Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Aging at the cellular level is a complex process resulting from accumulation of various damages leading to functional impairment and a reduced quality of life at the level of the organism. With a rise in the elderly population, the worldwide incidence of osteoporosis (OP) and osteoarthritis (OA) has increased in the past few decades. A decline in the number and “fitness” of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) in the bone marrow (BM) niche has been suggested as one of the factors contributing to bone abnormalities in OP and OA. It is well recognized that MSCs in vitro acquire culture-induced aging features such as gradual telomere shortening, increased numbers of senescent cells, and reduced resistance to oxidative stress as a result of serial population doublings. In contrast, there is only limited evidence that human BM-MSCs “age” similarly in vivo. This review compares the various aspects of in vitro and in vivo MSC aging and suggests how our current knowledge on rejuvenating cultured MSCs could be applied to develop future strategies to target altered bone formation processes in OP and OA.

Keywords

aging bone marrow (BM)mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs)

Introduction

Aging is a gradual process marked by the deterioration of functionality in living organisms with the passage of time. It is a complex phenomenon known to be affected by a variety of factors like diet, lifestyle, environment, heredity, and disease. It slows down the biological mechanisms that aid tissue maintenance, immunity, and health. Disorders like osteoarthritis (OA), osteoporosis (OP), Alzheimer's, and Parkinson's diseases have been associated with aging, making the life of patients more challenging as compared to a healthy elderly population. Physically, locomotion and daily activities become difficult, and vulnerability toward infections increases with aging.

OP is a skeletal disease characterized by a reduction in bone mineral density, predisposing people to an increased risk of fracture. The hypothesis that OP is an age-associated disease and mainly a consequence of estrogen deficiency was proposed in 1941.¹ In 1998, the “unitary model of OP in postmenopausal women and aging men” was put forward, this concept combined postmenopausal (involving mainly trabecular bone) and senile OP affecting both cortical and trabecular bone.² The management of OP involves various pharmacological options that can be divided into antiresorptive and bone stimulatory agents (the former are more broadly used in clinical practice). On the other hand, OA is a degenerative joint disease also associated with age that includes a group of pathologies of joint structures resulting in pain and disability. There is no disease-modifying treatment for OA, and the management of patients is currently limited to pain reduction and lifestyle modification. Increase in age is one of the risk factors for OA.³ However, it is now recognized that aging and OA are independent processes, so that age is one of many contributory factors. Because OA has been historically described as a disease of the cartilage, most of the research on aging in OA has been focused on cartilage tissue.⁴ More recently, OA has been proposed as a disease of the whole joint, which is additionally characterized by severe alterations to subchondral bone as well as by low-grade systemic and local inflammation.⁵ Abnormalities in OA bone include subchondral plate sclerosis, bone marrow (BM) lesions, and the formation of osteophytes, all are a result of intermittent abnormal subchondral bone remodeling, which links this aspect of OA to the OP.⁶

One of the key cellular players in bone physiology is the osteoblast, a bone-forming cell derived from BM resident mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). BM-MSCs are self-renewing in vivo, and the shift in their differentiation from osteogenic to adipogenic lineage with increase in age^7

–10 can potentially affect osteoblast formation and bone remodeling, in general, and thus be a factor in OP and OA development and pathogenesis. In vitro expanded MSCs have broadly been defined by their adherence to plastic, ability to give rise to at least 3 cell lineages (adipogenic, osteogenic, and chondrogenic); presence of CD73, CD90, and CD105 surface molecules; and absence of CD11b or CD14, CD19 or CD79a, CD34, CD45, and human leukocyte antigen—antigen D related (human leukocyte antigen—antigen D related [HLA-DR])—as defined by the International Society for Cellular Therapy.¹¹ However, the markers used for characterizing in vitro MSCs are not very useful for the identification of MSCs or their subpopulations in vivo.¹² Most of the experiments for understanding MSC aging have been performed using cultured MSCs, and attempts have been made to correlate the findings with in vivo environment. This article addresses the comparison of in vitro MSC aging with in vivo MSC aging and discusses the concept of in vivo MSC “rejuvenation” and its future prospects for novel therapies for OP and OA.

General Theories of Aging

In an attempt to understand MSC aging, it is worth reflecting on the general theories of cellular and whole body aging. Among many existing theories, DNA damage, the free radical (FR), telomere shortening, and stem cell theories have been discussed in detail recently.¹³

The DNA damage theory is among the earliest theories focusing on the mechanism of aging. It refers to the accumulation of DNA damage in every cell with the passage of time.^14,15 The sources of DNA damage vary from endogenous toxic chemicals and reactive oxidative species (ROS) to exogenous ultraviolet light. This theory has been explored to describe in vitro MSC aging, particularly in relation to the accumulation of chromosomal instability following prolonged culture.¹⁶

The FR theory or the theory of ROS proposes that the continuous process of FR generation in metabolism causes damages to tissues owing to the presence of free and unpaired electron on the oxygen atomic outer shell.¹⁷ Antioxidants in the body combat the negative effects of ROS. However, when the balance between production of antioxidants and FR is lost, oxidative stress (OS) develops.¹⁸ This can then lead to oxidation of nucleic acids, severely damaging the DNA and resulting in mutagenesis and modification of the transcription of specific genes. In terms of MSC aging, this theory has primarily been applied to describe the decrease in adhesion of MSCs¹⁹ and the increased bias toward adipogenic differentiation.²⁰

The telomere shortening theory postulates that with each cell division, the length of telomeres in mature cells keeps reducing due to the attrition and the lack of telomerase activity, an enzyme responsible for telomere elongation. In BM-MSCs, telomere attrition can also occur leading to cellular senescence,²¹ although its exact mechanism remains unclear, as in MSCs, telomerase activity is present but low. While telomere length decreases with an individual’s age, recent data suggest that after the age of 75, it becomes positively correlated with age implying its significance for survival in the very old age.^15,22 In terms of MSC aging, this theory has been extensively tested using serially passaged MSCs, where an average 17 base pair telomere loss with each population doubling was confirmed.^21,23

The stem cell theory of aging postulates a decline in stem cell number and functionalities as a potential effect of aging.^24
–26 Schultz and Sinclair have discussed that the probable causes of cellular aging (i.e., the abovementioned telomere attrition, DNA damage, and cellular senescence) can also be applied to stem cells.¹⁵ Fukada et al. have not only described the aging of stem cells but have also connected the other theories with the stem cell theory to explain the complex progression of aging.¹⁸ As BM-MSCs can be viewed as true stem cells,²⁷ the stem cell theory is linked to each of the theories mentioned above.

