Over the last few years, researchers have criticized the typical divides between the lower and the higher stages of the mainstream American undergraduate foreign-language curriculum. Roughly speaking, the lower levels are commonly characterized by meaning-focused, sentence-based language instruction with emphasis on oral interaction, whereas the higher levels tend to focus on formal, text-oriented instruction with an emphasis on reading, writing, literature and content-oriented study. This division has clear repercussions for the conceptualization of communication, language, and language learning in the mainstream foreign-language curriculum. One of the most notable consequences is the idea that literature is essentially different from ordinary language, and, therefore, a less ‘authentic,’ ‘real-life’ form of discourse. The present article presents an alternative, integrative, literature-through-language pedagogy founded on a stylistics-based approach to language. The study was implemented with a group of sixth-semester students of Spanish at an American university. This study examines how the learners’ acculturation into the conventional two-tiered curricular configuration shaped their language constructs and the ways they composed meaning in texts. This article also discusses how the alternative course impacted on the learners’ linguistic development, views of language, and learning attitudes.
Adfl (2004) Special Issue on ‘Language and Literature in the Academy: Papers from the 2003 ADE-ADFL Summer Seminar’, ADFL Bulletin36(1).
2.
Applied Linguistics. (2007) Special Issue on ‘Everyday Creativity in Language: Developing a Contextualized Approach Creativities in Context’, Applied Linguistics28(4).
3.
Bakhtin, M.M. ( 2004[1945]) ‘Dialogic origin and dialogic pedagogy of grammar: Stylistics as part of Russian language instruction in secondary school’ , Journal of Russian and East European Psychology42(6): 12-49.
4.
Bruner, J. ( 1986) Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
Byrnes, H. ( 2001) ‘Reconsidering graduate students’ education as teachers: It takes a department!’Modern Language Journal85(4): 512-30.
6.
Byrnes, H. ( 2005) ‘Literacy as a framework for advanced language acquisition’ , ADFL Bulletin37(1): 85-110.
7.
Byrnes, H. and Kord, S. ( 2002) ‘Developing literacy and literacy competence: challenges for foreign language departments’, in V. Scott and H. Tucker (eds) SLA and the Literature Classroom: Fostering dialogues, pp. 35-43. Boston : Heinle and Heinle.
8.
Byrnes, H.Crane, C., Maxim, H.H. and Sprang, K.A. ( 2006) ‘Taking text to task: Issues and choices in curriculum construction’, ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics152: 85-110.
9.
Carter, R. ( 1997) Investigating English Discourse: Language, Literacy and Literature. London and New York : Longman.
10.
Carter, R. ( 2004) Language and Creativity: The Art of Common Talk. London and New York: Routledge .
11.
Carter, R. ( 2007) ‘Literature and language teaching 1986-2006: A review’ , International Journal of Applied Linguistics17(1): 3-13.
12.
Carter, R. and Long, M. ( 1987) The Web of Words: Exploring Literature Through Language . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Carter, R. and Long, M. ( 1991) Teaching Literature. New York: Longman.
14.
Carter, R., Goddard, A., Reah, D., Sanger, K. and Bowring, M. ( 2008) Working with Texts (3rd edition). London and New York: Routledge.
15.
Gee, J.P. ( 1989) ‘"Literariness", Formalism, and Sense Making: The line and stanza structure of human thought’, Journal of Education171(1): 61-74.
16.
Gibbs, R.W. ( 1994) The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Giest, H. and Lompscher, J. ( 2003) ‘Formation of Learning Activity and Theoretical Thinking in Science Teaching’, in A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V.S. Ageyev and S.M. Miller (eds) Vygotsky’s Educational Theory in Cultural Context, pp. 267-88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives series).
18.
Gugin, D.L. ( 2008) ‘The uses of literature: Towards a bidirectional stylistics’, Language and Literature17(2): 123-36.
19.
Hall, G. ( 2005) Literature in Language Education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
Howatt, A.P.R. ( 1998) A History of English Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
Kern, R.G. ( 2002) ‘Reconciling the language-literature split through literacy’, ADFL Bulletin33(3): 20-4.
22.
Knights, B. and Thurgar-Dawson, C. ( 2006) Active Reading: Transformative Writing in Literary Studies . London and New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
23.
