The combination of a past tense verb with a proximal deictic has been identified in the literature as one of the formal markings of free indirect style (Adamson, 1995). In this article, I examine corpus-derived, non-literary occurrences of the pattern, arguing that construction grammar can provide an adequate, all-encompassing framework for both literary and non-literary uses. Defined as conventional pairings of meaning and form, constructions can accommodate all kinds of semantic, pragmatic, discoursal and textual information as part of their meaning. In the case of the past + now pattern such specifications include a particular discourse or text type, namely narrative, which is the licensing context, and whose conventional association with the particular form constitutes precisely a distinct (discourse) construction. Within this constructional context, the past tense makes a predictable, compositional contribution while the present deictic suppresses part of its meaning signalling instead an anchoring to the current experience, thought, perception of the other. Where present, the progressive aspect enhances further this shift in perspective in a way fully consistent with its basic (non-truth conditional, cognitively defined) semantics. I attempt to show that a constructional approach to past + now may therefore pinpoint the source of the viewpoint effect associated with the pattern in all its uses, and illuminate the relationship of free indirect style with constructions of non-literary discourse.
Adamson, S. ( 1995) ‘From Empathetic Deixis to Empathetic Narrative: Stylisation and (De)subjectivisation as Processes of Language Change’ , in D. Stein and S. Wright (eds) Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives, pp. 195-224. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Antonopoulou, E. and Nikiforidou, K. ( 2009) ‘Deconstructing Verbal Humour with Construction Grammar’, in G. Brône and J. Vandaele (eds) Cognitive Poetics. Goals, Gains and Gaps, pp. 289-314. Berlin and New York : Mouton de Gruyter.
3.
Attardo, S. ( 2002) ‘Cognitive Stylistics of Humorous Texts’, in E. Semino and J. Culpeper (eds) Cognitive Stylistics: Language and Cognition in Text Analysis, pp. 231-50. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
4.
Austen, J. ( 1867) Emma: A Novel. Boston, MA: Ticknor and Fields.
5.
Bally, C. ( 1912) ‘Le style indirect libre en français moderne’ , Germanisch-Romanische Monatsschrift4: 549-56 and 597-606.
6.
Banfield, A. ( 1982) Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
7.
Baxter, R. ( 1844 [1696]) Select Practical Writings of Richard Baxter: With a Life of the Author (ed. Leonard Bacon), Vol. I. New Haven, CT: Durrie and Peck.
8.
Benveniste, E. ( 1966) Problèmes de linguistique générale . Paris: Gallimard.
9.
Bosseaux, C. ( 2004) ‘Translation and Narration: A Corpus-Based Study of French Translations of Two Novels by Virginia Woolf’, unpublished PhD thesis, University College London.
10.
Bray, J. ( 2007) ‘The Dual Voice of Free Indirect Discourse: A Reading Experiment’, Language and Literature16(1): 37-52.
11.
Brinton, L. ( 1995) ‘Non-anaphoric Reflexives in Free Indirect Style: Expressing the Subjectivity of the Non-Speaker’, in D. Stein and S. Wright (eds) Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives , pp. 173-94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Brisard, F. ( 2002) ‘The English Present’, in F. Brisard (ed.) Grounding: The Epistemic Footing of Deixis and Reference (Cognitive Linguistics Research 21), pp. 251-97. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Croft, W. ( 2001) Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
15.
Croft, W. and Cruse, A. ( 2004) Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Cuyckens, H.,Dirven, R. and Taylor, J.R. (eds) (2003) Cognitive Approaches to Lexical Semantics. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
17.
Ehrlich, S. ( 1990) Point of View: A Linguistic Analysis of Literary Style . London and New York: Routledge.
18.
Faulkner, W. ( 2003) The Portable Faulkner (ed. Malcolm Cowley). Harmondsworth: Penguin Classics.
19.
Fillmore, C. ( 1981) ‘Pragmatics and the Description of Discourse’ , in P. Cole (ed.) Radical Pragmatics, pp. 143-66. New York: Academic Press.
20.
Fillmore, C., Kay, P. and O’ Connor, M.C. ( 1988) ‘Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone’, Language64(3): 501-38.
21.
Fludernik, M. ( 1993) The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction: The Linguistic Representation of Speech and Consciousness. London and New York: Routledge .
22.
Genette, G. ( 1980) Narrative Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.
23.
Goldberg, A. ( 1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
24.
Goldberg, A. ( 2006) Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
Hemingway, E. ( 1965) To Have and Have Not. Scribner Paperback Fiction. Simon & Schuster.
26.
Jackendoff, R. ( 1997) ‘Twistin’ the Night Away’, Language73(3): 534-59.
27.
Kay, P. and Fillmore, C. ( 1999) ‘Grammatical Constructions and Linguistic Generalizations: The What’s X Doing Y? Construction’, Language75(1): 1-33.
28.
Langacker, R. ( 1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. I, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
29.
Langacker, R. ( 1991) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. II, Descriptive Application. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
30.
Langacker, R. ( 2000) Grammar and Conceptualization (Cognitive Linguistics Research 14). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
31.
Lawrence, D.H. ( 1955) The Rainbow (Classics Library). Ware : Wordsworth Classics. Wordsworth Editions Limited .
32.
Lawrence, D.H. ( 2001) The First and Second Lady Chatterley Novels, edited by Dieter Mehl and Christa Jansohn.The Cambridge Edition of the Works of D.H. Lawrence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Leech, G.N. and Short, M.H. ( 1981) Style in Fiction. London and New York: Longman.
34.
Lessing, D. ( 1989) The Fifth Child. New York: Vintage International, Vintage Books.
35.
Lodge, D. ( 1990) Nice Work. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
36.
Lyons, J. ( 1977) Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Lyons, J. ( 1982) ‘Deixis and Subjectivity: Loquor, Ergo Sum?’ in R. Jarvella and W. Klein (eds) Speech, Place and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Subjects, pp. 101-24. New York: Wiley.
38.
Michaelis, L. ( 2004) ‘Entity and Event Coercion in a Symbolic Theory of Syntax’, in J.O. Östman and M. Fried (eds) Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions, pp. 45-88. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
39.
Nikiforidou, K. ( 2009) ‘Constructional Analysis’, in J. Verschueren and J. O. Östman (eds) Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights, pp. 16-32. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
40.
Östman J.-O. ( 2005) ‘Construction Discourse: A Prolegomenon’, in J.O. Östman and M. Fried (eds) Construction Grammars. Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions, pp. 121-44. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
41.
Scott, P. ( 1998) Staying On: A Novel (Phoenix Fiction Series). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
42.
Sotirova, V. ( 2004) ‘Connectives in Free Indirect Style: Continuity or Shift?’ Language and Literature13(3): 216-34.
43.
Woolf, V. ( 1994) To the Lighthouse. Ware: Wordsworth Classics. Wordsworth Editions Limited.
Woolf, V. ( 2000) The Waves. Ware: Wordsworth Classics. Wordsworth Editions Limited.
46.
Wright, S. ( 1995) ‘Subjectivity and Experiential Syntax’, in D. Stein and S. Wright (eds) Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives, pp. 151-72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
