Do we treat individuals as patients or as potential donors? A phenomenological study of healthcare professionals’ experiences

Abstract

Background:

Organ donation and transplantation have made it possible to both save life and to improve the quality of life for a large number of patients. In the last years there has been an increasing gap between the number of patients who need organs and organs available for transplantation, and the focus worldwide has been on how to meet the organ shortage. This also rises some ethical challenges.

Objective:

The objective of this study was to explore healthcare professionals' experience of ethics related to care and interaction with critically ill patients with severe brain injuries and their families.

Research design:

A hermeneutic phenomenological approach was used to explore the participants' experiences. Methods for collecting data were a combination of participant observations and in-depth interviews.

Participants and research context:

Two ICUs in a Norwegian university hospital were recruited for data collection. A total of 12 cases were observed, and 32 of the healthcare professionals involved were interviewed.

Ethical considerations:

The study was approved by the Regional Committee for Research Ethics. Permission to the study in the ICUs was obtained from the Chief Physician in the two ICUs respectively. The right of the participants was ensured by written, voluntary, and informed consent.

Findings:

From the thematic analysis, a structure of the participants' experiences emerged as a process. While the patients' condition was clarified through phases of prognostic ambiguity, gradual clarification and prognostic certainty, interaction with the families was characterized by ambiguity that involved withholding. The prognostic process had a great impact on how the healthcare professionals interacted with the family. The interaction challenged the participants' caring values in various ways and captured an important structure in their experiences of the ethical interaction with the patients' families. These challenges distinguish caring for families in donation situations from caring for relatives of critically ill patients in general.

Discussion:

In the discussion we have illuminated how professional ethics may be threatened by more pragmatic and utilitarian arguments contained in regulations and transplant act.

Conclusion:

Ethical questions should be discussed more both in educations of healthcare professionals and in clinical practice.

Keywords

Critical care nursing ethical challenges healthcare professionals interaction with family organ donation phenomenology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Truog

. Consent for organ donation—balancing conflicting ethical obligations. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 1209–1210.

Daly

. End-of-life decision making, organ donation, and critical care nurses. Crit Care Nurse 2006; 26: 78–86.

Rudge

Matesanz

Delmonico

. International practices of organ donation. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108: i48–i55.

Det kongelige helsedepartement. St.prp. nr. 59 (2001-2002) Spesialisthelsetjenestens økonomi og budsjett 2002 (The economy and budget for the specialist health service, 2002). Available at: http://www.regjeringen.no/Rpub/STP/20012002/059/PDFA/STP200120020059000DDDPDFA.pdf (accessed 10 June 2010).

Ministry of Health and Care Services. Antall donasjoner skal økes. Pressemelding, 24.09.2008 (Number of donations must increase). Available at: http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dokumentarkiv/stoltenberg-ii/hod/Nyheter-og-pressemeldinger/pressemeldinger/2007/antall-organdonasjoner-skal-okes-flere-.html?id=481608 (accessed 5 October 2008).

Ministry of Health and Care Services. Nasjonal koordinator for organdonasjon Pressemelding, 11.01.2005 (National Coordinator for Organ Donation). Oslo: Available at: http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dokumentarkiv/Regjeringen-Bondevik-II/hod/Nyheter-og-pressemeldinger/2005/nasjonal_koordinator_for_organdonasjon.html?id=255695 (accessed 5 October 2008).

Ministry of Health and Care Services. Tiltak for å øke antall organdonasjoner 24. 09.2008 (Initiative to increase number of organ donations). Available at: http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/HOD/SHA/Rapport%20-%20tiltak%20for%20%C3%A5%20%C3%B8ke%20antall%20organdonasjoner.pdf (accessed 5 October 2008).

Ministry of Health and Care Services. Om regelverk som gjelder organdonasjon og samtykke. Rundskriv I-6/2008 (Regulations concerning organ donation and consent). Available at: http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/hod/dok/rundskriv/2008/i-62008-om-regelverket-som-gjeld-orgando.html?id=534652 (accessed 30 November 2008).

Coyle

. Meeting the needs of the family: the role of the specialist nurse in the management of brain death. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2000; 16: 45–50.

10.

Hibbert

. Stressors experienced by nurses while caring for organ donors and their family. Heart Lung 1995; 24: 399–407.

11.

Pearson

Robertson-Malt

Walsh

. Intensive care nurses’ experiences of caring for brain dead organ donor patients. J Clin Nurs 2001; 10: 132–139.

12.

Day

. How nurses shift from care of a brain-injured patient to maintenance of a brain-dead organ donor. Am J Crit Care 2001; 10: 306–312.

13.

Floden

Forsberg

. A phenomenographic study of ICU-nurses’ perceptions of and attitudes to organ donation and care of potential donors. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2009; 25: 306–313.

14.

Williams

Lipsett

Rushton

. The physician’s role in discussing organ donation with families. Crit Care Med 2003; 31: 1568–1573.

15.

Castellana

Burallò

Gonzalo

. Health care professionals: what do they know about organ donation? Prog Transplant 2008; 18: 141–145.

16.

Meyer

Bjørk

Eide

. Intensive care nurses’ perception of their professional competence in the organ donor process: a national survey. J Adv Nurs 2011; 68: 104–115.

17.

