Early conceptions of the public understanding of science suffered from a narrow framing of what science means and a presumption that science is divided from its publics by walls of ignorance and indifference. Those assumptions amplified misunderstanding and led to faulty policies. It is time to reopen each element in the term “public understanding of science” to renewed reflection. This journal can advance that goal by encouraging research on actual rather than imagined public responses to science, on representations of science in the public sphere, and on interactions between science, technology and society.
BodmerWWilkinsJ (1992) Research to improve public understanding programmes. Public Understanding of Science1(1): 7–9.
2.
CallonMLascoumesPBartheY (2009) Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
CorburnJ (2005) Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
De VriesG (2007) What is political in sub-politics? How Aristotle might help STS. Social Studies of Science37(5): 781–809.
5.
EpsteinS (1996) Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
JasanoffS (1995) Science at the Bar: Law, Science and Technology in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
JasanoffS (1997) Civilization and madness: The great BSE scare of 1996. Public Understanding of Science6(3): 221–232.
8.
JasanoffS (2005) Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
JasanoffS (2007) Making order: Law and science in action. In: HackettEAmsterdamskaOLynchMWajcmanJ (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd edn.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 761–786.
10.
JasanoffS (2011) The politics of public reason. In: Dominguez RubioFBaertP (eds) The Politics of Knowledge. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 25–30.
11.
LatourB (2007) Turning around politics: A note on Gerard de Vries’ paper. Social Studies of Science37(5): 811–820.
12.
LeachMFairheadJ (2007) Vaccine Anxieties: Global Science, Child Health and Society. London: Earthscan.
13.
MarrisCWynneBSimmonsPWeldonS (2001) Public Perceptions of Agricultural Biotechnologies in Europe. Final report of the PABE research project. Lancaster, UK: Lancaster University.
14.
National Science Foundation (NSF) (2012) Science and technology: Public attitudes and understanding. In:Science and Engineering Indicators 2012. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, Chapter 7. Available at: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind12/c7/c7h.htm
OreskesNConwayEM (2009) Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
17.
OverbyeD (2012) Physicists find elusive particle seen as key to the universe. New York Times, July4.
18.
PinkerS (2013) Science is not your enemy. New Republic, August6.
19.
SternPCFinebergHV (eds) (1996) Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
20.
WynneB (1996) Misunderstood misunderstandings: Social identities and the public uptake of science. In: IrwinAWynneB (eds) Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–46.
