Prior research demonstrates that students and some teachers often depict scientists as socially inept workaholic males; however, scholars rarely examine representative samples of adults. How the US general public stereotypes scientists may influence accepting science expertise because its practitioners can appear so eccentric. By expressing negative stereotypes, “typical adults” also can discourage youthful interests in science. This study analyzes general public interview data using identical questions from the 1983 and 2001 National Science Foundation Surveys of Public Understanding of Science and Technology, probability samples of 3219 adults. Despite many positive changes over nearly 20 years, and strong approval of a child’s potential science career, sizable minorities of adults continued to negatively stereotype scientists. Women were more positive than men but had considered a science career less often. Images of scientists also were affected by age, educational variables, parental status, and a religiosity measure.
Andre, T., Whigham, M., Hendrickson, A. and Chambers, S. ( 1999) "Competency Beliefs, Positive Affect, and Gender Stereotypes of Elementary Students and their Parents about Science versus Other School Subjects,"Journal of Research in Science Teaching36(6): 719-47.
2.
Barman, C. ( 1999) "Students’ Views about Scientists and School Science: Engaging K-8 Teachers in a National Study," Journal of Science Teacher Education10(1): 43-54.
3.
Beardslee, D.C. and O’Dowd, D.D. ( 1961) "The College-Student Image of the Scientist," Science133(3457): 997-1001.
4.
Bianchini, J.A., Cavazos, L.M. and Helms, J.V. ( 2000) "From Professional Lives to Inclusive Practice: Science Teachers and Scientists’ Views of Gender and Ethnicity in Science Education ," Journal of Research in Science Teaching37(6): 511-47.
5.
Brush, L. ( 1979) "Avoidance of Science and Stereotypes of Scientists," Journal of Research in Science Teaching16(3): 237-41.
6.
Burris, J. ( 2006) Testimony offered to the Research Subcommittee of the Committee on Science of the US House of Representatives Hearing on "Undergraduate Science, Math & Engineering Education: What’s Working?" 15 March.
7.
DeLamater, J.D. and Myers, D.J. ( 2007) Social Psychology, 6th edn. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
8.
Eisenhart, M. and Finkel, E. ( 1998) Women’s Science: Learning and Succeeding from the Margins. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
Etzkowitz, H., Kemelgor, C., Neuschatz, M. and Uzzi, B. ( 1992) "Athena Unbound: Barriers to Women in Academic Science and Engineering," Science and Public Policy19(3): 157-79.
10.
Evans, W. ( 1996) "Science and Reason in Film and Television," Skeptical Inquirer20(1): 45-8, 58.
11.
Eve, R. and Harrold, F. ( 1994) "Who are the Creationists? An Examination of a Conservative Christian Social Movement in International Perspective," Population Review38: 65-76.
12.
Finson, K.D. ( 2002) "Drawing a Scientist: What We Do and Do Not Know after Fifty Years of Drawings," School Science and Mathematics107(7): 335-45.
13.
Flicker, E. ( 2003) "Between Brains and Breasts-Women Scientists in Fiction Film: On the Marginalization and Sexualization of Scientific Competence," Public Understanding of Science12: 307-18.
14.
Ford, D.J. ( 2006) "Representations of Science within Children’s Trade Books," Journal of Research in Science Teaching43: 214-35.
15.
Fort, D.C. and Varney, H.L. ( 1989) "How Students See Scientists: Mostly Male, Mostly White, and Mostly Benevolent,"Science and Children26(8): 8-13.
16.
Fox, M.F. ( 2000) "Organizational Environments and Doctoral Degrees Awarded to Women in Science and Engineering Departments,"Women’s Studies Quarterly28 (Spring/Summer): 47-61.
17.
Fraser, B.J. ( 1981) TOSRA: Test of Science-related Attitudes. Hawthorn, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research Limited.
18.
Funk, C. ( 2003) "VCU Life Sciences Survey: Public Values Science but Concerned about Biotechnology" URL: http://www.vcu.edu/lifesci/images2/PublicValues.pdf (accessed 3 May 2008).
19.
Gates, B. ( 2005) High Schools for the New Millennium: Imagine the Possibilities . URL: http://www.gatesfoundation.org/nr/Downloads/ed/EdWhitePaper.pdf (accessed 3 May 2008).
20.
Gerbner, G. ( 1987) "Science on Television: How it Affects Public Conceptions ," Issues in Science and Technology3: 109-15.
21.
Gerbner, G. and Linson, B. ( 1999) Images of Scientists in Prime Time Television: A Report for the U.S. Department of Commerce.
22.
Hagerty, W.W. ( 1964) "Students’ Images of Scientists and Engineers," Bioscience14(3): 20-3.
23.
Harding, S. ( 1991) Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
24.
Harris Interactive (2007) "Firefighters, Scientists and Teachers Top List as ‘Most Prestigious Occupations’ ," 1 August. URL: http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=793 (accessed 3 May 2008).
25.
Harvard Crimson ( 2005) "Full Transcript: President Summers’ Remarks at the National Bureau of Economic Research, Jan. 14 2005" URL: http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=505844 (accessed 11 February 2008).
26.
Helford, E.R. (ed.) (2000) Fantasy Girls: Gender in the New Universe of Science Fiction and Fantasy Television . New York: Rowman and Littlefield .
27.
Hornig, S. ( 1992) "Gender Differences in Responses to News about Science and Technology," Science, Technology, and Human Values17(4): 532-42.
28.
LaFollette, M.C. ( 1988) "Eyes on the Stars: Images of Women Scientists in Popular Magazines," Science, Technology, and Human Values13(3-4): 262-75.
29.
LaFollette, M.C. ( 1992) Stealing into Print: Fraud, Plagiarism, and Misconduct in Scientific Publishing. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
30.
Lemonick, M., Keegan, R.W. and Ybarra, I. ( 2006) "Is America Flunking Science?," Time 13 February, pp. 23-33. McDuffie, T.E., Jr. (2001) "Scientists-Geeks and Nerds? Dispelling Teachers’ Stereotypes of Scientists,"Science and Children38 (May): 16-19.
31.
Miller, J.D. ( 2007) "The Sources and Impact of Civic Scientific Literacy," Paper presented at the International Indicators of Science and the Public Workshop, the Royal Society of London, London , 6 November.
32.
National Science Board (2008) " Science and Technology: Public Attitudes and Understanding," in Science and Engineering Indicators: 2008, Vol. 1, Chapter 7 (NSB 08-01). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
33.
Schibeci, R. ( 2006) "Student Images of Scientists: What Are They? Do They Matter?," Teaching Science52(2): 12-16.
34.
Schneider, B., Carnoy, M., Kilpatrick, J., Schmidt, W.H. and Shavelson, R.J. ( 2007) Estimating Causal Effects: Using Experimental and Observational Designs. Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.
35.
Terzian, S.G. and Grunzke, A.L. ( 2007) "Scrambled Eggheads: Ambivalent Representations of Scientists in Six Hollywood Film Comedies from 1961 to 1965," Public Understanding of Science16(2): 407-19.
36.
US Bureau of the Census (2000) Statistical Abstract of the United States, 119th edn. Washington DC: Government Printing Office.
37.
US Bureau of the Census (2007) Statistical Abstract of the United States, 126th edn. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
38.
US Department of Education (2007) The Condition of Education, 2007 (NCES 2007-064). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
