This article aims to provide a quantitative account of the stylistic differences between two modern Chinese translations of Don Quijote in terms of the use of language archaism. For this purpose, a number of statistical techniques applicable in corpus linguistics have been used, which exemplifies the foregrounding of quantitative primary data. The article provides an original interdisciplinary study which attempts to integrate research methods adapted from different areas of research, e.g. textual statistics, corpus linguistics, literary stylistics and translation studies, into the development of an emerging field known as corpus stylistics.
Cervantes, M. Saavedra (1947-9 [1605]) Don Quijote (Part I), ed. Francisco Rodríguez Marín. Madrid: Clásicos Castellanos.
2.
Hoover, D.L. (2003) `Multivariate Analysis and the Study of Style Variation' , Literary and Linguistic Computing18: 341-60.
3.
Ji, M. (2009, forthcoming) Phraseology in Corpus-Based Translation Studies. London and New York: Peter Lang.
4.
Johnson, K. (2008) Quantitative Methods in Linguistics. London: Blackwell. Also available online at http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/~kjohnson/quantitative/
5.
Liu, J.S. (1995) Tang Ji He De [Don Quijote]. Beijing: Li Jing Publishing
6.
Mancing, H. (1982) The Chivalric World of Don Quijote: Style, Structure, and Narrative Technique. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
7.
Oakes, M.P. (1998) Statistics for Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
8.
Venables, W.N. and Smith, D.M. (2004) An Introduction to R: Notes on R, a Programming Environment for Data Analysis and Graphics, available online at http://www.nceas.ucsb.edu/scicomp/Dloads/RProgramming/AnIntroToR.pdf
9.
Yang, J. (1978) Tang Ji He De [Don Quijote]. Beijing: People's Publisher.