Finally, the theories of epigenetic alterations²⁴ and decline in protein homeostasis²⁵ have also gained importance in the recent past. While all these theories have been mentioned separately, they are interlinked and lead to one another. Mitochondrial damage often leads to the production of ROS that interact with molecules in the body affecting them negatively.²⁴ The accumulation of the oxidative by-products of ROS interactions, with time, causes DNA damage and genomic instability resulting in cellular senescence. This disturbs the self-renewal capacity of stem cells in their microenvironment which is known to interrupt the normal functioning of different types of stem and other cells in the BM.^18,28

In Vitro MSC Aging

This section outlines the recent findings of in vitro MSC aging as well as the current methods used to track MSC aging in culture.

Passage Dependent

It is well accepted that MSC expansion in culture results in their accelerated aging.^23,29 Colony-forming unit fibroblast assay has been one of the oldest methods to document the loss of proliferation in cultured MSCs during their extended passaging.³⁰ Many independent studies have later documented that this loss of proliferation is correlated with a decline in the telomere length with increasing population doublings (PD).^23,29 The senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-gal) enzyme activity is increased in senescent cells and similarly, the number of SA-β-gal positive cells have been reported to escalate with increase in PDs.^29,31 Regarding the potentials of MSC for differentiation, a study by Vacanti et al. was among the first to show a significant decrease in the differentiation potential of cultured BM-MSCs (porcine) into osteogenic lineage in the late passages as compared to early passages. The late passages also exhibited actin accumulation, reduced adherence to substrates, and increased activity of β-galactosidase all of which are indicative of cellular aging.³² More recently, Yao et al. have highlighted the effects of in vitro aging on wound healing ability of MSCs derived from mouse fat pads.³³

In addition to the abovementioned changes, Bonab et al. observed anomalies in the morphology of human BM-MSCs with increasing passage number and suggested that in vitro aging of MSCs begins from the minute they are plated on plastic.²³ One of the potential reasons for such accelerated aging could be the fact that MSCs placed in culture receive conditions supportive of their enhanced proliferation that goes far beyond its physiological demands (Fig. 1). Importantly, MSCs are cultured under hyperoxia, where they consume oxygen at a high rate,³⁴ leading to high levels of ROS that accumulate with prolonged culture of MSCs.³⁵

Figure 1.

A proposed model highlighting the different mechanisms of bone marrow–mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) aging in vitro and in vivo. 2-D = 2-dimensional; 3-D = 3-dimensional; ECM = extracellular matrix; HSC = hematopoietic stem cells.

One of the suggested solutions to such accelerated aging could involve growing MSCs under hypoxic conditions. Under long-term exposure to hypoxia, MSCs may adapt themselves to low oxygen levels, decreasing their oxygen consumption and reducing their ROS production.²³ This would lead to improved MSC survival and reduced apoptosis. Interestingly, the migration of adipose tissue MSCs may also be induced by hypoxia as shown in animals.³⁶

Donor Age Dependent

The closest to understanding in vivo aging of BM-MSCs in humans has so far been obtained from the studies where the growth and differentiation of MSCs from young and old donors have been compared using the same growth conditions in vitro. For example, Mueller and Glowacki observed a decline in the osteogenic differentiation potential of MSCs from human femoral BM collected from subjects above the age of 60 (old) compared to subjects below the age of 50.⁸ Stenderup et al. studied the maximal in vitro life span and in vivo bone formation in mice of human BM-MSCs from young (18–29 years old) and old (68–81 years old) individuals. Their results suggested that the life span in cumulative PDs from the older donors was significantly lower than that of the younger donors and that the MSCs from the older donors exhibited accelerated senescence with each PD. However, they did not find any change in the total number of senescent cells (using SA-β-gal assay) or in the telomere lengths in the early passage cells of both groups of donors. Interestingly, MSCs from both the donor groups were able to form similar amounts of mineralized matrix and in vivo bone formation in mice. This provided the first indication that MSC aging in vitro possibly occurs faster than in vivo MSC aging.²⁹

Baxter et al. measured the mean telomere restriction fragment at exactly the same “culture age” (16 PDs) of human BM-MSCs and found a significant decrease in the length of telomeres in the MSCs of older donors (59–75 years old) compared to the younger ones (0–18 years old).²¹ Stolzing et al. measured ROS and superoxide dismutase levels to compare these and other indices of in vitro aging in BM-MSC cultures from younger and older donors. They observed an increase in all tested indices of aging in cultured MSCs from older donors, indicating a reduction in their “fitness.”³¹ Peffers et al. have used protein analysis of human MSCs from young and old donors and have discovered alterations in energy metabolism in older donors.³⁷ These studies suggested that BM-MSCs most probably “age” in vivo, but the use of cultured MSCs, which themselves undergo rapid “aging” in vitro, is not an optimal material to understand in vivo BM-MSC aging and other approaches need to be developed.

Methods to Track MSC Aging in Culture

Tracking in vitro aging of MSCs has been performed using a variety of methods, some of which have been mentioned already. One of the most intriguing observations noted in many studies pertains to considerable changes in MSC size and morphology. Initial passages of cultured MSCs retain their characteristic spindle-like morphology, but the cells after a few PDs appear enlarged and more granular.^23,38,39 The relative area of BM-MSCs in the late passages increases over 10-fold compared to early passages (from 5 μm² up to 50 μm², respectively).⁴⁰ This increase in size appears to parallel with the increase in actin stress filaments.²⁹ A similar increase in size and actin filaments in late passage cells has also been observed in late passage of cultured osteoblasts.⁴¹ While the reasons for these morphological changes in MSCs remain unknown, precise measurements of MSC size could provide a rapid estimate of an MSC aging “status” during their culture in vitro.