Eide

Foss

Sanner

. Organ donation and Norwegian doctors’ need for training. Tidsskr Nor Legeforen 2012; 132(10): 1235–1238.

18.

Sadala

MLA

Mendes

HWB

. Caring for organ donors: the intensive care unit nurses’ view. Qual Health Res 2000; 10: 788–805.

19.

Floden

Persson

Rizell

. Attitudes to organ donation among Swedish ICU nurses. J Clin Nurs 2011; 20: 3183–3195.

20.

Sadala

Lorencon

Cercal

. Caring for organ donors: the intensive care unit physicians’ view. Heart Lung 2006; 35: 190–197.

21.

Sanner

. Two perspectives on organ donation: experiences of potential donor families and intensive care physicians of the same event. J Crit Care 2007; 22: 296–304.

22.

Blok

van Dalen

Jager

. The European Donor Hospital Education Programme (EDHEP): addressing the training needs of doctors and nurses who break bad news, care for the bereaved, and request donation. Transpl Int 1999; 12: 161–167.

23.

Siminoff

Mercer

Arnold

. Families’ understanding of brain death. Prog Transplant 2003; 13: 218–224.

24.

Youngner

Allen

Barlett

. Psychosocial and ethical implications of organ retrieval. N Engl J Med 1985; 313: 321–324.

25.

Orøy

Strømskag

Gjengedal

. Interaction with potential donors’ families: the professionals’ community of concern—a phenomenological study. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-Being 2011; 6: 1–11.

26.

Orøy

Strømskag

Gjengedal

. Approaching families the subject of organ donation: a phenomenological study of the experience of healthcare professionals. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2013; 29: 202–211.

27.

Benner

Wrubel

. The primacy of caring: stress and coping in health and illness. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1989.

28.

Benner

. Interpretive Phenomenology: embodiment, caring, and ethics in health and illness. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.

29.

Benner

Tanner

Chesla

. Expertise in nursing practice: caring, clinical judgment, and ethics. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 1996.

30.

Wadel

. Feltarbeid i egen kultur [Fieldwork in own culture]. Flekkefjord: Seek Publishing, 1991 (in Norwegian).

31.

Fangen

. Deltagende observasjon [Participant observation]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget, 2010 (in Norwegian).

32.

Kvale

. Interview: En introduktion til det kvalitative forskningsinterview [Interview: An introduction to the qualitative research interview]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag, 1997 (in Danish).

33.

Van Manen

. Researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London, ON, Canada: The Althouse Press, 1990.

34.

Beauchamp

Childress

. Principles of biomedical ethics. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.

35.

Henriksen

Vetlesen

. Nærhet og distanse: grunnlag, verdier og etiske teorier i arbeid med mennesker [Closeness and distance: values and ethical theories in working with human beings]. Oslo: Ad Notam Gyldendal, 2006 (in Norwegian).

36.

Kant

. Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. New York: HarperTorch Books, 1964.

37.

Nortvedt

. Omtanke: en innføring i sykepleiens etikk [Care: an introduction to the ethics of nursing]. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk, 2012 (in Norwegian).

38.

Ruyter

Førde

Solbakk

. Medisinsk og helsefaglig etikk [Ethics in medicine and healthcare]. 2nd ed. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk, 2007 (in Norwegian).

39.

Den norske legeforening. Etiske regler for leger (Ethical guidlines for physicians). Available at: http://legeforeningen.no/Om-Legeforeningen/Organisasjonen/Rad-og-utvalg/Organisasjonspolitiske-utvalg/etikk/etiske-regler-for-leger/ (accessed 7 June 2010).

40.

Norsk sykepleierforbund. Yrkesetiske retningslinjer for sykepleiere. ICNs etiske regler (Ethical guidelines for nurses). Available at: https://www.nsf.no/ikbViewer/Content/785285/NSF-263428-v1-YER-hefte_pdf.pdf (accessed 7 June 2010).

41.

World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki – ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Available at: http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html (accessed 7 June 2010).

42.

The Foundation of International Human Rights Law. The universal declaration of human rights. Available at: http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml (accessed 7 June 2010).

43.

Helsepersonelloven (Act relating to health personnel etc.). Available at: http://www.lovdata.no/all/nl-19990702-064.html (accessed 7 June 2010).

44.

Rikshospitalet. Protokoll for Organdonasjon. En veiledning for norske sykehus (Protocol for organ donation, guidelines for Norwegian hospitals). Oslo: Oslo Universitetssykehus, Rikshospitalet.

45.

Hotvedt

Førde

. Oppstart av intensivbehandling kun for å preservere organer [Starting advanced medical treatment only for preserving organs]. Tidsskr Norske Laege 2002; 28: 2722–2725.

46.

Youngner

. Organ retrieval: can we ignore the dark side? Transplant Proc 1990; 22: 1014–1015.

47.

Long

Sque

Addington-Hall

. What does a diagnosis of brain death mean to family members approached about organ donation? A review of the literature. Prog Transplant 2008; 18: 118–125 (quiz 26).

48.

Pelletier

. The need of family members of organ and tissue donors. Heart Lung 1993; 22: 151–157.

49.

Ministry of Health and Social Services. Transplantasjonsloven [Act relating to transplantation, hospital autopsies and donation of bodies etc.]. Norwegian Act No. 6, 9 February. Oslo: Ministry of Health and Social Services, 1973.