Kozulin, A. ( 1993) ‘Literature as a Psychological Tool’, Educational Psychologist28(3): 253-65.
24.
Kozulin, A. ( 1998) Psychological Tools. A Sociocultural Approach to Education . London: Harvard University Press .
25.
Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V.S. and Miller, S.M. ( 2003) ‘Introduction: Sociocultural theory and education: Students, teachers, and knowledge’, in A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V.S. Ageyev and S.M. Miller (eds) Vygotsky’s Educational Theory in Cultural Context, pp. 1-14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives series).
26.
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. ( 1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Lantolf, J.P. (2006) ‘Sociocultural theory and second language learning: State of the art’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28(1): 67-109.
27.
Lantolf, J.P. and Appel, G. ( 1994) ‘Theoretical framework: An introduction to Vygotskian perspectives on second language research’, in J.P. Lantolf and G. Appel (eds) Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research, pp. 1-32. Westport : Ablex Publishing.
28.
Lantolf, J.P. and Thorne, S.L. ( 2006) Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
Larsen-Freeman, D. ( 2002) ‘A grammar of choice’, in E. Hinkel and S. Fotos (eds) New Perspectives On Grammar Teaching in Second Language Classrooms, pp. 103-118. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (ESL and Applied Linguistics Professional series).
30.
Leech, G. and Short, M. ( 2007) Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose (2nd edition). Cambridge: Pearson Education.
31.
Maybin, J. and Swann, J. (eds) (2006) The Art of English: Literary Creativity. London: Palgrave Macmillan .
32.
McCarthy, M. and Carter, R. ( 1994) Language as Discourse. Perspectives for Language Teaching . London and New York: Longman.
33.
MLA Ad Hoc Committee on Foreign Languages ( 2007) ‘Foreign languages and higher education: New structures for a changed world’, Profession. May: 234-45.
34.
Negueruela, E. ( 2003) ‘A sociocultural approach to the teaching and learning of second languages: Systemic-theoretical instruction and L2 development’, unpublished PhD thesis, Pennsylvania State University.
35.
Negueruela, E. and Lantolf, J.P. ( 2005) ‘Concept-Based instruction: Teaching grammar in an intermediate-advanced Spanish L2 university classroom’, CALPER Working Paper Series, no. 3, The Pennsylvania State University: Center for Advanced Language Proficiency Education and Research.
36.
Odlin, T. (ed.) (1994) Perspectives on Pedagogical Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Paran, A. (ed.) (2006) Literature in Teaching and Learning: Case studies in TESOL Practice. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
38.
Pavlenko, A. and Lantolf, J.P. ( 2000) ‘Second Language Learning as Participation and the (Re) construction of Selves’, in J.P. Lantolf (ed.) Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning , pp. 155-77. New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
Pope, R. ( 1995) Textual Intervention. London and New York: Routledge.
40.
Pope, R. ( 2002) The English Studies Book: An Introduction to Language, Literature and Culture (2nd edition). London and New York: Routledge .
41.
Pope, R. ( 2005) Creativity: Theory, History, Practice. London: Routledge.
42.
Simpson, P. ( 1997) Language through Literature: An Introduction. New York and London: Routledge .
43.
Simpson, P. ( 2004) Stylistics: A Resource Book for Students. New York: Routledge.
44.
Sullivan, P.N. ( 2000) ‘Playfulness as Mediation in Communicative Language Teaching’, in J.P. Lantolf (ed.) Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning, pp. 115-31. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
45.
Turner, M. ( 1996). The Literary Mind. The Origins of Thought and Language . New York: Oxford University Press .
46.
Vygotsky, L.S. ( 1962) Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
47.
Vygotsky, L.S. ( 1987) Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA : MIT. Press.
48.
Watson, G. and Zyngier, S. (eds) (2007) Literature and Stylistics for Language Learners: Theory and Practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
49.
Wertsch, J.V. ( 1985). Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50.
Whitley, M.S. ( 2002). A Course in Spanish Linguistics. Spanish/English Contrasts . Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
51.
Yáñez Prieto, M.C. (2008) ‘On Literature and the Secret Art of (Im)possible Worlds: Teaching Literature Through Language’ , unpublished PhD thesis, Pennsylvania State University .