Immunophenotyping using several antibodies have been performed to identify surface markers specific for aged MSCs. An increase in the expression of CD44 and a decrease of Stro-1 molecule, CD71, CD90, CD105, CD146, and CD274 were detected in human BM-MSCs with increasing PDs as well as in old donors.^31,42,43 However, measuring surface markers as indicators of MSC aging remains controversial; for example, while some studies have observed a decrease in CD106 expression during MSC passaging,⁴⁴ others documented its gradual increase,⁴⁵ which is most likely due to the different culture conditions used. Gene expression and DNA methylation marks may, in this respect, be more useful.^39,46 For example, the analysis by Wagner et al. revealed over 1,000 transcripts upregulated at least 2-fold in senescent MSCs and over 500 transcripts downregulated.³⁹ More recently, Peffers et al. have shown that the expression of miR-199b-5p was reduced in MSCs from old donors and correlated with a decline in energy metabolism and cell survival.³⁷ Duscher et al. worked on murine adipose–derived MSCs and observed a decline with age in hypoxic transcription factor (Hif1a) and C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12) highlighting their impaired therapeutic potential.³⁶

In Vivo MSC Aging

In vivo tracking of MSC aging has so far been performed only in animal models. While the available literature broadly suggests a decline in MSC frequency with aging,^47,48 the issue remains controversial. For example, some studies have indicated a decline in MSC number in older individuals,^31,49 whereas other scientists did not find any significant changes.^43,50 This could be due to different volumes of BM aspirate used as well as different processing methodologies (e.g., direct plating vs. density centrifugation).^51,52 One of the most interesting features of MSCs from older individuals appears to be their reduced propensity for osteogenic differentiation with increased bias toward adipogenic differentiation. The loss of balance between osteogenic–adipogenic differentiation leads to increased BM adiposity and is seen in OP.^7,10,28,53 The exact mechanism underlying the adipogenic bias is yet to be clearly understood. Recent studies have identified microRNAs miR-27a,⁵⁴ miR-27b, Let-7G, and miR-106a⁵⁵ that are necessary for maintaining the osteogenic differentiation potential of MSCs and have displayed a significant decline with aging.

As mentioned in the above sections, the great majority of studies investigating the aging of human BM-MSCs have been performed on MSCs expanded in culture. As these cultured MSCs undergo an aging process as a result of extensive proliferation during consecutive PDs, these studies provide only indirect evidence of how MSCs may age in vivo. Furthermore, in vivo BM-MSC niche is not mirrored when these cells are cultured and expanded on the plastic surfaces. Thus, it can be proposed that in vivo and in vitro aging of MSCs may have both common (overlapping) and nonoverlapping features (Fig. 1).

Intrinsic Factors: Proliferation Burden

In vitro MSC aging could, to a large extent, be due to telomere erosion occurring as a result of their rapid proliferation in response to growth factors (GFs) present in fetal calf serum. MSCs grown in medium supplemented with human platelet lysates grow even faster.⁵⁶ As shown for fibroblasts,⁵⁷ the chronic exposure of MSCs to high doses of growth promoting factors could lead to the downregulation of GF receptors and resistance to these factors and eventually resulting in cellular senescence.

In contrast, there is no compelling evidence that MSCs in vivo are rapidly cycling cells; in the opposite, earlier studies have documented that the in vivo MSCs identified based on Stro-1 expression are slow cycling.⁵⁸ In vivo MSC proliferation, and factors that influenced it, is not fully understood, but the fact that human bone constantly undergoes a process of remodeling so that every 10 years mature bone cells are renewed⁵⁹ suggests that in vivo MSCs should undergo rare asymmetrical divisions in order to both maintain their own pool and also to provide enough osteoblast progenitors to facilitate bone remodeling. Because of this slow-cycling nature of in vivo MSCs, their aging due to telomere erosion is unlikely to be the primary factor in their in vivo aging process. It is noteworthy that following bone fracture, the local MSC proliferation response is activated⁶⁰; furthermore, local injections of platelet-derived factors can temporarily increase their local pool.⁶¹ There is some evidence that blood platelet responses following fracture may also exert a systemic effect and “activate” these slow-cycling MSCs.⁶²

Environmental Factors: Stem Cell Niche

The stem cell niche is commonly defined as an in vivo regulatory microenvironment where stem cells reside.⁶³ MSC niches in human BM are poorly understood but are believed to be primarily in the perivascular and bone-lining locations.⁶⁴ Notably, cells expressing a common BM-MSC marker LNGFR/CD271 may be more broadly distributed as adventitial reticular cells, which are connected to each other via long projections, forming the “backbone” of the BM stroma.⁶⁵ These topographical differences should be taken into account when considering how BM-MSCs may age in vivo. For example, perivascular BM regions are believed to be more oxygenated compared to endosteal regions⁶⁶ and so perivascular MSCs could theoretically be more exposed to OS compared to bone-lining MSCs. However, recent direct in vivo measurements of local oxygen tension in the BM of live mice showed perisinusoidal rather than endosteal regions to be more hypoxic suggesting that the BM hypoxic landscape is determined not only by vascularity (oxygen supply) but also by the area’s cellularity (consumption).⁶⁷

As the MSC niche in BM generally has low oxygen level, they must be adapted to use mainly an anaerobic metabolism (glycolysis) for their energy supply, which appears to limit the MSC proliferation to avoid OS.³⁵ A phenomenon called extra physiological oxygen shock/stress (EPHOSS) was first noted for hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) when BM was collected and processed in ambient air (21% oxygen).³⁴ The EPHOSS is associated with loss of stemness and is related to increased level of mitochondrial ROS.³⁴ Although the level of ROS is induced during in vitro MSC aging, this event has been reported at similar levels between young and old animals (rats).⁶⁸ It was proposed that the increase of ROS was more related to microenvironment of culture than chronological age.

