Abstract
This article argues that Bakhtin's repeated assertions that poetry, unlike the novel, is inherently monologic can be questioned in the light of a clear case of dialogism in Tennyson's 'The Lotos-Eaters'. A discussion of its dialogism is formalised by an analysis of grammatical function-structures of the Experiential component of the Ideational function of clause structure, following Halliday (1985), in the tradition of Systemic Functional Linguistics. In particular, the paper discusses the significance of the instantiation of transitivity and ergativity. It incorporates modifications suggested by Davidse (1992a) to the analysis of Material process types and argues that these modifications are useful for foregrounding the different worlds construed by the poem. The analysis reveals three worlds or voices in the poem: (1) the transitive:effective, or Deed and Extension paradigm of the outside world; (2) the transitive:middle/ergative, or Instigation of Process paradigm of lotos-land; and (3) the Behavioural/ Mental:Perceptive paradigm of the mariners-in-Lotos-land. It is argued that the mariners oppose (1), wish to ally themselves with (2), but settle for (3) as a strategy.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
