This study considers the text of the Harry Potter novels to understand the way in which gender is represented. The analysis centers on the two sidekick characters, Hermione Granger and Ron Weasley, cataloging the way in which their direct speech is reported throughout the series. From a wide-lens perspective, verbs used for each of these characters are largely the same. However, a more fine-grained analysis reveals patterns of asymmetry that also reflect broader cultural ideologies about gender, reproducing stereotypical views about ‘essential’ differences between females and males for the millions of readers that comprise the audience of these fictional works.
AnatolGL (ed.) (2009) Reading Harry Potter Again: New Critical Essays. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
3.
BakerP (2010) Will Ms ever be as frequent as Mr?: A corpus-based comparison of gendered terms across four diachronic corpora of British English. Gender and Language4(1): 125–149.
4.
BakerP (2014) Using Corpora to Analyze Gender. London: Bloomsbury.
5.
BellA (1991) The Language of News Media. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
6.
BellC (2012) Introduction. In: BellC (ed.) Hermione Granger Saves the World: Essays on the Feminist Heroine of Hogwarts. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, pp.1–15.
7.
BellC (ed.) (2016) Wizards vs. Muggles: Essays on Identity and the Harry Potter Universe. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company.
8.
BucholtzM (1999) ‘Why be normal?’: Language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls. Language in Society28(2): 203–223.
9.
Caldas-CoulthardC (1987) Reported speech in written narrative texts. In: CoulthardM (ed.) Discussing Discourse. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Press, pp.149–167.
10.
Caldas-CoulthardC (1995) Man in the news: The misrepresentation of women speaking in news-as-narrative discourse. In: MillsS (ed.) Language and Gender: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. New York: Longman, pp.226–239.
11.
Caldas-CoulthardCMoonR (2010) ‘Curvy, hunky, kinky’: Using corpora as tools for critical analysis. Discourse & Society21(2): 99–133.
12.
Caldas-CoulthardCMoonR (2016) Grandmother, gran, gangsta granny: Semiotic representations of grandmotherhood. Gender and Language10(3): 309–339.
13.
CameronD (1992) Feminism and Linguistic Theory. New York, NY: St Martin’s Press.
14.
CameronD (2006a) On Language and Sexual Politics. New York, NY: Routledge.
15.
CameronD (2006b) Theorising the female voice in public contexts. In: BaxterJ (ed.) Speaking Out: The Female Voice in Public Contexts. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.3–20.
16.
CordovaM (2015) ‘Because I’m a girl, I suppose!’: Gender lines and narrative perspective in Harry Potter. Mythlore33(2): 19–33.
17.
DresangE (2002) Hermione Granger and the heritage of gender. In: WhitedL (ed.) The Ivory Tower and Harry Potter: Perspectives on a Literary Phenomenon. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press, pp.211–242.
18.
EckertP (2006) Vowels and nailpolish: The emergence of linguistic style in the preadolescent hetereosexual marketplace. In: CameronDKulickD (eds) Language and Sexuality: A Reader. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.189–195.
19.
EckertPMcConnell-GinetS (1992) Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology21: 461–490.
20.
Gallardo-CXSmithC (2003) Cinderfella: J.K. Rowling’s wily web of gender. In: AnatolGL (ed.) Reading Harry Potter: Critical Essays. Westport, CT: Praeger, pp.191–205.
21.
GeisM (1987) The Language of Politics. New York, NY: Springer.
22.
GidengilEEverittJ (2003) Talking tough: Gender and reported speech in campaign news coverage. Political Communication20(3): 209–232.
23.
GomardKKunøeM (2003) Equal before the law – Unequal in language. In: HellingerMBuβmannH (eds) Gender Across Languages: The Linguistic Representation of Men and Women (Volume 3). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp.59–85.
24.
GrayJ (2004) Men are From Mars, Women are From Venus: The Classic Guide to Understanding the Opposite Sex. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
25.
HeilmanE (2003) Blue wizards and pink witches: Representations of gender identity and power. In: HeilmanE (ed.) Harry Potter’s World: Multidisciplinary Critical Perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.221–239.
26.
HeilmanE (ed.) (2009) Critical Perspectives on Harry Potter (2nd edition). New York, NY: Routledge.
27.
HeilmanEDonaldsonT (2009) From sexist to (sort-of) feminist representations of gender in the Harry Potter series. In: HeilmanE (ed.) Critical Perspectives on Harry Potter (2nd edition). New York, NY: Routledge, pp.139–161.
28.
HolmesJ (2001) A corpus-based view of gender in New Zealand English. In: HellingerMBuβmannH (eds) Gender Across Languages: The Linguistic Representation of Men and Women (Volume 1). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp.115–136.
29.