Environmental Factors: Effect of Hormones and GFs

The significant drop of sex hormone levels and the increase of the glucocorticoids production and activity are hormonal hallmarks of human aging that are associated with reduced bone mass.^69,70 The functional capacities of MSCs have been linked to these age-related hormones. Estrogen can induce osteogenic rather than adipogenic differentiation of MSCs.⁷¹ Conversely, testosterone promotes the proliferation of MSCs and preserves their stemness.⁷² This may explain a more prominent decline in in vivo MSC numbers in females compared to males.^43,73 The in vivo effect of glucocorticoids on MSCs is not clear, but these hormones have a negative effect on osteogenesis as inducer of the apoptosis in osteoblasts and suppressor of their differentiation and proliferation.⁷⁴ In contrast to the in vivo hormones, the hormones incorporated into the MSC expansion or differentiation medium could have different effects. For example, very high doses of glucocorticoids added to MSC differentiation media stimulate their differentiation into fat, cartilage, bone, and muscle cells.⁷⁵

An interesting GF that can be implicated in in vivo MSC aging is insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1). The blood and bone matrix levels of IGF-1 are decreased significantly with aging and correlated with reduced bone mineral density.⁷⁶ The osteogenic differentiation potential of MSCs is enhanced by the effect of IGF-1 as shown in mouse IGF-1 model of receptor knockout.⁷⁷ Thus, it could be assumed that the reduction in IGF-1 effect on MSCs is another characteristic of their in vivo aging.

Environmental Factors: The Cross Talk with Other BM Cells

The cross talk between HSCs and MSCs within BM is a dynamic process that affects the functions of both cells and probably their aging as well. Within their common niche,⁶⁷ HSCs also undergo alterations with aging. Studies in animals have confirmed the process called “myeloid skewing,” which includes a decline in the number of lymphoid progenitors and a bias toward the formation of myeloid progenitors with increasing age.⁷⁸

It is quite likely that both types of stem cells are influenced by similar “aging forces.” In fact, some studies have indeed shown that BM-HSC and MSC aging occur in parallel.⁵⁰ Interestingly, MSCs can help HSCs to reduce their intracellular ROS levels via several mechanisms including C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4)/CXCL12 (stromal cell-derived factor 1 [SDF-1]) interactions and an uptake of ROS via connexin gap junction.⁵⁷ While there has been more focus on the niche-related mechanisms that might induce aging of HSCs (changes in connexin gap junction and role of SDF-1), it is still unclear whether these changes in the in vivo niche/milieu could also affect the aging of MSCs. It will be valuable to determine to what extent the surrounding cells (e.g., HSCs) would affect the in vivo MSC aging.

Mature MSC and HSC descendants and the molecules they release may also play a significant role in MSC aging. For example, it is well known that marrow adiposity (i.e., the numbers of fat cells, which are mature MSC descendants) increase with age.⁷⁹ The factors that mature adipocytes release into their environment (adipokines and other adipose tissue hormones) are likely to influence the neighboring MSCs, potentially creating a “vicious loop” that drives preferential MSC differentiation toward fat rather than bone, which likely impacts also on the decline in hematopoiesis in this area and the propensity to OP.

Rejuvenation of OP and OA MSCs

Early studies have shown a decline in the number of osteoblast progenitors in the BM of OP patients compared with age-matched controls.⁸⁰ At least in females, this could be explained by an altered balance in the systemic levels of hormones such as estrogen and testosterone. Culture-expanded MSCs from OP patients have been shown to possess lower proliferative and osteogenic capacities⁸¹ (i.e., to exhibit distinctive marks of premature in vitro aging) compared to healthy individuals. Recent evidence suggests that this could be due to the overexpression of osteogenic inhibitors in OP MSCs.⁸² A recent study by Zhou et al. has identified a number of differentially expressed genes that are up- or downregulated in OP MSCs, which could not only be used as a biomarker for OP,⁸³ but also serve as potential targets for therapeutic modulation to rejuvenate OP MSCs. MSCs extracted from the areas of subchondral bone damage in hip OA patients also appear to acquire several abnormalities indicative of premature aging (e.g., reduced in vitro proliferative and mineralization capacities).⁸⁴ It remains to be investigated whether putative accelerated aging of OP and OA MSCs in vitro is reflective of their accelerated aging in vivo. However, as mentioned in the above sections, OP MSCs may indeed reside in a considerably modified in vivo niche that is markedly enriched in marrow fat.⁵³ Changes in marrow adiposity and an increased cellular necrosis have also been detected in the affected areas of OA subchondral bone.⁸⁵ This suggests that targeting putative in vivo aging in OP and OA MSCs may be performed indirectly, by targeting their in vivo niches (Table 1).

Table 1.

Abnormalities in MSCs or Their In Vivo Niches as Potential Targets for OP and OA MSC Rejuvenation.

Abnormality	Intrinsic/Environmental	OP	OA
MSC number	Intrinsic	Reduced⁸⁰	Unbalanced in damaged areas^84,86
Signaling pathways in MSC	Intrinsic	Reduced osteogenesis due to overexpression of osteogenic inhibitors⁸²	Abnormal homing due to altered TGFβ signaling⁸⁶ and chemokine receptor expression⁸⁴
MSC niche: ECM	Environmental	Increased BM adiposity⁵³	Increased BM adiposity⁸⁵ Increased levels of free TGFβ⁸⁶
MSC niche: Neighboring cells	Environmental	Accelerated osteoclast activation⁵ ³	Increased numbers of osteoclasts in damaged areas⁸⁶

Note. BM = bone marrow; ECM = extracellular matrix; MSC = mesenchymal stromal cells; OA = osteoarthritis; OP = osteoporosis; TGFβ = transforming growth factor β.

