This paper discusses subjectivity as a text-type marker in a historical perspective. It claims that linguistic features reflecting personal involvement in a text act as text-type markers in some genre and period styles. Cultural conventions are important formative factors in the use of such features, and generic conventions may override individual styles in some early periods. The quality of ‘personal affect’ seems to vary greatly in different text types. It is an essential component of participant relations, and because of the variation in volume and form, it can provide a tool for a more detailed assessment of period and genre styles.
Atkinson, D. (1992) The evolution of medical research writing from 1735 to 1985: the case of the Edinburgh Medical Journal, Applied Linguistics13 (4): 337–374
2.
Biber, D. (1988) Variation across Speech and Writing, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
3.
Biber, D. and Finegan, E. (1989a) Drift and the evolution of English style: a history of three genres, Language65 (3): 487–517
4.
Biber, D. and Finegan, E. (1989b) Styles of stance in English: lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect, Text9 (1): 93–124
5.
Calvo, C. (1992) Pronouns of address and social negotiation in As You Like It, Language and Literature1 (1): 5–27
6.
Carter, R. and Nash, W. (1990) Seeing Through Language: A Guide to Styles of English Writing, Blackwell, Oxford/Cambridge, Mass.
7.
Chafe W.L. (1985) Linguistic differences produced by differences between speaking and writing in D.R. Olson, N. Torrance and A. Hildyard (eds) Literature, Language and Learning: The Nature and Consequences of Reading and WritingCambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 105–23
8.
Fowler, A. (1982) Kinds of Literature: An Introduction of the Theory of Genres and Modes, Clarendon Press, Oxford
9.
Gläser, R. (1975) Emotive features in technical and scientific English, in H. Ringbom (ed.) Style and Text: Studies presented to Nils Erik Enkvist, Skriptor, Stockholm, pp 190–201
10.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1978) Language as a Social Semiotic: The Social Interpetation of Language and Meaning, Edward Arnold, London
11.
Halliday, M.A.K., (1988) On the language of physical science, in Moshen Ghadessy (ed.) Registers of Written English: Situational Factors and Linguistic Features, Pinter Publishers, London and New York, pp. 162–178
12.
Lakoff, G. (1987) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London
Martin, J.R. (1992) English Text: System and Structure, John Benjamins, Philadelphia, Amsterdam
15.
Meurman-Solin, A. (1993) Involvement markers in the characterization of early prose genres, in On the Sociohistorical Conditioning of Linguistic Differentiation and Standardization in the History of Scots, Studies based on the Helsinki Corpus of Older Scots, Dissertation Helsinki, 276–312
16.
Mühlhäusler, P, and Harré, R. (1990), Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity, Basil Blackwell, Oxford
17.
Poynton, C. (1985) Language and Gender: making the difference, Deakin University Press, Geelong, Victoria and Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1989
18.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, Longman, London
19.
Rand Schmidt, K.A. (1993) The Authorship of the Equatory of the Planetis, Boydell & Brewer, Cambridge
20.
Riffaterre, M. (1974) The stylistic approach to literary history, in (ed.) R. CohenNew Directions in Literary History, Routlege & Kegan Paul, London, pp. 147–164
21.
Rissanen, M., Kytö, M. and Palander-Collin, M. (eds) (1993) Early English in the Computer Age: Explorations through the Helsinki Corpus, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin and New York
22.
Rosch, E. (1973) Natural categories, Cognitive Psychology4: 328–50
23.
Rosch, E. (1978) Principles of Categorization in E. Rosch and B.B. Lloyd Erlbaum (eds), Cognition and Categorization, HillsdaleN.J., pp. 27–47
24.
Taavitsainen, I. (1988) Middle English Lunaries: A Study of the Genre, Diss., Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki XLVII, Helsinki
25.
Taavitsainen, I (1991) Pater noster: A mediation connected with Richard Rolle in BL Royal MS. 17.C.XVII, Neuphilologische Mitteilungen92: 331–41
26.
Taavitsainen, I. (1993) Genre/subgenre styles in Late Middle English? in Rissanen et al., pp. 171–200
27.
Taavitsainen, I. (1994a) On the evolution of scientific writings between 1375 and 1675: repertoire of emotive features in F. Fernandez et al. (ed.) Papers from the 7th International Conference of English Historical Linguistics, Valencia, Sept. 1992, John Benjamins, Philadelphia, Amsterdam, pp. 329–42
28.
Taavitsainen, I. (1994b, forthcoming) Characters and English almanac literature: genre development and intertexuality, in R.D. Sell and P. Verdonk (eds) Literature and the New Interdisciplinarity: Poetics, Linguistics, History, Rodopi, Amsterdam
29.
Todorov, T. (1990) Genres in Discourse, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
30.
Virtanen, T. (1993) Discourse Functions of Adverbial Placement in English, Åbo Akademi University Press, Åbo
31.
Voigts, L.E. (1989) Scientific and medical books, in J. Griffiths and D. Pearsall (eds) Book Production and Publishing in Britain 1375–1475, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 345–402
32.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953) Philosophical Investigations, Macmillan, New York
