Grounded in Vygotskian sociocultural theory (SCT), this study examines Korean as a foreign language (KFL) students’ emerging conceptual development of honorifics through their participation in concept-based language instruction (C-BLI). Seven participants were recruited from a second-semester elementary Korean class at a U.S. college, and various data were collected to trace the students’ unfolding development-in-activity of three interrelated subconcepts of Korean honorifics; namely, power, distance, and formality. Qualitative findings suggest that, overall, students gained a deeper conceptual understanding and sociopragmatic awareness of using Korean honorifics through the development of these interrelated subconcepts and their participation in the goal-directed activities of C-BLI. In particular, the qualitative findings reveal that students’ prior rules-of-thumb-based conceptualizations of honorifics transformed into more semantic, systematic, coherent, and complete understandings as students are in the process of becoming more self-regulated in planning and monitoring their mental and physical activity and their linguistic choices. This study points to the crucial importance of not only the quality of materials design but also how intentional and explicit instruction can be applied to second language teaching–learning processes.
BrownL. (2010). Questions of appropriateness and authenticity in the representation of Korean honorifics in textbooks for second language learners. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 23, 35–50.
2.
BrownL. (2011). Korean honorifics and politeness in second language learning. John Benjamins.
3.
BrownL. (2013a). ‘Mind your own esteemed business’: Sarcastic honorifics use and impoliteness in Korean TV dramas. Journal of Politeness Research, 9, 159–186.
4.
BrownL. (2013b). Teaching ‘casual’ and/or ‘impolite’ language through multimedia: The case of non-honorific panmal speech styles in Korean. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 26, 1–18.
5.
ByonA.S. (2000). Teaching Korean honorifics. The Korean Language in America, 5, 275–289.
6.
ByonA.S. (2007). Teaching the polite and the deferential speech levels using media materials: Advanced KFL classroom settings. In YoshimiD.R.WangH. (Eds.), Selected papers from Pragmatics in the CJK Classroom: The State of the Art (pp. 21–64). University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa.
7.
ChoY.Y.LeeH.S.SchulzC.SohnH.SohnS.-O. (2019). Integrated Korean: Beginning 2. 3rd edition.University of Hawaii Press.
8.
ChooM. (1999). Teaching Language styles of korean. The Korean Language in America, 3, 77–95.
9.
CreswellJ.W.PothC.N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 4th edition.Sage.
10.
DíazR.M.NealC.J.Amaya-WilliamsM. (1990). The social origins of self-regulation. In MollL.C. (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 127–154). Cambridge University Press.
11.
EganK. (2002). Getting it wrong from the beginning: Our progressivist inheritance from Herbert Spencer, John Dewey, and Jean Piaget. Yale University Press.
12.
EsteveO.FarróL.RodrigoC.VerdíaE. (2021). Meaningfully designing and implementing SCOBAs in socioculturally-based L2 teacher education programs. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 8, 8–34.
13.
GalʹperinP.I. (1992). Stage-by-stage formation as a method of psychological investigation. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 30, 60–80.
14.
GarcíaP.N. (2018). Concept-based instruction: Investigating the role of conscious conceptual manipulation in L2 development. In LantolfJ.P.PoehnerM.E.SwainM. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of sociocultural theory and second language development (pp. 181–196). Routledge.
15.
HaenenJ. (2001). Outlining the teaching–learning process: Piotr Galʹperin’s contribution. Learning and Instruction, 11, 157–170.
16.
IdeS. (1989). Formal forms and discernment. Multilingua, 8, 223–248.
17.
JohnsonK.E.GolombekP.R. (2016). Mindful L2 teacher education: A sociocultural perspective on cultivating teachers’ professional development. Routledge.
18.
JohnstoneB.KieslingS.F. (2008). Indexicality and experience: Exploring the meanings of /aw/-monophthongization in Pittsburgh. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12, 5–33.
19.
KarpovY.V. (2003). Vygotsky’s doctrine of scientific concepts: Its role for contemporary education. In KozulinA.GindisB.AgeyevV.S.MillerS.M. (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 65–82). Cambridge University Press.
20.
KimJ.LantolfJ.P. (2018). Developing conceptual understanding of sarcasm in L2 English through explicit instruction. Language Teaching Research, 22, 208–229.
21.
KimM.LeeH.KimY. (2018). Learning of Korean honorifics through collaborative tasks comparing heritage and foreign language learners. In TaguchiN. (Ed.), Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics (pp. 27–54). John Benjamins.
22.
KimY.J.ChoiB.YunH.KimB.ChoiS. (2022). Task repetition, synchronous written corrective feedback and the learning of Korean grammar: A classroom-based study. Language Teaching Research, 26, 1106–1132.