Abdallah et al. tested the impact of serum from young (20–30 years old) and old (70–84 years old) donors on MSC differentiation and proliferation and found a significant decline in osteogenic differentiation potential of MSCs grown in serum from old donors.⁸⁷ This suggests the existence of, yet unknown, factors in the serum or plasma from “younger” donors that could potentially be used systemically to reduce the rate of in vivo aging of MSCs, including OP MSCs. Similarly, Sun et al. cultured MSCs from young and old mice on plastic, young extracellular matrix (ECM) and old ECM and have shown that the number and quality of MSCs from old mice could be improved when cultured on young ECM.⁸⁸ In vivo ECM modulation could thus be another strategy to rescue or rejuvenate MSCs in OP and possibly, OA.

The “mechanistic target of rapamycin” (mTOR) is a serine/threonine protein kinase of the phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase (PI3K) family, which regulates cell growth, metabolism, and functions in two complexes—mTOR complex 1 and mTOR complex 2. This pathway has been the target of wide interest ever since it was discovered, and it has been suggested that inhibition of this pathway could extend the life span of rodents.⁸⁹ The role of rapamycin in the differentiation of MSCs or their progenitors has also been studied, but to date, the results are controversial,⁹⁰ suggesting that the drug can either encourage⁹¹ or discourage⁹² osteogenic differentiation of MSCs. This implies the need for further exploring this pathway and related molecules to understand their function in MSC aging and their possibility to rejuvenate aged MSCs.

Sirtuins (SIRT) genes have similarly proved to be of significant importance in regulating aging.⁹³ Simic et al. performed experiments on mice with MSC specific sirtuin 1 (Sirt-1) knock out gene and found that Sirt-1 regulates the MSC differentiation by the deacetylation of β-catenin.⁹⁴ This suggests that targeting this gene using gene therapy can be used for halting or reversing aging of MSCs. However, further studies are required to understand the connecting links between the SIRT genes and this signaling cascade to ultimately apply this approach for preventing aging of MSCs in vivo and in diseases such as OP and OA.

Conclusions and Future Directions

Currently, our understanding of MSC aging in vitro considerably surpasses our understanding of MSC aging in vivo. In order to move forward in the study of human MSC aging in vivo, an ability to isolate a pure population of uncultured MSCs represents an initial and critical step. Up to now, a broad consensus on the combination of markers to purify human BM-MSCs does not exist, although markers such as CD271 and MSCA-1,¹² possibly in combination with CD140a,²⁷ appear to be the most promising.

Methods currently used for the detection of aging in cultured MSCs could, in principle, be used for the study of aging of uncultured MSCs, although these need to be adapted to be used with very low numbers of cells as BM-MSCs are very rare in vivo. Research based on molecules like prelamin and lipofuscin, which can be⁶⁵ detected at the later stages of MSC culture in vitro, is a promising approach for identifying “aged” and senescent MSCs in vivo.^39,95 It will be interesting to investigate the change of size of BM-MSCs with aging in vivo and compare it to the acknowledged change of size in vitro ⁴⁰ to possibly use cell size as an indicator of MSC aging in vivo. Churchman et al. have demonstrated a decline in the expression of molecules like connexin 43 in uncultured human BM-MSCs in older donors using quantitative polymerase chain reaction,⁹⁶ suggesting that it, and similar surface molecules, could be considered further as potential indicators of aged MSCs in vivo.

The ability to identify MSCs in situ and extract them less invasively from their native niches would then lead to a better understanding of their local environments, which could then be reconstructed and modeled using 3-dimensional (3-D) “organ” cultures. These organoids could then be used for developing and screening new rejuvenation compounds to target OP and OA MSCs in 3-D environments most closely resembling their native niches.

These approaches should lead to a better understanding of MSC aging in vivo. Considering that MSCs form an integral part of the musculoskeletal system and that OP and OA have been associated with aging,^1,3 prevention of MSC aging in vivo could lead to novel therapies to target altered bone formation in OP and OA.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Payal Ganguly is a recipient of PhD scholarship from Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine. Jehan J. El-Jawhari is supported by Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) foundation grant. Agata N. Burska’s source of funding is Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI)-funded project BeTheCure, 115142-2.

References

Albright

Smith

Richardson

. Postmenopausal osteoporosis: its clinical features. JAMA. 1941;116(22):2465–2474.

Riggs

Khosla

Melton

. A unitary model for involutional osteoporosis: estrogen deficiency causes both type I and type II osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and contributes to bone loss in aging men. J Bone Miner Res. 1998;13(5):763–773.

Johnson

Hunter

. The epidemiology of osteoarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2014;28(1):5–15.

Loeser

Collins

Diekman

. Ageing and the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Nature Rev Rheumatol. 2016;12(7):412–420.

Goldring

. Changes in the osteochondral unit during osteoarthritis: structure, function and cartilage-bone crosstalk. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2016;12(11):632–644.

Castañeda

Roman-Blas

Largo

Herrero-Beaumont

. Subchondral bone as a key target for osteoarthritis treatment. Biochem Pharmacol. 2012;83(3):315–323.

Bethel

Chitteti

Srour

Kacena

. The changing balance between osteoblastogenesis and adipogenesis in aging and its impact on hematopoiesis. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2013;11(2):99–106.

Mueller

Glowacki

. Age-related decline in the osteogenic potential of human bone marrow cells cultured in three-dimensional collagen sponges. J Cell Biochem. 2001;82(4):583–590.

Liu

Xia

. Mesenchymal stem cell aging: mechanisms and influences on skeletal and non-skeletal tissues. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2015;240(8):1099–1106.

10.

Kim

Choi

Kim

Park

Suh

. Age-related alterations in mesenchymal stem cells related to shift in differentiation from osteogenic to adipogenic potential: implication to age-associated bone diseases and defects. Mech Ageing Dev. 2012;133(5):215–225.

11.

Khan

Mafi

Khan

. The effects of ageing on differentiation and characterisation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2016;11.

12.

Boxall

Jones

. Markers for characterization of bone marrow multipotential stromal cells. Stem Cells Int. 2012;2012:975871.