HuntS (2015) Representations of gender and agency in the Harry Potter series. In: BakerPMcEneryT (eds) Corpora and Discourse Studies: Integrating Discourse and Corpora. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.266–284.
30.
LakoffR (1975) Language and Woman’s Place. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
31.
LeechGShortM (2007) Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
LevoratoA (2003) Language and Gender in the Fairy Tale Tradition. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
33.
MaltzDBorkerR (1983) A cultural approach to male–female miscommunication. In: GumperzJ (ed.) Language and Social Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.196–216.
34.
Mendoza-DentonN (2008) Homegirls: Language and Cultural Practice among Latina Youth Gangs. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
35.
MikulanK (2009) Harry Potter through the focus of feminist literary theory: Examples of (un)founded criticism. The Journal of International Social Research2(9): 288–298.
36.
MillsS (2008) Language and Sexism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
MoonR (2014) From gorgeous to grumpy: Adjectives, age, and gender. Gender and Language, 8(1): 5–41.
38.
MotschenbacherH (2013) Gentlemen before ladies? A corpus-based study of conjunct order in personal binomials. Journal of English Linguistics41(3): 212–242.
39.
MotschenbacherHSteguM (2013) Queer linguistic approaches to discourse. Discourse & Society24(5): 519–535.
40.
NakamuraM (2006) Creating indexicality: Schoolgirl speech in Meiji Japan. In: CameronDKulickD (eds) The Language and Sexuality Reader. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.270–284.
PageR (2003) ‘Cherie: lawyer, wife, mum’: Contradictory patterns of representation in media reports of Cherie Booth/Blair. Discourse & Society14(5): 559–579.
43.
PearceM (2008) Investigating the collocational behavior of MAN and WOMAN in the BNC using Sketch Engine. Corpora3(1): 1–29.
44.
PughTWallaceD (2006) Heteronormative heroism and queering the school story in J. K. Rowling’s Harry Potter series. Children’s Literature Association Quarterly31(3): 260–281.
45.
RomaineS (2001) A corpus-based view of gender in British and American English. In: HellingerMBuβmannH (eds) Gender Across Languages: The Linguistic Representation of Men and Women (Volume 1). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp.153–175.
46.
RowlingJK (1997) Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone. New York, NY: AA Levine.
47.
RowlingJK (1999a) Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. New York, NY: AA Levine.
48.
RowlingJK (1999b) Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban. New York, NY: AA Levine.
49.
RowlingJK (2000) Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. New York, NY: AA Levine.
50.
RowlingJK (2003) Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix. New York, NY: AA Levine.
51.
RowlingJK (2005) Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince. New York, NY: AA Levine.
52.
RowlingJK (2007) Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. New York, NY: AA Levine.
53.
San Segundo PR (2016) A corpus-stylistic approach to Dickens’ use of speech verbs: Beyond mere reporting. Language and Literature25(2): 113–129.
SeminoEShortM (2004) Corpus Stylistics: Speech, Writing and Thought Presentation in a Corpus of English Writing. New York, NY: Routledge.
56.
Shibamoto SmithJ (2003) Gendered structures in Japanese. In: HellingerMBuβmannH (eds) Gender Across Languages: The Linguistic Representation of Men and Women (Volume 3). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp.201–226.
57.
SpenderD (1998) Man Made Language. New York, NY: Pandora.
58.
StubbsM (2001) Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
59.
SunderlandJ (2010) Language, Gender and Children’s Fiction. London: Continuum.
60.
SuttonL (1995) Bitches and skankly hobags: The place of women in contemporary slang. In: HallKBucholtzM (eds) Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.279–296.
61.
SwannJ (2002) Yes, but is it gender? In: LitosselitiLSunderlandJ (eds) Gender Identity and Discourse Analysis. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp.43–67.
62.
TannenD (1990) You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York, NY: Quill.
63.
WhitedL (ed.) (2004) The Ivory Tower and Harry Potter: Perspectives on a Literary Phenomenon. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press.
64.
YeoM (2004) Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets: Feminist interpretations/Jungian dreams. SIMILE: Studies In Media & Information Literacy Education4(1): 1–10.
65.
ZimmanLDavisJRaclawJ (eds) (2014) Queer Excursions: Retheorizing Binaries in Language, Gender, and Sexuality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
66.
ZipesJ (2002) Sticks and Stones: The Troublesome Success of Children’s Literature from Slovenly Peter to Harry Potter. New York, NY: Routledge.
67.
ZipesJ (2006) Fairy Tales and the Art of Subversion: The Classical Genre for Children and the Process of Civilization. New York, NY: Routledge.
68.
ZwickyA (1971) In a manner of speaking. Linguistic Inquiry2(2): 223–233.
