This article investigates differences in structural tendencies between Japanese newspaper editorials and front-page columns. Although intuitively recognized by Japanese people, such differences have tended to be empirically overlooked in discourse or rhetoric research. This study compares the two text types, specifically focusing on the location of the main topic (or ‘the highest topic’) in the text item rather than the main thesis, the former of which has received less empirical attention than the latter in Japanese discourse research. The study analyzed 30 editorials and 30 front-page columns from three major Japanese newspapers. The results show that the editorials have an early placement pattern, whereas the columns tend to have delayed introductions. These differences were statistically significant, empirically demonstrating how the intuitively recognized structural tendencies between the two text types crucially differ. The finding that there is a systematic early placement of the main topic in Japanese editorials is indicative of a basic common feature among languages in the editorial genre. From a methodological perspective, the study demonstrates the validity of the index of the main topic location as an analytical tool to distinguish different textual structures.
AiharaS (1984) Bunshoo hyoogen no kisoteki kenkyu [A Basic Study on Writing Text]. Tokyo, Japan: Meiji Shoin.
2.
CahillD (2003) The myth of the ‘turn’ in contrastive rhetoric. Written Communication20: 170–194.
3.
ConnorU (1996) Contrastive Rhetoric: Cross-cultural Aspects of Second-language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
HindsJ (1980) Japanese expository prose. Papers in Linguistics: International Journal of Human Communication13(1): 117–158.
5.
HindsJ (1982) Linguistics and written discourse in particular languages, English and Japanese: A contrastive study (1978–1982). Annual Review of Applied Linguistics3: 78–84.
6.
HindsJ (1983) Contrastive rhetoric: Japanese and English. Text3: 183–195.
7.
HindsJ (1987) Reader versus writer responsibility: A new typology. In: ConnorUKaplanRB (eds) Writing across Languages: Analysis of L2 Text. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 141–152.
8.
HindsJ (1990) Inductive, deductive, quasi-inductive: Expository writing in Japanese, Korean, Chinese, and Thai. In: ConnorUJohnsAM (eds) Coherence in Writing: Research and Pedagogical Perspectives. Alexandria, VA: TESOL, pp. 87–109.
9.
HiroseK (2003) Comparing L1 and L2 organizational patterns in the argumentative writing of Japanese EFL students. Journal of Second Language Writing12: 181–209.
10.
HiroseK (2005) Product and Process in the L1 and L2 Writing of Japanese Students of English. Hiroshima, Japan: Keisuisha.
11.
HonnaN (1989) Nihongo no buntai to eigo no buntai [Japanese rhetorical style and English rhetorical style]. In: YamaguchiY (ed.) Kooza nihongo to nihongo kyooiku 5: Nihongo no bunpoo, buntai [Lecture on Japanese and Japanese Language Education 5: Japanese Grammar, Rhetoric]. Tokyo, Japan: Meiji Shoin, pp. 363–385.
12.
IchikawaT (1978) Kokugo kyooiku no tame no bunshooron gaisetsu [Introduction to Rhetoric for Japanese Language Education]. Tokyo, Japan: Kyooiku Shuppan.
13.
KatoA (1997) A contrastive analysis of organizational patterns among languages and genres. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Orland, FL, March.
14.
KawanishiY (2003) Another look at organizational principles in written Japanese: A study of cognitive and discourse perspective on newspaper columns. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of California at, Los Angeles, CA.
15.
KintschWVan DijkTA (1978) Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review85: 363–394.
16.
KobayashiH (1984) Rhetorical patterns in English and Japanese. TESOL Quarterly18(4): 737–738.
17.
KobayashiHRinnertC (1996) Factors affecting composition evaluation in an EFL context: Cultural rhetorical pattern and reader’s background. Language Learning46: 397–437.
18.
KobayashiHRinnertC (2002) High school student perceptions of first language literacy instruction: Implications for second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing11: 91–116.
19.
KubotaR (1992) Contrastive rhetoric of Japanese and English: A critical approach. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
20.
KubotaR (1998) An investigation of L1-L2 transfer in writing among Japanese university students: Implications for contrastive rhetoric. Journal of Second Language Writing7: 69–100.
21.