13.

Wang

Zhou

Xie

Zhao

Liu

. Research progress on aging mechanisms. Adv Aging Res. 2016;5(02):49.

14.

Medawar

. An Unsolved Problem of Biology. London, UK: H.K. Lewis and Company, 1952.

15.

Schultz

Sinclair

. When stem cells grow old: phenotypes and mechanisms of stem cell aging. Development. 2016;143(1):3–14.

16.

Wagner

Zenke

. Different facets of aging in human mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2010;16(4):445–453.

17.

Harman

. Aging: a theory based on free radical and radiation chemistry. J Gerontol. 1956;11(3):298–300.

18.

Fukada

S-i

Uezumi

. Adult stem cell and mesenchymal progenitor theories of aging. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2014;2:10.

19.

Song

Cha

Song

Kim

Chang

Lim

Choi

Ham

Lee

Chung

. Reactive oxygen species inhibit adhesion of mesenchymal stem cells implanted into ischemic myocardium via interference of focal adhesion complex. Stem Cells. 2010;28(3):555–563.

20.

Kanda

Hinata

Kang

Watanabe

. Reactive oxygen species mediate adipocyte differentiation in mesenchymal stem cells. Life Sci. 2011;89(7):250–258.

21.

Baxter

Wynn

Jowitt

Wraith

Fairbairn

Bellantuono

. Study of telomere length reveals rapid aging of human marrow stromal cells following in vitro expansion. Stem Cells. 2004;22(5):675–682.

22.

Lapham

Kvale

Lin

Connell

Croen

Dispensa

Fang

Hesselson

Hoffmann

Iribarren

. Automated assay of telomere length measurement and informatics for 100,000 subjects in the genetic epidemiology research on adult health and aging (GERA) cohort. Genetics. 2015;200(4):1061–1072.

23.

Bonab

Alimoghaddam

Talebian

Ghaffari

Ghavamzadeh

Nikbin

. Aging of mesenchymal stem cell in vitro. BMC Cell Biol. 2006;7(1):1.

24.

López-Otín

Blasco

Partridge

Serrano

Kroemer

. The hallmarks of aging. Cell. 2013;153(6):1194–1217.

25.

Lee

Wagers

. Stem cell aging: mechanisms, regulators and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Med. 2014;20(8):870–880.

26.

Jones

Rando

. Emerging models and paradigms for stem cell ageing. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13(5):506–512.

27.

Ghazanfari

Zacharaki

Lim

Scheding

. Human non-hematopoietic CD271pos/CD140alow/neg bone marrow stroma cells fulfill stringent stem cell criteria in serial transplantations. Stem Cells Dev. 2016;25(21):1652–1658.

28.

García-Prat

Muñoz-Cánoves

. Aging, metabolism and stem cells: spotlight on muscle stem cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2017;445:109–117.

29.

Stenderup

Justesen

Clausen

Kassem

. Aging is associated with decreased maximal life span and accelerated senescence of bone marrow stromal cells. Bone. 2003;33(6):919–926.

30.

DiGirolamo

Stokes

Colter

Phinney

Class

Prockop

. Propagation and senescence of human marrow stromal cells in culture: a simple colony-forming assay identifies samples with the greatest potential to propagate and differentiate. Br J of Haematol. 1999;107(2):275–281.

31.

Stolzing

Jones

McGonagle

Scutt

. Age-related changes in human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells: consequences for cell therapies. Mech Ageing Dev. 2008;129(3):163–173.

32.

Vacanti

Kong

Suzuki

Sato

Canty

Lee

. Phenotypic changes of adult porcine mesenchymal stem cells induced by prolonged passaging in culture. J Cell Physiol. 2005;205(2):194–201.

33.

Yao

Huang

Gao

Xie

Liu

. Age-associated changes in regenerative capabilities of mesenchymal stem cell: impact on chronic wounds repair. Int Wound J. 2015; 13(6):1252–1259.

34.

Broxmeyer

O’Leary

Huang

Mantel

. The importance of hypoxia and extra physiologic oxygen shock/stress for collection and processing of stem and progenitor cells to understand true physiology/pathology of these cells ex-vivo. Curr Opin Hematol. 2015;22(4):273.

35.

Pattappa

Thorpe

Jegard

Heywood

de Bruijn

Lee

. Continuous and uninterrupted oxygen tension influences the colony formation and oxidative metabolism of human mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2012;19(1):68–79.

36.

Duscher

Rennert

Januszyk

Anghel

Maan

Whittam

Perez

Kosaraju

Walmsley

. Aging disrupts cell subpopulation dynamics and diminishes the function of mesenchymal stem cells. Sci Rep. 2014;4:7144.

37.

Peffers

Collins

Fang

Goljanek-Whysall

Rushton

Loughlin

Proctor

Clegg

. Age-related changes in mesenchymal stem cells identified using a multi-omics approach. Eur Cell Mater. 2016;31:136–159.

38.

Justesen

Stenderup

Eriksen

Kassem

. Maintenance of osteoblastic and adipocytic differentiation potential with age and osteoporosis in human marrow stromal cell cultures. Calcif Tissue Int. 2002;71(1):36–44.

39.

Wagner

Horn

Castoldi

Diehlmann

Bork

Saffrich

Benes

Blake

Pfister

Eckstein

. Replicative senescence of mesenchymal stem cells: a continuous and organized process. PLoS One. 2008;3(5):e2213.

40.

Mauney

Kaplan

Volloch

. Matrix-mediated retention of osteogenic differentiation potential by human adult bone marrow stromal cells during ex vivo expansion. Biomaterials. 2004;25(16):3233–3243.

41.

Kassem

Ankersen

Eriksen

Clark

Rattan

. Demonstration of cellular aging and senescence in serially passaged long-term cultures of human trabecular osteoblasts. Osteoporosis Int. 1997;7(6):514–524.

42.

Sethe

Scutt

Stolzing

. Aging of mesenchymal stem cells. Ageing Res Rev. 2006;5(1):91–116.

