Going off-script and reframing the frame: The dialogic intertwining of the centripetal and centrifugal voices in the Truth and Reconciliation Commission hearings

Abstract

After the end of apartheid, the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) was established to uncover the truth and, most importantly, unite a deeply divided nation. This overarching goal of reconciliation not only framed the TRC’s work, but also shaped each hearing so that it followed a somewhat predictable script. In this article, bringing together Goffman’s framing and Bakhtin’s dialogicality, I analyze two selected hearings to show how the testifiers and the TRC commissioners go off-script and thereby reframe participants’ relationships in terms of power and solidarity, the hearing as a social situation, and understandings of the past and the truth. Suggesting that the TRC officials represent centripetal (official) voices and the testifiers represent centrifugal (marginal) voices, I show how going off-script works to not only reframe and laminate frames in a highly organized institutional encounter, but also is a way of intertwining the centripetal and centrifugal voices, thus creating dialogicality.

Keywords

Centripetal and centrifugal forces dialogicality framing going off-script heteroglossia the TRC discourse voice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agha

(2005) Voice, footing, enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1): 38–59.

Anthonissen

(2007) The language of remembering and forgetting. In: Anthonissen

Blommaert

(eds) Discourse and Human Rights Violations. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1–12.

Bakhtin

(1981) The Dialogic Imagination (trans. Emerson

Holquist

). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Bakhtin

(1984) Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics (trans. Emerson

). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Bateson

(1972 [1955]) Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine Books.

Bauman

(1996) Transformations of the word in the production of Mexican festival drama. In: Silverstein

Urban

(eds) Natural Histories of Discourse. Chicago, IL; London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 301−327.

Bauman

Briggs

(1990) Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 59–88.

Blommaert

Bock

McCormick

(2007) Narrative inequality in the TRC hearings: On the hearability of hidden transcripts. In: Anthonissen

Blommaert

(eds) Discourse and Human Rights Violations. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 33–63.

Bock

(2008a) Multiple representations of a human rights violation: Competing discourses in TRC narratives and related media texts. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics PLUS 36: 35–65.

10.

Bock

(2008b) ‘Language has a heart’: Linguistic markers of evaluation in selected TRC testimonies. Special Issue on the TRC of the Journal of Multicultural Discourses 3(3): 189–203.

11.

Bock

(2011) Code-switching: An appraisal resource in TRC testimonies. Functions of Language 18(2): 183–209.

12.

Boraine

(1999) Alternatives and adjuncts to criminal prosecutions. In: Brooks

(ed.) When Sorry Isn’t Enough: The Controversy over Apologies and Reparations for Human Injustice. New York: New York University Press, pp. 469–476.

13.

Brooks

(1999) What price reconciliation? In: Brooks

(ed.) When Sorry Isn’t Enough: The Controversy over Apologies and Reparations for Human Injustice. New York: New York University Press, pp. 443−450.

14.

Evans

(2012) Transmitting the Transition: Media Events and Post-apartheid South African National Identity. Dissertation, University of Cape Town. Available at: https://open.uct.ac.za/bitstream/handle/11427/10475/thesis_hum_2012_evans_m.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed 3 October 2015).

15.

Gade

(2013) Restorative justice and the South African truth and reconciliation process. South African Journal of Philosophy 32(1): 10−35.

16.

Gibson

(2006) The contributions of truth to reconciliation: Lessons from South Africa. Journal of Conflict Resolution 50(3): 409−432.

17.

Goffman

(1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper Colophon.

18.

Goffman

(1981) Footing. In: Goffman

(ed.) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 124–159.

19.

Gordon

(2002) ‘I’m Mommy and you’re Natalie’: Role-reversal and embedded frames in mother–child discourse. Language in Society 31(5): 679–720.

20.

Gordon

(2008) A(p)parent play: Blending frames and reframing in family talk. Language in Society 37(3): 319–349.

21.

Gordon

(2009) Making Meaning, Creating Family: Intertextuality and Framing in Family Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press.

22.

Gumperz

(1982) Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

23.

Heritage

(1985) Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In: Van Dijk

(ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis, vol. 3. New York: Academic Press, pp. 95−117.

24.

Kristeva

(1986) Word, dialogue and novel. In: Moi

(ed.) The Kristeva Reader. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 34–61.

25.

Lakoff

(2000) The Language War. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

26.

Lawrence

(2008) The intertextual forging of epideictic discourse: Construals of victims in the South Africa Truth and Reconciliation Commission Amnesty Hearings. In: Johnstone

Eisenhart

(eds) Rhetoric in Detail: Discourse Analyses of Rhetorical Talk and Text. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 113−138.

27.

Lubowski

Van der Vyver

(1992) Anton Lubowski: Paradox of a Man. Strand, South Africa: Queillerie.

28.

McCormick

Bock

(1999) Narratives of the TRC: Towards a framework for analysis. In: Proceedings of PALA (Poetics and Linguistics Association) 1999 Conference. Available at: http://www.pala.ac.uk/uploads/2/5/1/0/25105678/bockmc.pdf (accessed 27 October 2015).

29.

Mamdani

(2002) Amnesty or impunity? A preliminary critique of the report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa (TRC). Diacritics 32 (3–4): 32−59.

30.

Robinson

(2013) On the edge of transition: Minority parties and groupings in South Africa, 1990–1994. In: Andrews

Khalema

Oriola

. (eds) Africa Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow: Exploring the Multi-dimensional Discourses on ‘Development’. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 131–151.

31.

Sacks

Schegloff

Jefferson

(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696–735.

32.

Shore

(2009) Religion and Conflict Resolution: Christianity and South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

33.

Simpson

(2005) ‘Race against time’: The politics of memory in South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation process. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Gilder Lehrman Center International Conference at Yale University. Available at: www.yale.edu/glc/justice/simpson.pdf (accessed 13 May 2015).

34.

Spitulnik

(1997) The social circulation of media discourse and the mediation of communities. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 6(2): 161–187.

35.

Stibbe

Ross

(1997) The truth commission: At the crossroads of discourse. Sajals 5(1): 14−28.

36.

Tannen

(1994) Gender and Discourse. New York: Cambridge University Press.

37.

Tannen

(2006) Intertextuality in interaction: Reframing family arguments in public and private. Text & Talk 26(4–5): 597−617.

38.

Tannen

(2007) Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue and Imagery in Conversational Discourse, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

39.

Tannen

Wallat

(1993) Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview. In: Tannen

(ed.) Framing in Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 57−76.

40.

The Promotion of the National Unity and Reconciliation Act No. 34 (1995) Available at: http://www.justice.gov.za/legislation/acts/1995-034.pdf (accessed 24 May 2015).

41.

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report (1998) Available at: http://www.justice.gov.za/trc/report/index.htm (accessed 26 April 2014).

42.

Urban

(1991) A Discourse-centered Approach to Culture. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

43.

Van Dijk

(2010) Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

44.

Verdoolaege

(2007) The debate on truth and reconciliation. In: Anthonissen

Blommaert

(eds) Discourse and Human Rights Violations. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 13–32.

45.

Verdoolaege

(2008) Reconciliation Discourse: The Case of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

46.

Verdoolaege

(2009) Dealing with a traumatic past: The victim hearings of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission and their reconciliation discourse. Critical Discourse Studies 6(4): 297–309.

47.

Verwoerd

(1999) Justice after Apartheid? Reflections on the South African TRC. In: Brooks

(ed.) When Sorry Isn’t Enough: The Controversy Over Apologies and Reparations for Human Injustice. New York: New York University Press, pp. 479–486.