KubotaR (2010) Critical approaches to theory in second language writing: A case of critical contrastive rhetoric. In: SilvaTMatsudaPK (eds) Practicing Theory in Second Language Writing. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press, pp. 191–208.
22.
KubotaRShiL (2005) Instruction and reading samples for opinion writing in L1 junior high school textbooks in China and Japan. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication15: 97–127.
23.
MaynardSK (1996) Presentation of one’s view in Japanese newspaper columns: Commentary strategies and sequencing. Text16: 391–421.
24.
MaynardSK (1997) Rhetorical sequencing and the force of the topic-comment relationship in Japanese: The case of Mini-Jihyoo newspaper articles. Japanese Discourse2: 43–64.
25.
MaynardSK (1998) Principles of Japanese Discourse: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
MaynardSK (2003) Danwa bunseki no taishoo kenkyu [Contrastive study in discourse analysis]. In: SakumaM (ed.) Asakura nihongo kooza 7: Bunshoo, danwa [Asakura Japanese Language Seminar 7: Written Text, Spoken Discourse]. Tokyo, Japan: Asakura Shoten, pp. 227–249.
27.
NishiharaS (1997) Patterns of assertion and exposition in English and Japanese newspaper editorials. Japanese Discourse2: 25–41.
28.
OiKM (1984) Cross-cultural differences in rhetorical patterning: A study of Japanese and English. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, State Stony Brook University of New York, Stony Brook, NY.
29.
PakC-S (1996) Newspaper editorials from the New York Times, El País, El Universal: A comparative applied genre analysis. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
30.
PakC-SAcevedoR (2008) Spanish-language newspaper editorials from Mexico, Spain, and the U.S. In: ConnorUNagelhoutERozyckiWV (eds) Contrastive Rhetoric: Reaching to Intercultural Rhetoric. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 123–145.
31.
SakumaM (2000) Nihongo no bunshoo danwa ni okeru ‘dan’ no koozoo to kinoo [Structures and Functions of ‘Dan’ in Japanese Written Texts and Spoken Discourse]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda Daigaku Nihongo Kenkyu Kyooiku Center.
32.
SakumaM (2003) Bunshoo, danwa ni okeru ‘dan’ no tookatsu kinoo [Unifying function of ‘dan’ in written text and spoken discourse]. In: SakumaM (ed.) Asakura nihongo kooza 7: Bunshoo, danwa [Asakura Japanese Language Seminar 7: Written Text, Spoken Discourse]. Tokyo, Japan: Asakura Shoten, pp. 91–119.
33.
SasakiMHiroseK (1996) Explanatory variables for EFL students’ expository writing. Language Learning46: 137–174.
34.
SasakiMHiroseK (1999) Development of an analytic rating scale for Japanese L1 writing. Language Testing16: 457–478.
35.
SugiuraM (1996) A contrastive analysis of English editorials in Japan and Britain. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Aston University, Birmingham.
36.
SuzukiH (1989) Bunshoo no kousei [Text structures]. In: YamaguchiY (ed.) Kooza nihongo to nihongo kyooiku 5: Nihongo no bunpoo, buntai [Lecture on Japanese and Japanese Language Education 5: Japanese Grammar, Rhetoric]. Tokyo, Japan: Meiji Shoin, pp. 84–116.
37.
TakasakiM (1989) Ronsetsu no buntai [The rhetorical styles of expository writings]. In: YamaguchiY (ed.) Kooza nihongo to nihongo kyooiku 5: Nihongo no bunpoo, buntai [Lecture on Japanese and Japanese Language Education 5: Japanese Grammar, Rhetoric]. Tokyo, Japan: Meiji Shoin, pp. 212–240.
38.
TakemataK (1976) Genkoo shippitsu nyuumon [An Introduction to Writing Manuscripts]. Tokyo, Japan: Natsumesha.
39.
Tirkkonen-ConditSLieflander-KoistinenL (1989) Argumentation in Finnish versus English and German editorials. In: KuschMSchroderH (eds) Text, Interpretation, Argumentation. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag, pp. 173–181.
40.
Van DijkTA (1980) Macrostructures. The Hague: Mouton.
41.
Van DijkTA (1988a) News Analysis: Case Studies of International and National News in the Press. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42.
Van DijkTA (1988b) News as Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43.
Van DijkTAKintschW (1983) Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