43.

Siegel

Kluba

Hermanutz-Klein

Bieback

Northoff

Schäfer

. Phenotype, donor age and gender affect function of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells. BMC Med. 2013;11:146.

44.

Jones

English

Churchman

Kouroupis

Boxall

Kinsey

Giannoudis

Emery

McGonagle

. Large-scale extraction and characterization of CD271+ multipotential stromal cells from trabecular bone in health and osteoarthritis: implications for bone regeneration strategies based on uncultured or minimally cultured multipotential stromal cells. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(7):1944–1954.

45.

Tormin

Brune

Olsson

Valcich

Neuman

Olofsson

Jacobsen

S-E

Scheding

. Characterization of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) based on gene expression profiling of functionally defined MSC subsets. Cytotherapy. 2009;11(2):114–128.

46.

Bork

Pfister

Witt

Horn

Korn

Wagner

. DNA methylation pattern changes upon long-term culture and aging of human mesenchymal stromal cells. Aging Cell. 2010;9(1):54–63.

47.

Bellantuono

Aldahmash

Kassem

. Aging of marrow stromal (skeletal) stem cells and their contribution to age-related bone loss. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1792(4):364–370.

48.

Baker

Boyette

Tuan

. Characterization of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in aging. Bone. 2015;70:37–47.

49.

García-Prat

Sousa-Victor

Muñoz-Cánoves

. Functional dysregulation of stem cells during aging: a focus on skeletal muscle stem cells. FEBS J. 2013;280(17):4051–4062.

50.

Wagner

Bork

Horn

Krunic

Walenda

Diehlmann

Benes

Blake

Huber

Eckstein

. Aging and replicative senescence have related effects on human stem and progenitor cells. PloS One. 2009;4(6):e5846.

51.

Muschler

Boehm

Easley

. Aspiration to obtain osteoblast progenitor cells from human bone marrow: the influence of aspiration volume. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(11):1699–1709.

52.

Cuthbert

Boxall

Tan

Giannoudis

McGonagle

Jones

. Single-platform quality control assay to quantify multipotential stromal cells in bone marrow aspirates prior to bulk manufacture or direct therapeutic use. Cytotherapy. 2012;14(4):431–440.

53.

Rosen

Bouxsein

. Mechanisms of disease: is osteoporosis the obesity of bone? Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2006;2(1):35–43.

54.

You

Pan

Chen

. MiR-27a is essential for the shift from osteogenic differentiation to adipogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2016;39(1):253–265.

55.

Zhou

Greenberger

Epperly

Goff

Adler

LeBoff

Glowacki

. Age-related intrinsic changes in human bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and their differentiation to osteoblasts. Aging Cell. 2008;7(3):335–343.

56.

Bieback

Hecker

Kocaömer

Lannert

Schallmoser

Strunk

Klüter

. Human alternatives to fetal bovine serum for the expansion of mesenchymal stromal cells from bone marrow. Stem Cells. 2009;27(9):2331–2341.

57.

Ishikawa

Gonzalez-Nieto

Ghiaur

Dunn

Ficker

Murali

Madhu

Gutstein

Fishman

Barrio

. Connexin-43 prevents hematopoietic stem cell senescence through transfer of reactive oxygen species to bone marrow stromal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109(23):9071–9076.

58.

Gronthos

Zannettino

Hay

Shi

Graves

Kortesidis

Simmons

. Molecular and cellular characterisation of highly purified stromal stem cells derived from human bone marrow. J Cell Sci. 2003;116(9):1827–1835.

59.

Manolagas

Parfitt

. What old means to bone. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2010;21(6):369–374.

60.

Einhorn

. The science of fracture healing. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19(10):S4–S6.

61.

Philippart

Meuleman

Stamatopoulos

Najar

Pieters

De Bruyn

Bron

Lagneaux

. In vivo production of mesenchymal stromal cells after injection of autologous platelet-rich plasma activated by recombinant human soluble tissue factor in the bone marrow of healthy volunteers. Tissue Eng Part A. 2013;20(1–2):160–170.

62.

Tan

Giannoudis

Boxall

McGonagle

Jones

. The systemic influence of platelet-derived growth factors on bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in fracture patients. BMC Med. 2015;13:6.

63.

Zhang

Niu

Huang

Tong

Ross

Haug

Johnson

Feng

. Identification of the haematopoietic stem cell niche and control of the niche size. Nature. 2003;425(6960):836–841.

64.

Tormin

Brune

Walsh

Schütz

Ehinger

Ditzel

Kassem

Scheding

. CD146 expression on primary nonhematopoietic bone marrow stem cells is correlated with in situ localization. Blood. 2011;117(19):5067–5077.

65.

Jones

McGonagle

. Human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in vivo. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008;47(2):126–131.

66.

Suda

Takubo

Semenza

. Metabolic regulation of hematopoietic stem cells in the hypoxic niche. Cell Stem Cell. 2011;9(4):298–310.

67.

Spencer

Ferraro

Roussakis

Klein

Runnels

Zaher

Mortensen

Alt

Turcotte

. Direct measurement of local oxygen concentration in the bone marrow of live animals. Nature. 2014;508(7495):269.

68.

Geißler

Textor

Kühnisch

Könnig

Klein

Ode

Pfitzner

Adjaye

Kasper

Duda

. Functional comparison of chronological and in vitro aging: differential role of the cytoskeleton and mitochondria in mesenchymal stromal cells. PLoS One 2012;7(12):e52700.

69.

Riggs

Khosla

Melton

III . Sex steroids and the construction and conservation of the adult skeleton. Endocr Rev. 2002;23(3):279–302.

70.

Jia

O’brien

Stewart

Manolagas

Weinstein

. Glucocorticoids act directly on osteoclasts to increase their life span and reduce bone density. Endocrinology. 2006;147(12):5592–5599.

71.

Zhao

Gao

Mei

Wang

. Differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells: the potential mechanism for estrogen-induced preferential osteoblast versus adipocyte differentiation. American J Med Sci. 2011;341(6):460–468.