23.
KozulinA. (2018). Mediation and internalization: Conceptual analysis and practical applications. In LantolfJ.P.PoehnerM.E.SwainM. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of sociocultural theory and second language development (pp. 23–41). Routledge.
24.
KuepperM.-C.FeryokA. (2020). Concept-based pragmatics instruction: Teaching German address pronouns to New Zealand Tertiary students. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 6, 158–183.
25.
LantolfJ.P. (2003). Intrapersonal communication and internalization in the second language classroom. In KozulinA.GindisB.AgeyevV.S.MillerS.M. (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 349–370). Cambridge University Press.
26.
LantolfJ.P.PoehnerM.E. (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education: Vygotskian praxis and the research/practice divide. Routledge.
27.
LantolfJ.ThorneS.L.PoehnerM.E. (2015). Sociocultural theory and second language development. In van PattenB.WilliamsJ. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 207–226). Routledge.
28.
LantolfJ.P.XiJ.MinakovaV. (2021). Sociocultural theory and concept-baesd language instruction, Language Teaching, 54, 327–342.
29.
LeeJ. (1999). Kwukekyengepep-uy cenlyakcek yongpep-ey tayhaye [On the strategic usage of Korean honorifics]. Ehakyenkwu (Language Research), 35, 91–122.
30.
MasudaK.ArnettC. (2015). Cognitive linguistics, sociocultural theory and language teaching: Introduction. In MasudaK.ArnettC.LabarcaA. (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics and sociocultural theory: Applications for second and foreign language teaching (pp. 1–24). De Gruyter Mouton.
31.
MayringP. (2004). Qualitative content analysis. In FlickU.von KardorffE.SteinkeI. (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 266–275). Sage.
32.
NegueruelaE. (2003). A sociocultural approach to teaching and researching Second languages: systemic-theoretical instruction and second language development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Penn State University, State College, PA, USA. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
33.
NegueruelaE.LantolfJ.P. (2006). Concept-based instruction and the acquisition of L2 Spanish. In SalaberryR.LaffordB.A. (Eds.), The art of teaching Spanish: Second language acquisition from research to praxis (pp. 79–102). Georgetown University Press.
34.
OhtaA.S. (2017). From SCOBA development to implementation in concept-based instruction: Conceptualizing and teaching Japanese addressee honorifics as expressing modes of self. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 4, 187–218.
35.
SohnH. (1999). The Korean language. Cambridge University Press.
36.
StraussS.EunJ. (2005). Indexicality and honorific speech level choice in Korean. Linguistics, 43, 611–651.
37.
SwainM. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In ByrnesH. (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). Continuum.
38.
SwainM.LapkinS.KnouziI.SuzukiW.BrooksL. (2009). Languaging: Students learn the grammatical concept of voice in French. Modern Language Journal, 93, 5–29.
39.
van CompernolleR.A. (2011). Developing second language sociopragmatic knowledge through concept-based instruction: A microgenetic case study. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 3267–3283.
40.
van CompernolleR.A. (2014). Sociocultural theory and L2 instructional pragmatics. Multilingual Matters.
41.
van CompernolleR.A. (2018). Concept-based pragmatics instruction: Principles and applications. In LantolfJ.P.PoehnerM.E.SwainM. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of sociocultural theory and second language development (pp. 211–228). Routledge.
42.
VygotskyL.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
43.
VygotskyL.S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In WertschJ.V. (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144–188). Sharpe.
44.
VygotskyL.S. (1987). The problem and the method of investigation. In RieberR.W.CartonA.S. (Eds.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky, Volume 1: Problems of general psychology, including the volume Thinking and Speech (pp. 43–53). Plenum.
45.
VygotskyL.S. (1994). The problem of the environment. In van der VeerR.ValsinerJ. (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 338–354). Oxford.
46.
VygotskyL.S. (1997). The historical meaning of the crisis in psychology: A Methodological investigation. In RieberR.W.WollockJ. (Eds.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky: Problems of the theory and history of psychology (pp. 233–343). Springer US.
47.
VygotskyL.S. (2004). The historical meaning of the crisis in psychology: A methodological investigation. In RieberR.W.RobinsonD.K. (Eds.), The essential Vygotsky (pp. 227–344). Plenum.
48.
VygotskyL.S. (2012). Thought and language. Revised and expanded by KozulinA.MIT Press.
49.
WilliamsL.AbrahamL.B.Negueruela-AzarolaE. (2013). Using concept-based instruction in the L2 classroom: Perspectives from current and future language teachers. Language Teaching Research, 17, 363–381.
50.
YoonS. (2010). Situational meanings and functions of Korean speech styles. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, Mānoa, HI, USA.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
