The increasing ecological and environmental concerns have led to the development of natural fibre composites. Chemical treatments are usually used to modify the surface of fibre to improve the bonding between fibre and resin. Alkalization and acetylation were used in this study to treat the hemp fibre. It was found that the chemical treatments remove the impurity and lignin, increasing the cellulose content of the hemp fibre. Removal of the surface lignin and hemicelluloses also exposes more active hydroxyl groups from cellulose to react with matrix. All theses lead to the increase of mechanical properties. It is also noticed that excessive treatment is detrimental to the fibre internal structure itself and weaken the fibre.
RayD., SarkarB.K., BasakR.K., and RanaA.K.“Study of thermal behaviour of alkali treated jute fibres”. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 85(12) (2002) 2594–99.
2.
DoanT.T.L., GaoS.L., and MaderE.“Jute/polypropylene composites I. Effect of matrix modification”. Compos. Sci. Technol., 66(7–8) (2006) 952–63.
3.
CheungH.Y., LauK.T., PowY.F., ZhaoY.Q., and HuiD.“Biodegradation of a Silkworm Silk/PLA Composite”. Composites Part B: Eng., 41(3) (2010) 223–28.
4.
LeonardY.M., and MartinP.A.“Chemical modification of hemp, sisal, jute and kapok fibres by alkalization”. Appl. Polym. Sci., 84(12) (2002) 2222–34.
5.
JohnM.J., and AnandjiwalaR.D.“Recent developments in chemical modification and characterization of natural fibre-reinforced composites”. Polym. Compos., 29(2) (2008) 187–207.
6.
FakirovS., and BhattacharyyaD.“Engineering biopolymers: homopolymers, blends and composites”.Munich Hanser Publishers, ISBN: 978-1-56990–405–3, 2007.
7.
MwaikamboY.M., and AnsellM.P.“The effect of chemical treatment on the properties of hemp, sisal, jute and kapok fibres for composite reinforcement”. Angew Makromol. Chem., 272 (1999) 108–16.
8.
LiX., TabilL.G., and PanigrahiS.“Chemical treatment of natural fibre for use in natural fibre-reinforced composites: A review”. Polym. Environ., 15(1) (2007) 25–33.
9.
CyrasV.P., ValloC., KennyJ.M., and VazquezA.“Effect of chemical treatment on the mechanical properties of starch-based blends reinforced with sisal fibre”. J. Compos. Mater., 38(16) (2004) 1387–99.
10.
AbdelmoulehM., BoufiS., BelgacemM.N., and DufresneA.“Short natural fibre reinforced polyethylene and natural rubber composites: effect of silane coupling agents and fibre loading”. Compos. Sci. Technol., 67 (2007) 1627–39.
11.
SreekalaM.S., KumaranM.G., and ThomasS.“Oil palm fibers: Morphology, chemical composition, surface modification, and mechanical properties”. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 66(5) (1997) 821–35.
12.
RoutJ., MisraM., TripathyS.S., NayakS.K., and MohantyA.K.“The influence of fibre treatment on the performance of coir-polyester composites”. Compos. Sci. Technol., 61(9) (2001) 1303–10.
13.
SinhaE., and RoutS.K.“Influence of fibre surface treatment on structural, thermal and mechanical properties of jute fibre and its composite”. Bull. Mater. Sci., 32(1) (2009) 65–76.
14.
AzizS.H., and AnsellM.P.“The effect of alkalization and fibre alignment on the mechanical and thermal properties of kenaf and hemp bast fibre composites: Part 1-polyester resin matrix”. Compos. Sci. Technol., 64(9) (2004) 1219–30.
15.
BeckermannG.W., and PickeringK.L.“Engineering and evaluation of hemp fibre reinforced polypropylene composites: fibre treatment and matrix modification”. Composites: Part A, 39 (2008) 979–88.
16.
OdegardG., and KumosaM.“Determination of shear strength of unidirectional composite materials with the Iosipescu and 10° off-axis shear test”. Compos. Sci. Technol., 60 (2000) 2917–43.
