Exploring the convergence between sustainability and local innovation systems from a southern perspective: What Brazilian empirical evidence has to offer
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2019
Exploring the convergence between sustainability and local innovation systems from a southern perspective: What Brazilian empirical evidence has to offer
In this paper, we address some important issues regarding innovation, sustainability and entrepreneurship in selected case studies based on the Local Innovative and Productive Systems (LIPSs) approach. First, we provide a brief overview of the LIPSs theoretical approach and discuss the relationship between LIPS and sustainability, and then we analyze selected case studies from Brazil in order to understand the relationship between LIPS and sustainability. The case study summarized here were extensive studies carried out by researchers related to a research network specialized in LIPS called RedeSist. The final section provides a brief analysis of how LIPSs have incorporated sustainability and the challenges yet to face.
AmaralJ (2004) Estudo do Arranjo Produtivo Local Pingo D’água, Quixeramobim - Ceará (Project report: LIPS: A new strategy for the Brazilian service for SMEs). Brasília, Brazil. Available at: www.redesist.ie.ufrj.br/nts/nt6/NT%20Agroind%20CE.zip (accessed 14 July 2019).
2.
CamposRBetschauerJ (2006) Inovação, Aprendizagem e Cooperação em Serviços: O Arranjo Produtivo Local de Turismo em Florianópolis (Project report: Mobilizing knowledge to develop SME LIPS in Brazil). Florianópolis, Brazil. Available at: www.redesist.ie.ufrj.br/nts/nt7/Turismo_Florianopolis.pdf (accessed 11 December 2019).
3.
CassiolatoJLastresH (eds) (1999) Globalização e Inovação Localizada: experiências de Sistemas Locais de Inovação No Mercosul.
Brasília, Brazil:
IBICT/MCT.
4.
CassiolatoJLastresH (2008) Discussing innovation and development: Converging points between the Latin American school and the Innovation Systems perspective? GLOBELICS Working Paper Series, 2008, p. 01. Aalborg, Denmark: Globelics. Available at: http://www.globelics.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/GWP2008-02.pdf (accessed 22 July 2019).
5.
CassiolatoJLastresHMatosMet al. (2017) Local production and innovation systems in Brazil: A balance of 20 years. In: 2017 Globelics conference, Athens, Greece, 11 October 2017.
6.
CassiolatoJLastresHMatosMet al. (2018) Local innovation and production systems: RedeSist’s conceptual framework and analytical methodology. In: 2018 Globelics conference, Accra, Ghana, 25 October 2018.
7.
CassiolatoJSoaresM (eds) (2015) Health Innovation Systems, Equity and Development.
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil:
E-Papers.
CoutinhoL (2003) Macroeconomic regimes and business strategies: An alternative industrial policy for Brazil in the wake of the 21st century. In: CassiolatoJLastresHMacielM (eds) Systems of Innovation and Development: Evidence from Brazil.
Cheltenham, UK:
Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 429–448.
10.
FajnzylberF (1988) Competitividad internacional: evolución y leciones. Revista deLa CEPAL 36: 7–23. In Furtado (1964).
11.
FreemanC (1987) Technology Policy and Economic Performance.
London:
Pinter.
12.
FurtadoC (1964) Development and Underdevelopment.
USA:
University of California Press.
13.
HerreraA (1971) Ciencia y Política en América Latina.
México:
Siglo XXI.
14.
KatzJ (1999)
Reformas Estructurales y Comportamiento Tecnológico: Reflexiones en torno a las fuentes y naturaleza del cambio tecnológico en América Latina en los años noventa. Serie Reformas Económicas13: 1–44.
15.
KirkwoodJWaltonS (2010)
What motivates ecopreneurs to start businesses?International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research16(3): 204–228.
16.
LastresH (2016) Development, innovation, sustainability and policies: Chris Freeman’s legacy. Freeman Lecture. In: Globelics conference, Bandung, Indonesia, 13 October 2016.
17.
LastresHCassiolatoJ (2005)
Innovation systems and local produtive arrangements: New strategies to promote the generation, acquisition and diffusion of knowledge. Innovation: Management Policy and Practice7(2–3): 172–187.
18.
LastresHCassiolatoJMacielM (2003) Systems of innovation for development in the knowledge era. In: CassiolatoJLastresHMacielM (eds) Systems of Innovation and Development: Evidence from Brazil.
Cheltenham:
Edward Elgar, pp. 17–50.
LustosaC (2006) Arranjo Produtivo Local do Turismo de Lagoa e Mar, Alagoas (Project Report: mobilizing knowledge to develop SME LIPS in Brazil). Available at: www.redesist.ie.ufrj.br/nts/nt7/Turismo_Lagoa_Mar_Alagoas.pdf (accessed 11 December 2019).
21.
LustosaCPodcameniMMarcellinoIet al. (2017) Desenvolvimento local inclusivo e sustentável: Revisitando a sustentabilidade a partir da perspectiva sistêmica de arranjos produtivos locais. In: MatosMCassiolatoJLastresHet al (eds) Arranjos Produtivos Locais: Referencial, Experiências e Políticas em 20 Anos da RedeSist.
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil:
E-Papers, pp. 289–318.
22.
MarcellinoIBorinEVasconcelosLet al. (2018) Analysis on the experiences of local development policies in the intimate fashion LIPS of Nova Friburgo (Brazil) from 2000 to 2015. In: 16th Globelics international conference, Accra, Ghana, 12 October 2018.
23.
MazzucatoMPennaC (2016) The Brazilian Innovation System: A Mission-Oriented Policy Proposal.
Brasília:
CGEE.
24.
PeresW (2011) Industrial policies in Latin America. Working Paper, World Institute for Development Economics Research, 2011, p. 48.
25.
PermanRMaYMcGilvrayJ, et al. (2003) Natural Resource and Environmental Economics. 3rd ed.
Glasgow:
Pearson Education.
26.
SachsI (1993) Estratégias de Transição Para o Século XXI: desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente.
São Paulo:
Studio Nobel; Fundap, 1993.
27.
SantiniC (2017)
Ecopreneurship and ecopreneurs: Limits, trends and characteristics. Sustainability9: 492.
28.
SchaperM (2002)
The essence of ecopreneurship. Greener Management International38: 26–30.
29.
TorreAZimmermannJ (2015)
Des clusters aux écosystèmes industriels locaux. Revue D'économie Industrielle152: 13–38.
30.
VeigaJ (2005) Desenvolvimento Sustentável: o Desafio Do Século XXI.
São Paulo:
Garamond.
31.
World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987) Our Common Future.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
