’ , Journal of Urban Affairs28: 1-17.
53.
Sforzi, F. ( 2000) ‘Local Development in the Experience of Italian Industrial Districts’, in S. Conti (ed.) Geographies of Diversity. Italian Perspectives , pp. 133-56. Rome: Società Geografica Italiana .
54.
Simmie, J. ( 2004) ‘Innovation and Clustering in the Globalised International Economy’, Urban Studies5/6: 1095-112.
55.
Storper, M. ( 1992) ‘The Limits to Globalization: Technology Districts and International Trade’, Economic Geography1: 60-93.
56.
Trigilia, C. ( 2004) ‘Distretti industriali e distretti hightech’ , in N. Bellanca, M. Dardi and T. Raffaelli (eds) Economia senza gabbie. Studi in onore di Giacomo Becattini, pp. 27-47. Bologna : Il Mulino.