72.

Corotchi

Popa

Simionescu

. Testosterone stimulates proliferation and preserves stemness of human adult mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial progenitor cells. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2016;57(1):75–80.

73.

Muschler

Nitto

Boehm

Easley

. Age-and gender-related changes in the cellularity of human bone marrow and the prevalence of osteoblastic progenitors. J Orthop Res. 2001;19(1):117–125.

74.

Canalis

Mazziotti

Giustina

Bilezikian

. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: pathophysiology and therapy. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18(10):1319–1328.

75.

Cooper

Hardy

. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis—a disorder of mesenchymal stromal cells? Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2011;2:24.

76.

Seck

Scheppach

Scharla

Diel

Blum

Bismar

Schmid

Krempien

Ziegler

Pfeilschifter

. Concentration of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and-II in iliac crest bone matrix from pre-and postmenopausal women: relationship to age, menopause, bone turnover, bone volume, and circulating IGFs 1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83(7):2331–2337.

77.

Xian

Pang

Lou

Rosen

Qiu

Crane

Frassica

Zhang

Rodriguez

. Matrix IGF-1 maintains bone mass by activation of mTOR in mesenchymal stem cells. Nat Med. 2012;18(7):1095–1101.

78.

Tang

Koh

Jiang

Schwarz

. CD137 ligand reverse signaling skews hematopoiesis towards myelopoiesis during aging. Aging (Albany NY). 2013;5(9):643–652.

79.

Stubbs

Hsiao

STF

Peshavariya

Lim

Dusting

Dilley

. Hypoxic preconditioning enhances survival of human adipose-derived stem cells and conditions endothelial cells in vitro. Stem Cells Dev. 2011;21(11):1887–1896.

80.

Oreffo

Bord

Triffitt

. Skeletal progenitor cells and ageing human populations. Clin Sci (Lond). 1998;94(5):549–555.

81.

Rodríguez

Garat

Gajardo

Pino

Seitz

. Abnormal osteogenesis in osteoporotic patients is reflected by altered mesenchymal stem cells dynamics. J Cell Biochem. 1999;75(3):414–423.

82.

Benisch

Schilling

Klein-Hitpass

Frey

Seefried

Raaijmakers

Krug

Regensburger

Zeck

Schinke

. The transcriptional profile of mesenchymal stem cell populations in primary osteoporosis is distinct and shows overexpression of osteogenic inhibitors. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45142.

83.

Zhou

Gao

Liu

Tao

. Comprehensive transcriptome analysis of mesenchymal stem cells in elderly patients with osteoporosis. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2015;27(5):595–601.

84.

Campbell

Churchman

Gomez

McGonagle

Conaghan

Ponchel

Jones

. Mesenchymal stem cell alterations in bone marrow lesions in hip osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(7):1648–1659.

85.

Zanetti

Bruder

Romero

Hodler

. Bone marrow edema pattern in osteoarthritic knees: correlation between MR imaging and histologic findings. Radiology. 2000;215(3):835–840.

86.

Zhen

Wen

Jia

Crane

Mears

Askin

Frassica

Chang

Yao

. Inhibition of TGF-β signaling in mesenchymal stem cells of subchondral bone attenuates osteoarthritis. Nat Med. 2013;19(6):704–712.

87.

Abdallah

Haack-Sørensen

Fink

Kassem

. Inhibition of osteoblast differentiation but not adipocyte differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by sera obtained from aged females. Bone. 2006;39(1):181–188.

88.

Sun

Chen

Ling

Ran

Jilka

Chen

. Rescuing replication and osteogenesis of aged mesenchymal stem cells by exposure to a young extracellular matrix. FASEB J. 2011;25(5):1474–1485.

89.

Johnson

Rabinovitch

Kaeberlein

. mTOR is a key modulator of ageing and age-related disease. Nature. 2013;493(7432):338–345.

90.

Xiang

Zhao

Zhang

. mTOR and the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2011;43(7):501–510.

91.

Lee

Yook

Son

Kim

Koo

Han

Cho

. Rapamycin promotes the osteoblastic differentiation of human embryonic stem cells by blocking the mTOR pathway and stimulating the BMP/Smad pathway. Stem Cells Dev. 2010;19(4):557–568.

92.

Singha

Jiang

Luo

Zhang

Xiao

. Rapamycin inhibits osteoblast proliferation and differentiation in MC3T3-E1 cells and primary mouse bone marrow stromal cells. J Cell Biochem. 2008;103(2):434–446.

93.

Haigis

Guarente

. Mammalian sirtuins—emerging roles in physiology, aging, and calorie restriction. Genes Dev. 2006;20(21):2913–2921.

94.

Simic

Zainabadi

Bell

Sykes

Saez

Lotinun

Baron

Scadden

Schipani

Guarente

. SIRT1 regulates differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by deacetylating β-catenin. EMBO Mol Med. 2013;5(3):430–440.

95.

Bellotti

Capanni

Lattanzi

Donati

Lucarelli

Duchi

. Detection of mesenchymal stem cells senescence by prelamin A accumulation at the nuclear level. Springerplus. 2016;5(1):1427.

96.

Churchman

Ponchel

Boxall

Cuthbert

Kouroupis

Roshdy

Giannoudis

Emery

McGonagle

Jones

. Transcriptional profile of native CD271+ multipotential stromal cells: evidence for multiple fates, with prominent osteogenic and Wnt pathway signaling activity. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(8):2632–2643.

Age-related Changes in Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stromal Cells

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

General Theories of Aging

In Vitro MSC Aging

Passage Dependent

Donor Age Dependent

Methods to Track MSC Aging in Culture

In Vivo MSC Aging

Intrinsic Factors: Proliferation Burden

Environmental Factors: Stem Cell Niche

Environmental Factors: Effect of Hormones and GFs

Environmental Factors: The Cross Talk with Other BM Cells

Rejuvenation of OP and OA MSCs

Conclusions and Future Directions

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

References